Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

PGM_outlook-100119_watermark

.pdf
Скачиваний:
4
Добавлен:
06.09.2019
Размер:
1.34 Mб
Скачать

vk.com/id446425943

Platinum Group Metals

Momentum could fade

Earnings momentum remains positive for platinum group metals (PGM) miners as commodity prices have recovered. We increase our earnings forecasts and TPs for the PGM miners under our coverage, as we mark-to-market our commodity price forecasts. However, we see potential downside risk to the spot PGM basket price, which we calculate is trading above cost support for the first time in seven years, making it more vulnerable to escalating fears of a global slowdown. Despite the recovery in sector margins, we struggle to calculate much value in the sector and believe poor capital allocation risk could be increasing, given the improving returns and the sector’s lack of commitment towards dividends. Our top picks are Norilsk Nickel and Impala Platinum.

Increases in TPs for PGM miners, but ratings unchanged

We increase our earnings forecasts and TPs for the PGM miners (as shown in Figure 1), as we incorporate up to a 5% higher PGM basket price forecast and a slightly weaker rand forecast. The increases to our TPs are: Impala Platinum (+29% to ZAR45), Sibanye-Stillwater (+23% to ZAR11.1), Lonmin (+17% to ZAR7.0), Anglo American Platinum (+15% to ZAR540), Royal Bafokeng Platinum (+14% to ZAR25) and Norilsk Nickel (+4% to $24).

Positive earnings momentum could fade in a global slowdown

Earnings momentum for the PGM miners continues to remain positive into 2019 on the back of: 1) the low base for consensus earnings; 2) a PGM basket price recovery; and 3) a weaker rand. We calculate 51% further upside to consensus earnings for the SA-listed PGM producers if spot commodity prices prevail. However, we believe the positive momentum could slow over the medium term, as we remain cautious on a sustained commodity price recovery against a weak economic outlook, and prices trading above cost support. In addition, we believe stronger producer currencies and rising costs could erode miners’ earnings more than forecast.

Value not that compelling, despite recovery in margins

PGM margins and returns have recovered back to historical averages. Share prices have risen sharply, making it more difficult to calculate value, in our view. Improving returns, healthy balance sheets and a lack of commitment to dividends could increase the risk of poor capital allocation. We believe that in a world where growth expectations are fading due to trade wars, high debt levels and rising interest rates, investors may target companies that screen well on near-term valuation metrics. We calculate that most of the PGM miners still screen poorly on near-term FCF yields, due to their high capex commitments, poor cost position or elevated share prices.

Sector update

Equity Research 10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

Global

Steven Friedman +27 (11) 750-1481

SFriedman@rencap.com

Derick Deale

+27 (11) 750-1458 DDeale@rencap.com

Johann Pretorius +27 (11) 750-1450

JPretorius2@rencap.com

Kabelo Moshesha +27 (11) 750-1472

KMoshesha@rencap.com

Siphelele Mhlongo +27 (11) 750-1420

SMhlongo@rencap.com

PGM sector ratings and TPs (ranked by total potential 12M return, including estimated dividends)

Company

New

Old

Current

Rating

TP

TP

price*

 

 

Norilsk, $

24.0

23.0

19.5

BUY

Implats, ZAR

45.0

35.0

37.1

BUY

Sibanye, ZAR

11.1

9.0

10.4

HOLD

Amplats, ZAR

540

470

537

HOLD

Northam, ZAR

40.0

35.0

42.8

SELL

RBPlats, ZAR

25.0

22.0

28.0

SELL

Lonmin, ZAR

7.0

6.0

9.0

SELL

*Priced as at market close on 8 January 2019.

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, Renaissance Capital estimates

Important disclosures are found at the Disclosures Appendix. Communicated by Renaissance Securities (Cyprus) Limited, regulated by the Cyprus Securities & Exchange Commission, which together with non-US affiliates operates outside of the USA under the brand name of Renaissance Capital.

vk.com/id446425943

TP changes and ranking table

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

Figure 1 shows PGM mining companies ranked by potential 12-month returns, based on our TPs.

