H.O. Pierson. Handbook of carbon, graphite, diamond and fullerenes. Properties, processing and applications. 1993
.pdf136 Carbon, Graphite, Diamond, and Fullerenes |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
5.1 Characteristics |
and Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Vitreous |
carbon |
foam |
is |
produced |
in |
several |
pore |
sizes, |
usually |
|||||||
described |
as number |
|
of pores per inch (ppi). Commercially |
available |
foams |
|||||||||||
are respectively |
60,100, |
and 200 |
ppi (24,39 |
and 78 pores |
per cm). |
These |
||||||||||
foams |
have low |
density, |
with |
relatively |
even |
pore |
distribution. |
Their |
||||||||
properties |
are |
listed |
in Table |
6.4.p4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Vitreous-carbon |
|
foam |
is very susceptible |
to oxidation due its large |
||||||||||||
surface |
area. |
Any |
application |
involving |
an |
oxidizing |
atmosphere |
above |
||||||||
500°C |
should |
not |
be considered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Table 6.4. |
Properties |
of Vitreous |
Carbon |
Foam |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Bulk |
void |
volume, |
% |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Bulk |
density, |
g/cm3 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Strut |
density, |
g/cm3 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Strut |
resistivity, |
1O-‘rohm-cm |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Crushing |
|
strength, |
MPa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
(function |
of pore |
size) |
|
0.07 - 3.4 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Surface |
area, m*/g |
|
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
5.2Applications
|
Electrodes. Its chemical |
inertness, its wide range |
of usable |
potential |
||||||||||||||||
(1.2 to -1 .OVvs. |
SCE) and the |
hydrodynamic |
and structural |
advantages |
of |
|||||||||||||||
its open-pore |
foam |
structure |
make |
vitreous |
carbon |
foam |
an |
attractive |
||||||||||||
material for |
|
electrodes |
for |
lithium-ion |
and |
other |
types |
of |
batteries, with |
|||||||||||
many |
potential |
applications |
in electrochemistry.[13)[15)[1s] |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
High-Temperature |
Thermal |
Insulation. |
A |
potential |
application |
of |
|||||||||||||
vitreous-carbon |
foam is high-temperature |
thermal |
insulation |
in vacuum |
or |
|||||||||||||||
non-oxidizing |
|
atmosphere. |
Several |
factors |
combine |
to make this |
structure |
|||||||||||||
an excellent |
thermal |
insulator: |
(@he |
lowvolumefraction |
|
of the solid phase, |
||||||||||||||
which |
limits |
|
conduction; |
(b) the |
small |
cell |
|
size, |
which |
virtually eliminates |
||||||||||
convection |
and |
reduces |
radiation |
through |
repeated |
absorption/reflection |
at |
|||||||||||||
the cell walls; |
and (c)the |
poor conductivity |
of the enclosed gas (orvacuum). |
|
||||||||||||||||
An additional |
advantage |
is its excellent |
thermal-shock |
resistance |
due to its |
Vitreous Carbon 137
relatively low modulus compared to the bulk material. Very high thermal gradients can be tolerated.
