книги2 / 17

8.Baur A.W., Bühler J., Bick M. How pricing of business intelligence and analytics SaaS applications can catch up with their technology // Journal of Systems and Information Technology. — 2015. — № 17(3). — P. 229–246.

9.Berners-Lee T. Weaving the Web: Origins and Future of the World Wide Web. — N. Y.: Texere Publishing, 1999. — 256 p.

10.Boshe P. Data privacy law: An international perspective // Information and communications technology law. — L., 2015. — Vol. 24, № 1. — P. 118–120.

11.Braga A., Logan, R.K. AI and the singularity: A fallacy or a great opportunity? // Information (Switzerland). — 2019. — № 10 (2). Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/2/73

12.Buskirk J.V., Naicker S., Roxburgh A. Who sells what? Country specific differences in substance availability on the Agora cryptomarket // International Journal of Drug Policy. — 2016. — № 35. — P. 16–23.

13.Calo, Ryan, Robots in American Law (February 24, 2016). University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2016-04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2737598

14.Chen X.-M., Tian G., Miao Y.-S., Gong J.-W. Driving Rule Acquisition and Decision Algorithm to nmanned Vehicle in Urban Traffic // Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology. — 2017. — № 37(5). —

P. 491–496.

15.Ciongaru E. Science of law in context of globalization // EIRP (Interna-

tional conference on European integration) proceedings. — Danubius, 2015. — Vol. 10. — P. 167–172.

16. Comment permettre à l’Homme de garder la main? Rapport sur les enjeux éthiques des algorithmes et de l’intelligence artificielle / Rapportdesynthèsedudébatpublic / CNIL. — URL: <https://www.cnil.fr/fr/comment- permettre-lhomme-de-garder-la-main-rapport-sur-les-enjeux-ethiques-des- algorithmes-et-de>. — 15.12.2017.

401

17. D'Amato A. Can/Should Computers Replace Judges? // Northwestern University School of Law. Faculty Working Papers. — 1977. — Paper № 129. — 19 p. — URL: <https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.ru/&httpsredir=1&article=1128&context=facult yworkingpapers>.

18.Das Potenzial der elektronischen Stimmabgabe. Berne 2005. — Retrieved from: http://www.gfsbern.ch/pub/vote-electronique.pdf

19.E. Celeste. Digital constitutionalism Mapping the constitutional response

to digital technology’s challenges (HIIG DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES 2018-

02). — P. 3–4.

20.Electronic voting — challenges and opportunities: report. — Norway : Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development, 2006. — 153 p.

21.Engle E.A. An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning: Using xTalk to Model the Alien Tort Claims Act and Torture Victim Protection Act // Richmond Journal of Law & Technology. — 2004. — Vol. XI. — № 1. — P. 2–12. — URL: <http://jolt.richmond.edu/jolt-archive/v11i1/article2.pdf>.

22.European Parliament. REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Debates. February, 15 2017. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=CRE&reference =20170215&secondRef=ITEM-014&language=EN&ring=A8-2017-0005 (дата обращения: 01.02.2019)

23.Fernández Hernández C., Boulat P. Inteligencia Artificial y Derecho.

Problemasyperspectivas.Retrieved		from:	http://noticias.juridicas.com/
conocimiento/articulos-doctrinales/10061-inteligencia-artificial-y-derecho-
problemas-y-perspectivas/#_edn28.
24.	Galindo F., Marco J.G. Freedom and the Internet: Empowering citizens

and addressing the transparency gap in search engines // European journal of law and technology. — Belfast, 2017. — Vol. 8, № 2. — P. 1–18.

402

25.Garcia D. Preparing for Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession // Lexis Practice Advisor Journal. — 06.07.2017. — Retrieved from: https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexis-practice-advisor/the- journal/b/lpa/archive/2017/06/07/preparing-for-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal- profession.aspx>.

26.Goldsmith B., Ruthrauff H. Implementing and overseeing Electronic voting and counting technologies. — USA: The National Democratic Institute, 2013. —

310p.

27.Goodman M. Future Crimes: Inside the Digital Underground and the Battle for Our Connected World. — Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2015. —

464р.

28.Greenberg A. (2013). «Meet The Dread Pirate Roberts, The Man Behind Booming Black Market Drug Website Silk Road». Retrieved. — 2014. — № 9/2. Retrieved from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/08/14/ meet-the- dread-pirate-roberts-the-man-behind-booming-blackmarket-drug-website-silk-road/.

29.Hall M.J.J, Calabro D., Sourdin T., Stranieri A., Zeleznikow J. Supporting Discretionary Decision Making with Information Technology: A Case Study in the Criminal Sentencing Jurisdiction // University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal 1. — 2004. — Vol. 1. — № 2. — Retrieved from: http://www.uoltj.ca/articles/vol2.1/2005.2.1.uoltj.Hall.1-36.pdf.