We increase our earnings forecasts and TPs for the PGM miners (as shown in Figure 1), as we incorporate higher PGM basket price forecasts. Detailed commodity price revisions are contained on page 3.

The biggest increases to our TPs are: Impala Platinum +29% to ZAR45, SibanyeStillwater +23% to ZAR11.1, Lonmin +17% to ZAR7.0 and Anglo American Platinum +15% to ZAR540.

Figure 1: Summary sector ratings and TPs (ranked by total potential 12M return, including estimated dividends)*

Company

Unit

New

Previous

Current

12M target

12M fwd

Total 12M

12M forward

Rating

12M TP

12M TP

price*

capital return

dividend yield

return

rolling P/E

 

 

 

Norilsk

$

24.0

23.0

19.5

23.1%

10.9%

33.9%

9.3x

BUY

Impala Platinum

ZAR

45.0

35.0

37.1

21.3%

0.0%

21.3%

7.9x

BUY

Sibanye-Stillwater

ZAR

11.1

9.0

10.4

6.7%

0.1%

6.8%

5.3x

HOLD

Anglo American Platinum

ZAR

540

470

537

0.6%

2.3%

2.9%

13.6x

HOLD

Northam

ZAR

40.0

35.0

42.8

-6.5%

0.0%

-6.5%

11.9x

SELL

RBPlats

ZAR

25.0

22.0

28.0

-10.7%

0.0%

-10.7%

8.0x

SELL

Lonmin

ZAR

7.0

6.0

9.0

-22.6%

0.0%

-22.6%

1.6x

SELL

*Price as at market close 08 January 2019

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, Renaissance Capital estimates

PGM mining companies are trading around 72% above their 12-month lows in rand terms.

Figure 2: PGM company share price compared with 12-month lows

160%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

138%

 

 

 

 

 

 

140%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

120%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

87%

80%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

72%

 

 

 

80%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52%

 

 

60%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39%

35%

 

 

 

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMP 15-8-2018 (ZAR15.9)

RBP 29-6-2018 (ZAR19.9)

AMS 13-4-2018 (ZAR312.0)

Average

SGL 19-7-2018 (ZAR7.1)

LON 26-7-2018 (ZAR6.7)

NHM 24-5-2018 (ZAR34.8)

 

Note: Priced as at market close on 8 January 2019.

Source: Thomson Reuters

2

vk.com/id446425943

Commodity revisions

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

The table below shows changes to our PGM prices and currency forecasts. We mark-to- market our near-term commodity price forecasts, resulting in a 4% increase to our PGM basket price. Our long-term commodity price forecasts are around the 90th percentile of industry cash costs. We increase our long-term 3PGM basket price by 5%, as we incorporate a higher rhodium price to reflect our expectations of rising cost support on the back of high industry inflation.

Figure 3: RenCap’s commodity price forecast revisions

Average per calendar year

2019E

2020E

2021E

2022E

LT real

Platinum, $/oz

 

 

 

 

 

New

870

1,070

1,153

1,177

1,100

Old

925

1,093

1,165

1,188

1,100

% change

-6%

-2%

-1%

-1%

0%

Palladium, $/oz

 

 

 

 

 

New

1,216

1,088

1,049

1,070

1,000

Old

1,050

1,051

1,059

1,080

1,000

% change

16%

4%

-1%

-1%

0%

Rhodium, $/oz

 

 

 

 

 

New

2,379

2,163

2,097

2,139

2,000

Old

2,146

1,579

1,377

1,405

1,300

% change

11%

37%

52%

52%

54%

3PGM basket (57% Pt, 36% Pd, 7% Rh), $/oz

 

 

 

 

 

New

1,100

1,153

1,182

1,206

1,127

Old

1,056

1,112

1,142

1,165

1,078

% change

4%

4%

4%

4%

5%

Gold, $/oz

 

