- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Parameter estimation toolbox
- •3 Population size
- •4 Vital statistics: birth, death and growth rates
- •5 Rate of increase of a population
- •6 Density dependence
- •7 Spatial parameters
- •8 Competition
- •9 Predator–prey, host–parasitoid and plant–herbivore models
- •10 Host–pathogen and host–parasite models
- •11 The state of the art
- •References
- •Index
Index
Page numbers in bold refer to tables and those in italic refer to figures
abridged life tables, 117 abstract models, 317–18
Acanthaster planci, 60 accuracy, 23, 23 – 4, 33
population size estimation, 72
acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus), 193
active adaptive management, 178 activity levels, 100
adaptive sampling, 60 – 6 application, 62–5 efficacy, 65 – 6
population size variance estimation, 61, 62
quadrat size, 65, 66 threshold rules, 61, 66
total population size estimation, 61 aerial surveys
double sampling, 71 transects, 68
age–size data, 133 – 4, 136 age-specific fecundity, 140, 141–2 age-specific survival, 132
death rates, 103, 104 Euler–Lotka equation, 140, 141
age structure, 6 – 8, 317, 318 comparison at different times, 131 conveyor belt analogy, 7, 7, 9 Leslie matrix model, 7– 8
McKendrick–von Forster equation, 8 –10 mark–recapture survival analysis, 121,
121
maturation period variable, 8 aggregated populations, 60
line transects, 77 predator–prey/host–parasitoid models,
252– 4
sampling strategies see adaptive sampling see also patchiness
Aimophila aestivalis (Bachman’s sparrow), 184
Akaike information criterion (AIC), 16, 238 mark–recapture study model selection,
123, 124
Alces alces (moose) see wolf–moose functional responses
ALEX, 47
Allee effect, 180, 181, 182 allometric relationships, 151–3, 152
ingestion rates, 258 –9
r (intrinsic rate of growth) estimation, 152, 152–3
transmission rates estimation, 297– 8
analysis of variance, 24
Ancylostoma duodenale, 308 Anopheles crucians, 305
Apodemus sylvaticus (wood mouse), 305 – 6 Ascaris lumbricoides, 308
Asterionella formosa, 239, 240 autocorrelation function (ACF), 170 auxiliary variables, 67, 68
Bachman’s sparrow (Aimophila aestivalis), 184
bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus), 299, 305 – 6
basic reproductive number see R0 Bayesian methods, 44 – 6
depensation (inverse density dependence), 181
posterior probability, 45 prior probability, 45
belt transects, 50
see also sampling strategies Beverton–Holt model, 175, 176, 183
inverse density dependence, 181, 182 bias, 23, 29
quadrat sampling, 53, 73 binary collision model, 298 –9 binomial data
logistic regression, 26, 27 overdispersion, 27– 8 survival analysis, 118, 119
biological control, 285 host–parasitoid models, 251–2
bird–spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) predation, 260, 261
births, 102
bison brucellosis infection, 311, 311 black molly (Poecilia latipinna)–
Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection, 29 –30, 30, 32
experimental infection, 294, 295 survival analysis, 109, 110, 113 –15
Weibull distribution, 109 –10, 111–12 bootstrap methods, 40, 42– 4
line transects sampling error, 78 stock–recruitment relationship models,
178
time series analysis
density dependence modelling, 163, 165, 168
dynamic competition modelling, 234 Box–Cox transformation, 168
bridled nailtail wallaby (Onychogalea fraenata), 188 –9
339
340 I N D E X |
|
brucellosis in bison, 311, 311 |
computer software, 2, 46 – 8 |
brushtailed possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), |
modelling, 47– 8 |
285 |
spreadsheets, 46 –7 |
Bubulus ibis ibis (cattle egret), 211 |
statistics, 47 |
bumble-bee competition modelling, 232–3 |
confidence intervals, 25 – 6 |
burrow counts, 99 |
Bayesian methods, 45 – 6 |
|
bootstrap methods, 40, 42– 4 |
call counts, 99 |
jackknife methods, 40, 41–2, 44 |
Canis lupus see wolf–moose functional |
line transects, 77– 8 |
responses |
maximum likelihood estimates, 38 –9 |
captive breeding data, 103 |
profile likelihood, 39, 41, 119 |
