- •1. The problems of style and stylistics.
- •2. Expressive means and Stylistic devices.
- •6. Phonetic expressivity
- •4. Special literary vocabulary.
- •11. Oxymoron, zeugma, pun.
- •13. Metaphor
- •12. Simile, epithet, polysemy.
- •24. Syntactical Stylistic Devices Based on Stylistic Use of Structural Meaning.
- •30. Ways of combining part of the utterance.
- •31. Particular use of colloquial constructions (ellipsis, break-in-the-narrative)
- •14. Metonymy
- •20. Publicistic style
- •1. Oratory and speeches
- •2. The essay
- •3. Articles
- •15. The features of the belles- lettres style.
- •16. The pecularities of the colloqual style
- •18. The Style of Official Documents
- •17. Newspaper style
- •19. The Scientific Prose Style
30. Ways of combining part of the utterance.
To follow closely how parts of an utterance are connected and to clarify the type of interdependence between these parts is sometimes difficult either because of the absence of formal signs of linkage (asyndeton), or because of the presence of too many identical signs (polysyndeton).
Asyndeton. Asyndeton, that is, connection between parts of a sentence or between sentences without any formal sign, becomes a stylistic device if there is a deliberate omission of the connective where it is generally expected to be according to the norms of the literary language.
The deliberate omission of the subordinate conjunction because or for makes the sentence almost entirely independent. Asyndeton is deliberate omission of conjunctions, cutting off connecting words. It helps to create the effect of terse, energetic, active prose.
Polysyndeton is the stylistic device of connecting sentences, or phrases, or syntagms, or words by using connectives (mostly conjunctions and prepositions) before each component part. The repetition of conjunctions and other means of connection makes an utterance more rhythmical; so much so that prose may even seem like verse. The conjunctions and other connectives, being generally unstressed elements, when placed before each meaningful member, will cause the alternation of stressed and unstressed syllables — the essential requirement of rhythm in verse. Hence, one of the functions of polysyndeton is a rhythmical one.
In addition to this, polysyndeton has a disintegrating function. It generally combines homogeneous elements of thought into one whole resembling enumeration. But, unlike enumeration, which integrates both homogeneous and heterogeneous elements into one whole, polysyndeton causes each member of a string of facts to stand out conspicuously. That is why we say that polysyndeton has a disintegrating function. Enumeration shows things united; polysyndeton shows them isolated.
Polysyndeton - repeated use of conjunctions. It is used to strengthen the idea of equal logical/emotive importance of connected sentences. Also it makes an utterance more rhythmical; so much so that prose may even seem like verse.
The Gap- Sentence Link. Consequently, GSL is a way of connecting two sentences seemingly unconnected and leaving it to the reader's perspicacity to grasp the idea implied, but not worded. Generally speaking, every detail of the situation need not be stated. Some must remain for the reader to divine.
As in many other cases, the device of GSL is deeply rooted in the norms of the spoken language. The omissions are justified because the situation easily prompts what has not been said. The proper intonation also helps in deciphering the communication. It is also natural in conversation to add a phrase to a statement made, a phrase which will point to uncertainty or lack of knowledge or to the unpredictability of the possible issue. The gap-sentence link is generally indicated by and or but.
The gap-sentence link as a stylistic device is based on the peculiarities of the spoken language and is therefore most frequently used in represented speech. It is GSL alongside other characteristics that moulds the device of unuttered represented speech.
The gap-sentence link has various functions. It may serve to signal the introduction of inner represented speech; it may be used to indicate a subjective evaluation of the facts; it may introduce an effect resulting from a cause which has already had verbal expression. In all these functions GSL displays an unexpected coupling of ideas. Even the cause- * and-effect relations, logical as they are, when embodied in GSL structures are not so obvious.
In contra-distinction to the logical segmentation of the utterance, which leaves no room for personal interpretation of the interdependence of the component parts, GSL aims at stirring up in the reader's mind the suppositions, associations and conditions under which the' sentence uttered can really exist.