- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •1 Introduction, with the biological basis for cell mechanics
- •Introduction
- •The role of cell mechanics in biological function
- •Maintenance of cell shape
- •Cell migration
- •Mechanosensing
- •Stress responses and the role of mechanical forces in disease
- •Active cell contraction
- •Structural anatomy of a cell
- •The extracellular matrix and its attachment to cells
- •Transmission of force to the cytoskeleton and the role of the lipid bilayer
- •Intracellular structures
- •Overview
- •References
- •2 Experimental measurements of intracellular mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Forces to which cells are exposed in a biological context
- •Methods to measure intracellular rheology by macrorheology, diffusion, and sedimentation
- •Whole cell aggregates
- •Sedimentation of particles
- •Diffusion
- •Mechanical indentation of the cell surface
- •Glass microneedles
- •Cell poker
- •Atomic force microscopy
- •Mechanical tension applied to the cell membrane
- •Shearing and compression between microplates
- •Optical traps
- •Magnetic methods
- •Twisting of magnetized particles on the cell surface and interior
- •Passive microrheology
- •Optically detected individual probes
- •One-particle method
- •Two-particle methods
- •Dynamic light scattering and diffusing wave spectroscopy
- •Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy
- •Optical stretcher
- •Acoustic microscopy
- •Outstanding issues and future directions
- •References
- •3 The cytoskeleton as a soft glassy material
- •Introduction
- •Magnetic Twisting Cytometry (MTC)
- •Measurements of cell mechanics
- •The structural damping equation
- •Reduction of variables
- •Universality
- •Scaling the data
- •Collapse onto master curves
- •Theory of soft glassy rheology
- •What are soft glassy materials
- •Sollich’s theory of SGMs
- •Soft glassy rheology and structural damping
- •Open questions
- •Biological insights from SGR theory
- •Malleability of airway smooth muscle
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •4 Continuum elastic or viscoelastic models for the cell
- •Introduction
- •Purpose of continuum models
- •Principles of continuum models
- •Boundary conditions
- •Mechanical and material characteristics
- •Example of studied cell types
- •Blood cells: leukocytes and erythrocytes
- •Limitations of continuum model
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •5 Multiphasic models of cell mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Biphasic poroviscoelastic models of cell mechanics
- •Analysis of cell mechanical tests
- •Micropipette aspiration
- •Cells
- •Biphasic properties of the pericellular matrix
- •Indentation studies of cell multiphasic properties
- •Analysis of cell–matrix interactions using multiphasic models
- •Summary
- •References
- •6 Models of cytoskeletal mechanics based on tensegrity
- •Introduction
- •The cellular tensegrity model
- •The cellular tensegrity model
- •Do living cells behave as predicted by the tensegrity model?
- •Circumstantial evidence
- •Prestress-induced stiffening
- •Action at a distance
- •Do microtubules carry compression?
- •Summary
- •Examples of mathematical models of the cytoskeleton based on tensegrity
- •The cortical membrane model
- •Tensed cable nets
- •Cable-and-strut model
- •Summary
- •Tensegrity and cellular dynamics
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgement
- •References
- •7 Cells, gels, and mechanics
- •Introduction
- •Problems with the aqueous-solution-based paradigm
- •Cells as gels
- •Cell dynamics
- •Gels and motion
- •Secretion
- •Muscle contraction
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgement
- •References
- •8 Polymer-based models of cytoskeletal networks
- •Introduction
- •The worm-like chain model
- •Force-extension of single chains
- •Dynamics of single chains
- •Network elasticity
- •Nonlinear response
- •Discussion
- •References
- •9 Cell dynamics and the actin cytoskeleton
- •Introduction: The role of actin in the cell
- •Interaction of the cell cytoskeleton with the outside environment
- •The role of cytoskeletal structure
- •Actin mechanics
- •Actin dynamics
- •The emergence of actin dynamics
- •The intrinsic dynamics of actin
- •Regulation of dynamics by actin-binding proteins
- •Capping protein: ‘decommissioning’ the old
- •Gelsolin: rapid remodeling in one or two steps
- •β4-thymosin: accounting (sometimes) for the other half
- •Dynamic actin in crawling cells
- •Actin in the leading edge
