PGM_outlook-100119_watermark
.pdfvk.com/id446425943
Risks
Our earnings forecasts and valuations are based on assumptions detailed in this report. Our forecasts are subject to downside risks, including the following:
▪Lower-than-forecast commodity prices.
▪Stronger-than-forecast producer currencies.
▪High global debt levels. The IMF recently warned that public and private sector debt has increased to $164trn or 225% of global GDP in 2018. This is higher than its previous peak in 2009.
▪Trade barriers. A full-blown global trade war could have a negative impact on global economic growth.
▪Electric vehicle production growth could decrease demand for PGMs.
▪Supply growth from a recent ramp-up of latent capacity that was mothballed during the low commodity price environment in 2015 and 2016.
▪Value-destruction through poor capital allocation – unexpected value-destructive acquisitions or the approval of marginal projects. The Norilsk shareholder shootout transaction could influence our earnings forecasts and valuation materially, with a wide range of potential outcomes.
▪Resource nationalism, including risks of higher mining taxes and royalties, pressure on miners to spend more on communities or the environment and possibly outright expropriation of mining assets. We do not see this theme disappearing and believe there could be upside risk to miners’ spending on royalties, taxes and communities.
▪Increased government regulation in producer countries, which could negatively affect profitability.
▪Higher-than-forecast mining inflation, especially if recovering demand puts pressure on scarce resources and skills.
▪Higher-than-forecast maintenance capex – miners need to spend more capex to maintain volumes as mining complexity increases. Underestimating maintenance capex would negatively affect our valuations.
▪Infrastructure constraints and shortages of skills, electricity and water in mining regions could affect production and costs more than we expect.
▪Overestimation of mineral reserves.
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
11
vk.com/id446425943
Catalysts
Short term
1.Weaker producer currencies could offset lower commodity prices to some extent and support mining company margins.
2.Prudent capital allocation and higher dividends.
Medium term
1.Falling production from existing mines. Falling grades and increasing mining complexity are likely to result in volume declines at existing mining operations and push up production costs. Miners with long-life, low-cost resources should benefit as competitors face more volume and cost pressure.
2.Delays in expected new supply from approved projects. Mining projects are becoming more difficult owing to: 1) permitting and environmental issues; 2) infrastructure constraints; 3) competition for skilled labour and mining equipment; 4) new and riskier geographies; 5) growing resource nationalism; and 6) difficulties in accessing finance.
3.Spot commodity prices do not incentivise new production and sector capex remains at decade lows, which we believe should limit new supply over the medium term. The next generation of mines are likely to be more complex and higher-cost than currently installed capacity. Miners with long-life resources should eventually benefit from higher incentive prices and a superior cost base.
4.Share buybacks: Recovering FCFs should result in surplus cash. We have not factored share buybacks into our forecasts, but they could support share prices.
5.Lower-than-expected cost of capital, as projects and acquisitions are debt financed at historically low interest rates.
6.Continued low interest rates, which could: 1) stimulate industrial demand; and 2) increase investment demand for commodities more than we expect.
7.Technological change, including a major shift towards fuel cells.
Long term
1.Sector consolidation. If the sector becomes starved of new supply over the medium term, commodity prices should eventually rise closer to incentive price levels. At that point, we think miners would be likely to target volume growth, rather than cash preservation. Given that some miners are trading below replacement cost, we think it could be cheaper for companies to buy de-risked, producing competitors, with low-cost assets, than to build risky new greenfield projects with up to a 10-year lag to positive cash flows. Low interest rates could reduce the cost of capital for acquisitions. In our view, this would:
a.continue to constrain new supply to the market as ‘capex’ invested in sector consolidation does not result in incremental global supply.
b.be likely to push up mining company valuations much closer to replacement cost, which is significantly above current share prices.
2.Higher incentive prices to make existing miners more competitive. We believe next-generation mines are likely to be lower-grade, more complex and face more regulatory issues than existing producers. We therefore believe commodity prices higher than historical trends may be required to incentivise the next generation of mines. This would effectively move existing low-cost, long-life miners down the cost curve and enhance their margins.
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
12
vk.com/id446425943
Anglo American Platinum – HOLD
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
Figure 23: Anglo American Platinum, ZARmn (unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anglo American Platinum |
|
AMSJ.J |
|
|
|
|
|
Target price, ZAR: |
|
|
540 |
|||
Market capitalisation, ZARmn: |
|
145,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
Last price, ZAR: |
|
|
537 |
|||
Enterprise value, ZARmn: |
|
147,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential 12-month return: |
|
2.9% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE |
|
2016 |
2017 |
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
Dec-YE |
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
61,944 |
65,671 |
74,708 |
85,729 |
88,974 |
|
Net operating assets |
44,516 |
40,109 |
|
44,433 |
46,051 |
47,684 |
EBITDA |
|
9,168 |
12,367 |
16,216 |
20,511 |
21,897 |
|
Investments |
2,585 |
2,725 |
|
2,341 |
2,388 |
2,436 |
EBIT |
|
4,501 |
8,274 |
12,065 |
16,033 |
17,227 |
|
Equity |
40,016 |
41,527 |
|
46,773 |
54,609 |
63,048 |
Net interest |
|
-1,153 |
-951 |
-95 |
-213 |
87 |
|
Minority interest |
-234 |
-526 |
|
259 |
259 |
259 |
Taxation |
|
-364 |
-1,616 |
-3,022 |
-4,904 |
-5,367 |
|
Net debt |
7,319 |
1,833 |
|
-258 |
-6,429 |
-13,187 |
Equity accounted income |
|
-115 |
-362 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable profit |
|
552 |
1,945 |
6,844 |
10,848 |
11,854 |
|
Balance sheet ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headline earnings |
|
1,867 |
3,886 |
8,027 |
10,848 |
11,854 |
|
Gearing (net debt/(net debt+equity)) |
15.5% |
4.2% |
|
-0.6% |
-13.3% |
-26.4% |
HEPS, ZAc |
|
713 |
1,482 |
3,018 |
4,037 |
4,412 |
|
Net debt to EBITDA |
0.8x |
0.1x |
|
0.0x |
-0.3x |
-0.6x |
|
|
RoCE |
8.1% |
16.6% |
|
24.1% |
30.0% |
31.2% |
||||||
Thomson Reuters consensus HEPS, ZAc |
|
|
|
2,610 |
3,009 |
3,608 |
|
RoIC (after tax) |
4.0% |
11.9% |
|
18.4% |
21.3% |
21.9% |
DPS declared, ZAc |
|
0 |
349 |
895 |
1,211 |
1,323 |
|
RoE |
4.7% |
9.5% |
|
18.2% |
21.4% |
20.1% |
Breakdown of EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mogalakwena |
|
4,785 |
7,029 |
7,894 |
9,938 |
10,090 |
|
Operating cash flow |
11,030 |
9,486 |
|
12,597 |
16,644 |
17,092 |
EBIT margin |
|
34% |
44% |
41% |
46% |
46% |
|
Capex (net of disposals) |
-4,695 |
-4,744 |
|
-6,271 |
-6,523 |
-6,219 |
Amandelbult |
|
1,293 |
1,699 |
3,208 |
4,570 |