CAPTURE, 86, 87 |
stock–recruitment relationship models, |
capture histories, 85, 90, 92– 4, 121 |
178 |
subpopulation interchange models, 195 |
survival analysis, 118 –19 |
carnivore track counts, 100 |
continuous-time models, 5 |
carrying capacity, 157, 158, 160, 183 |
density dependence, 158 |
estimation, 161 |
step length, 5 |
catastrophic stochasticity, 11 |
convex polygon, 186, 188 |
catch per unit effort, 99 |
coral cover, 74 |
cattle egret (Bubulus ibis ibis), 211 |
Cormack–Jolly–Seber model, 96, 97, 98, |
cellular automaton models, 184 –5 |
120, 195 |
Choristoneura fumiferana (spruce budworm), |
capture probabilities, 120 |
260, 261 |
survival probabilities, 120 |
Clethrionomys glareolus (bank vole), 299, |
cowpox, 299 |
305 – 6 |
effect on fecundity, 305 – 6 |
Clinocottus globiceps, 234, 235 |
credibility interval, 45 – 6 |
cluster sampling, 60, 66 –7 |
cross-validation, 169 |
see also adaptive sampling |
crown of thorns starfish, 191 |
clutch size, 103 |
current life tables, 116 |
cohort life tables, 116, 117–19 |
|
collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto), 211 |
death rates, 103, 104, 138 |
competition, 216 – 43 |
survival curves, 105 |
agents, 216, 229 |
see also hazard function |
defining interaction coefficients, 219 –21 |
deaths, 102 |
experimental approaches, 222–5, 241 |
delay-differential equations, 8 |
isocline mapping, 225 –30, 242 |
demographic stochasticity, 11 |
press experiments, 223 |
density dependence, 157– 83, 313 |
pulse experiments, 223, 242 |
definition, 158 |
resource competition, 224 –5 |
in demographic parameters, 173 |
time scales, 224 –5 |
host–parasite models, 307 |
Lotka–Volterra model, 216, 217–19 |
experimental manipulations, 183 |
mechanistic models, 238 – 41 |
density, 173 – 4 |
resource dynamics, 238 – 41, 239, 240, |
resources, 174 |
242 |
importance in natural populations, |
targets, 216, 229, 230 |
157– 8 |
competition coefficients |
inverse, 180 –2, 183 |
from census data, 230 – 8, 243 |
logistic, 158, 159 |
dynamic approach, 230, 233 – 8 |
rate of population spread, 214 |
observation error, 235, 236 |
reasons for estimation, 158 –9 |
Pimm–Schoener method, 232, 233 |
rescaling, 160 –1 |
process error, 235 – 6 |
stochasticity, 178 – 80, 183 |
static approach, 230, 231–3 |
stock–recruitment relationship, 174 – 8 |
density manipulations, 222–3 |
time series analysis, 161–73 |
resource usage methods, 221–2, 224, |
applications, 164 –7, 170 –2 |
241 |
bootstrapped estimates of parameters, |
see also interaction coefficients |
163, 165, 168 |
competitive isoclines |
cross-validation of parameters, 169 |
mapping, 225 –30 |
environmental stochasticity, 162, |
resource competition, 241, 242 |
173 |
complexity levels, 14 –15 |
exponential growth, 163, 163 |
computer-intensive methods, 318 –19 |
inverse density dependence, 181, |
bootstrap methods, 40, 42– 4 |
182 |
jackknife methods, 40, 41–2, 44 |
lagged population size model, 168 –9 |
density dependence (contd ) length of time series, 172–3
logistic models, 163, 163 – 4, 183 noise, 169, 173
observation error, 162, 172 parameter estimates, 163 process error, 162
random walk, 162, 163 randomization method, 168
transmission of pathogen/parasite, 293, 299
density manipulations, 173 – 4, 183 Allee effect demonstration, 182 competition studies, 222–5
interaction coefficients estimation, 223 – 4
press experiments, 223 pulse experiments, 223 resource competition, 224 –5 time scales, 224 –5
stock–recruitment relationship, 178 density-vagueness, 178
depensation, 180
see also inverse density dependence desert rodent competition modelling, 232 deterministic models, 10 –12
Diaptomus sanguineus, 127
diatom resource competition, 239, 239 – 41,
240, 242
differential equation models, 5 – 6 diffusion coefficient, 210
diffusion models, 210 –14, 211, 215 observed versus predicted rates of spread,
213 –14, 214
range expansion rate, 211–13, 212 discrete-time models, 5, 6
density dependence, 158 –9, 159 dispersal, 186, 187, 190