30.Hauer T. Society and the Second Age of Machines: Algorithms Versus Ethics // Society. — 2018. — № 55(2). — P. 100–106.

31.Hauer T., Huschitt N., Klein F. Patient care after terrorist attacks: Experiences from the Berlin Christmas market attack (19 December 2016) // Notfall und Rettungsmedizin. — 2018. — № 21(4). — P. 267–277.

32.Hvass J., Larsen O., Vendelbo K. Visual realism and presence in a virtual reality game // 3DTV-Conference 2017-Jun, 2018. — P. 1–4.

33.J. Buolamwini, T. Gebru Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification // Proceedings of the 1st Conference on

403

Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. New York, 23 — 24 Feb 2018 year / edi-

tor Sorelle A. Friedler, Christo Wilson. — New York, 2018.

34.Kamener L. Courting change: the verdict on AI and the courts / The Centre for Public Impact. — URL: <https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/ court- ing-change-verdict-ai-courts/>.

35.Leith P. The Judge and the Computer: How Best «Decision Support»? // Artificial Intelligence and Law. — 1998, June. — Vol. 6. — № 2–4. — P. 289–

309.— URL: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1008226325874>.

36.Lemley Mark A., Volokh E. Law, Virtual Reality, and Augmented Reality (February 27, 2018). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 166, 2018, Forthcoming; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2933867; UCLA School of

Law, Public Law Research Paper №. 17-13. Retrieved from:

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2933867 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2933867

37.Liat Clark, Walking the Plank with the Oculus Rift is Stomach-Churning Stuff, WIRED UK (May30, 2013), Retrieved from: http://www.wired.co.uk/article/ oculus-vr

38.Lodder A., Zeleznikow J. Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution // Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice / Ed. by M.A. Wahab, E. Katsh, D. Rainey. — The Hague (Netherlands): Eleven International Publishing, 2012. — P. 73–94. — URL: <https://www.mediate.com/pdf/lodder _zeleznikow.pdf>.

39.Martin J. Drugs on the Dark Net: How Cryptomarkets Are Transforming the Global Trade in Illicit Drugs. Publishedby PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. —

NewYork, 2014. — 100 p.

40.Meuleman B., Rudrauf D. Induction and profiling of strong multicomponential emotions in virtual reality // IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2018. Retrieved from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8432120/

41.Nakad-Weststrate H.W.R., Jongbloed A.W., Herik, van den H.J., Salem A.-B.M. Digitally Produced Judgements in Modern Court Proceedings // Internation-

404

al Journal of Digital Society (IJDS). — 2015, December. — Vol. 6. — № 4. —

P. 1102–1112. — URL: <https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/

42379/Int.%20J.%20Digital%20Soc.%206(2015)1102.pdf?sequence=1>.

42.Nakad-Weststrate H.W.R., Herik, van den H.J., Jongbloed A.W., Salem A.M. The Risе of the Robotic Judge in Modern Court Proceedings // ICIT 2015: The 7th International Conference on Information Technology. — Amman (Jordan), 2015. — P. 59–67.

43.National Robotics Initiative 2.0: Ubiquitous Collaborative Robots (NRI- 2.0) [Electronic resource] // The National Science Foundation [Site]. — URL: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17518/nsf17518.htm (accessed: 08.08.2019)

44.P. Cerka, J. Grigiene, G. Sirbikyte Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems?// Сomputer law & security review. —

2017. — № 33 (2017). — Р. 685–699.

45. P. Cerka, J. Grigiene, G. Sirbikyte Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence // Computer law & security review. — 2015. — № 31. — P. 376– 389.

46.Padhy N.P., Artificial intelligence and intelligent systems 3. Oxford University Press, 2005. 211 р.

47.Perry T.S. Virtual reality goes social: Meeting people, not playing games, will be VR's killer app, IEEESpectrum, 7367470. — 2016. — № 53(1). — P. 56–57.

48.Peter Biddle, Paul England, Marcus Peinado, and Bryan WillmanThe Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution. — URL: http://bearcave.com/ misl/misl_tech/msdrm/darknet.htm

49.Rajnai Z., Kocsis I.Labor market risks of industry 4.0, digitization, robots and AI // SISY 2017 — IEEE 15th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Proceedings, 2017. 8080580. — P. 343–346.

405

50.Reese H. Understanding the differences between AI, machine learning, and deep learning. — Mode of access: https://www.techrepublic.com/ article/understandingthedifferencesbetweenaimachine learninganddeeplearning.

51.Regan M.P. Reviving the public trustee concept and applying it to information privacy policy // Maryland law review. — Maryland, 2017. — Vol. 76,

№4. — P. 1025–1043.

