Экзамен зачет учебный год 2023 / SLC, Report on land registration. Vol 1
.pdfContents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
Part 5 |
Mapping |
|
|
Introduction |
|
5.1 |
44 |
The Base Map – the Ordnance Map |
5.5 |
45 |
|
Seabed |
|
5.12 |
47 |
Everything mapped once but not more than once |
5.13 |
47 |
|
No registration without mapping |
5.14 |
47 |
|
Tenements |
|
5.19 |
48 |
The "subjects within" formula |
5.24 |
49 |
|
Cadastral units should not overlap |
5.25 |
50 |
|
Section 19 agreements |
5.31 |
51 |
|
Water boundaries |
5.33 |
52 |
|
Rules for interpretation? |
5.36 |
53 |
|
Obligation to carry forward supplementary data? |
5.37 |
53 |
|
Red edging |
|
5.38 |
54 |
New developments and the OS Map |
5.39 |
54 |
|
Quality of deed plans |
5.40 |
55 |
|
Electronic conveyancing |
5.41 |
55 |
|
Discrepancies between deed plan boundaries and OS boundaries |
5.42 |
55 |
|
Three dimensions? |
5.43 |
56 |
|
Part 6 |
Common areas |
|
|
Introduction |
|
6.1 |
57 |
A common area should have its own title sheet (and cadastral unit) |
6.6 |
57 |
|
Shared plots |
|
6.7 |
58 |
Leases |
|
6.10 |
59 |
Common areas: the Keeper’s practice up to 2009 |
6.11 |
59 |
|
The PMP Plus decision |
6.13 |
60 |
|
Mapping the common area: the Keeper’s practice since 2009 |
6.14 |
60 |
|
No registration without mapping |
6.16 |
61 |
|
The problem that faces developers |
6.19 |
61 |
|
A scheme |
|
6.21 |
62 |
Stage 1: the opening of the provisional shared plot title sheet |
6.23 |
62 |
|
Stage 2: the progress of the development |
6.24 |
63 |
|
Stage 3: registration of the ascertainment deed |
6.25 |
63 |
|
Time limit |
|
6.26 |
63 |
Some comments on the scheme |
6.27 |
64 |
|
The offside goals rule |
6.34 |
65 |
ix
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
Part 7 |
Overring interests and off-register rights |
|
|
Introduction |
|
7.1 |
66 |
The current law |
7.3 |
66 |
|
The double function of the concept |
7.8 |
67 |
|
Critique |
|
7.9 |
68 |
The first function of the concept: our recommendation |
7.13 |
69 |
|
Which off-register rights should be capable of being noted? |
7.16 |
70 |
|
Mechanics of noting and the required evidential standard |
7.20 |
71 |
|
May and must |
|
7.23 |
72 |
Noting and rectification |
7.24 |
72 |
|
Effect of inclusion or omission |
7.26 |
72 |
|
A summary |
|
7.27 |
73 |
Information from the Register of Sasines |
7.29 |
73 |
|
Part 8 |
Extracts, data, fees, privacy |
|
|
The existing legislation as to information provision |
8.1 |
74 |
|
Only current title sheet data is available |
8.9 |
75 |
|
Should there be an obligation to provide past data? (i) the Title Sheet |
|
|
|
Record and Cadastral Map |
8.10 |
75 |
|
Should there be an obligation to provide past data? (ii) the Archive |
|
|
|
Record |
|
8.14 |
76 |
Paper and electronic extracts |
8.16 |
76 |
|
Should certificates of title be retained? |
8.17 |
77 |
|
Reports and other data |
8.18 |
77 |
|
P16 Reports (property definition reports) |
8.19 |
77 |
|
Official reports and independent reports |
8.20 |
78 |
|
Online access and other forms of access to registered data |
8.22 |
78 |
|
Regulation of data provision and fees |
8.23 |
78 |
|
Data protection |
8.24 |
79 |
|
Use of public sector information |
8.27 |
80 |
|
Part 9 |
Leases |
|
|
Introduction |
|
9.1 |
82 |
The current law, with historical background |
9.4 |
83 |
|
The disapplication of the 1449 Act to registrable leases |
9.8 |
83 |
|
How long should a long lease be? |
9.10 |
84 |
|
Noting of short leases |
9.11 |
84 |
|
The relationship of the 1857 Act to the land registration system |
9.12 |
84 |
x