dispersal distributions, 190 –3, 214 data collection methods, 191
finite study area effects, 192, 193 exponential models, 190, 191 Gaussain plume models, 191 power models, 190, 191
survival analysis methods, 192 DNA-based methods
microsatellite DNA, 200 –1 traces analysis, 100 –1
double sampling, 56, 69, 70 –1 Durbin–Watson test, 150
emigration, 102 see also migration
endangered species population dynamics, 208 –9
environmental stochasticity, 11
density dependence analysis, 162, 173 probability distribution, 11
rate of increase relationships, 154, 154 time series data, 147, 149
epidemic transmission, 294 –7, 296 estimation procedure, 14
bias, 23
I N D E X 341
Euler–Lotka equation, 140 – 6 parameters, 141–2, 144, 145 rmax (maximum rate of increase)
estimation, 144 – 6 solving equation, 142
spreadsheet application, 142–3 event-based models, 13
Exmouth Gulf prawns, 176 explanatory models, 3 exponential growth, 5, 149 extinction risk estimation, 160
extra sum of squares analysis, 38, 38 extra-binomial variation (heterogeneity),
32
F ratios, 15 factorial models, 21 failure time, 105
false fritillary butterfly (Melitaea diamina), 208 –9
fecundity, 102–3, 137 age/size-dependence, 103 definition, 103
density dependence, 173 macroparasites, 307, 308, 309
host–pathogen/parasite models, 305 – 6 parasite reduction experiments, 306,
306
stage-structured discrete models, 146 filter feeders, 245
fisheries biology, 1 depensation (inverse density
dependence), 180 –2 fecundity estimation, 103 growth rates modelling, 133 population size estimation, 99
stock–recruitment relationship, 174 –5 footprint tracking, 186
force of infection, 290 –3 fox–rabbit predation
diet analysis, 257, 259
estimated functional responses, 260 data-fitting procedure, 264 –5
fractional factorial models, 21 frequency-dependent transmission, 293,
299
frequency distribution, 12 FSTAT, 199
gene flow estimation, 197, 199 generation time, 6
genetic approaches
data collection methods, 198 generation time, 6 individual-based, 12 migration /dispersal, 187, 190
rates estimation, 200 –1, 215 spatial models, 196 –201, 197 variables rescaling, 18
genetic assignment test, 200 –1, 202 Geographic Information System (GIS), 184 gerbil competition modelling, 225 – 6, 226,
227, 228, 229, 230
342 I N D E X
Gerbillus allenbyi, 225 – 6, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230
Gerbillus pyramidum, 225 – 6, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230
gestation period, 103
ghost bat (Macroderma gigas), 124 – 6 Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia),
182, 208 GLIM, 28, 47, 89, 96
grasshopper competition modelling, 228 –130, 231
grouse macroparasite burden fecundity effect, 306, 306 mortality effect, 303, 304
growth curves, 135 growth rates, 133 – 6, 138
age–size data, 133 – 4, 136 functional forms, 133, 134 growth curves, 135 recapture data, 133, 135 – 6 von Bertalanffy model, 133
habitat destruction modelling, 208 –9 hair DNA analysis, 100, 101 Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, 200 harmonic mean distribution, 187, 189
Hanski model see incidence function models hazard function, 105, 108, 108
exponential survival function, 108, 109 functional form, 108
Weibull distribution, 108, 109 helminth parasite density-dependent
fecundity, 307, 308, 309 heterogeneity (extra-binomial variation),
32
home range, 185 – 6, 188 –9 definition, 186
harmonic mean, 187, 189 Jennrich–Turner bivariate normal
distribution, 187, 188 kernel estimation, 187, 189
minimum convex polygon, 186, 188 range data analysis, 186
host–parasite models, 284
algebraic sensitivity analysis, 19 –20 basic structure, 285, 287–9 demographic parasite parameters, 307 density dependence studies, 173
macroparasite fecundity, 307, 308, 309
free-living infective stages, 287, 288, 294 functional responses, 245
host fecundity effects, 305 – 6, 306 host population size, 287
threshold population (NT ), 289, 310 –11
host survival rate modelling, 109 –10, 111–12, 113 –15
maximum likelihood estimates, 29 –32,
30
