Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Skousen The Big Three in Economics - Smith, Marx, Keynes (Sharpe, 2007)

.pdf
Скачиваний:
160
Добавлен:
22.08.2013
Размер:
2.32 Mб
Скачать

The BIG

THREE in

ECONOMICS

OTHER ACADEMIC BOOKS BY MARK SKOUSEN

The Structure of Production

Economics on Trial

Dissent on Keynes

(editor)

The Investor’s Bible:

Mark Skousen’s Principles of Investment

Puzzles and Paradoxes in Economics

(co-authored with Kenna C. Taylor)

Economic Logic

The Power of Economic Thinking

Vienna and Chicago, Friends or Foes?

The Compleated Autobiography by Benjamin Franklin

(editor and compiler)

The BIG

THREE in

ECONOMICS

ADAM SMITH

KARL MARX and

JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES

MARK SKOUSEN

M.E.Sharpe

Armonk, New York

London, England

Copyright 2007 by Mark Skousen

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher, M.E. Sharpe, Inc.,

80 Business Park Drive, Armonk, NewYork 10504.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Skousen, Mark.

The big three in economics : Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes / Mark Skousen.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-10: 0-7656-1694-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-7656-1694-4 (cloth : alk. paper)

1.Economists—History. 2. Economics—Philosophy. 3. Economists—Biography.

4.Smith, Adam, 1723–1790. 5. Marx, Karl, 1818–1883. 6. Keynes, John Maynard, 1883–1946. I. Title.

HB76.S58 2007

 

330.15092’2--dc22

2006020466

Printed in the United States of America

The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials,

ANSI Z 39.48-1984.

~

BM (c) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Dedicated to

The Big Three in my life, My editor, my friend, and my wife,

Jo Ann Skousen

Contents

 

Introduction

ix

Photos follow page 104

 

Chapter 1. Adam Smith Declares an Economic Revolution

 

in 1776

3

Chapter 2. From Smith to Marx: The Rise and Fall of

 

Classical Economics

46

Chapter 3. Karl Marx Leads a Revolt Against Capitalism

64

Chapter 4. From Marx to Keynes: Scientific Economics

 

Comes of Age

105

Chapter 5. John Maynard Keynes: Capitalism Faces Its

 

Greatest Challenge

133

Chapter 6. A Turning Point in Twentieth-Century Economics

163

Chapter 7. Conclusion: Has Adam Smith Triumphed Over

 

Marx and Keynes?

191

Bibliography

219

Index

231

About the Author

243

vii

Introduction

Duringthepastthreecenturies,threeeconomistsstandoutasarchetypes, symbols of three distinct approaches to economic philosophy. In the eighteenth century, Adam Smith, a student of the Scottish Enlightenment, expounded a “system of natural liberty” (what we might term a liberal democratic order consisting of an unfettered market and limited government), and elucidated how a nation flourishes and advances the standard of living of its citizens. In the nineteenth century, the German philosopher Karl Marx attracted and inspired workers and intellectuals whofeltdisenfranchisedbyindustrialcapitalismandsoughtradicalsolutionstoinequality,alienation,andexploitationoftheunderprivileged. Finally, in the twentieth century, the British economist John Maynard Keynessoughttostabilizeacrisis-pronemarketsystemthroughactivist fiscal and monetary government policies.

The Pendulum and the Totem Pole

The stories and ideas of theseBigThree economists aretold in context of a larger history I have described in greater detail in The Making of Modern Economics. In the introduction to that work, I describe two possibleapproachestowritingaboutthelivesandideasofeconomists, what I term the spectral versus the hierarchal approach.

The most popular method of analysis I describe as a pendulum, by which historians place each economist somewhere along a political spectrum, from extreme left to extreme right. FigureA illustrates the pendulum approach used in many economics textbooks.

The Pendulum Approach to Competing

Economic Theories

Simple though it is, I see several problems with the spectral approach. First, it treats Karl Marx andAdam Smith as coequals, that is,

ix