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
Alterations to registered leases: (i) What can be registered? |
9.15 |
85 |
|
Alterations to registered leases: (ii) What is the effect of registration? |
9.21 |
86 |
|
Alterations to registered leases: (iii) What is the effect of non |
|
|
|
registration? |
|
9.24 |
87 |
Alterations to registered leases: conclusions and recommendations |
9.28 |
88 |
|
Registered leases and the guarantee of title |
9.31 |
89 |
|
Principal and subsidiary title sheets |
9.32 |
90 |
|
Other implications of the concept of plot registration |
9.36 |
91 |
|
Long leases granted by proprietors holding on a Sasine title |
9.42 |
94 |
|
Fishing and shooting leases |
9.45 |
95 |
|
Part 10 |
Servitudes and real burdens |
|
|
Introduction |
|
10.1 |
97 |
Servitudes: introduction |
10.2 |
97 |
|
Double noting of servitudes |
10.4 |
97 |
|
Extinction of servitudes |
10.6 |
98 |
|
Alleged prescriptive servitudes of way |
10.7 |
98 |
|
Real burdens: section 58 of the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act 2003 |
10.19 |
101 |
|
Part 11 |
How the Register is changed |
|
|
Introduction |
|
11.1 |
105 |
Registration |
|
11.3 |
105 |
Rectification |
|
11.5 |
106 |
Miscellaneous |
|
11.9 |
107 |
The registration/rectification overlap |
11.10 |
107 |
|
Part 12 |
Registration of transactions |
|
|
Introduction |
|
12.1 |
108 |
Meaning of “registration” |
12.2 |
108 |
|
Advance notices |
12.6 |
109 |
|
What can be registered? |
12.7 |
109 |
|
Effect of registration |
12.18 |
112 |
|
Ranking |
|
12.19 |
112 |
Date of receipt = date of application = date of registration |
12.23 |
113 |
|
The hour of registration |
12.27 |
114 |
|
Order in which applications are taken |
12.41 |
118 |
|
The criteria for acceptance: validity |
12.42 |
118 |
|
“Valid” |
|
12.52 |
120 |
xi
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
The criteria for acceptance: other matters |
12.56 |
121 |
|
Formalities of execution |
12.57 |
122 |
|
Evidence: (i) the evidential burden |
12.58 |
122 |
|
Evidence: (ii) the evidential standard |
12.59 |
123 |
|
The absence of a notarial system |
12.60 |
123 |
|
The “state of the legal universe at application date” principle |
12.61 |
124 |
|
The “one shot” principle |
12.71 |
126 |
|
Death and dissolution |
12.78 |
128 |
|
Souvenir plots |
|
12.82 |
128 |
Delays in registration |
12.86 |
129 |
|
Three special cases |
12.95 |
132 |
|
Wrongful rejection |
12.100 |
133 |
|
Duties owed to the Keeper |
12.101 |
133 |
|
Application forms |
12.110 |
136 |
|
Notification of the Keeper’s decision |
12.113 |
137 |
|
Keeper’s warranty (indemnity) |
12.119 |
138 |
|
Part 13 |
Effect of registration |
|
|
Introduction |
|
13.1 |
139 |
The 1979 Act: title flows from the Register |
13.2 |
139 |
|
Inaccuracies: actual and bijural |
13.7 |
140 |
|
Terminology |
|
13.9 |
141 |
A question of technique |
13.10 |
141 |
|
The problems of the Midas touch |
13.11 |
141 |
|
Subordinate real rights |
13.27 |
146 |
|
Evaluation of the Midas touch |
13.28 |
146 |
|
Section 3’s one-size-fits-all problem |
13.29 |
146 |
|
Recommendations |
13.34 |
148 |
|
Part 14 |
Advance notices |
|
|
Introduction |
|
14.1 |
149 |
Letters of obligation |
14.4 |
149 |
|
The alternative: advance notices |
14.5 |
150 |
|
The Reid Report and the Henry Report |
14.6 |
150 |
|
DP 130 and responses |
14.7 |
150 |
|
Subsequent developments |
14.8 |
151 |
|
Complexity |
|
14.12 |
152 |
Cost |
|
14.13 |
152 |
Optionality |
|
14.14 |
152 |
xii
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
|
Terminology |
|
14.15 |
152 |
|
Types of protectable transaction |
14.16 |
153 |
|