mortality see parasite-induced mortality parameterization, 284 –5
parasite survival within host, 20, 307 parasites on hosts, 19, 287, 288, 294
R0 (basic reproductive number), 288, 309 –10
rescaling, 19
transmission see transmission process; transmission rate
host–parasitoid models, 244, 251–2 age/stage structure effects, 6 aggregation, 253
functional responses dimensional analysis, 255 – 6
experimental approaches, 254 – 6 habitat complexity, 256
heterogeneity, 252– 4 Nicholson–Bailey model, 252 spatial refuges, 253
host–pathogen models, 284 age structure effects, 6 asymptomatic carriers, 307
basic structure (SIR models), 285, 286 –7 epidemics, 294 –5
host fecundity effects, 305 – 6 incubation period, 306 latent period, 306, 307
microparasite parameters, 306 –7 mortality see parasite-induced mortality parameterization, 284 –5
R0 (basic reproductive number), 12, 286, 309 –10
recovery rates, 306, 307 threshold population for disease
transmission (NT), 286, 310 –11 transmission see transmission process;
transmission rate house finch, 180 hypothesis testing, 24
Icelandic summer spawning herring, 176 Ichthyophthirius multifiliis–black molly
infection see black molly (Poecilia latipinna)
immigration, 102 see also migration
incidence function models, 204 –7, 215 application, 208 –9
colonization modelling, 206 extinction modelling, 205 – 6 parameters, 205
rescue effect, 205 – 6 individual-based models, 12–13 individual genotype detection, 100 –1 ingestion rates, allometric relationships,
258 –9
insects
density dependent survival, 159 generation time, 6
survival rates, 104 interaction coefficients, 219 –21
estimation from perturbation experiments, 223 – 4
inverted negative Jacobian matrix, 220 –1 Jacobian matrix at equilibrium, 220
per capita direct effects, 220 removal matrix, 221
see also competition coefficients
interaction parameters, 157, 313 –14 intraspecific competition, 17
inverse density dependence, 180 –2, 183 island models, 196, 197
jackknife methods, 40, 41–2, 44 line transects sampling error, 78
stock–recruitment relationship models, 178
see also cross-validation Jennrich–Turner bivariate normal
distribution, 187, 188 JOLLY, 95
Jolly–Seber method, 84, 85, 90, 91 application, 92– 4
kangaroos
commercial harvesting, 21
rainfall–rate of increase relationship, 154, 154
Kaplan–Meier method, 118 –19 kernel estimation, 187, 189
Lagopus lagopus scoticus (red grouse), 291–2, 292
lambda, λ (finite rate of increase), 140 landscape (spatially explicit) models, 184,
318
larch budmoth (Zeiraphera diniana), 170 –2 large vertebrate strip transects, 74 Lasiorhinus kreffti (northern hairy-nosed
wombat), 100
Latin hypercube sampling, 22, 22–3 lattice models, 185
genetic approaches (stepping stone models), 196, 197
least squares estimation, 33 Lefkowitz matrices, 8 Leslie matrix model, 7– 8
life tables, 104, 116 –19, 117 abridged, 117
cohort, 116, 117–19 current, 116
lifespans, 102 likelihood function, 31 likelihood ratio tests
linear models, 15, 16
mark–recapture study model selection, 122–3
Lincoln–Petersen method, 83 – 4, 85, 87, 90, 97
line-intercept transects, 74 line transects, 50, 73 – 83
application, 78 – 82 clustered distributions, 77 confidence intervals, 77– 8 definitions, 74
effective half strip width, 76 effective strip width, 74 fitting curves to data, 76 –7 method, 75 –7
rationale, 73 – 4 replicate lines, 78 sampling error, 78
I N D E X 343
sightability curve, 75, 75 sighting difficulties, 74 see also sampling strategies
linear models, 24
drawbacks for ecological problems, 29 least squares estimation, 29, 37 likelihood ratio test, 15, 16
litter size, 103
lizard fish (Saurida), 305 logarithmic transformations, 24, 37
logistic density dependence, 158, 159 carrying capacity, 161
logistic regression, 23, 26 – 8
drawbacks for ecological problems, 27 maximum likelihood estimates, 29 – 39 overdispersed data, 27– 8
scale parameter φ specification, 28 long-lived vertebrate populations, 6 Lotka–Volterra model, 216, 238, 268