Adsorption of Hydrocarbons and Other Gases. |
In the |
activated |
||||||||
form, vitreous-carbon |
foam |
could |
replace |
activated-carbon |
granules |
with- |
||||
out the requirement |
of a container |
(see Ch. 10, Sec. 4.0). Potential |
uses are |
|||||||
in emission |
control |
and recovery. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other |
Applications. |
Viireous-carbon |
foam |
is being |
considered |
as a |
||||
filter for |
diesel particulates |
and |
for the |
filtration |
of non-carbide-forming |
|||||
molten |
metals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0VITREOUS CARBON SPHERES AND PELLETS
|
Vitreous |
carbon |
in the form |
of microspheres |
or pellets |
has |
a number |
||||||||||||||||
of applications, especially |
in the |
field |
of |
catalytic |
supports. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
6.1 |
Processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A |
typical |
process |
for |
the |
production |
of |
vitreous-carbon |
|
spheres |
is |
||||||||||||
represented |
schematically |
|
in |
Fig. |
6.9.t”) |
The |
precursor |
is |
a partially |
||||||||||||||
polymerized |
polymer |
such |
|
as |
furfuryl |
|
alcohol, |
catalyzed |
with |
|
p-toluene |
||||||||||||
sulfonic |
acid |
and |
mixed with |
acetone |
|
to obtain |
the proper |
viscosity |
for |
||||||||||||||
atomization.tls) |
A pore |
former |
is added |
which |
can |
be an |
organic |
material |
|||||||||||||||
with |
a high boiling |
point |
or sub-micron |
|
solid |
particles |
such |
as carbon |
black. |
||||||||||||||
Atomization |
occurs |
in |
the |
thermal |
reactor |
shown |
schematically |
|
in |
Fig. |
|||||||||||||
6.10.[“] |
The |
curing |
time |
is |
very |
brief |
because |
of |
the small |
size |
of |
the |
|||||||||||
particles |
(- 45 pm). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
The microspheres |
are then |
heat-treated |
from 530 to 1330°C. If required, |
|||||||||||||||||||
they |
can be partially oxidized |
to create |
microand |
transitional-pores. |
|
|
6.2Applications
Catalytic Support. |
Vitreous |
carbon spheres |
are being |
considered as |
||||||||
catalyst supports |
for |
iron |
and |
other |
metals. |
The material may offer |
some |
|||||
important |
advantages |
over other |
forms of carbon, |
such as lower inorganic |
||||||||
impurities |
(which |
may poison |
the |
catalyst) |
and |
a |
more |
uniform |
pore |
|||
structure. |
The activation |
mechanism |
and the properties |
and characteristics |
||||||||
of catalytic |
materials |
are |
reviewed |
in greater |
detail in Ch. 10, Sec. |
4.0. |
138 Carbon, Graphite, Diamond, and Fullerenes
Other Applications: Other applications include foams, low density fillers for plastics and high-temperature thermal insulation.
Furfuryl |
Polymerization |
p-Toluene |
|
Sulfonic |
|||
Alcohol |
|
||
|
Acid |
||
|
I |
||
|
|
v
1Particle Generation1
I |
Sieving |
I |
|
|
$
Spheres
Figure 6.9. Processing flow-chart for vitreous carbon spheres.[17]
Vitreous Carbon 139
Aerosol Generator |
|
|
Dispersion Air --J/L |
Polymer |
Inlet |
2- |
Dilution Air |
Fi’ter\eIl--cEF:g
9!?=r N2
Exhaust
Collector
Figure 6.10. Schematic of vitreous-carbon |
production apparatus.[17] |
140 Carbon, Graphite, Diamond, and Fullerenes
REFERENCES
1.Dubgen, R., Glassy Carbon - A Material for Use in Analytical
Chemistry, Publication of Sigri, D-8901 Meitingen, Germany (1985)
2.Jenkins, G. M. and Kawamura, K., Polymeric Carbons, Cambridge
Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK (1976)
3. |
Fitzer, E., Schaefer, W., and Yamada, |
S., Carbon, |
7:643-648 |
(1969) |
|||
4. |
Inagaki, |
M., et al, Carbon, 27(2):253-257 |
(1989) |
|
|
||
5. |
Inakagi, |
M. et al, Carbon. 29(8):1239-l |
243 (1991) |
|
|
||
6. |
Fitzer, E. and Schaefer, W., |
Carbon, |
8:353-364 (1970) |
|
|||
7. |
Cowlard, |
F. and Lewis J., J. |
of Mat. Sci. |
2507-512 |
(1967) |
|
|
8. |
Doremus, R., G/ass Science, |
John Wiley |
& Sons, |