|
Should there be a time limit? |
14.17 |
153 |
|
|
If so, how long? |
14.18 |
153 |
|
|
Property still in the Register of Sasines? |
14.19 |
154 |
|
|
Must there already be a contract between the parties? |
14.20 |
154 |
|
|
Form |
|
14.21 |
154 |
|
Who should be able to grant an advance notice? |
14.22 |
155 |
|
|
Application Record – title sheet – Archive Record |
14.24 |
155 |
|
|
Would an advance notice freeze the register? |
14.25 |
156 |
|
|
Some relatively unproblematic situations |
14.26 |
156 |
|
|
The notice’s protective effect |
14.30 |
156 |
|
|
No inaccuracy arises |
14.34 |
157 |
|
|
More than one advance notice for same transaction |
14.35 |
158 |
|
|
A theoretical point |
14.36 |
158 |
|
|
Competing advance notices |
14.37 |
158 |
|
|
Competition between an advance notice and an application for |
|
|
|
|
registration |
|
14.38 |
158 |
|
Keeper's powers |
14.39 |
159 |
|
|
The Register of Inhibitions |
14.40 |
159 |
|
|
Sequestrations |
14.41 |
159 |
|
|
Trust deeds for behoof of creditors |
14.43 |
160 |
|
|
Limitations to the protection |
14.44 |
160 |
|
|
Exceptions to the protection |
14.46 |
160 |
|
|
The “offside goals rule” |
14.47 |
161 |
|
|
The statutory examples |
14.48 |
161 |
|
|
The race to the register |
14.49 |
161 |
|
|
Conveyancing practice |
14.51 |
162 |
|
|
The future of letters of obligation |
14.55 |
163 |
|
|
A wider role for advance notices? |
14.58 |
163 |
|
|
Abolition of the offside goals rule? |
14.61 |
164 |
|
|
Conclusion |
|
14.66 |
165 |
|
Postscript: the view as it might be seen from the Department |
14.67 |
166 |
|
|
of the Registers |
|
|
|
|
Part 15 |
Uncompleted titles |
|
|
|
Background |
|
15.1 |
170 |
|
Clauses of deduction of title |
15.3 |
170 |
|
|
Notices of title |
|
15.4 |
171 |
|
Use of notices of title to evade policy about completion of the Register |
15.12 |
172 |
|
xiii
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
Part 16 |
A non domino dispositions |
|
|
Introduction |
|
16.1 |
174 |
A non domino cases and the 1979 Act |
16.3 |
174 |
|
Three possibilities: door open, door shut, and door slightly ajar |
16.4 |
174 |
|
Current practice |
16.8 |
176 |
|
Our overall approach |
16.9 |
176 |
|
The approach taken in Discussion Paper 128 |
16.11 |
177 |
|
The task |
|
16.14 |
177 |
The two filters |
|
16.16 |
178 |
Notification or advertisement? |
16.22 |
179 |
|
The consequences of an a non domino registration |
16.26 |
180 |
|
Successors |
|
16.30 |
181 |
Two final comments |
16.32 |
182 |
|
Part 17 |
Inaccuracy in the Register |
|
|
Introduction |
|
17.1 |
183 |
Inaccuracies under the 1979 Act |
17.5 |
183 |
|
Inaccuracies: actual and bijural |
17.6 |
184 |
|
Bijural inaccuracies |
17.7 |
184 |
|
Actual inaccuracies |
17.10 |
185 |
|
Voidability |
|
17.12 |
186 |
Rectifiability: the current law |
17.13 |
186 |
|
A cross-table |
|
17.19 |
187 |
The effect of rectification |
17.20 |
187 |
|
The effect of non-rectification |
17.23 |
188 |
|
Register error and transactional error |
17.28 |
189 |
|
Bijural inaccuracies |
17.33 |
190 |
|
The continuing guarantee of title |
17.37 |
191 |
|
In the new scheme, what is an inaccuracy? |
17.40 |
191 |
|
Voidable titles |
|
17.43 |
192 |
Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1985 |
17.44 |
193 |
|
Administrative mistake |
17.45 |
193 |
|
Which parts of the Register can be inaccurate? |
17.47 |
195 |
|
Part 18 |
Rectifying the Register |
|
|
Introduction |
|
18.1 |
196 |
Current law and practice |
18.2 |
196 |
|
Our provisional proposals in DP 128 |
18.8 |
197 |
xiv
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
The way forward: procedure |
