10. Misrepresentation
Misrepresentation
is when one of the parties to a contract made a wrong statement about
some material element of the contract and, because of this statement,
the other party entered into the contract. Contract common law treats
fraudulent misrepresentation differently from innocent
misrepresentation. In his book The
Law of Contracts in Canada,
1994, p. 295, Professor G. Fridman says there are four conditions
that must be met before a court will accept that there has been
fraudulent misrepresentation:
"(1)
that the representations complained of were made by the wrongdoer to
the victim (before the contract); (2) that these representations were
false in fact; (3) that the wrongdoer, when he made them, either knew
that they were false or made them recklessly without knowing whether
they were false or true; and (4) that the victim was thereby induced
to enter into the contract in question (a
legal presumption exists in this regard)"
(emphasis added).
Notice
that the courts will not entertain a request to rescind a contract if
the representation was merely a puffed-up opinion on a particular
product. Parties should know better than to give full credence to
commercial aggrandizements. Nor will a misrepresentation on the law
be a cause for judicial intervention under this heading, and for the
same reasons as given above: everyone is presumed to know the law.
Silence can be construed as misrepresentation in certain
circumstances.