New York |
(1973) |
9.Jenkins, G. M. and Kawamura, K., Nature, 231:175-176 (May 21, 1971)
10.Lewis, J. C., Redfern, B., and Cowlard, F. C., So/id-State/Electronics, 6:251-254, Pergammon Press (1963)
11. |
Lausevic, 2. and Jenkins, G. M., Carbon, 24(5):651-652 (1986) |
12.Van der Linden, W. E., and Dieker, J. W., Analytica Chimica Acta,
119:1-24 (1980)
13. Wang, J., Hectrochimica Acta, 26(12):1721-1726 (1981)
14. Reticulated vitreous Carbon, Brochure form ERG, Oakland, CA
94608 (1976)
15.Sherman, A. J., Tuffias, R. H., and Kaplan, R. B., Ceramic Bull.,
70(6):1025-1029 (1991)
16. |
Sherman, |
A. J. and Pierson, H. O., Ultrastructures |
for |
Co/d Cathode |
|
|
Emitters, |
Final Report (ULT/TR-89-6762), |
Air Force Electronic Systems |
||
|
Division, Hanscom AFB, MA (April 1989). |
|
|
||
17. |
Levendis, |
Y. and Flagan, R., Carbon, |
27(2):265-283 |
|
(1989) |
18. |
Moreno-Castilla, C., et al, Carbon, 18:271-276 (1980) |
|
Pyrolytic Graphite
1.0GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
|
The |
|
production |
of molded |
graphite |
and vitreous |
|
carbon, |
described |
in |
||||||||||||||||||
the previous |
two chapters, |
relies on the |
carbonization |
|
(pyrolysis) |
of a solid, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
inorganic |
|
substance |
such |
as coal-tar pitch, |
petroleum |
fractions |
or polymers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
This |
chapter |
is a review |
of another |
type |
of carbon |
material, |
produced |
by a |
||||||||||||||||||||
fundamentally |
|
different |
|
process |
that |
is |
based |
on |
a |
gaseous |
precursor |
|||||||||||||||||
instead |
of a |
solid |
or |
liquid. |
The |
process |
is |
|
known |
as |
chemical |
|
vapor |
|||||||||||||||
deposition |
(CVD) |
and |
the |
product |
as |
pyrolytic |
|
carbon |
or |
graphite, |
some- |
|||||||||||||||||
times |
referred |
to as pyrocarbon |
or pyrographite. |
|
To simplify, |
in this |
chapter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
the material will be referred |
to as pyrolytic |
graphite, |
regardless |
of the degree |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
of graphitization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Pyrolytic |
|
graphite |
|
is different |
from |
another |
standpoint: |
although |
pro- |
||||||||||||||||||
duced in |
bulk |
form, |
its |
|
main |
use |
is in the |
form |
af coatings, |
deposited |
on |
|||||||||||||||||
substratessuch |
as molded |
graphite, carbon |
fibers, |
or poiouscarbon-carbon |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
structures. |
As such, |
it is part |
of a composite |
structure |
|
and is not as readily |
||||||||||||||||||||||
identifiable |
as |
other |
forms of |
carbon. |
|
It |
is similar |
in |
this |
respect |
to CVD |
|||||||||||||||||
diamond |
and |
|
diamond-like |
carbon |
(DLC) |
described |
in Chs. |
13 and |
14. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Pyrolytic |
|
graphite |
|
is the |
only |
graphitic |
material |
that can |
be |
produced |
|||||||||||||||||
effectively |
as |
a coating. |
|
The |
coating |
can |
be |
made |
sufficiently |
thick |
that, |
|||||||||||||||||
after |
removing |
the substrate, |
a free-standing |
object |
remains. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Pyrolytic |
|
graphite |
|
is a key |
element |
|
in the |
technology |
of carbon |
|
and |
is |
|||||||||||||||
used |
extensively |
in the |
coating |
of specialty |
molded |
graphites |
and |
in the |
||||||||||||||||||||
processing |
of carbon-carbon |
components. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
142 |
Carbon, |
|
Graphite, |
Diamond, |
and |
Fullerenes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
1.l |
Historical |
Perspective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
The |
CVD |
|
of carbon materials |
is not new. |
As mentioned |
in the pioneer |
||||||||||||||||
work of Powell, |
Oxley, and |
Blocher,tlj |