52.Riordan J. The Liability of Internet Intermediaries. — Oxford: Oxford univ. рress, 2016. — 383 р.

53.Rissland E.L. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning: A Discussion

of the Field&Gardner’s Book // AI Magazine. — 1988. — Vol. 9. — № 3. — P. 45–

55. — URL: <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/602c/ d68fe7bad5ba9e885f82

dded84d7215ad5e9.pdf>.

54.Roff H.M. The Strategic Robot Problem: Lethal Autonomous Weapons in War // Journal of Military Ethics. — 2014. — №13(3). — P. 211–227.

55.Rosser G., Davies T., Bowers K.J., Johnson S.D., Cheng T. Predictive Crime Mapping: Arbitrary Grids or Street Networks? // Journal of Quantitative Criminology. — 2017. — № 33(3). — P. 569–594.

56.Sartor G., Branting L. Introduction: Judicial Applications of Artificial Intelligence // Artificial Intelligence and Law. — 1998. — Vol. 6. — P. 105–110. —

URL: <http://www.buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/files/anexos/6624-6623-1-PB.pdf>.

57.Schrijver S. The Future Is Now: Legal Consequences of Electronic Per-

sonality for Autonomous Robots. In: Who’s Who Legal, 2018. Available at: http://whoswholegal.com/news/features/article/34313/future-now-legal- consequences-electronic-personality-autonomousrobots (accessed: 05.08.2019)

58. Scott J.D. Social media and government surveillance: The case for be er privacy protections for our newest public space // Journal of business & technology law. — Baltimore, 2017. — Vol. 12, № 2. — P. 151–164.

406

59.Siemaszkiewicz M. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Polish Civil Proceedings // Available at: <https://nms.kcl.ac.uk/icail2017/dcpdf/ siemaszkiewicz.pdf>.

60.Sourdin T. Justice and Technological Innovation // Access to Justice. —

2015. — Paper 42. — 12 p. — <http://www.civiljustice.info/

cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context =access>.

61.State of Wisconsin v. Eric L. Loomis / Decision of the Supreme Court of

Wisconsin № 2016 WI 68 of 2016 // Available at: <http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-

content/uploads/2017/02/ 16-6387-op-bel-wis.pdf>.

62.Stobbs N., Hunter D., Bagaric M. Can Sentencing Be Enhanced by the Use of Artificial Intelligence? // Available at: <https://eprints.qut.edu.au/ 115410/2/CLJprooffinal 25Nov2017.pdf>. — 45 p.

63.Strikwerda L. Present and Future Instances of Virtual Rape in Light of Three Categories of Legal Philosophical Theories on Rape // Philosophy and Technology. — 2015. — № 28(4). — Р. 491–510.

64.The National Artificial Intelligence Research And Development Strategic Plan [Electronic resource] //The Federal Networking and Information Technology Research and Development [Site]. — URL: https://www.nitrd.gov/ PUBS/national_ai_rd_strategic _plan.pdf(accessed: 03.08.2019).

65.Thompson D. Creating New Pathways to Justice Using Simple Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution // Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper. — 2016. — Vol. 12. — Issue 6. — 53 p. — URL: <http://digitalcommons. osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1151&context=olsrps>.

66.Twitter taught Microsoft’s AI chatbot to be a racist asshole in less than a

day // The Verge. — Available at: <https://www.theverge.com/ 2016/3/24/11297050/tay-microsoft-chatbot-racist> (дата обращения: 05.10.2019.)

67. Usingx Talk to Model the Alien Tort Claims Actand Torture Victim Protection Act // Richmond Journal of Law&Technology. — 2004. — Vol. XI. — №

1. — P. 1–3. — URL: <http://jolt.richmond.edu/jolt-archive/v11i1/article2.pdf>.

407

68.Van Calster B., Wynants L., Timmerman D., Steyerberg E.W., Collins G.S. Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works? // Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. — 2019. — № 26(12). — P. 1651–1654.

69.Anton Vasiliev, Sergey Zemlyukov, Zhamaladen Ibragimov, Egor Kulikov, & Ivan Mankovsky. Ethical and legal aspects of the use of artificial intelligence in Russia, EU, and the USA: comparative legal analysis // Religacion. Journal Of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. — No. 30.4 (19). — Retrieved from: http://revista.religacion.com/index.php/about/article/view/511

70.Vasiliev Anton, & Pechatnova Yylia. Artificial Intelligence Impact on the Legal Sphere // Religacion. Journal Of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. —

No. 30. 4 (19). — Retrieved from: http://revista.religacion.com/ in-

dex.php/about/article/view/514

71.Vasiliev A.A., Voronkova E.O., Murutkhanova M. Law in the digital era // Sustainable development of cross-border territories. IOP 2019.