5,195 |
|
Other |
1,399 |
1,841 |
|
-3,267 |
-670 |
-622 |
EBIT margin |
|
12% |
15% |
23% |
30% |
33% |
|
FCF |
7,734 |
6,583 |
|
3,059 |
9,451 |
10,252 |
Unki |
|
22 |
369 |
351 |
545 |
656 |
|
Equity shareholders' cash |
5,450 |
5,486 |
|
4,024 |
9,183 |
10,173 |
EBIT margin |
|
1% |
15% |
14% |
19% |
22% |
|
Dividends and share buy backs |
0 |
0 |
|
-1,933 |
-3,012 |
-3,415 |
JV operations |
|
626 |
659 |
1,834 |
2,684 |
2,479 |
|
Movement in net debt |
5,450 |
5,486 |
|
2,091 |
6,171 |
6,758 |
EBIT margin |
|
10% |
11% |
23% |
26% |
24% |
|
Cash flow ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party |
|
1,319 |
2,104 |
2,722 |
3,068 |
3,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT margin |
|
9% |
8% |
9% |
9% |
8% |
|
Working capital turnover, days |
49 |
52 |
|
51 |
46 |
47 |
Other |
|
-3,544 |
-3,586 |
-3,945 |
-4,772 |
-4,368 |
|
FCF yield |
7.8% |
7.3% |
|
2.9% |
6.9% |
7.8% |
EBIT |
|
4,501 |
8,274 |
12,065 |
16,033 |
17,227 |
|
Equity shareholders' yield |
5.9% |
6.2% |
|
3.8% |
6.4% |
7.1% |
Income statement ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capex/EBITDA |
44.9% |
36.0% |
|
37.7% |
30.2% |
27.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion |
2.9x |
1.4x |
|
0.5x |
0.8x |
0.9x |
|
EBITDA margin |
|
15% |
19% |
22% |
24% |
25% |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT margin |
|
7% |
13% |
16% |
19% |
19% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEPS growth |
|
1626% |
108% |
104% |
34% |
9% |
|
SoTP DCF fair value and calculation of target price |
|
|
|
ZARmn |
ZAR/sh |
|
Dividend payout ratio |
|
0% |
47% |
35% |
30% |
30% |
|
Union mine |
|
|
|
|
23 |
0 |
Input assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amandelbult operations |
|
|
|
|
33,074 |
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mogalakwena mine |
|
|
|
|
103,624 |
387 |
|
Platinum, $/oz |
|
988 |
950 |
880 |
870 |
1,070 |
|
Twickenham mine |
|
|
|
|
-428 |
-2 |
Palladium, $/oz |
|
614 |
871 |
1,030 |
1,216 |
1,088 |
|
Unki mine |
|
|
|
|
6,794 |
25 |
Rhodium, $/oz |
|
694 |
1,108 |
2,218 |
2,379 |
2,163 |
|
Modikwa |
|
|
|
|
4,138 |
15 |
USD/ZAR |
|
14.70 |
13.31 |
13.24 |
14.31 |
14.14 |
|
Mototolo |
|
|
|
|
3,562 |
13 |
Sales volumes, koz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kroondal |
|
|
|
|
2,697 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party sales |
|
|
|
|
8,858 |
33 |
|
Mined platinum |
|
1,809 |
1,389 |
1,328 |
1,399 |
1,369 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
-17,679 |
-66 |
Third party platinum |
|
652 |
1,066 |
1,172 |
1,201 |
1,221 |
|
Enterprise value |
|
|
|
|
144,662 |
540 |
Total platinum sales |
|
2,416 |
2,505 |
2,466 |
2,600 |
2,591 |
|
Investments as at 31 December 2017 |
|
|
|
|
2,725 |
10 |
Volume growth |
|
-2.2% |
3.7% |
-1.6% |
5.4% |
-0.4% |
|
Net debt as at 31 December 2017 |
|
|
|
|
-1,833 |
-7 |
3PGM breakeven price, $/oz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in share buy-backs during 2018E |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity value |
|
|
|
|
145,554 |
543 |
|
Mogalakwena |
|
530 |
430 |
533 |
492 |
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rounded to |
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
||||||||
Amandelbult |
|
684 |
761 |
727 |
712 |
704 |
|
Current share price on 8/1/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
536.7 |
Unki |
|
699 |
660 |
751 |
775 |
770 |
|
Expected share price return |
|
|
|
|
|
0.6% |
JV operations |
|
702 |
788 |
746 |
770 |
837 |
|
Plus: expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3% |
Group (mined production) |
|
754 |
744 |
744 |
743 |
756 |
|
Total implied one-year return |
|
|
|
|
|
2.9% |
Contribution to FY18E underlying EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share price range, ZAR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-month high |
552 |
12-month low |
|
299 |
||
Third party |
Union |
|
Amandelbult |
|
|
Price move since high |
-2.9% |
Price move since low |
|
79.6% |
||||
16% |
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
Calculation of WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Kroondal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC |
11.4% |
Cost of debt |
|
|
10.0% |
|||
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free rate |
9.0% |
Tax rate |
|
|
28% |
|
Mototolo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity risk premium |
4.0% After-tax cost of debt |
|
7.2% |
|||||
3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Modikwa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beta |
1.30 |
Debt weighting |
|
40% |
|||
3% |
|
|
Mogalakwena |
|
|
|
Cost of equity |
14.2% |
Terminal growth rate |
|
6.0% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unki |
|
|
49% |
|
|
|
Valuation ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE |
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
||
3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/E multiple |
48.5x |
22.4x |
|
13.1x |
13.3x |
12.2x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
0.0% |
1.1% |
|
2.3% |
2.3% |
2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EV/EBITDA |
9.5x |
6.8x |
|
6.4x |
6.4x |
5.7x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/B |
2.3x |
2.1x |
|
2.3x |
2.6x |
2.3x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per share, ZAR |
149 |
155 |
|
174 |
204 |
235 |
Source: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, Renaissance Capital estimates
13
vk.com/id446425943
Impala Platinum – BUY
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
Figure 24: Impala Platinum, ZARmn (unless otherwise noted)
Impala Platinum |
IMPJ.J |
Target price, ZAR: |
45.0 |
Market capitalisation, ZARmn: |
30,526 |
Last price, ZAR: |
37.1 |
Enterprise value, ZARmn: |
39,553 |
Potential 12-month return: |
21.3% |
Jun-YE |
|
2017 |
2018 |
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
40,540 |
39,587 |
41,506 |
53,956 |
51,383 |
Underlying EBITDA |
|
3,622 |
5,884 |
8,743 |
9,933 |
11,658 |
Underlying EBIT |
|
-474 |
1,684 |
4,957 |
6,192 |
8,331 |
Net interest |
|
-400 |
-701 |
-614 |
-324 |
-37 |
Taxation |
|
2,461 |
2,042 |
-1,216 |
-1,643 |
-2,322 |
Minority interest in profit |
|
122 |
-114 |
-307 |
-352 |
-339 |
Attributable profit |
|
-7,976 |
-10,907 |
2,820 |
3,873 |
5,632 |
Headline earnings |
|
-983 |
-1,228 |
2,820 |
3,873 |
5,632 |
HEPS, ZAc |
|
-137 |
-171 |
392 |
539 |
784 |
Thomson Reuters consensus HEPS, ZAc |
|
|
196 |
286 |
436 |
|
DPS declared, ZAc |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Underlying EBIT |
|
-1,760 |
-1,083 |
1,576 |
2,126 |
4,245 |
Rustenburg lease |
|
|||||
EBIT margin |
|
-6% |
-4% |
5% |
6% |
13% |
Zimplats |
|
1,169 |
1,911 |
2,069 |
2,613 |
2,775 |
EBIT margin |
|
17% |
26% |
25% |
28% |
29% |
Marula |
|
-627 |
-6 |
220 |
172 |
-5 |
EBIT margin |
|
-39% |
0% |
8% |
6% |
0% |
Mimosa |
|
2 |
320 |
235 |
346 |
386 |
EBIT margin |
|
0% |
16% |
11% |
15% |
16% |
Two Rivers |
|
460 |
419 |
684 |
753 |
735 |
EBIT margin |
|
24% |
23% |
32% |
32% |
31% |
Other |
|
282 |
123 |
173 |
182 |
196 |
EBIT |
|
-474 |
1,684 |
4,957 |
6,192 |
8,331 |
Income statement ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA margin |
|
9% |
15% |
21% |
18% |
23% |
EBIT margin |
|
-1% |
4% |
12% |
11% |
16% |
HEPS growth |
|
-1242% |
-25% |
329% |
37% |
45% |
Dividend payout ratio |
|
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Input assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum, $/oz |
|
988 |
940 |
820 |
970 |
1,134 |
Palladium, $/oz |
|
738 |
977 |
1,151 |
1,152 |
1,050 |
Rhodium, $/oz |
|
821 |
