Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Федорова_МУ по академическому письму

.pdf
Скачиваний:
41
Добавлен:
30.03.2015
Размер:
489.55 Кб
Скачать

f. The aim of this [section] is to generalize beyond the data and ___.

In modern usage, data can also be treated as a mass / uncountable noun, like information. Before you submit your work, check whether the institution you’re writing for / on behalf of prefers data + plural verb.

Debate (спор)

a.[X] has fostered debate on ___. (fostered = encouraged)

b.There has been an inconclusive debate about whether ___.

c.The question of whether ___ has caused much debate in [our profession] [over the years].

d.(Much of) the current debate revolves around ___.

Discussion (обсуждение)

a.In this section / chapter, the discussion will point to ___.

b.The foregoing discussion implies that ___. (foregoing = that came be-

fore)

с. For the sake of discussion, I would like to argue that ___.

d.In this study, the question under discussion is ___.

e.In this paper, the discussion centers on ___.

f.[X] lies at the heart of the discussion on ___.

Evidence (доказательство)

a.The available evidence seems to suggest that ___ / point to ___.

b.On the basis of the evidence currently available, it seems fair to suggest

that ___.

c.There is overwhelming evidence corroborating the notion that ___. (corroborating = confirming)

d.Further evidence supporting / against [X] may lie in the findings of [Y], who

___.

e.These results provide confirmatory evidence that ___.

Ground (основа)

a.I will now summarize the ground covered in this [chapter] by ___.

b.On logical grounds, there is no compelling reason to argue that ___.

c.[X] takes a middle-ground position on [Y] and argues that ___.

d.On these grounds, we can argue that ___.

e.[X]ʼs views are grounded on the assumption that ___.

31

Issue (вопрос, проблема)

a.This study is an attempt to address the issue of ___.

b.In the present study, the issue under scrutiny is ___.

c.The issue of whether ___ is clouded by the fact that ___. (clouded = made less clear)

d.To portray the issue in [X]‘s terms, ___.

e.Given the centrality of this issue to [my claim], I will now ___.

f.This [chapter] is concerned with the issue of [how/whether/what] ___.

Literature (литература)

a.[X] is prominent in the literature on [Y].

b.There is a rapidly growing literature on [X], which indicates that ___.

c.The literature shows no consensus on [X], which means that ___.

d.The (current) literature on [X] abounds with examples of ___.

Premise (исходное условие, предпосылка)

a.The main theoretical premise behind [X] is that ___.

b.[X] and [Y] share an important premise: ___.

c.[X] is premised on the assumption that ___.

d.The basic premises of [X]ʼs theory / argument are ___.

e.The arguments against [X]ʼs premise rest on [four] assumptions: ___.

Research (исследование)

a.This study draws on research conducted by ___.

b.Although there has been relatively little research on / into [X], ___.

c.In the last [X] years, [educational] research has provided ample support for the assertion that ___.

d.Current research appears / seems to validate the view that ___.

e.Research on / into ___ does not support the view that ___.

f.Further research in this area may include ___ and ___.

g.Evidence for [X] is borne out by research that shows ___.

h.There is insufficient research on / into ___ to draw any firm conclusions about / on.

View (точка зрения, предположение)

a.The consensus view seems to be that ___.

b.[X] propounds the view that ___. (propound = put forward for consid-

eration)

32

c.Current research (does not) appear(s) to validate such a view.

d.There have been dissenters to the view that ___. (dissenter = someone who disagrees)

e.The answer to [X] / The difference between [X] and [Y] is not as clearcut as popular views might suggest.

f.The view that _____ is (very much) in line with [common sense].

g.I am not alone in my view that ___.

h.[X] puts forward the view that ___.

i.[X]ʼs views rest on the assumption that ___.

33

БИБЛИОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ СПИСОК

1.Завьялов, А.М. Формирование навыков академического письма

впроцессе преподавания математики / А.М. Завьялов, М.А. Федорова // Актуальные вопросы преподавания математики в техническом вузе : материалы третьей межвуз. науч.-метод. конф. (Омск, 27–28 сентября 2013 г.) / [редкол.: А.Ю. Веснин, А.В. Горяга, В.Н. Степанов]. – Омск : Изд-во ОмГТУ, 2013. – С. 50–54.

2.Как написать и опубликовать статью в международном научном журнале: метод. рекомендации / сост.: И.В. Свидерская, В.А. Кратасюк. – Красноярск : Сиб. федер. ун-т, 2011. – 52 с.

3.Маркушевская, Л.П. Аннотирование и реферирование : метод. рекомендации для самостоятельной работы студентов / Л.П. Маркушевская, Ю.А. Цапаева. – СПб. : ГУ ИТМО, 2008. – 51 с.

4.Минакова, Т.В. Английский язык для аспирантов и соискателей : учеб. пособие / Т.В. Минакова. – Оренбург : ГОУ ОГУ, 2005. – 103 с.

5.Сосинский, А.Б. Как написать математическую статью поанглийски / А.Б. Сосинский. – М. : Изд-во «Факториал Пресс», 2000.– 112 с.

6.Федорова, М.А. Развитие научных коммуникаций в современном техническом университете : монография / М.А. Федорова. – Новосибирск : Изд-во СО РАН, 2014. – 172 с.

7.Шимановская, Л.А. Анализ типичных ошибок в аннотациях на английском языке к научным статьям по проблемам инженерной экологии / Л.А. Шимановская // Вестник Казанского технологического университета. – 2013. – Т. 16. – № 13. − С. 287–292.

8.Blum, Deborah and Mary Knudson, eds. A Field Guide for Science Writers: the Official Guide of the National Association of Science Writers. – New York : Oxford University Press, 1997.

9.Booth, Wayne. The Craft of Research / Wayne Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, Joseph M. Williams. – Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1995.

10.Briscoe, Mary Helen. Preparing Scientific Illustrations: a Guide to Better Posters, Presentations, and Publications / Mary Helen Briscoe. – 2nd edition. – New York : Springer Publications, 1996.

11.Council of Science Editors. Scientific Style and Format: the CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers. – 7th edition. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2006.

34

12.Day, Robert A. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper / Robert A Day. – 4th edition. – Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press, 1994.

13.Davis, M. Scientific Papers and Presentations / М. Davis. – Academic Press, 2004. – 384 p.

14.Krukiewicz-Gacek, A. English for mathematics / A. KrukiewiczGacek, A. Trzaska. – 3rd ed. – University of science and Technology press, Krakow, 2012. – 180 p.

15.Porush, David. A Short Guide to Writing about Science / David Porush. – New York : HarperCollins, 1995.

35

Редактор К. В. Муковоз

Компьютерная верстка А. Н. Кошелапова

Сводный темплан 2015 г.

Подписано в печать 30.01.15. Формат 60×841/16. Отпечатано на дупликаторе. Бумага офсетная. Усл. печ. л. 2,25. Уч.-изд. л. 2,25.

Тираж 50 экз. Заказ 73.

—————————————————

Издательство ОмГТУ. 644050, г. Омск, пр. Мира, 11; т. 23-02-12 Типография ОмГТУ

36