Книги 2 / Книги 2 / Лунная афера США / innet381 / index
.htmvar PUpage="76001076"; var PUprop="geocities"; var thGetOv="http://themis.geocities.yahoo.com/themis/h.php"; var thCanURL="http://us.geocities.com/apolloreality/index.html"; var thSpaceId="76001076"; var thIP="http://www.geocities.com/apolloreality/85.140.247.96"; var thTs="1175429648"; var thCs="ad1fb8b11567853bb43434517fa428dd"; APOLLO REALITY var TlxPgNm='index'; APOLLO REALITY
This web page will show how, and where NASA faked the lunar approach, lunar landing, and lunar take off, for all 6 Apollo missions. Contrary to what many believe, the sequences were not shot in a desert, Hollywood studio, or Area 51. There may have been the odd picture taken at Area 51, and a few Apollo 17 pics that were taken in some remote desert, but the majority of stills and video were performed at Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia. Scientist's at NASA knew in the early 60's that a manned mission to the Moon was impossible within 8 years, and a plan to fake the Moon landings was put into operation. NASA's fake Moon pictures were taken at various locations such as KSC, JSC, LRC, and of course the odd one or two desert locations. I would also like to point out to pro Apollo nutters that the art of manipulating photo's and moving film is as old as photography and film itself. The 1930's film "King Kong" showed a huge gorilla scaling up the Empire State building. If it's on film are we led to believe it's real? No of course not, but that is exactly what the pro Apollo nutters are claiming.
Langley is NASA's secret research facility, and staff are sworn to secrecy. All the files pertaining to the Apollo missions are stored there, along with other artifacts including the burnt out Apollo capsule which killed Grissom, Chaffe and White. They have the facilities to perform anything, fake backgrounds, simulated orbiters etc. First piece of evidence is the large 250 foot traverse crane shown below. Notice the fake Moon crater surface beneath it.
This crane was PURPOSELY built in 63/64 to perfect the lunar landing as close as possible to the real thing, and used to suspend both astronauts, and the LM itself. It enabled movement of the astronauts and LM in all directions, ie, up down, left right, forward and reverse. The trial runs were so good, and with NASA, fully aware that a Moon landing was impossible, opted to use the setup for faking the alleged cine film of lunar landing, and take off, whereby the flag is blown over.
According to Bobby Braun and other NASA officials the idea was to teach the astronauts how to land a rocket propelled LM. However NO ROCKET POWERED LM WAS EVER SUSPENDED FROM THIS CRANE. In any case anyone with the slightest gumption knows that it is IMPOSSIBLE to control a rocket engine. If the pro Apollo nutters disagree, then perhaps they could direct me to a video or film showing how the feat was, or could be accomplished. The landings were controlled purely by traverse and lowering of the LM in the same way as a conventional crane.
Below are more pictures showing mock LM suspended from this crane. In the center picture note the circular objects on the ground floor. The vast expanse of ground area beneath this crane was ideal for creating mock lunar landscapes. In reality the area was covered with gray ash, (possibly from some coal fired power station or boiler house), or plain cement. The circular objects were then raised by crane to create authentic looking Moon craters, as shown later.
Picture far right above is a time lapse sequence taken at night. Notice spotlights on crane gantry, and how it illuminates the ground surface. The mock LM was traversed full length of crane, and simultaneously lowered at the same time in order to create an authentic looking lunar landing, when viewed from within the mock LM itself. Power supply to the mock LM was by cable from crane tower. This enabled a large fan, (fitted beneath the mock LM), to create the dust scatter effect of a rocket engine as it descended to the fake Moon surface. The film shown to public of the LM supposedly blasting off from the Moon's surface was also created beneath this crane at LRC. The mock LM was simply attached to the crane, and hoisted very rapidly at the same time a pathetic looking blast off sparks was enacted beneath it. The film was then speeded up for showing to the public, and it is interesting to note that the camera filming this sequence cut short once the LM had reached the crane maximum height. In other words WHY didn't the camera continue to film the LM until it was out of view? Quite simply because it was not possible to do under the circumstances in which the "lift off" was faked.