1,634 |
2,440 |
2,271 |
2,098 |
USD/ZAR |
|
13.60 |
12.85 |
14.25 |
14.25 |
14.09 |
Production volumes, koz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mined platinum |
|
1,121 |
1,048 |
1,159 |
1,144 |
1,004 |
Third party platinum |
|
244 |
241 |
180 |
180 |
180 |
Joint venture platinum |
|
165 |
180 |
145 |
149 |
149 |
Gross refined platinum |
|
1,530 |
1,468 |
1,484 |
1,473 |
1,333 |
Volume growth |
|
6.4% |
-4.0% |
1.1% |
-0.7% |
-9.5% |
3PGM breakeven price, $/oz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rustenburg lease |
|
1,071 |
1,183 |
1,066 |
1,123 |
982 |
Zimplats |
|
653 |
783 |
765 |
781 |
807 |
Marula |
|
1,201 |
970 |
962 |
1,053 |
1,158 |
Mimosa |
|
888 |
896 |
934 |
956 |
978 |
Two Rivers |
|
677 |
797 |
717 |
758 |
807 |
Group (mined production) |
|
895 |
959 |
902 |
941 |
876 |
Contribution to FY19E proportionately consolidated underlying EBITDA |
|
|
||||
|
Two Rivers |
|
|
|
|
|
Mimosa |
10% |
|
|
Rustenburg Lease |
||
|
|
|
|
|||
6% |
|
|
|
|
46% |
|
IRS 1%
Zimplats
37%
Jun-YE |
|
|
|
|
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
|
2017 |
2018 |
|
||||
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating assets |
|
51,832 |
45,914 |
|
44,722 |
45,490 |
46,964 |
Investments |
|
-929 |
326 |
|
333 |
339 |
346 |
Equity |
|
46,807 |
37,213 |
|
40,033 |
43,906 |
49,538 |
Minority interest |
|
2,425 |
2,380 |
|
2,380 |
2,380 |
2,380 |
Net debt (including finance leases) |
|
1,671 |
6,647 |
|
2,642 |
-457 |
-4,608 |
Balance sheet ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gearing (net debt/(net debt+equity)) |
|
3.4% |
15.2% |
|
6.2% |
-1.1% |
-10.3% |
Net debt to EBITDA |
|
0.5x |
1.1x |
|
0.3x |
0.0x |
-0.4x |
RoCE |
|
-0.8% |
3.2% |
|
10.5% |
13.1% |
17.3% |
RoIC (after tax) |
|
-8.5% |
-5.9% |
|
7.6% |
9.5% |
12.5% |
RoE |
|
-1.9% |
-2.9% |
|
7.3% |
9.2% |
12.1% |
Cash flow statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow |
|
-1,247 |
-1,256 |
|
9,436 |
7,810 |
8,031 |
Capex (net of disposals) |
|
-3,798 |
-5,106 |
|
-4,675 |
-4,119 |
-3,506 |
Other |
|
3,856 |
3,305 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
FCF |
|
-1,189 |
-3,057 |
|
4,761 |
3,690 |
4,525 |
Equity shareholders' cash |
|
846 |
-4,976 |
|
4,005 |
3,099 |
4,152 |
Dividends and share buy backs |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
Movement in net debt |
|
846 |
-4,976 |
|
4,005 |
3,099 |
4,152 |
Cash flow ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital turnover, days |
|
58 |
81 |
|
49 |
48 |
60 |
FCF yield |
|
-2.9% |
-9.8% |
|
15.0% |
12.9% |
18.5% |
Equity shareholders' yield |
|
2.3% |
-22.3% |
|
15.0% |
11.6% |
15.6% |
Capex/EBITDA |
|
104.9% |
86.8% |
|
53.5% |
41.5% |
30.1% |
Cash conversion |
|
-0.9x |
4.1x |
|
1.4x |
0.8x |
0.7x |
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SoTP DCF fair value and calculation of target price |
|
|
|
ZARmn |
ZAR/sh |
||
Rustenburg lease |
|
|
|
|
19,757 |
27.5 |
|
Zimplats (effective interest = 87%) |
|
|
|
|
14,793 |
20.6 |
|
Marula (effective interest = 73%) |
|
|
|
|
-279 |
-0.4 |
|
Afplats (effective interest = 74%) |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.0 |
|
IRS (third party only) |
|
|
|
|
205 |
0.3 |
|
Mimosa (effective interest = 50%) |
|
|
|
|
1,700 |
2.4 |
|
Two Rivers (effective interest = 46%) |
|
|
|
|
4,801 |
6.7 |
|
Chrome operations |
|
|
|
|
404 |
0.6 |
|
Enterprise value |
|
|
|
|
41,382 |
57.6 |
|
Investments as at 30 June 2018 |
|
|
|
|
326 |
0.5 |
|
Net debt as at 30 June 2018 |
|
|
|
|
-6,647 |
-9.2 |
|
Cash used in share buy-backs during 2019E |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.0 |
|
Convertible debt conversion cost at ZAR50/share |
|
|
|
-1,585 |
-2.2 |
||
Anticipated indigenization discount of Zimplats and Mimosa |
|
-841 |
-1.2 |
||||
Equity value |
|
|
|
|
32,634 |
45.4 |
|
Rounded to |
|
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Current share price on 8/1/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Expected share price return |
|
|
|
|
|
21.3% |
|
Plus: expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Total implied one-year return |
|
|
|
|
|
21.3% |
|
Share price range, ZAR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-month high |
39 |
12-month low |
|
16 |
|||
Price move since high |
-4.4% |
Price move since low |
|
137.7% |
|||
Calculation of WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC |
15.4% |
Cost of debt |
|
|
10.0% |
||
Risk-free rate |
9.0% |
Tax rate |
|
|
28% |
||
Equity risk premium |
6.0% |
After-tax cost of debt |
|
7.2% |
|||
Beta |
1.30 |
Debt weighting |
|
15% |
|||
Cost of equity |
16.8% |
Terminal growth rate |
|
0.0% |
|||
Valuation ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun-YE |
|
2017 |
2018 |
|
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
P/E multiple |
|
-36.6x |
-18.2x |
|
9.5x |
6.9x |
4.7x |
Dividend yield |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
EV/EBITDA |
|
11.3x |
5.3x |
|
3.6x |
2.9x |
2.1x |
P/B |
|
0.8x |
0.6x |
|
0.7x |
0.6x |
0.5x |
NAV per share, ZAR |
|
64 |
52 |
|
56 |
61 |
69 |
Source: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, Renaissance Capital estimates
14
vk.com/id446425943
Lonmin – SELL
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
Figure 25: Lonmin, $mn (unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lonmin |
|
LONJ.J |
|
|
|
|
|
Target price, ZAR: |
|
|
7.0 |
||
Market capitalisation, $mn: |
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
Last price, ZAR: |
|
|
9.0 |
||
Enterprise value, $mn: |
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential 12-month return: |
|
-22.6% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep-YE |
2017 |
2018 |
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
Sep-YE |
2017 |
2018 |
|
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
1,166 |
1,345 |
1,340 |
1,155 |
1,123 |
|
Operating cash flow |
79 |
140 |
|
117 |
115 |
51 |
Underlying EBITDA |
38 |
115 |
231 |
144 |
73 |
|
Capex (net of disposals) |
-100 |
-73 |
|
-110 |
-110 |
-102 |
Underlying EBIT |
-28 |
101 |
212 |
121 |
47 |
|
Other |
20 |
-34 |
|
4 |
4 |
0 |
Net interest |
-88 |
-30 |
-13 |
-5 |
-6 |
|
FCF |
-1 |
33 |
|
12 |
8 |
-52 |
Taxation |
18 |
-6 |
-56 |
-32 |
-11 |
|
Equity shareholders' cash |
-70 |
11 |
|
3 |
4 |
-56 |
Minority interest profit |
156 |
-20 |
-20 |
-11 |
-4 |
|
Dividends and share buy backs |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
Attributable profit |
-998 |
42 |
124 |
72 |
25 |
|
Movement in net debt |
-70 |
11 |
|
3 |
4 |
-56 |
Underlying earnings |
-103 |
63 |
124 |
72 |
25 |
|
Cash flow ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying EPS, USc |
-37 |
22 |
44 |
25 |
9 |
|
31 |
21 |
|
36 |
41 |
45 |
|
|
Working capital turnover, days |
|
|||||||||||
- ZAR |
-4.87 |
3.06 |
6.30 |
3.60 |
1.30 |
|
FCF yield |
0% |
47% |
|
18% |
14% |
-44% |
Thomson Reuters consensus HEPS, ZAR |
|
|
1.61 |
1.93 |
1.73 |
|
Equity shareholders' yield |
-17% |
6% |
|
1% |
2% |
-31% |
DPS declared, USc |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Capex/EBITDA |
263% |
63% |
|
47% |
77% |
141% |
Income statement ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion |
0.7x |
0.2x |
|
0.0x |
0.1x |
-2.2x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA margin |
3% |
9% |
17% |
12% |
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT margin |
-2% |
8% |
16% |
10% |
4% |
|
Calculation of target price |
|
|
|
|
|
ZAR/sh |
EPS growth |
-3% |
161% |
97% |
-42% |
-64% |
|
DCF fair value per share |
|
|
|
|
|
-0.3 |
Dividend payout ratio |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Smelting and refining value per share |