 

 

 

 

New

1,350

1,338

1,311

1,337

1,250

Old

1,264

1,300

1,324

1,350

1,250

% change

7%

3%

-1%

-1%

0%

ZAR/$

 

 

 

 

 

New

14.31

14.14

14.17

14.45

13.00

Old

14.00

13.98

14.04

14.32

12.75

% change

2%

1%

1%

1%

2%

Source: Renaissance Capital estimates

The cost curve below shows total quality-adjusted cash costs plus sustaining capex, net of by-product credits. We calculate “all-in” quality adjusted cash cost as follows: 1) we divide EBITDA in dollar terms by 3PGM sales volumes to get EBITDA per 3PGM ounce; 2) we then subtract EBITDA per 3PGM ounce from the 3PGM benchmark price and add sustaining capex per 3PGM ounce; 3) the result is quality-adjusted “all-in” unit costs plus sustaining capex, which takes product premiums or discounts into account.

Figure 4: 2018E cash costs plus sustaining capex per 3PGM ounce (realisation adjusted) by mine, $/oz

 

1,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3PGM price: $1,107/oz*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

90th percentile: $943/oz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

935

 

 

Average cash cost: $822/oz

 

 

(AMS),Kroondal739 (AMS),Unki749 (IMP),RiversTwo767 (IMP),Zimplats776 (AMS),Modikwa778 (IMP),Mimosa808 (ARI),RiversTwo 813 (NHM),Zondereinde827 (RBP),BRPM842 Kroondal(SGL), 879

Lonmin, 888

Rustenburg(SGL),928

943

 

800

 

 

 

(ARI),

 

 

 

 

 

$/oz

 

Norilsk

528(AMS),Mogalakwena

613(SGL),Stillwater 692(NHM),Booysendal (AMS),Mototolo726 (AMS),Amandelbult726

(AMS),

 

Modikwa

 

600

 

 

 

 

 

 

Union

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marula (IMP), 997

Rustenburg lease (IMP), 1,134

*Priced as at market close on 8 January 2019.

Source: Bloomberg, Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

3

vk.com/id446425943

Earnings revisions

Figures 5-6 summarise the changes to our earnings forecasts, as we incorporate revised commodity price forecasts and make slight changes to our cost and volume assumptions in some cases. Our medium-term earnings forecasts are above consensus in most cases.

Figure 5: Earnings for December year-ends

 

 

 

 

 

Dec-YE

2018E

2019E

2020E

2021E

2022E

Anglo American Platinum – HEPS forecasts, ZAc

 

 

 

 

 

New

3,018

4,037

4,412

4,424

4,452

Old

2,949

3,329

3,870

3,725

3,923

% change

2%

21%

14%

19%

13%

Thomson Reuters consensus

2,610

3,009

3,608

 

 

RenCap compared with consensus

16%

34%

22%

 

 

NorNickel–underlying EPS forecasts, USc

 

 

 

 

 

New

212

209

222

205

203

Old

206

210

206

200

200

% change

3%

-1%

8%

3%

1%

Thomson Reuters consensus

238

249

256

 

 

RenCap compared with consensus

-11%

-16%

-13%

 

 

Royal Bafokeng Platinum – HEPS forecasts, ZAc

 

 

 

 

 

New

21

380

568

598

662

Old

12

308

515

544

594

% change

72%

23%

10%

10%

11%

Thomson Reuters consensus

28.2

138

368

 

 

RenCap compared with consensus

-26%

175%

54%

 

 

Sibanye-Stillwater – HEPS forecasts, ZAc

 

 

 

 

 

New

29

202

174

156

182

Old

14

83

112

131

155

% change

107%

143%

55%

19%

17%

Thomson Reuters consensus

33

128

157

 

 

RenCap compared with consensus

-13%

58%

11%

 

 

Source: Thomson Reuters, Renaissance Capital estimates

Figure 6: Earnings for June and September year-ends

 