The above pictures were taken by Bob Nye on June 20 1969, one month before Armstrong, err, supposedly stepped on the Moon. Picture on right shows the lander hovering above fake Moon crater surface beneath the crane. Believe me folks this is how it was done, even if the pro Apollo nutters say no way. Picture on left, taken at night, looks like a realistic Moon setting, although I am in no doubt that some out there will actually say this photo is the Moon. I have heard so much BS from the pro Apollo nutters nothing would surprise me. The light source seen in left picture is the SAME light source that highlights Buzz Aldrin in the controversial picture of him allegedly on the Moon. Those lights are fixed at top of crane gantry, as shown in earlier picture, or picture could have been taken at Moonscape, (see apolloreality2).
The monochrome picture left shows Armstrong at the site in January 1970. This is 6 months AFTER HE SUPPOSEDLY LANDED ON THE MOON, AND LIKEWISE APOLLO 12 HAD DONE THE SAME. Evidently he returned to the simulation site 6 months later to figure out how he could do it, having conned the world into believing he actually did land on the Moon 6 months before this picture was taken.
Pictures below show how astronauts were suspended from the crane in order to simulate low gravity. They eventually settled for an upright position with the astronaut suspended by strong elastic/bungee cord, so that his feet were only just touching the ground, the same way as a baby bouncer. You can try it yourself by placing a given weight at the end of an elastic band. As the astronauts walked in a given direction, the overhead crane moved in the same direction. This enabled the astronauts to literally float along in a crude "Moon walk" fashion. There is a classic piece of film, and I have only ever seen it once. It shows two astronauts supposedly on the Moon, but one astronaut is following behind the other in a dead straight line, and at a fixed distance. Two partners in a strange desolate place would not walk in such a stupid fashion, and so far apart. It's obvious both are following a given line/route, ie, the line or route in which the two overhead cranes are forcing them to follow. In the pictures below, it can be seen how astronauts were suspended from this crane. It is interesting to note that high backward leg swing in far left picture. That high backward leg swing is identical to the backleg swing in the Apollo 17 photo of Harrison Schmitt allegedly tripping up on the Moon. In another video sequence of Apollo 17 astronauts supposedly cavorting on the Moon, one of them is actually suspended 2 feet off, and at right angles to, the ground. This sequence lasts for a couple of seconds, so how do NASA officials explain that, and why is it that no one else has passed comment on this totally absurd picture shot? It's clear evidence that person in space suit is suspended from wire, rope, or some other line. In the center picture notice rail moving device in background for dispensing the ash/charcoal, (fake lunar surface).
Still not convinced? Then maybe this NASA archive, dated 26 August 1969, and copied word for word, will change your mind. It relates to Donald Hewes, who oversaw operations/filming with the fake landing and take off. Read it, then think hard about it. Why were NASA phaffing around with fake lunar landscapes, one month AFTER Armstrong supposedly pulled it off for real? Answer, to make the fake film look ever more realistic, when future, higher quality images were broadcast to an already gullible audience.
Looking down from the top of the gantry on to the simulated Lunar Surface. James Hansen writes: "To make the simulated landings more authentic, [Donald] Hewes and his men filled the base of the huge eight-legged, red-and-white structure with dirt and modeled it to resemble the moon's surface. They erected floodlights at the proper angles to simulate lunar light and installed a black screen at the far end of the gantry to mimic the airless lunar "sky." Hewes personally climbed into the fake craters with cans of everyday black enamel to spray them so that the astronauts could experience the shadows that they would see during the actual moon landing." (p. 375) From A.W. Vigil, "Piloted Space-Flight Simulation at Langley Research Center," Paper presented at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1966 Winter Meeting, New York, NY, November 27 - December 1, 1966. "Ground-based simulators are not very satisfactory for studying the problems associated with the final phases of landing. This is due primarily to the fact that the visual scene cannot be simulated with sufficient realism. For this reason it is preferable to go to some sort of flight-test simulator which can provide real-life visual cues. One research facility designed to study the final phases of lunar landing is in operation at Langley. ... The facility is an overhead crane structure about 250 feet tall and 400 feet long. The crane system supports five-sixths of the vehicle's weight through servo-driven vertical cables. The remaining one-sixth of the vehicle weight pulls the vehicle downward simulating the lunar gravitational force. During actual flights the overhead crane system is slaved to keep the cable near vertical at all times. A gimbal system on the vehicle permits angular freedom for pitch, roll, and yaw. The facility is capable of testing vehicles up to 20,000 pounds. A research vehicle, weighing 10,500 pounds fully loaded, is being used and is shown [in this picture]. This vehicle is provided with a large degree of flexibility in cockpit positions, instrumentation, and control parameters. It has main engines of 6,000 pounds thrust, throttle able down to 600 pounds, and attitude jets. This facility is studying the problems of the final 200 feet of lunar landing and the problems of maneuvering about in close proximity to the lunar surface." Published in James R. Hansen, Spaceflight Revolution: NASA Langley Research Center From Sputnik to Apollo, (Washington: NASA, 1995), pp. 373-378.