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
Input assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total value per share |
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rounded to |
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Platinum, $/oz |
955 |
905 |
840 |
1,020 |
1,149 |
|
Current share price on 8/1/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
Palladium, $/oz |
794 |
990 |
1,212 |
1,120 |
1,045 |
|
Expected share price return |
|
|
|
|
|
-22.6% |
Rhodium, $/oz |
927 |
1,957 |
2,435 |
2,217 |
2,089 |
|
Plus: expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
USD/ZAR |
13.38 |
13.07 |
14.31 |
14.20 |
14.11 |
|
Total implied one-year return |
|
|
|
|
|
-22.6% |
Breakeven price, $/3PGMoz |
927 |
992 |
967 |
1,096 |
1,207 |
|
Implied Lonmin share price based on Sibanye's proposed offer |
|
|
ZAR/sh |
|||
Platinum volumes, koz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
629 |
640 |
520 |
500 |
|
At share exchange ratio of 0.967 and assuming market values on 8/1/2019 |
|
9.9 |
|||||
Metal in concentrate |
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Gross refined |
688 |
666 |
658 |
538 |
518 |
|
Share price range, ZAR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
706 |
676 |
658 |
538 |
518 |
|
12-month high |
15 |
12-month low |
|
|
7 |
|
Volume growth |
-4.0% |
-4.3% |
-2.7% |
-18.2% |
-3.7% |
|
Price move since high |
-41.6% |
Price move since low |
|
39.1% |
||
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating assets |
363 |
440 |
581 |
660 |
745 |
|
WACC |
11.0% |
Cost of debt |
|
|
5.0% |
|
Investments less rehab provision |
-100 |
-97 |
-97 |
-97 |
-97 |
|
Risk-free rate |
4.0% |
Tax rate |
|
|
28% |
|
Equity |
685 |
757 |
881 |
952 |
978 |
|
Equity risk premium |
6.0% After-tax cost of debt |
|
3.6% |
|||
Minority interest |
-323 |
-300 |
-280 |
-269 |
-265 |
|
Beta |
1.30 |
Debt weighting |
|
10% |
||
Net debt |
-99 |
-114 |
-117 |
-121 |
-65 |
|
Cost of equity |
11.8% |
Terminal growth rate |
|
0.0% |
||
Balance sheet ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gearing (net debt/(net debt+equity)) |
-16.9% |
-17.7% |
-15.2% |
-14.6% |
-7.1% |
|
Sep-YE |
2017 |
2018 |
|
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
Net debt to EBITDA |
-2.6x |
-1.0x |
-0.5x |
-0.8x |
-0.9x |
P/E multiple |
-4.1x |
2.9x |
|
1.5x |
2.6x |
7.2x |
|
RoCE |
-2.1% |
12.0% |
41.5% |
19.5% |
6.6% |
|
Dividend yield |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
RoIC (after tax) |
-4.6% |
9.9% |
29.9% |
14.0% |
4.8% |
|
EV/EBITDA |
0.0x |
-2.0x |
|
-0.9x |
-1.4x |
-2.0x |
RoE |
-8.8% |
8.7% |
15.1% |
7.8% |
2.6% |
|
P/B |
0.6x |
0.2x |
|
0.2x |
0.2x |
0.2x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per share, ZAR |
32 |
35 |
|
45 |
48 |
49 |
Source: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, Renaissance Capital estimates
15
vk.com/id446425943
Northam Platinum – SELL
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
Figure 26: Northam Platinum, ZARmn (unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northam |
|
NHMJ.J |
|
|
|
|
|
Target price, ZAR: |
|
|
40.0 |
|||
Market capitalisation, ZARmn: |
|
21,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
Last price, ZAR: |
|
|
42.8 |
|||
Enterprise value, ZARmn: |
|
27,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential 12-month return: |
|
-6.5% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun-YE |
|
2017 |
2018 |
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
Jun-YE |
2017 |
2018 |
|
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
6,865 |
7,553 |
14,328 |
14,251 |
15,956 |
|
Net operating assets |
15,261 |
19,650 |
|
19,986 |
20,817 |
21,751 |
Underlying EBITDA |
|
1,068 |
1,268 |
3,136 |
4,027 |
4,794 |
|
Investments |
8 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
Underlying EBIT |
|
616 |
826 |
2,470 |
3,410 |
4,154 |
|
Equity |
8,092 |
7,387 |
|
7,495 |
8,105 |
9,054 |
Equity accounted income |
|
5 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Minority interest |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
Net interest |
|
-984 |
-1,137 |
-1,467 |
-1,623 |
-1,800 |
|
Net debt |
7,177 |
12,263 |
|
12,491 |
12,711 |
12,698 |
Other operating items |
|
-57 |
-164 |
-331 |
-342 |
-356 |
|
Balance sheet ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation |
|
-212 |
-232 |
-564 |
-834 |
-1,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in profit |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Gearing (net debt/(net debt+equity)) |
47.0% |
62.4% |
|
62.5% |
61.1% |
58.4% |
Attributable profit |
|
-634 |
-702 |
108 |
611 |
948 |
|
Net debt to EBITDA |
6.7x |
9.7x |
|
4.0x |
3.2x |
2.6x |
Headline earnings |
|
-635 |
-699 |
108 |
611 |
948 |
|
RoCE |
3.9% |
4.4% |
|
11.4% |
15.2% |
17.8% |
HEPS, ZAc |
|
-182 |
-201 |
31 |
175 |
271 |
|
RoIC (after tax) |
4.2% |
5.9% |
|
10.8% |
12.5% |
14.0% |
|
|
RoE |
-7.5% |
-9.0% |
|
1.5% |
7.8% |
11.1% |
||||||
Normalised HEPS, ZAc |
|
78 |
83 |
288 |
424 |
533 |
|
Cash flow statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomson Reuters consensus HEPS, ZAc |
|
|
|
-70 |
54 |
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPS declared, ZAc |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Operating cash flow |
934 |
225 |
|
3,585 |
3,482 |
3,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capex (net of disposals) |
-1,645 |
-3,778 |
|
-2,050 |
-1,762 |
-1,572 |
Underlying EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
-433 |
-413 |
|
-331 |
-342 |
-356 |
Zondereinde operations |
|
177 |
298 |
1,044 |
1,420 |
1,468 |
|
FCF |
-1,143 |
-3,966 |
|
1,205 |
1,379 |
1,800 |
EBIT margin |
|
4% |
7% |
11% |
17% |
17% |
|
Equity shareholders' cash |
-1,127 |
-3,980 |
|
1,115 |
1,314 |
1,766 |
Booysendal operations |
|
437 |
525 |
1,427 |
1,990 |
2,687 |
|
Dividends and share buy backs |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
EBIT margin |
|
17% |
17% |
31% |
33% |
37% |
|
Non-cash increase in debt |
-1,017 |
-1,107 |
|
-1,343 |
-1,534 |
-1,753 |
EBIT |
|
616 |
826 |
2,470 |
3,410 |
4,154 |
|
Movement in net debt |
-2,144 |
-5,086 |
|
-228 |
-220 |
14 |
Income statement ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA margin |
|
16% |
17% |
22% |
28% |
30% |
|
Working capital days |
58 |
118 |
|
47 |
46 |
45 |
EBIT margin |
|
9% |
11% |
17% |
24% |
26% |
|
FCF yield |
-4.8% |
-14.3% |
|
4.4% |
5.0% |
6.5% |
HEPS growth |
|
-29% |
-10% |
115% |
466% |
55% |
|
Equity shareholders' yield |
-6.7% |
-25.7% |
|
7.5% |
8.8% |
11.8% |
Dividend payout ratio |
|
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Capex/EBITDA |
154.0% |
297.9% |
|
65.4% |
43.8% |
32.8% |
Input assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion |
1.8x |
5.7x |
|
10.3x |
2.2x |
1.9x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum, $/oz |
|
988 |
940 |
820 |
970 |
1,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palladium, $/oz |
|
738 |
977 |
1,151 |
1,152 |
1,050 |
|
SoTP DCF fair value and calculation of target price |
|
|
|
ZARmn |
ZAR/sh |
|
Rhodium, $/oz |
|
821 |
1,634 |
2,440 |
2,271 |
2,098 |
|
Zondereinde operations |
|
|
|
|
8,302 |
23.7 |
$/ZAR |
|
13.60 |
12.85 |
14.25 |
14.25 |
14.09 |
|
Booysendal operations |
|
|
|
|
18,022 |
51.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
-184 |
-0.5 |
3PGM sales volumes (excl. third party) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise value |
|
|
|
|
26,141 |
74.7 |
Zondereinde operations |
|
230 |
178 |
469 |
347 |
347 |
|
Investments as at 30 June 2018 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.0 |