its first |
practical |
use |
was developed |
|||||||||||||||||
in |
the |
1880’s |
|
in |
the |
production |
of |
incandescent |
lamps |
to |
improve |
the |
|||||||||||
strength |
of filaments |
by carbon deposition |
and |
a patent was |
issued |
over a |
|||||||||||||||||
hundred |
years |
ago, |
covering |
the |
basis |
of the |
CVD |
of carbon!*] |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
The |
CVD |
process |
developed |
|
slowly |
in the next |
fifty |
years, |
and |
was |
||||||||||||
limited |
mostly |
to pyro |
and extraction |
metallurgy, |
|
and |
little workwas |
done on |
|||||||||||||||
graphite |
deposition. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
It is only |
since the end |
of World |
War II that |
the |
CVD of graphite |
began |
||||||||||||||||
to expand |
rapidly |
as researchers |
realized |
the potential |
of this |
technique |
for |
||||||||||||||||
the |
formation |
of coatings |
and |
free-standing |
shapes. |
The |
importance |
and |
|||||||||||||||
impact |
of pyrolytic |
graphite |
have |
been |
growing |
ever |
since. |
|
|
|
|
1.2The Chemical Vapor Deposition Process
CVD is nowawell-established |
processthat |
hasreached major production |
|||||
status in areas |
such |
as semiconductors and cutting toots. |
It is a vapor-phase |
||||
process |
which |
relies |
on the chemical |
reaction |
of a vapor |
near or on a heated |
|
surface |
to form a solid deposit and gaseous by-products. |
The process is very |
|||||
suitable |
to the |
deposition of carbon, |
as reviewed be~ow.tq |
1.3Pyrolytic Graphite as a Coating
|
Although, |
|
as mentioned |
above, |
pyrolytic |
graphite |
is used |
by itself |
as |
||||||||||||
free-standing |
structures |
such |
as crucibles |
or rocket |
nozzles |
(see |
Sec. 4.0), |
||||||||||||||
its major |
use |
|
is |
in |
the |
form |
of |
coatings |
on |
substrates |
such |
as |
molded |
||||||||
graphite, |
carbon |
foam, |
carbon fibers, |
metals, |
and |
ceramics. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Composite |
Nature |
of |
Coatings. |
The |
surfaces |
of |
many |
|
materials |
|||||||||||
exposed |
to the |
environment |
are prone |
to the effects |
of abrasion, |
|
corrosion, |
||||||||||||||
radiation, |
electrical |
or |
magnetic |
fields, |
and |
other conditions. |
|
These |
|||||||||||||
surfaces |
must |
have |
the |
ability |
to withstand |
these |
environmental |
|
conditions |
||||||||||||
and/or provide |
certain |
desirable |
properties |
such |
as |
reflectivity, |
semi- |
||||||||||||||
conductivity, |
high |
thermal |
conductivity, |
or erosion |
resistance. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
To obtain |
these |
desirable |
surface |
properties, |
a coating |
is deposited |
on |
|||||||||||||
the |
bulk |
material |
to form |
a composite |
in which |
bulk |
and |
surface |
|
properties |
|||||||||||
may |
be very |
different.t4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pyrolytic |
Graphite |
143 |
Table 7.1 summarizes the surface |
properties that |
may be obtained |
or |
modified by the use of pyrolytic graphite |
coatings. |
|
|
Table 7.1. Material Properties |
Affected by Pyrolytic Graphite Coatings |
|
Electrical |
Resistivity |
|
Optical |
Reflectivity |
|
Mechanical |
Wear |
|
|
Friction |
|
|
Hardness |
|
|
Adhesion |
|
|
Toughness |
|
Porosity |
Surface area |
|
|
Pore |
size |
|
Pore |
volume |
Chemical |
Diffusion |
|
|
Corrosion |
|
|
Oxidation |
2.0THE CVD OF PYROLYTIC GRAPHITE
The CVD |
of pyrolytic |
graphite |
is theoretically |
simple |
and |
is based on |
||||||||||
the thermal |
decomposition |
(pyrolysis) |
of a hydrocarbon |
gas. |
The |
actual |
||||||||||
mechanism |
of |
decomposition |
however |
is |
complex |
and not |
completely |
|||||||||
understood.t5j |
This |
may |
be due in part |
to the fact |
that most of the studies |
|||||||||||
on the subject |
of hydrocarbon |
decomposition |
are focused |
on the improve- |