We now go inside the Langley Research Center complex itself to see how they faked the lunar approach and close orbit of the Moon's surface. We've all seen the film supposedly taken from the LM as it approached the Moon, and then began to orbit. The speed at which it changes from approach to lunar orbit is utterly ridiculous, as any craft traveling at that speed would crash straight into the Moon, NO ONE could control a craft in such as way as shown on the film, and in reality NO ONE did. The following pictures show EXACTLY how it was done.
Ladies, SIZE does matter believe me, especially when NASA want to create a fake lunar surface as shown in the above picture on left. It literally dwarfs the two men stood in front of it. It's unbelievable the time, trouble and expense that NASA incurred purely to fake the lunar missions. It was of course done purely to convince the world they were the leaders in space. This very large picture, and others were used in conjunction with a rail mounted camera, which also focused on a large rotating PLASTER PARIS model of the Moon, ) shown on the right). NASA knew, (after Kennedy's speech in 61), that a lunar landing before 1970 was utterly impossible. Realizing this they had no option but to fake the missions. A program was launched at LRC to design props/backgrounds etc. to convince the media they had achieved the goal set by Kennedy. The pictures above were scanned from a book, hence the poor quality, however the following pictures are from NASA.
The high resolution picture above left shows a 20' diameter sphere which can be rotated from below. In the left of that picture can be seen a huge blank placard. This is the scene before LRC staff began work on converting the sphere to an authentic looking Moon complete with craters. Notice also the rail track around placard, (there were 3 placards in all).Note moving trolley on that track. The camera was mounted on that trolley. It first began to film the rotating sphere, (lunar approach), it then swung around and began scanning the fake lunar surface on placard, (lunar orbit). The picture above right shows the sphere after modeling work. Pretty impressive eh? Notice how background is in the dark. Remove that bloke from the picture and you could EASILY pass this photo as being taken by the Apollo command module circling the Moon. It is evident that there were many people involved in the faking of Apollo, and NASA claim that if it were faked someone would have spoken out by now. Well the LRC staff were sworn to secrecy, and if anyone should tell they could face prosecution, possibly jail, and of course loss of pension rights. In any case those involved were 100% patriotic to the USA and because of the American pride instilled within them, they would not in any way condemn what they were doing.
The two pictures above show how LRC made "plaster paris" copies of the Moon craters on the placard. They are checking that the craters are exactly to scale and layout, as craters shown on the lunar photographs previously taken by high magnification telescope. Notice the sphere in left hand picture after modeling work. This sphere had a light inside it which was translucent on the outside, hence the appearance. The large placard with Moon craters was also backlit. Turn off all your lighting, and you end up with the picture shown below. This is how the Moon would look in the void of space if you could get close enough to it, however no one, not even Armstrong could get anywhere near to the real thing.
NASA claim that picture on left is far side of Moon, taken by Apollo 8. The picture is of course fake, because Apollo 8 never left Earth orbit, and wouldn't far side of Moon be in total darkness? Compare this sphere with one shown above in left hand pic. It speaks for itself does it not? In all of these pictures notice the "blackness" of background. This of course made it easier for touching up photo's to ensure that background space was indeed black. However as everyone knows they FORGOT to put any stars in the final pic.
This picture was taken by an unmanned probe orbiting the Moon in 1966, or so we are told. However it has a striking resemblance to pictures supposedly taken 3 years later by manned spacecraft orbiting the Moon.
What I am saying here, and this is directed purely towards the pro Apollo nutters, is that according to this picture it is quite possible to get a photograph of Earth rise above the Moon's surface WITHOUT a manned space craft orbiting the Moon, OR this picture is fake, when compared with the photo's above.
There are some other photographs taken inside the LRC complex which show astronauts cavorting around in space suits beside the LM that is shown in the alleged Apollo 11 Moon pictures, and watched over by NASA officials. However those pictures are fairly common, and can be seen on the Apollo 11 site, hence I have not included them here. It may be that the VERY FIRST FAKE PICTURES were indeed taken inside some large complex, if that be the case, then it was most certainly LRC, and NOT some studio in the Nevada desert as many proclaim. Incidentally ALL RECORDS pertaining to the faking of Apollo, are stored under 24 hour guard at LRC, and not due for declassification until 2026, (see APOLLO FACTS).