Booysendal operations |
|
188 |
199 |
264 |
331 |
397 |
|
Net debt as at 30 June 2018 |
|
|
|
|
-12,263 |
-35.1 |
Group |
|
418 |
377 |
732 |
678 |
744 |
|
Cash used in share buy-backs during 2019E |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0 |
|
Volume growth |
|
-0.5% |
-9.7% |
94.2% |
-7.4% |
9.7% |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.0 |
3PGM breakeven price, $/oz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity value |
|
|
|
|
13,878 |
39.7 |
|
832 |
921 |
867 |
867 |
902 |
|
Rounded to |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Zondereinde operations |
|
|
Current share price on 8/1/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
42.8 |
|||||
Booysendal operations |
|
653 |
741 |
653 |
700 |
697 |
|
Expected share price return |
|
|
|
|
|
-6.5% |
Group (mined production) |
|
751 |
826 |
790 |
785 |
792 |
|
Plus: expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
Contribution to FY19E underlying EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total implied one-year return |
|
|
|
|
|
-6.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share price range, ZAR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-month high |
60 |
12-month low |
|
32 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price move since high |
-28.9% Price move since low |
|
35.2% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC |
14.5% |
Cost of debt |
|
|
12.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zondereinde |
Risk-free rate |
9.0% |
Tax rate |
|
|
28% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
45% |
|
|
Equity risk premium |
6.0% After-tax cost of debt |
|
9.0% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beta |
1.3 |
Debt weighting |
|
30% |
||
Booysendal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equity |
16.8% |
Terminal growth rate |
|
6.0% |
|||
55% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun-YE |
2017 |
2018 |
|
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/E multiple |
-26.4x |
-22.1x |
|
138.7x |
24.5x |
15.8x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normalised P/E multiple |
61.5x |
53.5x |
|
14.9x |
10.1x |
8.0x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EV/EBITDA |
22.4x |
21.9x |
|
8.8x |
6.9x |
5.8x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/B |
2.1x |
2.1x |
|
2.0x |
1.8x |
1.7x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per share, ZAR |
23 |
21 |
|
21 |
23 |
26 |
Source: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, Renaissance Capital estimates
16
vk.com/id446425943
Sibanye-Stillwater – HOLD
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
Figure 27: Sibanye-Stillwater, $mn (unless otherwise noted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sibanye-Stillwater |
|
|
|
SGLJ.J |
|
|
|
|
|
Target price, ZAR: |
|
|
11.1 |
|||
Market capitalisation, $mn: |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last price, ZAR: |
|
|
10.4 |
|||
Enterprise value, $mn: |
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential 12-month return: |
|
6.8% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE |
|
|
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
Dec-YE |
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2,128 |
3,449 |
|
3,745 |
4,342 |
4,465 |
|
Net operating assets |
1,938 |
4,316 |
|
3,716 |
3,882 |
3,969 |
EBITDA |
|
|
717 |
680 |
|
705 |
1,190 |
1,152 |
|
Investments, net of rehab provision |
-134 |
-466 |
|
-390 |
-390 |
-390 |
EBIT |
|
|
442 |
251 |
|
233 |
703 |
635 |
|
Equity |
1,220 |
1,942 |
|
1,901 |
2,248 |
2,554 |
Other items |
|
|
-79 |
-47 |
|
-54 |
-88 |
-105 |
|
Minority interest |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
4 |
6 |
Net interest |
|
|
-94 |
-254 |
|
-100 |
-149 |
-126 |
|
Net debt |
585 |
1,908 |
|
1,424 |
1,239 |
1,018 |
Taxation |
|
|
-77 |
221 |
|
-23 |
-130 |
-113 |
|
Balance sheet ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in profit |
|
29 |
-0 |
|
-6 |
-14 |
-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net profit for the year |
|
263 |
-333 |
|
49 |
348 |
306 |
|
Gearing (net debt/(net debt+equity)) |
32.4% |
49.6% |
|
42.8% |
35.5% |
28.5% |
|
Headline earnings |
|
|
171 |
-17 |
|
51 |
348 |
306 |
|
Net debt to EBITDA |
0.8x |
2.8x |
|
2.0x |
1.0x |
0.9x |
Headline EPS, ZAR |
|
1.62 |
-0.12 |
|
0.29 |
2.02 |
1.74 |
|
RoCE |
23.7% |
6.8% |
|
4.9% |
15.4% |
13.5% |
|
|
|
|
RoIC (after tax) |
23.3% |
22.2% |
|
3.3% |
11.8% |
10.6% |
|||||||
Consensus HEPS, ZAR |
|
|
|
|
0.33 |
1.40 |
1.57 |
|
RoE |
15.7% |
-1.1% |
|
2.6% |
16.8% |
12.7% |
|
DPS declared, ZAR |
|
1.45 |
0.00 |
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.24 |
|
Cash flow statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow |
573 |
1,120 |
|
1,134 |
941 |
1,010 |
Driefontein |
|
|
192 |
54 |
|
-59 |
73 |
77 |
|
Capex (net of disposals) |
-283 |
-458 |
|
-528 |
-548 |
-584 |
EBIT margin |
|
|
30% |
9% |
|
-14% |
14% |
14% |
|
Other cash flows |
-633 |
-3,074 |
|
31 |
-88 |
-105 |
Kloof |
|
|
181 |
123 |
|
76 |
177 |
124 |
|
Free cash flow |
-342 |
-2,412 |
|
637 |
304 |
321 |
EBIT margin |
|
|
30% |
19% |
|
12% |
25% |
20% |
|
Equity shareholders' cash |
-276 |
-2,262 |
|
484 |
185 |
221 |
Beatrix |
|
|
89 |
16 |
|
14 |
51 |
31 |
|
Dividends and share buy-backs |
-110 |
939 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
EBIT margin |
|
|
22% |
4% |
|
4% |
14% |
9% |
|
Surplus (deficit) cash |
-386 |
-1,324 |
|
484 |
185 |
221 |
Rustenburg |
|
|
1 |
45 |
|
83 |
106 |
99 |
|
Cash flow ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT margin |
|
|
1% |
6% |
|
10% |
11% |
9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stillwater |
|
|
0 |
54 |
|
133 |
249 |
258 |
|
Working capital turnover, days |
15 |
27 |
|
-23 |
-11 |
-8 |
EBIT margin |
|
|
- |
8% |
|
11% |
18% |
17% |
|
FCF yield |
-13.6% |
-50.6% |
|
20.0% |
10.4% |
11.8% |
Other |
|
|
-22 |
-40 |
|
-13 |
47 |
46 |
|
Equity shareholders' yield |
-14.3% |
-79.2% |
|
27.6% |
11.0% |
13.1% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
|
442 |
251 |
|
233 |
703 |
635 |
|
Capex/EBITDA |
39.4% |
67.4% |
|
74.8% |
46.1% |
50.7% |
Income statement ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion |
-1.6x |
134.7x |
|
9.6x |
0.5x |
0.7x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EBITDA margin |
|
|
34% |
20% |
|
19% |
27% |
26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT margin |
|
|
21% |
7% |
|
6% |
16% |
14% |
|
SoTP DCF fair value |
|
|
|
|
$mn |
ZAR/sh |
HEPS Growth |
|
|
119% |
-107% |
|
342% |
597% |
-14% |
|
Driefontein |
|
|
|
|
302 |
1.9 |
Dividend payout ratio |
|
57% |
0% |
|
- |
0% |
14% |
|
Kloof |
|
|
|
|
756 |
4.8 |
|
Input assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beatrix |
|
|
|
|
108 |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cooke |
|
|
|
|
-290 |
-1.8 |
|
Gold, $/oz |
|
|
1,248 |
1,258 |
|
1,269 |
1,350 |
1,338 |
|
Burnstone |
|
|
|
|
106 |
0.7 |
Platinum, $/oz |
|
|
988 |
950 |
|
880 |
870 |
1,070 |
|
Rustenburg |
|
|
|
|
924 |
5.8 |
Palladium, $/oz |
|
|
614 |
871 |
|
1,030 |
1,216 |
1,088 |
|
Kroondal |
|
|
|
|
200 |
1.3 |
ZAR/$ |
|
|
14.70 |
13.31 |
|
13.24 |
14.31 |
14.14 |
|
Stillwater |
|
|
|
|
2,909 |
18.4 |
Gold breakeven price, $/oz |
|
976 |
1,161 |
|
1,288 |
1,177 |
1,231 |
|
Equity accounted income |
|
|
|
|
261 |
1.6 |
|
PGM breakeven price, $/oz |
|
776 |
1,049 |
|
1,189 |
1,226 |
1,250 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
|
|
-1,018 |
-6.4 |
|
Mined volumes, koz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating value |
|