||||||||||||
ment |
of fuel |
efficiency |
and the prevention |
of carbon |
formation |
(e.g., |
soot), |
|||||||||
rather |
than |
the |
deposition |
of a coating. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Although |
many |
studies |
of the |
CVD |
of graphite |
|
have |
been |
carried out, |
|||||||
a better understanding |
of the pyrolysis |
reactions, |
a more |
accurate |
predic- |
|||||||||||
tion of the results, |
and more |
complete |
experimental, |
thermodynamic, |
and |
|||||||||||
kinetic |
investigations |
are |
still |
needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 Carbon, Graphite, Diamond, and Fullerenes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2.1 |
Thermodynamics |
and Kinetics Analyses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
The |
CVD of pyrolytic |
|
graphite |
can be optimized |
by experimentation. |
||||||||||||||||||||
The |
carbon |
source (hydrocarbon |
gas), the method |
|
of activating |
the decom- |
||||||||||||||||||||
position reaction (thermal, plasma, laser, etc.), |
and the |
deposition |
variables |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(temperature, |
pressure, |
gas flow, |
etc.) |
can be changed |
|
until |
a satisfactory |
|||||||||||||||||||
deposit |
is |
achieved. |
|
However, |
this |
empirical |
|
approach |
|
may |
be |
too |
||||||||||||||
cumbersome |
and, for |
more |
accurate |
results, |
it should |
be combined |
with a |
|||||||||||||||||||
theoretical |
|
analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Such |
|
an |
analysis |
is |
a valuable |
|
step |
which, |
|
if properly |
carried |
out, |
|||||||||||||
predicts |
what |
will |
happen |
to the |
reaction, what |
the |
resulting |
composition |
of |
|||||||||||||||||
the |
deposit |
will |
be (i.e., |
stoichiometry), |
what |
type |
of |
carbon |
structure |
to |
||||||||||||||||
expect, |
and |
what |
the |
reaction |
mechanism |
(i.e., the |
path |
of the reaction |
as |
|||||||||||||||||
it forms |
the |
deposit) |
is |
likely |
to |
be. |
The |
analysis |
|
generally |
|
includes |
two |
|||||||||||||
steps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
The |
calculation |
|
of |
the |
change |
in |
the |
|
free |
energy |
of |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
formation |
for |
a |
given |
temperature |
range; |
this |
is |
a |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
preliminary, |
|
relatively |
|
simple |
step |
which |
provides |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
information |
on the |
feasibility |
|
of the |
reaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2. |
The |
minimization |
|
of the free |
|
energy |
of formation |
which |
is |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
a more complete |
analysis |
carried out |
with |
a computer |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2AG Calculations and Reaction Feasibility
Thermodynamics |
of CVD Carbon. The CVD of carbon |
(as all CVD |
|||||||||||||||
reactions) |
is |
governed |
by |
two ‘factors: |
(a) |
thermodynamics, |
that is |
the |
|||||||||
driving |
force |
which |
indicates |
the |
direction |
the |
reaction |
is going |
to proceed |
||||||||
(if at |
all), |
and |
(b) kinetics, which |
defines |
the |
transport |
process |
and |
|||||||||
determines |
the |
rate-control |
mechanism, |
i.e., |
how |
fast |
it is going. |
|
|||||||||
Chemical |
thermodynamics |
is |
concerned with |
the |
interrelation |
of |
|||||||||||
various |
forms |
of |
energy |
and the transfer |
of |
energy |
from |
one chemical |
|||||||||
system |
to another |
in accordance |
with |
the |
first |
and |
second |
laws |
of thermo- |
||||||||
dynamics. |
In the |
case |
of |
CVD, |
this |
transfer |
occurs |
when the gaseous |
|||||||||
compounds, |
|
introduced |
in the deposition |
chamber, |
react to form the carbon |
||||||||||||
deposit |
(and |
by-products |