We now move away from LRC to KSC for some genuine simulation pictures taken here on planet Earth, but which were then doctored for use as Moon photographs. I do not believe for once that they were training for a Moon mission, moreover the simulations were done purposely to create photographs which, after alteration by Tuttle, could be passed off as Moon photographs.
The sole purpose of picture above left is to show that simulation photo's were later doctored and classed as Moon pics. Look at sandy surface with Moon boot footprints, its IDENTICAL to the Moon boot footprints allegedly on the Moon. Notice other astronaut and Moon buggy in background, but the main point to observe is the relative flatness of the foreground, and ABRUPT STRAIGHT LINE where that foreground meets the background bushy/grass area, which is but a few yards away. Applying the same tactics as Tuttle, (see APOLLO FAKE), we could easily paste our mountain scene in the background, black the sky out, and there you have it, one photo taken on the Moon. Tut, tut. The picture above right was also taken at KSC. Notice sandy (fake Moon surface, rocks etc). Again astronauts don their helmets and picture is taken. That picture is then revamped as a photo supposedly taken on the Moon.
These two pictures were, of course, taken here on planet Earth. The photo on right was taken at KSC, however those random spaced boulders appear to have a VERY similar layout to the boulders shown in the far left picture. NASA claim it's a Moon picture.
How could NASA create a boulder strewn landscape BEFORE they supposedly visited the area, and had any indication of that landscape?
The picture above was taken at Houston. It shows how NASA created a fake Moon crater. That SAME crater however appears in quite a number of Moon pics from DIFFERING missions. In Apollo 16 picture of Charlie Duke by crater, this is THE CRATER. The rough edges, gaps and pockets between boulders were smoothed out with ash/charcoal. Overall this fake crater appeared in rough format for the Apollo 14 and 15 fake pictures, and smooth format for the Apollo 16 and 17 fake pictures.
Opposite is a picture of how the crater appeared in NASA's fake pictures.
During the mid 60's astronauts went on training missions to Iceland. One of the reasons for this was because they believed the remote Icelandic landscape closely resembled the Moon itself.
The picture opposite shows astronauts on just such a mission, however it is interesting to note that the background mountain scene in this picture is IDENTICAL to a mountain scene from one of the Apollo 15 pictures.
Evidently they decided to use some of those remote scenes, (in monochrome of course), for pasting onto to the simulation pictures taken at KSC and LRC, and then publish them as genuine photo's taken on the Moon.
This last picture shows Buzz Aldrin in his Apollo 11 capsule, returning from, ermm, the Moon, AND of course in the blackness of space. But wait what do we see through the capsule window? Why it's the light blue haze of Earth's atmosphere. Living proof that capsule was only in Earth orbit. In fact that light blue haze streaming through capsule window can be seen in video coverage from EVERY Apollo mission, Apollo 8 through to Apollo 17, as all were simply EARTH ORBITING.
So there you have it. You've seen how film of lunar approach, lunar orbit, landing, and take off were accomplished, so next time you see a film on TV of any Apollo craft supposedly approaching, orbiting, landing on, or taking off from the Moon, you will know exactly how it was done. I have also shown how fake Moon pictures were created. Those under 45 can be excused for being somewhat gullible to have believed the film and photo's from Apollo missions were real, however those above should have "wised up" many years ago, (38 to be exact), that Moon missions were faked.
I'm definitely hooked on this scam, and wanna see more
NASA SCAM Home page, start your investigation here. (View 1280 X 768) APOLLO TRUTH Essential reading for anyone under 50. Explains why NASA faked the Moon missions. (View 1280 X 768) APOLLO DATA NASA's Moon mission data which just does not add up. (View 1280 X 768) APOLLO FACTS Facts which prove conclusively the Moon missions were faked. (View 1280 X 768) APOLLO FAKE The person who faked NASA's Moon pictures. Click URL at bottom of page. (View 1280 X 768) APOLLO SCAM More fake pictures with humorous content. Viewer needs to have sense of humor. (View 800 X 600) APOLLO FEEDBACK Read what the media say about naughty NASA. (View 1280 X 768)
nasascam@yahoo.com geovisit();