|
|
|
4,257 |
26.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and rehab provision as at 31 December 2017 |
|
-466 |
-2.9 |
|||||
Driefontein |
|
|
516 |
485 |
|
331 |
400 |
420 |
|
Enterprise value |
|
|
|
|
3,791 |
23.9 |
Kloof |
|
|
488 |
529 |
|
514 |
523 |
460 |
|
Net debt as at 31 December 2017 |
|
|
|
|
-1,908 |
-12.0 |
Beatrix |
|
|
323 |
292 |
|
274 |
266 |
266 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
-124 |
-0.8 |
Cooke |
|
|
181 |
100 |
|
31 |
28 |
0 |
|
19.9% stake in Aldebaran |
|
|
|
|
7 |
0.0 |
Gold |
|
|
1,508 |
1,407 |
|
1,174 |
1,324 |
1,293 |
|
Cash raised in rights issue during 2018E |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.0 |
Rustenburg |
|
|
138 |
810 |
|
769 |
785 |
810 |
|
Equity value |
|
|
|
|
1,765 |
11.1 |
Kroondal |
|
|
178 |
241 |
|
245 |
240 |
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rounded to |
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
||||||||
Mimosa |
|
|
91 |
124 |
|
122 |
120 |
120 |
|
Share price on 8/1/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
Stillwater |
|
|
0 |
355 |
|
587 |
700 |
800 |
|
Expected share price return |
|
|
|
|
|
6.7% |
PGM's |
|
|
421 |
1,550 |
|
1,741 |
1,863 |
1,968 |
|
Plus: expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1% |
Attributable Cu eq volume growth |
24% |
50% |
|
-2% |
9% |
2% |
|
Total implied one-year return |
|
|
|
|
|
6.8% |
||
Contribution to FY18E proportionately consolidated underlying EBITDA |
|
|
|
Share price range, ZAR: |
|
12-month low on 19-7-2018 |
7 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-month high on 15-1-2018 |
16 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price move since high |
-37.0% Price move since low |
|
52.5% |
|||
|
|
|
Driefontein |
|
|
|
|
Calculation of WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stillwater |
|
3% |
|
|
|
Kloof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC |
9.6% |
Cost of debt |
|
|
5.0% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
37% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free rate |
4.0% |
Tax rate |
|
|
28% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity risk premium |
5.5% After-tax cost of debt |
|
0.7% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beta |
1.30 |
Debt weighting |
|
20% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equity |
11.2% |
Terminal growth rate |
|
2.0% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beatrix |
Valuation ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE, $mn |
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
|
Plat Mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DRD Gold |
Cooke |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/E multiple |
26.1x |
-131.8x |
|
35.8x |
4.9x |
5.5x |
||||
0% |
Mimosa |
|
|
Rustenburg |
|
0% |
-4% |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
4.7% |
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
2.3% |
||||
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Kroondal |
|
16% |
|
|
|
|
|
EV/EBITDA |
3.5x |
7.0x |
|
4.5x |
2.5x |
2.4x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/B |
1.6x |
1.5x |
|
0.9x |
0.8x |
0.7x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per share, $ |
1.3 |
0.9 |
|
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per share, ZAR |
19 |
12 |
|
11 |
14 |
16 |
Source: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, Renaissance Capital estimates
17
vk.com/id446425943
Royal Bafokeng Platinum – SELL
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
Figure 28: Royal Bafokeng Platinum, ZARmn (unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Bafokeng Platinum |
|
RBPJ.J |
|
|
|
|
|
Target price, ZAR: |
|
|
25.0 |
||
Market capitalisation, ZARmn: |
|
7,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
Last price, ZAR: |
|
|
28.0 |
||
Enterprise value, ZARmn: |
|
10,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential 12-month return: |
|
-10.7% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE |
2016 |
2017 |
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
Dec-YE |
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
3,342 |
3,499 |
3,505 |
7,419 |
8,456 |
|
Net operating assets |
13,944 |
13,988 |
|
15,873 |
18,580 |
19,950 |
Underlying EBITDA |
553 |
673 |
737 |
2,132 |
2,783 |
|
Investments |
35 |
36 |
|
40 |
40 |
41 |
Underlying EBIT |
241 |
312 |
372 |
1,503 |
2,094 |
|
Equity |
11,156 |
10,679 |
|
11,086 |
15,690 |
16,872 |
Other operating items |
-68 |
-106 |
-197 |
-188 |
-204 |
|
Minority interest |
3,658 |
3,745 |
|
3,815 |
0 |
0 |
Net interest |
84 |
85 |
23 |
-218 |
-248 |
|
Net debt |
-835 |
-401 |
|
1,012 |
2,930 |
3,119 |
Taxation |
8 |
-84 |
-80 |
-307 |
-460 |
|
Balance sheet ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in profit |
-94 |
-96 |
-61 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable profit |
168 |
-753 |
30 |
790 |
1,182 |
|
Gearing (net debt/(net debt+equity)) |
-8.1% |
-3.9% |
|
8.4% |
15.7% |
15.6% |
Headline earnings |
167 |
109 |
43 |
790 |
1,182 |
|
Net debt to EBITDA |
-1.5x |
-0.6x |
|
1.4x |
1.4x |
1.1x |
HEPS, ZAc |
87 |
56 |
21 |
380 |
568 |
|
RoCE |
1.4% |
1.8% |
|
2.0% |
7.0% |
8.9% |
|
RoIC (after tax) |
0.9% |
2.5% |
|
2.1% |
7.1% |
7.3% |
||||||
Thomson Reuters consensus HEPS, ZAc |
|
|
28 |
138 |
368 |
|
RoE |
1.5% |
1.0% |
|
0.4% |
5.9% |
7.3% |
DPS declared, ZAc |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Cash flow statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow |
602 |
1,063 |
|
1,195 |
1,152 |
2,150 |
BRPM |
241 |
312 |
373 |
347 |
359 |
|
Capex |
-1,126 |
-2,160 |
|
-3,164 |
-1,936 |
-1,101 |
EBIT margin |
7% |
9% |
11% |
12% |
12% |
|
Other |
385 |
611 |
|
179 |
-976 |
-1,058 |
Styldrift |
0 |
0 |
-0 |
1,156 |
1,735 |
|
FCF |
-139 |
-486 |
|
-1,789 |
-1,760 |
-9 |
EBIT margin |
- |
- |
- |
26% |
32% |
|
Equity shareholders' cash |
-82 |
-435 |
|
-1,768 |
-1,918 |
-188 |
EBIT |
241 |
312 |
372 |
1,503 |
2,094 |
|
Dividends and share buy backs |
0 |
0 |
|
355 |
0 |
0 |
Income statement ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in net debt |
-82 |
-435 |
|
-1,413 |
-1,918 |
-188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA margin |
17% |
19% |
21% |
29% |
33% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT margin |
7% |
9% |
11% |
20% |
25% |
|
Working capital turnover, days |
16 |
-11 |
|
-56 |
22 |
30 |
HEPS growth |
204% |
-35% |
-63% |
1729% |
50% |
|
FCF yield |
-1.3% |
-5.0% |
|
-17.5% |
-20.1% |
-0.1% |
Dividend payout ratio |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Equity shareholders' yield |
-1.0% |
-6.8% |
|
-32.6% |
-32.9% |
-3.2% |
Input assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capex/EBITDA |
203.7% |
320.8% |
|
429.4% |
90.8% |
39.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion |
-0.5x |
-4.0x |
|
-41.3x |
-2.4x |
-0.2x |
|
Platinum, $/oz |
988 |
950 |
880 |
870 |
1,070 |
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palladium, $/oz |
614 |
871 |
1,030 |
1,216 |
1,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhodium, $/oz |
694 |
1,108 |
2,218 |
2,379 |
2,163 |
|
Calculation of target price |
|
|
|
|
ZARmn |
ZAR/sh |
USD/ZAR |
14.70 |
13.31 |
13.24 |
14.31 |
14.14 |
|
BRPM |
|
|
|
|
2,202 |
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Styldrift |
|
|
|
|
2,829 |
13.6 |
Platinum sales volumes, koz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise value |
|
|
|
|
5,031 |
24.2 |
BRPM volumes |
177 |
183 |
168 |
130 |
120 |
|
Investments as at 31 December 2017 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
0.2 |