72.A.A. Vasilyev, Ibragimov Zh.I. and Gubernatorova E.V. «The Russian draft bill of «the Grishin Law» in terms of improving the legal regulation of relations in the field of robotics: critical analysis»// «Information Technologies in Business and Industry» ITBI-2019. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

73.Vitaliy Polyakov. (2019). Criminalistics specifics of methods of committing computer crimes and peculiarities of their prevention. Religacion. Journal Of Social Sciences and Humanities. — 2019. — № 4 (19). — Р. 145–152. — Retrieved from: http://revista.religacion.com/ index.php/about/article/view/518

74.Walker N. Intimations of global law. — Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2015. — 224 р.

75.Welsh police wrongly identify thousands as potential criminals. — Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/05/welsh-police- wrongly-identify-thousands-as-potential-criminals

76.Wittenberg D.S. Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law // Litiga-

tion News (American Bar Association). — 18.01.2017. — URL:

408

<https://www.americanbar.org/publications/litigation-news/business-

litigation/artificial-intelligence-in-the-practice-of-law.html>.

77.Wohlforth W. The Stability of a Unipolar World //International Security. Summer 1999. — № 24. — P. 5–41.

78.Won H. Measures to Realize Sustainable and Efficient Justice from the Perspective of Information and Communications Technology: Focusing on the Korean Court // Journal of Korean Law. — 2016, December. — Vol. 16. — P. 67–91. —

URL: <http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/112423/1/03 _Hoshin%20Won_%

EC%9E%AC%EA%B5%90OK2.pdf>.

79.Xu (Lu) A. Chinese judicial justice on the cloud: a future call or a Pan-

dora’s box? An analysis of the «intelligent court system» of China // Information & Communications Technology Law. — 2017. — Vol. 26. — № 1. — P. 59–71. — URL: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2017.1269873>.

80.Zeleznikow J. Can artificial intelligence and online dispute resolution enhance efficiency and effectiveness in courts // International Journal For Court Administration. 2017, May. — Vol. 8. — № 2. — P. 30–45. — URL: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2999339>.

81.Абызов Р.М., Землюков С.В. К вопросу о понятии вербального преступления // Российский следователь. — 2014. — № 24. — С. 34–37.

82.Аверьянов М.А., Баранова О.В., Кочетова Е.Ю., Сиваков Р.Л. Цифровая трансформация процессов нормативного регулирования: тенденции, подходы и решения // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. —

2018. — Vol. 6. — № 11.

83. Алексеев С.С. Общая теория права: в 2 т. — Т. I. — М.: Юрид. лит.,

1981. — 360 с.

84.Ализар А. Нейросеть сделала фальшивого Обаму. — URL: https:// habr.com/post/405269.

85.Аналитический вестник Совета Федерации Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации. — 2002. — № 17. — С. 15–16.

409

86. Анисимова И.А. Уголовно-правовое значение преступного вреда :

дис. … канд. юрид. наук. — Барнаул, 2008. — 232 с.

87.Антонов Я.В. Конституционно-правовые перспективы развития электронной демократии в современной России // Конституционное и муниципальное право. — 2016. — № 9; — Российская юстиция. — 2016. — № 12. — С. 17–20.

88.Антонов Я.В. Проблемы содержания универсальных демократических прав в системе электронной демократии // Российская юстиция. —

2017. — № 3. — С. 50–53.

89. Антонов Я.В. Электронная демократия и электронное голосование: конституционно-правовое измерение // Российский юридический журнал. —

2016. — № 5. — С. 101–113.

90.Антонов Я.В. Электронная демократия как политико-правовой механизм согласования частных и публичных интересов // Российская юстиция. — 2017. — № 12. — С. 38–41.

91.Антонов Я.В. Электронное голосование и электронная демократия: правовые основы развития и взаимодействия. — URL: http://www.st-

petersburg.izbirkom.ru/etc/5a.doc (дата обращения: 13.07.2019).

92.Аристотель. Сочинения: в 4 т. — Т. 4. — М.: Мысль, 1984. — 830 с.

93.Архипов В.В., Наумов В.Б. Искусственный интеллект и автономные устройства в контексте права: о разработке первого в России закона о робототехнике // Труды СПИИРАН. — 2017. — № 6. — С. 43–66.

94.Архипов В.В., Наумов В.Б. О некоторых вопросах теоретических оснований развития законодательства о робототехнике: аспекты воли и правосубъектности // Закон. — 2017. — № 5. — С. 157–170.

95.Архипов В.В. Интернет-право : учебник и практикум для бакалавриата и магистратуры. — М. : Юрайт, 2019. — 249 с.

96.Бабурин С.Н. Мир империй: территория государства и мировой порядок. — М. : Магистр: ИНФРА-М, 2013. — 246 с.

410