 

 

 

 

Jun/Sep-YE

2019E

2020E

2021E

2022E

2013E

Impala Platinum – HEPS forecasts, ZAc

 

 

 

 

 

New

392

539

784

842

888

Old

302

369

639

682

719

% change

30%

46%

23%

24%

23%

Thomson Reuters consensus

189

272

410

 

 

RenCap compared with consensus

108%

98%

91%

 

 

Northam – Normalised HEPS forecasts, ZAc

 

 

 

 

 

New

288

424

533

695

745

Old

243

340

429

570

611

% change

19%

25%

24%

22%

22%

Thomson Reuters consensus

-70

54

365

 

 

RenCap compared with consensus

511%

681%

46%

 

 

Lonmin – underlying EPS forecasts, USc

 

 

 

 

 

New

44

25

9

2

-1

Old

9

9

11

4

3

% change

387%

194%

-17%

-60%

-127%

Thomson Reuters consensus

11

12

12

 

 

RenCap compared with consensus

290%

115%

-27%

 

 

Source: Thomson Reuters, Renaissance Capital estimates

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

4

vk.com/id446425943

Share prices rose with positive earnings momentum…

Earnings momentum in the PGM sector remains positive on the back of higher commodity prices and weaker producer currencies.

The figures below show PGM mining company one-year forward consensus earnings over time relative to share price performance. The graphs also show: 1) peak reported earnings; 2) trough reported earnings; 3) our estimate of mid-cycle earnings; 4) our one- year-forward earnings estimate; and 5) spot earnings.

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

Figure 7: Amplats – consensus 12M forward earnings vs share price

Forward 12M EPS

 

60

 

2008 estimated peak EPS, 54.58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

Mid-cycle EPS, 41.12

 

 

 

 

ZAR/share

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012 estimated trough EPS, (5.63)

 

 

 

 

-10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Figure 8: Impala – consensus 12M forward earnings vs share price

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

Forward 12M EPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008 estimated peak EPS, 30.12

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

ZAR/share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

Mid-cycle EPS, 4.84

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

2016 estimated trough EPS, (1.12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Share price, ZAR (RHS)

 

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

 

800

 

 

12M forward RenCap EPS est., 40.35

700

 

 

 

 

 

12M forward spot EPS est.,

37.71

600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

0

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

 

Source: Company data, Thomson Reuters DataStream, Bloomberg, Renaissance Capital estimates

 

Share price, ZAR (RHS)

 

 

250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

12M forward RenCap EPS est., 4.69

 

 

 

12M forward spot EPS est., 4.09

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

 

Source: Company data, Thomson Reuters DataStream, Bloomberg, Renaissance Capital estimates

5

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

Figure 9: Lonmin – consensus 12M forward earnings vs share price

ZAR/share

20

15

10

5

0

-5

-10

 

 

 

 

Forward 12M EPS

 

Share price, ZAR (RHS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

160

 

2008 estimated peak EPS, 14.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12M forward RenCap EPS est., 5.56

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12M forward spot EPS est., 4.57

 

 

Mid-cycle EPS, 1.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

2016 estimated trough EPS, (5.19)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

 

Source: Company data, Thomson Reuters DataStream, Bloomberg, Renaissance Capital estimates

Figure 10: Northam – consensus 12M forward earnings vs share price

Forward 12M EPS

Share price, ZAR (RHS)

ZAR/share

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

-1

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

2008 estimated peak EPS, 5.41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

Mid-cycle EPS, 4.97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12M forward RenCap EPS est., 3.60

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12M forward spot EPS est., 3.09

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

2015 estimated trough EPS, 0.32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Source: Company data, Thomson Reuters DataStream, Bloomberg, Renaissance Capital estimates

Figure 11: RBPlats – consensus 12M forward earnings vs share price

ZAR/share

 

 

 

Forward 12M EPS

 

Share price, ZAR (RHS)

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mid-cycle EPS, 3.40

 