18.10 |
198 |
|
The way forward: the evidential standard |
18.16 |
199 |
|
Litigation |
|
18.26 |
202 |
Prescription |
|
18.28 |
202 |
Intervention by the Keeper |
18.29 |
202 |
|
Part 19 |
The guarantee of title: (A) general |
|
|
Overview of this group of parts |
19.1 |
203 |
|
Defects in title: the general law |
19.2 |
203 |
|
Defects in title: the general law about compensation |
19.8 |
204 |
|
Title insurance from commercial insurers |
19.10 |
205 |
|
The 1979 Act |
|
19.11 |
205 |
When the title guarantee does not apply |
19.15 |
206 |
|
Title guarantee and title registration systems |
19.17 |
206 |
|
Title insurance and the Land Register |
19.20 |
207 |
|
Evaluation |
|
19.22 |
207 |
No requirement of actual reliance |
19.27 |
209 |
|
Donations and other non-onerous transactions |
19.29 |
209 |
|
Part 20 |
The guarantee of title: (B) voidable titles |
|
|
Introduction |
|
20.1 |
210 |
The mud guarantee |
20.2 |
210 |
|
The money guarantee |
20.8 |
212 |
|
Is the result paradoxical? |
20.12 |
213 |
|
Is the doctrine of notice a threat to land registration objectives? |
20.13 |
213 |
|
Voidability: the general law and the Keeper’s liabilities |
20.16 |
214 |
|
Part 21 |
The guarantee of title: (C) the mud or the money |
|
|
Introduction |
|
21.1 |
215 |
Immediate indefeasibility in the Torrens systems |
21.3 |
215 |
|
England and Wales |
21.10 |
217 |
|
The 1979 Act |
|
21.11 |
218 |
The mud/money question |
21.14 |
219 |
|
The first difficulty: the position of the true owner |
21.16 |
219 |
|
The second difficulty: insecurity of title ("easy come, easy go") |
21.18 |
220 |
|
The “proprietor in possession” test of the 1979 Act: some difficulties |
21.22 |
221 |
|
Lack of notice in the current system |
21.26 |
223 |
|
The need for notice |
21.30 |
224 |
xv
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
Outline recommendation about Register error |
21.32 |
224 |
|
The mud should be real mud |
21.36 |
225 |
|
Protecting the grantee: the curtain principle |
21.38 |
225 |
|
Discretion? |
|
21.39 |
226 |
Terminology: the integrity principle and realignment of rights |
21.40 |
226 |
|
Subordinate real rights |
21.41 |
227 |
|
Transactional error |
21.42 |
227 |
|
Is the money/mud choice neutral from the standpoint of the Keeper's |
|
|
|
purse? |
|
21.44 |
228 |
Retrospective |
|
21.45 |
228 |
Part 22 |
The guarantee of title: (D) the Keeper’s warranty |
|
|
|
of title |
|
|
Introduction |
|
22.1 |
230 |
Current law and its drawbacks |
22.2 |
230 |
|
The warranty’s two prongs |
22.5 |
231 |
|
Limitations on the Keeper’s warranty |
22.8 |
232 |
|
Warranty only on registration |
22.9 |
232 |
|
Warranty in whose favour? |
22.15 |
234 |
|
Title warranted as at which date? |
22.17 |
234 |
|
Warranty only against inaccuracy |
22.23 |
235 |
|
What is not warranted: windfall caused by administrative error |
22.24 |
235 |
|
What is not warranted: freedom from off-register rights |
22.25 |
236 |
|
What is not warranted: that registered pertinents are of a registrable |
|
|
|
type |
|
22.27 |
236 |
What is not warranted: that a pertinent has not been extinguished off- |
|
|
|
register |
|
22.28 |
237 |
Servitudes and real burdens: an overview |
22.30 |
238 |
|
Mineral rights |
|
22.31 |
238 |
Alluvion |
|
22.32 |
239 |
Leases |
|
22.33 |
239 |
A non domino cases |
22.34 |
239 |
|
Caveats |
|
22.35 |
239 |
Default warranty, sub-warranty and super-warranty |
22.36 |
239 |
|
Warranty upgrade |
22.41 |
240 |
|
Warranty downgrade |
22.43 |
241 |
|
If warranty is given to one person, must it be given to a successor? |
22.44 |
241 |
|
When liability crystallises |
