Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
ISTORIYa_YaZYKA_STANKEVICh.docx
Скачиваний:
48
Добавлен:
23.03.2015
Размер:
114.48 Кб
Скачать

Verb (5th lecture)

OE: Some people say that Old English was much like modern German, not more. This question is really interesting. In fact she is right, there is much more in common between Old English and German, than between Modern English and German. That happens because different languages have different speed of development. English through history was very progressive and active - the whole revolution happened with it in the 15th and the 16th centuries, not only taking into consideration the Great Vowel Shift, but also the major grammar changes. The result was the Modern, or New, English, which has practically no declension, lost genders, shortened words and forms, simplified the syntax. Modern English makes a distinction between regular and irregular verbs. This distinction goes back to the Old English system of strong and weak verbs: the ones which used the ancient Germanic type of conjugation (the Ablaut), and the ones which just added endings to their past and participle forms. Strong verbs make the clear majority. According to the traditional division, which is taken form Gothic and is accepted by modern linguistics, all strong verbs are distinguished between seven classes, each having its peculiarities in conjugation and in the stem structure.

The system of the verbs was less developed than it is now, it had fewer forms, and its categories were somewhat different from the similar categories in present-day English. All the paradigmatic forms of the verb were synthetic. There were also lexical structures with non-finite forms of the verb rendering some grammatical meaning. The non-finite forms of the verb in OE were the infinitive and two Participles. They had no categories of the finite verb but shared many features with the nominal parts of speech. The infinitive had the suffix –an/ian. It had the grammatical category of case: the nominative and dative, the latter form was made by the suffix –enne/anne: wrītan – to wrītenne. The infinitive in this form was associated with the preposition tō. Participle I is formed by means of the suffix –ende added to the stem of the infinitive: wrītan – wrītende (to write – writing). It was active in meaning and expressed the action simultaneous with the tense of the finite verb. Like all nominal parts of speech, it had the categories of number, gender and case and was declined like a strong adjective.

Participle II expressed actions and states resulting from past action and was passive in meaning. Depending on the class of the verb it was formed by vowel interchange and the suffix –en (strong verbs) or the dental suffix –d/t (weak verbs). Participle II was commonly marked by the prefix Ʒe-, though may be found without it. Wrītan – written, Ʒewriten. Categories: Number is not specifically verbal category. The choice of singular or plural form depends on the number of the noun/pronoun subject of the sentence. The category of person is represented by all the three persons, though this opposition is neutralized in many positions. Present tense singular has all forms, in plural it is not shown. Past tense singular had only one form for the 1 and 3 person, and in the Imperative and Subjunctive mood it was absent. The category of mood was represented by the opposition of 3 moods – Indicative (represents action as a real fact), Subjunctive (expresses condition, desire, supposition), Imperative (expresses order, or request to a second person).

The category of tense was represented by opposition past – non-past (preterit-non-preterit). The current form for the non-preterit. The majority of OE verbs fell into 2 great divisions: weak (derived their past tense stem and that of Participle II by adding dental suffix – d and –t, normally they didn’t change their rot vowels) and strong (formed their stems means of vowel gradation and by adding certain suffixes); in some verbs gradation was accompanied by changes of consonants. There were 4 basic forms of strong verbs: I – the stem with this vowel are used in the infinitive, the present tense indicative and subjunctive, the imperative mood and participle I; II – in the past tense singular, the 1st and the 3d person; III – past tense plural< 2d person singular and past Subjunctive; IV – in the form of the Participle II).

Strong verbs. There were about three hundred strong verbs in OE. They are derived into 7 classes.

Regular strong verbs were all conjugated roughly the same, with the main differences being in the stem vowel. Thus stelan 'to steal' represents the strong verb conjugation paradigm.

Conjugation

Pronoun

'steal'

Infinitives

stelan

tō stelanne

Present Indicative

ic

stele

þū

stilst

hē/hit/hēo

stilð

wē/gē/hīe

stelaþ

Past Indicative

ic

stæl

þū

stæle

hē/hit/hēo

stæl

wē/gē/hīe

stælon

Present Subjunctive

ic/þū/hē/hit/hēo

stele

wē/gē/hīe

stelen

Past Subjunctive

ic/þū/hē/hit/hēo

stǣle

wē/gē/hīe

stǣlen

Imperative

Singular

stel

Plural

stelaþ

Present Participle

stelende

Past Participle

stolen

Of course it’s the easiest example. Cause you can find out that the word changed a lot, its root vowels and so on. But this example can show you the main idea of changes in OE strong verb.

Weak verbs. Weak verbs are formed by adding alveolar (t or d) endings to the stem for the past and past-participle tenses. Some examples are love, loved or look, looked.

