5) The principles of administrative justice

Consideration of human rights nature of administrative justice is impossible without defining principles of this institution, or basic, primary principles of its existence, which mediate the pattern of this existence and mutual connection of this phenomenon with other human rights events.

For in-depth consideration of the fundamental principles of the functioning administra ¬ nistratyvnoyi Justice proposed to classify the principles of this institution for the semantic criterion is given basic legal, organiza ¬ nizatsiyni and procedural components of the examined institution.

General principles reflect key priorities and targets the most common bases of creation and functioning of administrative justice in soc ¬ ialno institutional environment. These principles include the following.

1. The principle of the system (complex) function. This principle is confirmed ¬ Jenny fact that administrative justice, firstly, an independent system, which consists of legal, institutional and procedural means to achieve human rights goals, and secondly, it is part of a global system of state-legal protection of citizens of functionally defined place in this system, and, thirdly, one of the institutions that make up the updated system of administrative law in Ukraine.

In this connection it is important to realize that the imposition of administrative ¬ tive justice in Ukraine should be under careful weighing of all the components of administrative justice, to decide on the possibility ¬ cially systematization of legal rules governing the appropriate group relations, or the creation of separate legal acts.

In addition, you really need to adopt codes relate ¬ nizes legislative act in the field of administrative justice required of other Stu ¬ Legislative Drafting and thus provide possible ¬ lyvist of conflicting issues in the administrative courts resolve disputes in the field of public administration.

Establishment of a national law on administrative justice can not be seen in isolation from other activities in the field of legislation. COP ¬ particular, the introduction of administrative justice without law ¬ nd procedural arrangements of the executive power leveling threatens some important characteristics of human rights administra ¬ tion of Justice, terminological inconsistency bills, in its June ¬ gu exert adverse effects on the efficiency of the administrative ¬ tive courts.

With the introduction of a specialized form of legal protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens as subjects of legal relations arising in the field of public administra ¬ ment, which would provide appropriate organizational and procedural safeguards, individuals should be given a real opportunity to appeal any decision ¬ ing authorities and local government, which they believe is illegal.

In particular, the wrongfulness may be in violation of executive au ¬ thorities procedure for adoption of the legal act. Clearly under-

240

legislative determination of principles of preparation and adoption of regulations will, firstly, ensuring regime legitimacy in the public educa ¬ ment and, secondly, to establish clear rules of administrative procedure, the violation of which could result in an invasion or not ¬ safety of such intrusion into the sphere pravorealizatsii citizens. So if ¬ nom, citizens will legally established grounds for an appeal to the Administrative Court to correct wrongful sec ¬ hnennya or prevent such consequences.

Accordingly, administrative justice after the codification of regulations that would detail the settled order of administrative procedures (law-making activities, departmental review of citizens and others.) Can more efficiently, and most importantly - specifically, to respond to violations of the law orga ¬ our executive .