- •390 1 English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Strain and Conflict
- •392 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •394 I EnQlish for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Unit VIII
- •Kinds of Groups
- •II. Answer the following questions:
- •396 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •XIII. Translate the following sentences into Russian:
- •XIV. Read and translate the text:
- •XV. Answer the following questions:
- •402 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •XVI. Contradict the following statements. Start your sentence with: «Quite on the contrary...»
- •XVII. Ask your friend:
- •Give examples of primary and secondary groups.
- •Characterize in brief:
- •404 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Networks
- •406 | English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •V. Answer the following questions:
- •Unit IX
- •Group Dynamics
- •III. Answer the following questions:
- •4'* I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •VIII. Read the text again and note the difference between ingroups and outgroups.
- •IX. Prepare a report «Group Dynamics and Society». Unitx
- •I. Read and translate the text:
- •Deviance
- •4/6 | English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •418 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •VII. Speak on:
- •VIII. Translate the text in writing:
- •2. People become deviant as others define them that way.
- •420 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Unit XI
- •422 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •II. Answer the following questions:
- •424 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •XII. Answer the following questions:
- •428 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Unit XII
- •IV. Answer the following questions:
- •Fourth Dimension
- •434 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •The Golden Mean
- •436 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •VI. Answer the following questions:
- •440 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •VIII. Answer the following questions:
- •442 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •444 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Make up disjunctive questions:
- •445 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •V. What problems are similar for both countries?
- •44Д I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Mass society
- •450 | English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •7Exrs for written translation I 453
- •III. Translate the text in writing.
- •454 1 English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •455 1 English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •460 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •1. Spencer and His Time
- •VII. Translate the text in writing:
- •466 | English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •VIII. Translate the text in writing:
- •468 | English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •470 1 English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •47Г | English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •P resent simple
- •II. Complete the following sentences:
- •Past simple
- •478 I Enalish for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Present perfect
- •480 1 English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •482 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •II. Analyze and translate the sentences with participles:
- •484 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •486 | English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •488 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •490 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •494 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •XIII. Read and translate the sentences with complex subject:
- •495 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •XIV. Translate the following conditional sentences:
- •XV. Translate the following conditional sentences:
- •498 | English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •XVI. Read, analyze and translate:
- •XVII. Read and translate the following sentences:
- •Vocabulary 500 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Vocabulary I 5o3
- •504 I English for Psychologists and Sociologists
- •Vocabulary I s°5
- •Vocabulary I s07
- •Vocabulary 1 509
■made
the
most difference. They have been widely cited;
■they
have
stimulated extensive further research; some have
created substantial controversies; but above all, they have
attracted the attention of the community of communication
scholars, and in many cases the general
Iublic,
to provide important perspectives on the process nd
influences of mass communication.7Exrs for written translation I 453
III. Translate the text in writing.
452
I
English
for Psychologists and Sociologists
found through an examination of the major research studies of the past. There are also a few generalizations that appear to have wide applicability under a variety of times and circumstances.
In an ideal world, science would proceed very systematically to accomplish its twin goals of innovation and accumulation. In such a world, some studies would move forward the cutting edge of theory and method whereas others would replicate and confirm earlier findings. Such an ideal science would be self-policing, and the generalizations accumulated would be both reliable and valid. Unfortunately, things seldom work out so neatly in the real world of scientific investigation. Studies in almost every field are undertaken for a bewildering variety of reasons, ranging from the trivial to the profound. Thus, the accumulation of knowledge is often frustratingly uncoordinated.
The study of mass communication has been particularly unsystematic. It is not a concisely defined field, and it has had only a relatively brief history. One problem has been that those who have studied the media in the past have come from several different disciplines. Some were investigations that led researchers to conceptualize the process of mass communication in a new and important way. Others introduced innovative methodological procedures, techniques, or strategies that made a lasting contribution to the scientific study of mass communication. And still others played a particularly important part in shaping the beliefs of the non-scientific public about the nature of media influences.
They all represent attempts to study the media within the framework of science. In some cases the research efforts were programs rather than single projects. Some were based on elaborate experiments; others used survey techniques. One was based on a purely clinical strategy. But above all, these appear to us as the ones that have
FROM SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY TO SOCIOLOGY (by Igor Kon)
The Ideological and Theoretical Premisses of Sociological Knowledge
Sociology arose in the middle of the nineteenth century as an independent science of the patterns of development and functioning of social systems, not because a new object of study had appeared, but because problems had developed in other social sciences that could not be tackled by the traditional means and within the bounds of the existing system of knowledge.
The sociological vision of the world presupposes (1) a view of society as a systemic whole functioning and developing according to its own laws; (2) a conscious stance on study of actually existing social relations; (3) reliance on empirical methods of research in contrast to speculative philosophical constructs.
The elements of this approach were built up gradually within the context of social philosophy and the philosophy of the history of modern times, and as empirical studies and the differentiation of social and humanitarian sciences.
The problem of society as a system had already been posed by seventeenth-century theories of «social physics». Insofar as society was represented as part of nature, social