 

 

 

12M forward RenCap EPS est., 3.39

60

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014 estimated peak EPS, 2.39

 

 

 

 

 

12M forward spot EPS est., 2.62

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

2015 estimated trough EPS, (0.83)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Source: Company data, Thomson Reuters DataStream, Bloomberg, Renaissance Capital estimates

6

vk.com/id446425943

…but we believe the momentum could fade

Basket price above marginal cost of production

The chart below on the left shows historical annual average 3PGM prices compared with the 90th percentile of the cost curve over time. The chart on the right shows the 3PGM price premium or discount to the 90th percentile.

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

Figure 12: 3PGM basket price vs cash costs at the 90th percentile

Figure 13: 3PGM basket price premium (discount) relative to the 90th percentile

 

 

90th percentile of 3PGM cost curve*

 

 

 

3PGM basket price**

 

 

87%

 

 

 

 

 

1,800

 

1,226

946

1,053

1,339

1,421

1,370

1,320

1,088

947

970

1,028

1,100

1,153

1,182

1,127

100%

42%

81%

21%

 

21%

 

$/oz

 

 

 

 

1,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forecasts

 

80%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

580 720

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3%

 

514

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

933

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6%-

 

800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

400

2005

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E

2019E

2020E

2021E

LT (real)

-40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

 

 

*Cash costs including sustaining capex adjusted for realisations and by-products.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**3PGM basket (57% Pt, 36% Pd, 7% Rh), $/oz.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Bloomberg, Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Historical average, 14%9%

3%

10%

3%

-15%

-14%

-12%

-16%

-12%

-4%

 

 

 

 

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E

2019E

2020E

2021E

Source: Bloomberg, CRU, Renaissance Capital estimates

Weak economic outlook could weigh on industrial demand

We believe increasing geopolitical uncertainty and escalating fears of a global slowdown could weigh on industrial demand for PGMs. The chart below highlights the recent declining trend in global vehicle sales, with sales contracting the most since the global financial crisis.

Figure 14: Global vehicle sales growth, YoY

30%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average, 4%

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-5%

-10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-30%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Source: Bloomberg

7

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

Cost inflation through mining complexity and wage inflation

Western Limb mines are some of the more mature platinum mines in SA; they suffer from increasing mining complexity as they go deeper, and grade declines, given their finite lives. Miners generally need either to spend more capex to maintain volumes as mining complexity increases or achieve major technological advances that could offset increasing mining complexity in deep-level, labour-intensive mines. Neither of these events have occurred on the Western Limb over the past decade, resulting in production falling by around 25% over the period due to lower tonnes milled and falling grades.

Figure 15: Western Limb* tonnes milled and 3PGM grades

 

 

 

 

Figure 16: Western Limb* 3PGM production, mn oz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tonnes milled (LHS)

 

 

 

3PGM grades (RHS)

 

7.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

5.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mnt

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.1

4.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.0 g/t

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.9

3.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.8

3.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.7

2.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018E

2.6

2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018E

 

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

 

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

*Includes Lonmin, Zondereinde, BRPM, Impala, Rustenburg, Amandebult, Union, Kroondal and Marikana.

*Includes Lonmin, Zondereinde, BRPM, Impala, Rustenburg, Amandebult, Union, Kroondal and Marikana.

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

The SA platinum sector has historically suffered from very high wage inflation (2008-2017 CAGR of 10.2%) relative to SA CPI (5.5% over the same period). We believe we could be underestimating the impact of wage inflation, given the historical precedents and improved profitability. Most PGM miners are expected to enter wage negotiations during 2019.

Figure 17: Average wages in the SA platinum sector (LHS) relative to wage and CPI CAGR, 2008-2017

ZAR '000 p/a

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12%

PGM wage inflation CAGR (2008-2017), 10.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8%

SA CPI CAGR (2008-2017), 5.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

 

 

 

6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Minerals Council, Department of Mineral Resources, STATSSA, Renaissance Capital

8

vk.com/id446425943

Value not that compelling, despite recovery in margins

Sector margins have recovered…

We estimate that near-term mining sector margins have recovered back to their long-term average over the past decade, which we expect to result in significant earnings growth.