gases). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pyrolytic Graphite |
|
145 |
||||||
AG Calculation: |
The first |
step |
is to |
ensure |
that |
the |
desired |
CVD |
||||||||||
reaction |
will |
take |
place |
in a given |
temperature |
range. |
This |
will |
happen |
if the |
||||||||
thermodynamics |
|
is favorable, that |
is, if the transfer |
of energy |
(i.e., |
thefree- |
||||||||||||
energy |
change |
of the reaction, |
known |
asAG,) |
is negative. |
|
To calculate |
AG,, |
||||||||||
it is necessary |
to know |
the thermodynamic |
properties |
of each |
component, |
|||||||||||||
specifically |
their |
free-energy |
of |
formation |
(also |
known |
as Gibbs |
free |
||||||||||
energy), |
AGr. |
The values of AG, |
of the reactants |
and |
products |
for |
each |
|||||||||||
temperature |
can |
be obtained |
from |
thermodynamic-data |
|
tables such |
as the |
|||||||||||
JANAF |
Thermochemical |
Tables |
and |
others.t6jm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
It |
should |
be noted that |
the |
|
negative |
free-energy |
change |
is |
a |
valid |
||||||||
criterionforthefeasibility |
of areaction |
only ifthe reaction |
aswritten |
contains |
||||||||||||||
the major species |
that |
exist |
at equilibrium. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3Minimization of Gibbs Free Energy
|
Experimentation |
|
shows |
that |
the best, |
fully |
dense, |
and |
homogeneous |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
carbon |
deposits |
are |
produced |
at an optimum |
negative |
value |
of AG. |
For |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
smaller negative values, the reaction rate |
is |
very |
low |
and, |
for |
higher |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
negative values, vapor-phase |
|
precipitation |
and |
the |
formation |
|
of soot |
can |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
occur. |
Such |
factors |
are not |
revealed |
|
in the |
simple |
free-energy |
change |
||||||||||||||||||||||
calculation. |
|
A more |
complete |
|
analysis |
|
is often |
necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
A method |
of analysis |
is the |
minimization |
of the |
Gibbs |
free energy, |
a |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
calculation |
|
based |
on |
the |
rule |
of |
thermodynamics |
which |
|
states |
that |
a |
|||||||||||||||||||
system |
will |
be in equilibrium |
when |
the |
|
Gibbs |
free |
energy |
is at a minimum. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
The |
objective |
then |
is the |
minimization |
|
of the total free |
energy |
of the system |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
and |
the |
calculation |
|
of |
equilibria |
|
at |
constant |
temperature |
|
and |
volume |
or |
||||||||||||||||||
constant |
pressure. |
|
It is a |
complicated |
|
and |
lengthy |
operation |
but, fortu- |
||||||||||||||||||||||
nately, |
computer |
|
programs |
are |
|
now |
available |
that |
simplify |
the |
task |
||||||||||||||||||||
considerably.f8)t9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
These |
programs |
provide |
the |
|
following |
information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
• |
The |
composition |
and |
amount |
of deposited |
material |
that |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
is theoretically |
possible |
at agiven |
temperature, |
pressure, |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
and |
concentration |
|
of input |
gases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
. The |
existence |
of gaseous |
species |
and |
their |
equilibrium |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
partial |
pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
. |
The |
possibility |
of multiple |
|
reactions |
with |
the |
inclusion |
of |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
the |
substrate |
|
as a possible |
reactant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|