Originally, the weak ending was used to form the preterite of informal, noun-derived verbs such as often emerge in conversation and which have no established system of stem-change. By nature, these verbs were almost always transitive, and even today, most weak verbs are transitive verbs formed in the same way. However, as English came into contact with non-Germanic languages, it invariably borrowed useful verbs which lacked established stem-change patterns. Rather than invent and standardize new classes or learn foreign conjugations, English speakers simply applied the weak ending to the foreign bases.

The linguistic trends of borrowing foreign verbs and verbalizing nouns have greatly increased the number of weak verbs over the last 1,200 years. Some verbs that were originally strong (for example help, holp, holpen) have become weak by analogy; most foreign verbs are adopted as weak verbs; and when verbs are made from nouns (for example "to scroll" or "to water") the resulting verb is weak. Additionally, conjugation of weak verbs is easier to teach, since there are fewer classes of variation. In combination, these factors have drastically increased the number of weak verbs, so that in modern English weak verbs are the most numerous and productive form (although occasionally a weak verb may turn into a strong verb through the process of analogy, such as sneak (originally only a noun), where snuck is an analogical formation rather than a survival from Old English).

There are three major classes of weak verbs in Old English. The first class displays i-mutation in the root, and the second class none. There is also a third class explained below.

Class-one verbs with short roots exhibit gemination of the final stem consonant in certain forms. With verbs in <r> this appears as <ri> or <rg>, where <i> and <g> are pronounced [j]. Geminated <f> appears as <bb>, and that of <g> appears as <cg>. Class one verbs may receive anepenthetic vowel before endings beginning in a consonant.

Where class-one verbs have gemination, class-two verbs have <i> or <ig>, which is a separate syllable pronounced [i]. All class-two verbs have an epenthetic vowel, which appears as <a> or <o>.

In the following table, three verbs are conjugated. Swebban 'to put to sleep' is a class one verb exhibiting gemination and an epenthetic vowel.Hǣlan 'to heal' is a class-one verb exhibiting neither gemination nor an epenthetic vowel. Sīðian 'to journey' is a class-two verb.

Conjugation

Pronoun

'put to sleep'

'heal'

'journey'

Infinitives

swebban

hǣlan

sīðian

tō swebbanne

tō hǣlanne

tō sīðianne

Present Indicative

ic

swebbe

hǣle

sīðie

þū

swefest

hǣlst

sīðast

hē/hit/hēo

swefeþ

hǣlþ

sīðað

wē/gē/hīe

swebbaþ

hǣlaþ

sīðiað

Past Indicative

ic

swefede

hǣlde

sīðode

þū

swefedest

hǣldest

sīðodest

hē/hit/hēo

swefede

hǣle

sīðode

wē/gē/hīe

swefedon

hǣlon

sīðodon

Present Subjunctive

ic/þū/hē/hit/hēo

swebbe

hǣle

sīðie

wē/gē/hīe

swebben

hǣlen

sīðien

Past Subjunctive

ic/þū/hē/hit/hēo

swefede

hǣlde

sīðode

wē/gē/hīe

swefeden

hǣlden

sīðoden

Imperative

Singular

swefe

hǣl

sīða

Plural

swebbaþ

hǣlaþ

sīðiað

Present Participle

swefende

hǣlende

sīðiende

Past Participle

swefed

hǣled

sīðod

During the Old English period the third class was significantly reduced; only four verbs belonged to this group: habban 'have', libban 'live', secgan'say', and hycgan 'think'. Each of these verbs is distinctly irregular, though they share some commonalities.

Conjugation

Pronoun

'have'

'live'

'say'

'think'

Infinitive

habban

libban, lifgan

secgan

hycgan

Present Indicative

ic

hæbbe

libbe, lifge

secge

hycge

þū

hæfst, hafast

lifast, leofast

segst, sagast

hygst, hogast

hē/hit/hēo

hæfð, hafað

lifað, leofað

segð, sagað

hyg(e)d, hogað

wē/gē/hīe

habbaþ

libbað

secgaþ

hycgað

Past Indicative

(all persons)

hæfde

lifde, leofode

sægde

hog(o)de, hygde

Present Subjunctive

(all persons)

hæbbe

libbe, lifge

secge

hycge

Past Subjunctive

(all persons)

hæfde

lifde, leofode

sægde

hog(o)de, hygde

Imperative

Singular

hafa

leofa

sæge, saga

hyge, hoga

Plural

habbaþ

libbaþ, lifgaþ

secgaþ

hycgaþ

Present Participle

hæbbende

libbende, lifgende

secgende

hycgende

Past Participle

gehæfd

gelifd

gesægd

gehogod