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

Figure 18: Long-term average margin analysis, %

Figure 19: Long-term average margin analysis, $/oz

 

 

 

 

Margin, %

 

 

Average margin, %

 

 

 

70%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

900

60%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

700

50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

400

20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E

2019E

2020E

2021E

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

 

 

 

Margin, $/oz

 

 

 

Average margin, $/oz

 

 

 

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E

2019E

2020E

2021E

Source: Bloomberg, Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

…but yields still uncompelling.

We calculate that most of the PGM miners still screen poorly on near-term FCF yields, due to their high capex commitments, poor cost position or elevated share prices. We believe that in a world where growth expectations are fading due to trade wars, high debt levels and rising interest rates, investors may target companies that screen well on nearterm valuation metrics.

Figure 20: Miners ranked by CY19E FCF yields

30.0%

25.0%

20.0%

15.0%

10.0%

5.0%

0.0% -5.0%

-10.0% -15.0%

23.4%

 

15.4%

15.2%

13.7%

13.7%

13.7%

12.4%

12.2%

11.2%

11.0%

10.6%

10.4%

10.3%

10.0%

9.9%

9.8%

9.7%

9.3%

8.9%

8.3%

6.8%

5.6%

5.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sector average, 9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-5.4%

 

ARM

Harmony

AngloGold

Alrosa

Gold Fields

Exxaro

Assore

Anglo

Polyus

PhosAgro

Fortescue

Sibanye

Kumba

South32

BHP

Impala

Polymetal

Glencore

Vale

Rio Tinto

Amplats

Norilsk

Northam

Lonmin

RBPlats-10.0%

*Priced at market close on 8 January 2019.

Source: Bloomberg, Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

9

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

10 January 2019

Metals & Mining

Capital allocation risk on the increase

Improving returns, healthy balance sheets and a lack of commitment to dividends could increase the risk of poor capital allocation, in our view.

We restate the PGM miners’ balance sheets to reflect the replacement cost of productive assets. This eliminates accounting distortions and anomalies such as impairments, revaluations or fully depreciated assets. It also removes capital efficiency discrepancies among companies, as we assume they all pay the same for productive capacity. We forecast returns turning positive in 2018 and recovering back to c. 4% in 2019 (close to their long-term average) on the back of recovering margins. While our long-term returns are still below WACC, we believe rising returns could result in new projects being approved, given the industry’s willingness to invest at value-destructive returns in the hope that PGM prices will recover strongly in the medium-to-long term.

Figure 21: SA PGM sector* average RoE with assets at estimated replacement cost

 

 

 

 

 

20.0%

 

18.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.0%

14.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0%

7.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average RoE, 2005-2017, 5.5%

4.3%

4.2%

4.2%

5.0%

 

 

 

 

3.6%

 

 

2.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4%

1.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3%

0.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-0.7%

-0.8%

 

 

 

-2.2%

-5.0%

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E

2019E

2020E

2021E

2022E

*Five SA PGM miners under coverage.

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

We believe investors tend to steer clear of companies with low payout ratios, as this could suggest: 1) management’s desire to spend shareholder cash on potentially low-return acquisitions or projects; and/or 2) a lack of confidence in profitability. Higher dividends reduce the risk of value-destruction through poor capital allocation, in our view

Figure 22: JSE-listed companies ranked by 12M forward consensus dividend yields*

10.0%

8.0%

6.0%

4.0%

2.0%

0.0%

*Priced as at market close on 8 January 2019.

Average dividend yield, 4.3%

 

Amplats,1.5%

Sibanye, 0.3% RBPlatt, 0.0% Northam, 0.0% Implats, 0.0% Lonmin, 0.0%

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, Renaissance Capital estimates

10