- •Monomer recycling: the other ‘actin dynamics’
- •The biophysics of actin-based pushing
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •10 Active cellular protrusion: continuum theories and models
- •Cellular protrusion: the standard cartoon
- •The RIF formalism
- •Mass conservation
- •Momentum conservation
- •Boundary conditions
- •Cytoskeletal theories of cellular protrusion
- •Network–membrane interactions
- •Network dynamics near the membrane
- •Special cases of network–membrane interaction: polymerization force, brownian and motor ratchets
- •Network–network interactions
- •Network dynamics with swelling
- •Other theories of protrusion
- •Numerical implementation of the RIF formalism
- •An example of cellular protrusion
- •Protrusion driven by membrane–cytoskeleton repulsion
- •Protrusion driven by cytoskeletal swelling
- •Discussion
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •11 Summary
- •References
- •Index
Cell dynamics and the actin cytoskeleton |
187 |
Capping protein: ‘decommissioning’ the old
Capping protein is an abundant heterodimeric protein that binds with high affinity to the barbed ends of actin filaments to block both assembly and disassembly at these ends (Cooper and Pollard, 1985; Isenberg et al., 1980). Vertebrates express multiple isoforms of both the α and β subunits (Hart et al., 1997; Schafer et al., 1994). With the conditions of cells favoring polymerization at free barbed ends, capping protein is essential to control the degree of polymerization. The association rates of capping protein with barbed ends in combination with high cellular concentrations of capping protein ( 2 µM) should only allow a newly crated, unprotected barbed end to grow for1 s (Schafer et al., 1996). On the other hand, because the residency time of capping proteins on barbed ends is 30 minutes (Schafer et al., 1996), short capped filaments will depolymerize from their pointed ends in cells. Capping proteins are thought to be integral to the recycling of monomers in dendritically arranged filaments at the leading edge of cells (Pollard et al., 2000). Consistent with this idea are findings that perturbations of capping activity dramatically alter the geometry of Arp2/3-complex- induced networks in reconstitution studies (Pantaloni et al., 2000; Vignjevic et al., 2003).
In addition to blocking barbed-end dynamics, capping protein diminishes the lag phase of actin polymerization (Pollard and Cooper, 1984). In this ‘nucleating’ activity, capping protein is probably stabilizing small oligomers rather than generating filaments de novo (Schafer and Cooper, 1995). Because the growing filaments are capped at their barbed end, this function is probably not active in cells with abundant sequestering proteins that can prevent assembly at pointed ends. The only known regulation of capping protein activity is by phospholipids. Phospholipids can both inactivate free capping protein (Heiss and Cooper, 1991) and remove bound capping protein from barbed ends (Schafer et al., 1996).
Gelsolin: rapid remodeling in one or two steps
If the job of actin-binding proteins is to remodel the actin cytoskeleton, then gelsolin has exceptional qualifications. Activated by micromolar Ca2+ (Yin and Stossel, 1979), gelsolin binds to the sides of actin filaments and severs them (Yin et al., 1980). However, unlike cofilin, gelsolin remains attached to the new barbed end created by severing to block further polymerization (Yin et al., 1981; Yin et al., 1980). Because gelsolin has nM affinity for barbed ends, it functions as a permanent cap that can only be removed through subsequent binding by phospholipids (Janmey and Stossel, 1987). In platelets and neutrophils, activated gelsolin remodels actin in two steps (Barkalow et al., 1996; Glogauer et al., 2000). Because the majority of filaments in resting cells are capped, cellular activation first leads to gelsolin severing to create a large number of dynamically stable filaments. Shortly thereafter, these filaments become nuclei for new growth as phospholipid levels increase to result in massive uncapping.
While gelsolin seems built for acute remodeling, expression studies clearly indicate a role for gelsolin at steady-state. Gelsolin null fibroblasts have impaired motility, reduced membrane ruffling, slow filament turnover, and abundant stress fibers (Azuma et al., 1998; McGrath et al., 2000a; Witke et al., 1995), and gelsolin overexpression produces the opposite trends (Cunningham et al., 1991). With its high