Styldrift volumes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
190 |
220 |
|
Net debt as at 31 December 2017 |
|
|
|
|
401 |
1.9 |
Group total |
177 |
183 |
168 |
320 |
340 |
|
Cash used in share buy-backs during 2018E |
|
|
|
0 |
0.0 |
|
Volume growth |
-0.1% |
3.3% |
-8.0% |
90.4% |
6.3% |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0.0 |
3PGM breakeven price, $/oz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debt conversion cost at ZAR43/share |
|
|
|
-276 |
-1.3 |
|
718 |
682 |
647 |
652 |
651 |
|
Equity value |
|
|
|
|
5,191 |
25.0 |
|
BRPM |
|
Rounded to |
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|||||
Styldrift |
- |
- |
- |
547 |
456 |
|
Current share price on 8/1/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
28.0 |
Group (mined production) |
718 |
682 |
647 |
588 |
525 |
|
Expected share price return |
|
|
|
|
|
-10.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0% |
RBPlats - Divisional DCF valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total implied one-year return |
|
|
|
|
|
-10.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share price range, ZAR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Styldrift |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-month high |
35 |
12-month low |
|
15 |
||
56% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price move since high |
-20.0% Price move since low |
|
86.6% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC |
15.4% |
Cost of debt |
|
|
10.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free rate |
9.0% |
Tax rate |
|
|
28% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity risk premium |
6.0% After-tax cost of debt |
|
7.2% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beta |
1.30 |
Debt weighting |
|
15% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equity |
16.8% |
Terminal growth rate |
|
6.0% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE |
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
|
|
|
BRPM |
|
|
|
P/E multiple |
47.7x |
58.5x |
|
125.6x |
7.4x |
4.9x |
|
|
|
44% |
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EV/EBITDA |
19.5x |
14.4x |
|
13.9x |
4.1x |
3.2x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/B |
0.7x |
0.6x |
|
0.5x |
0.4x |
0.3x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per share, ZAR |
58 |
55 |
|
53 |
75 |
81 |
Source: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, Renaissance Capital estimates
18
vk.com/id446425943
NorNickel – BUY
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
Figure 29: NorNickel, $mn (unless otherwise noted)
|
NorNickel |
|
|
GMKN.MM |
|
|
|
|
Market capitalisation, $mn: |
|
31,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise value, $mn: |
|
39,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE |
|
2016 |
2017 |
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
8,259 |
9,146 |
11,196 |
10,849 |
11,695 |
|
EBITDA |
|
3,898 |
3,995 |
5,861 |
5,644 |
6,161 |
|
EBIT |
|
3,280 |
3,123 |
5,131 |
4,847 |
5,289 |
|
Net interest |
|
-339 |
-458 |
-375 |
-373 |
-462 |
|
Taxation |
|
-745 |
-721 |
-942 |
-1,074 |
-1,158 |
|
Minority interest in profit |
5 |
6 |
-7 |
-100 |
-152 |
|
|
Net profit for the year |
2,535 |
2,129 |
3,355 |
3,300 |
3,516 |
|
|
Underlying earnings |
|
2,535 |
2,129 |
3,355 |
3,300 |
3,516 |
|
Underlying EPS, $ |
|
1.62 |
1.35 |
2.12 |
2.09 |
2.22 |
|
Thomson Reuters consensus EPS, $ |
|
|
2.38 |
2.49 |
2.56 |
|
|
DPS declared, $ |
|
1.08 |
1.17 |
2.16 |
2.11 |
2.24 |
|
Thomson Reuters consensus DPS, $ |
|
######## |
1.88 |
2.11 |
2.37 |
|
|
EBIT by division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russia (GMK & KGMK) |
3,524 |
4,299 |
5,831 |
5,452 |
5,707 |
|
|
EBIT margin |
|
55% |
58% |
67% |
65% |
66% |
|
NN Harjavalta |
|
17 |
59 |
31 |
-47 |
73 |
|
EBIT margin |
|
2% |
7% |
3% |
-5% |
7% |
|
Other metallurgical |
|
-11 |
-126 |
70 |
251 |
380 |
|
EBIT margin |
|
-157% |
-371% |
25% |
40% |
45% |
|
Other non-metallurgical |
96 |
91 |
-13 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
EBIT margin |
|
9% |
11% |
-1% |
1% |
1% |
|
Other |
|
-285 |
-973 |
-782 |
-814 |
-877 |
|
Income statement ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA margin |
|
47% |
44% |
52% |
52% |
53% |
|
EBIT margin |
|
40% |
34% |
46% |
45% |
45% |
|
EPS growth |
|
47% |
-17% |
58% |
-2% |
7% |
|
Dividend payout ratio |
|
67% |
87% |
102% |
101% |
101% |
|
Dividend as % of EBITDA |
44% |
46% |
58% |
59% |
58% |
|
|
Input assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel, $/t |
|
9,599 |
10,404 |
13,130 |
11,530 |
14,285 |
|
Copper, $/t |
|
4,867 |
6,170 |
6,532 |
6,000 |
6,367 |
|
Palladium, $/oz |
|
614 |
871 |
1,030 |
1,216 |
1,088 |
|
Platinum, $/oz |
|
988 |
950 |
880 |
870 |
1,070 |
|
RUB/$ |
|
67 |
58 |
63 |
67 |
68 |
|
Unit costs per nickel eq tonne, $ |
6,109 |
8,163 |
7,542 |
7,243 |
7,609 |
|
|
Sustaining capex per nickel eq tonne, $ |
814 |
1,187 |
915 |
2,365 |
2,397 |
|
|
Production volumes* |
236 |
217 |
211 |
214 |
214 |
|
|
Nickel, kt |
|
|||||
|
Copper, kt |
|
360 |
401 |
461 |
481 |
494 |
|
Palladium, koz |
|
2,618 |
2,780 |
2,757 |
2,684 |
2,684 |
|
Platinum, koz |
|
644 |
670 |
670 |
648 |
648 |
|
Attributable Cu eq volumes, kt |
1,412 |
1,442 |
1,484 |
1,496 |
1,509 |
|
|
Volume growth |
|
-6% |
2% |
3% |
1% |
1% |
|
Contribution to 2018E revenue per commodity |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Semi-products and |
|
|
|
||
|
Rhodium |
Silver |
other |
|
|
|
|
|
Cobalt 0% |
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold 1% |
3% |
|
|
|
|
Nickel |
Platinum 2% |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
26% |
||
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palladium
29%
Copper
27%
|
Target price, $: |
|
|
24.0 |
||
|
Last price, $: |
|
|
19.5 |
||
|
Potential 12-month return: |
|
34% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE |
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating assets |
10,299 |
13,581 |
|
12,304 |
13,836 |
15,433 |
Financial instruments |
198 |
267 |
|
259 |
259 |
259 |
Equity |
4,986 |
4,333 |
|
3,828 |
3,783 |
3,749 |
Minority interest |
74 |
331 |
|
310 |
410 |
562 |
Net debt |
4,530 |
8,201 |
|
7,479 |
8,909 |
10,338 |
Balance sheet ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gearing (net debt/(net debt+equity)) |
47.6% |
65.4% |
|
66.1% |
70.2% |
73.4% |
Net debt to EBITDA |
1.2x |
2.1x |
|
1.3x |
1.6x |
1.7x |
RoCE |
37.0% |
28.1% |
|
39.7% |
37.1% |
36.1% |
RoIC (after tax) |
31.1% |
21.5% |
|
31.5% |
28.7% |
27.9% |
RoE |
64.0% |
45.7% |
|
82.2% |
86.7% |
93.4% |
Cash flow statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow |
3,737 |
1,339 |
|
6,047 |
4,514 |
4,890 |
Capex |
-1,714 |
-2,002 |
|
-1,650 |
-2,300 |
-2,400 |
Other FCF |
-930 |
431 |
|
29 |
0 |
0 |
FCF |
1,093 |
-232 |
|
4,426 |
2,214 |
2,490 |
Equity shareholders' cash |
770 |
-667 |
|
4,134 |
1,916 |
2,121 |
Dividends and share buy backs |
-1,088 |
-3,004 |
|
-3,448 |
-3,345 |
-3,551 |
Surplus (deficit) cash |
-318 |
-3,671 |
|
686 |
-1,429 |
-1,430 |
Cash flow ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital days |
24 |
96 |
|
38 |
40 |
40 |
Cash Conversion |
0.3x |
-0.3x |
|
1.2x |
0.6x |
0.6x |
FCF yield |
4.0% |
-0.7% |
|
12.2% |
5.5% |
6.0% |
Equity shareholders' yield |
3.4% |
-2.6% |
|
14.5% |
6.2% |
6.9% |
Capex/EBITDA |
44.0% |
50.1% |
|
28.2% |
40.8% |
39.0% |
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SoTP DCF valuation and calculation of target price |
|
|
|
$mn |
$/sh |
|
Russia (GMK & KGMK) |
|
|
|
|
51,577 |
32.6 |
Finland |
|
|
|
|
825 |
0.5 |
Other metallurgical |
|
|
|
|