22.45 |
241 |
|
Compensation for rectification? |
22.47 |
242 |
|
Quantification of compensation: introduction |
22.48 |
242 |
xvi
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
Quantification of compensation: A ceiling to claims? |
22.49 |
242 |
|
Quantification of compensation: when? |
22.55 |
244 |
|
Compensation: scope |
22.56 |
244 |
|
First port of call? |
22.57 |
244 |
|
Non-patrimonial loss |
22.58 |
245 |
|
Failure to mitigate |
22.60 |
245 |
|
Remoteness |
|
22.61 |
246 |
Inaccuracy caused by breach of duty of care |
22.63 |
246 |
|
Bad faith |
|
22.64 |
247 |
Inaccuracy due to fault in base map |
22.65 |
247 |
|
Part 23 |
The guarantee of title: (E) indefeasibility |
|
|
|
(realignment of rights) |
|
|
Introduction |
|
23.1 |
248 |
Background |
|
23.1 |
248 |
Indefeasibility deferred, not immediate |
23.2 |
248 |
|
The issues: an overview |
23.3 |
248 |
|
Dispositions: (1) Validation of a defective title |
23.4 |
248 |
|
The granter |
|
23.4 |
248 |
Disposition to be valid in other respects |
23.5 |
249 |
|
Possession |
|
23.6 |
249 |
“Fraud or carelessness” or bad faith? |
23.8 |
250 |
|
Timing |
|
23.15 |
252 |
Caveats and exclusions of warranty |
23.16 |
252 |
|
Dispositions: (2) Omission of encumbrances |
23.19 |
253 |
|
Introduction |
|
23.19 |
253 |
Good faith and possession |
23.21 |
253 |
|
Which encumbrances? |
23.22 |
253 |
|
Interaction with Keeper's warranty against omitted encumbrances |
23.23 |
253 |
|
Leases |
|
23.24 |
254 |
Servitudes |
|
23.32 |
256 |
Compensation |
|
23.37 |
257 |
The right to compensation for those who suffer from realignment |
23.37 |
257 |
|
When the right emerges |
23.38 |
257 |
|
Quantum and defences |
23.39 |
257 |
|
Heritable security |
23.42 |
258 |
xvii
Contents (cont'd)
|
|
Paragraph |
Page |
|
Part 24 |
The guarantee of title: (F) Keeper’s rights of |
|
|
|
|
recovery |
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
24.1 |
259 |
|
The current law |
24.2 |
259 |
|
|
Two examples under current law |
24.5 |
260 |
|
|
Evaluation: the two bases of claim |
24.9 |
260 |
|
|
Might the wrong person end up suffering the loss? |
24.12 |
261 |
|
|
Evaluation: the mechanics of the derivative claim |
24.16 |
262 |
|
|
Part 25 |
The guarantee of title: (G) some worked |
|
|
|
|
examples |
|
263 |
|
Part 26 |
Title Insurance |
|
275 |
|
Part 27 |
The Keeper's liabilities |
|
|
|
An overview |
of the Keeper's statutory liabilities |
27.1 |
278 |
Compensation for the rectification of an inaccuracy (breach of Keeper’s |
|
|
|
warranty of title) |
27.2 |
279 |
|
Compensation for the non-rectification of an inaccuracy (compensation |
|
|
|
for the victims of the realignment of rights) |
27.3 |
279 |
|
Compensation for the loss or destruction of documents |
27.4 |
279 |
|
Compensation for the issue of erroneous information |
27.5 |
279 |
|
Re-imbursement of expenses |
27.7 |
280 |
|
Compensation to those in whose favour an inaccuracy is rectified |
27.13 |
281 |
|
Other grounds of liability |
27.17 |
282 |
|
Indemnity statistics |
27.18 |
282 |
|
Part 28 |
Challengeable deeds (A): reduction |
|
|
Introduction |
|
28.1 |
284 |
Reduction of voidable deeds and the Register of Sasines |
28.3 |
284 |
|
Reduction of voidable deeds and the Land Register: the current law |
28.5 |
285 |
|
Reduction of void deeds and the Land Register: the current law |
28.7 |
285 |
|
Should the reduction of a voidable deed result in an inaccuracy? |
28.9 |
286 |
|
Section 46(1) of the Conveyancing (Scotland) Act 1924 |
28.18 |
288 |
|
Reductions of void deeds |
28.19 |
288 |
|
Ownership and other rights |
28.20 |
288 |
xviii