dynamic regression models, 234, 236 phase-plane analysis, 217–19 predator–prey models, 245, 247 process/experimental error, 278 –9
McKendrick–von Forster equation, 8 –10, 129
Macroderma gigas (ghost bat), 124 – 6
Macropus robustus (wallaroo), 78 – 82 Macropus rufus (red kangaroo), 269, 270, 272 marine bottom sampling, 59
MARK, 121, 124
mark–recapture methods, 82– 4, 313 capture histories, 85, 90, 92– 4, 121 capture probabilities, 85 – 6, 97, 99, 119,
120, 120, 194, 195 closed populations, 84 –9
effective sample area, 84 –5 Cormack–Jolly–Seber method, 97, 98 dispersal distribution models, 192 growth rates estimation, 133, 135 – 6 Jolly–Seber method, 84, 85, 90, 91, 92– 4 Lincoln–Petersen method, 83 – 4, 85, 87,
97
log-linear method, 95 – 6
migration rates estimation, 193 – 6, 215 subpopulation interchanges, 194 – 6
movement of individuals estimation, 186 patch-related movement, 187, 190
open-population models, 90 – 6 recovery probability, 95 removal methods, 98 –9 sample size, 96 –7
sampling effort allocation, 97– 8 sampling times, 97– 8, 98 Schnabel estimates, 87, 88 –9
survival analysis, 119, 120, 120, 121, 124 – 6
age-structured model, 121, 121 application, 124 – 6
likelihood ratios, 15, 16
model selection approaches, 122–3 time-dependent methods, 86 –7, 89
mark–resight methods see mark–recapture methods
344 I N D E X |
|
Marmota flaviventris (yellow-bellied |
nonlinear models, 37 |
marmot), 193 |
extra sum of squares analysis, 38, 38 |
matrix-based models, 7 |
logarithmic transformations, 24, 37 |
maturation period modelling, 8 |
northern hairy-nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus |
maximum likelihood estimates, 29–39 |
kreffti ), 100 |
age–size data, 133, 134 |
northern spotted owl, 3 |
confidence intervals, 38 –9 |
|
bootstrap methods, 40, 42– 4 |
objective statistical methods, 14, 15, 45 |
jackknife methods, 40, 41–2 |
observation error, 314 –16 |
profile likelihood, 39, 41 |
dynamic competition modelling, 235, 236 |
gene flow estimation, 199 |
stochastic models, 11 |
nonlinear least squares, 37– 8 |
stock–recruitment relationship, 177, 177, |
principle, 29, 30 –2 |
178 |
process, 31, 33 – 6 |
time series analysis, 278, 279, 280 |
residual deviance, 31–2 |
density dependence, 162, 172 |
stock–recruitment relationship models, |
Oligocottus maculosus, 234, 235 |
178 |
Ondatra zibethicus (muskrat), 211 |
survival rates, 29 –32, 30, 32 |
Onychogalea fraenata (bridled nailtail |
Weibull distribution, 111–12 |
wallaby), 188 –9 |
mechanistic models |
Opisthorchis viverrini, 308 |
competition, 238 – 41 |
Ostertagia, 308 |
density dependence, 158, 159 – 60 |
|
Melanerpes formicivorus (acorn woodpecker), |
Paramecium competition modelling, 234 – 6, |
193 |
237, 237 |
Melanoplus sanguinipes, 231 |
parameter interaction, 18, 21 |
Melitaea cinxia (Glanville fritillary butterfly), |
parameter numbers, 14 –15 |
182, 208 |
parameter uncertainty, 18 –23 |
Melitaea diamina (false fritillary butterfly), |
parametric statistical tests, 24 |
208 –9 |
parasite-induced mortality, 299 –305 |
metapopulations, 201, 203 – 4, 215 |
experimental studies, 300 –2, 301 |
definition, 201 |
impact of disease on survival, 300 –1 |
incidence function models see incidence |
laboratory experiments, 302 |
function models |
observational methods, 302–5 |
microsatellite DNA-based methods, |
case mortality in epidemics, 303 |
200 –1 |
macroparasite burden, 303 –5, 304 |
migration, 186, 187, 190 |
patch models, 185 |
rates, 190, 215 |
colonization/extinction patterns, 203, |
genetic approaches, 200 –1 |
204 |
mark–recapture methods, 193 – 6 |
competition modelling, 225 – 6, 226, 227, |
minimum convex polygon, 186, 188 |
228, 229 |
modelling objectives, 1 |
genetic approaches (island models), 196, |
modelling software packages, 47– 8 |
197 |
moose (Alces alces) see wolf–moose |
gene flow estimation, 197, 199 |
functional responses |
incidence function models, 204 –9 |
movement of individuals, 185 –201 |
metapopulations, 201, 203 – 4 |
data collection, 186 |
patch-related movement, 187, 190 |