4,637 |
2.9 |
Other non-metallurgical |
|
|
|
|
30 |
0.0 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
-11,047 |
-7.0 |
Total enterprise value |
|
|
|
|
46,021 |
29.1 |
Net debt as at 31 December 2017 |
|
|
|
|
-8,201 |
-5.2 |
Cash used in share buy-backs |
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
267 |
0.2 |
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
-331 |
-0.2 |
Equity value as at 9/1/2019 |
|
|
|
|
37,756 |
23.9 |
Rounded to |
|
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
Share price on 8/1/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.5 |
Expected share price return |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1% |
Plus: expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9% |
Total implied one-year return |
|
|
|
|
|
33.9% |
Share price range, $: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-month high on 26/2/2018 |
21.3 |
12-month low on 10/4/2018 |
14.6 |
|||
Price move since high |
-8.6% Price move since low |
|
33.8% |
|||
Calculation of discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WACC |
9.4% |
Cost of debt |
|
|
5.0% |
|
Risk-free rate |
4.0% |
Tax rate |
|
|
24% |
|
Equity risk premium |
6.0% After-tax cost of debt |
|
3.8% |
|||
Beta |
1.30 |
Debt weighting |
|
30% |
||
Cost of equity |
11.8% |
Terminal growth rate |
|
2.5% |
||
Valuation ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec-YE |
2016 |
2017 |
|
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
P/E multiple |
8.8x |
12.0x |
8.5x |
9.4x |
8.8x |
|
Dividend yield |
7.6% |
7.2% |
|
12.0% |
10.8% |
11.5% |
EV/EBITDA |
6.9x |
8.6x |
6.2x |
7.1x |
6.8x |
|
P/B |
4.5x |
5.9x |
7.5x |
8.2x |
8.2x |
|
NAV per share, $ |
3.2 |
2.7 |
|
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
* From Russian own feed |
Source: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates |
19
vk.com/id446425943
Disclosures appendix
Renaissance Capital
10 January 2019
Metals & Mining
Analysts certification
This research report has been prepared by the research analyst(s), whose name(s) appear(s) on the front page of this document, to provide background information about the issuer or issuers (collectively, the “Issuer”) and the securities and markets that are the subject matter of this report. Each research analyst hereby certifies that with respect to the Issuer and such securities and markets, this document has been produced independently of the Issuer and all the views expressed in this document accurately reflect his or her personal views about the Issuer and any and all of such securities and markets. Each research analyst and/or persons connected with any research analyst may have interacted with sales and trading personnel, or similar, for the purpose of gathering, synthesizing and interpreting market information. If the date of this report is not current, the views and contents may not reflect the research analysts’ current thinking.
Each research analyst also certifies that no part of his or her compensation was, or will be, directly or indirectly related to the specific ratings, forecasts, estimates, opinions or views in this research report. Research analysts’ compensation is determined based upon activities and services intended to benefit the investor clients of Renaissance
Securities (Cyprus) Limited and any of its affiliates (“Renaissance Capital”). Like all of Renaissance Capital’s employees, research analysts receive compensation that is impacted by overall Renaissance Capital profitability, which includes revenues from other business units within Renaissance Capital.
Important issuer disclosures
Important issuer disclosures outline currently known conflicts of interest that may unknowingly bias or affect the objectivity of the analyst(s) with respect to an issuer that is the subject matter of this report. Disclosure(s) apply to Renaissance Securities (Cyprus) Limited or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries or affiliates (which are individually or collectively referred to as “Renaissance Capital”) with respect to any issuer or the issuer’s securities.
A complete set of disclosure statements associated with the issuers discussed in this Report is available using the ‘Stock Finder’ or ‘Bond Finder’ for individual issuers on the Renaissance Capital Research Portal at: http://research.rencap.com/eng/default.asp
Investment ratings
Investment ratings may be determined by the following standard ranges: Buy (expected total return of 15% or more); Hold (expected total return of 0-15%); and Sell (expected negative total return). Standard ranges do not always apply to emerging markets securities and ratings may be assigned on the basis of the research analyst’s knowledge of the securities.
Investment ratings are a function of the research analyst’s expectation of total return on equity (forecast price appreciation and dividend yield within the next 12 months, unless stated otherwise in the report). Investment ratings are determined at the time of initiation of coverage of an issuer of equity securities or a change in target price of any of the issuer’s equity securities. At other times, the expected total returns may fall outside of the range used at the time of setting a rating because of price movement and/or volatility. Such interim deviations will be permitted but will be subject to review by Renaissance Capital’s Research Management.
Where the relevant issuer has a significant material event with further information pending or to be announced, it may be necessary to temporarily place the investment rating Under Review. This does not revise the previously published rating, but indicates that the analyst is actively reviewing the investment rating or waiting for sufficient information to re-evaluate the analyst’s expectation of total return on equity.
Where coverage of the relevant issuer is due to be maintained by a new analyst, on a temporary basis the relevant issuer will be rated as Coverage in Transition. Previously published investment ratings should not be relied upon as they may not reflect the new analysts’ current expectations of total return. While rated as Coverage in Transition, Renaissance Capital may not always be able to keep you informed of events or provide background information relating to the issuer.
If issuing of research is restricted due to legal, regulatory or contractual obligations publishing investment ratings will be Restricted. Previously published investment ratings should not be relied upon as they may no longer reflect the analysts’ current expectations of total return. While restricted, the analyst may not always be able to keep you informed of events or provide background information relating to the issuer.
Where Renaissance Capital has neither reviewed nor revised its investment ratings on the relevant issuer for a period of 180 calendar days, coverage shall be discontinued.
Where Renaissance Capital has not provided coverage of an issuer for a period of 365 calendar days, coverage shall be discontinued.
Where Renaissance Capital has not expressed a commitment to provide continuous coverage and/or an expectation of total return, to keep you informed, analysts may prepare reports covering significant events or background information without an investment rating (Not Covered).
Your decision to buy or sell a security should be based upon your personal investment objectives and should be made only after evaluating the security’s expected performance and risk.
Renaissance Capital reserves the right to update or amend its investment ratings in any way and at any time it determines.
20