genetic approaches, 196 –201, 215 |
patchiness, 60 |
migration, 187, 190 |
population sampling strategies, 54 |
rates, 193 – 6, 215 |
see also aggregated populations |
probability distributions, 187, 190 –3 |
pellets analysis, 257, 259 |
range data analysis, 186 –7, 188 –9 |
periodicity in data, 60, 60 |
MSSURVIV, 196 |
phase-plane analysis, 217–19 |
Mus musculus mark–recapture study, 88 –9 |
phocine distemper epidemic transmission, |
Jolly–Seber population estimation |
296 –7, 297 |
method, 92– 4 |
phytoplankton–cladoceran herbivory |
muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), 211 |
model, 278, 279 – 80, 280, 281 |
myxomatosis in rabbits, 303 |
‘pick-up’ sample, 131 |
|
Pimm–Schoener method, 232 |
Necator americanus, 308 |
plant–herbivore models, 244, 268 –78 |
nested models, 15 –16 |
vertebrate herbivores, 268 –71, 272 |
Nicholson–Bailey model, 252 |
herbivore functional response, 269, 270 |
nonlinear least squares, 37– 8 |
herbivore numerical response, 269 –70, |
growth parameters, 133, 135 |
270 |
I N D E X 345
plant–herbivore models (contd ) herbivore population density
dependence, 269
plant response function, 269, 270 plug-in estimate, 43
Poecilia latipinna see black molly– Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection
polar bear migration, 201, 202 polymerase chain reaction, 100, 101 population age structure see age structure population dynamics, 102
overcompensation, 17 population growth rates, 102
early reproduction, 103 fecundity, 103
population sampling problems, 50 strategies, 50, 51–2 subareas definition, 50
subsampling methods, 50 population size estimation, 49 –101
accuracy, 72
actual population size, 49 catch per unit effort, 99 continuous-time models, 5
deterministic/stochastic models, 10 –12 DNA traces, 100
indexes, 49, 50, 100 indirect methods, 99 –100 line transects, 73 – 83
mark–recapture/resight, 82– 4 numerical algorithms, 5 population definition, 49 –50 precision, 54, 72 quadrat/transect shape, 72–3, 73 quadrat/transect size, 72
rare animals, 100 –1 ratio methods, 98 –9 removal methods, 98 –9
sampling see population sampling population viability analysis models, 2
sensitivity analysis, 23 software packages, 47 posterior probability, 45
post-sampling stratification, 59 double sampling, 71
precision, 23, 23 – 4, 29 population size estimation, 72
population sample size, 53 quadrat size, 54, 72
stratified random sampling, 55 predator–prey consumption rates allometric relationships, 258 –9
estimation from field data, 257, 259, 260 stomach contents, 259, 261–2
predator–prey models, 244 – 68 age/stage structure effects, 6
approximate methods for sparse data see vole–predator interactions
basic structure, 245
functional responses, 244, 245 –7, 246, 282, 283
data-fitting procedure, 264 –7
dimensional analysis, 255 – 6 experimental approaches, 254 – 6, 283 explicit forms, 247
field data, 256 – 68 habitat complexity, 256
predator-centred measurement approach, 257– 62, 263, 283
prey-centred measurement approach, 256 –7, 262–3, 283
type I, 245
type II, 245 – 6, 263 – 4, 283, 314 type III, 246, 263 – 4, 283
type IV, 246
Lotka–Volterra model, 245, 247 numerical response of predators, 244,
247–51, 249, 282, 283 field data, 268
ratio-dependent predation, 248, 249, 250 –1
total response, 248
spatial heterogeneity, 252– 4, 283 time series analysis, 278 – 82, 280, 281
observer error, 278, 279, 280 process error, 278
predictive models, 3, 4 press experiments, 223 prior probability, 45 probability distributions
computer-intensive methods, 39 – 40 dispersal distances, 187, 190 –3 stochastic models, 136 –7
PROC GENMOD, 32 process error, 314 –16
dynamic competition modelling, 235 – 6 stochastic models, 11
stock–recruitment relationship, 175, 177, 178
time series analysis, 278 density dependence, 162
production/biomass (P/B) ratios, 153 profile likelihood, 39, 41 proportions estimation, 26
Pseudomys gracilicaudatus, 233 pulse experiments, 223, 224
purposes (application) of models, 3, 4
quadrats, 50, 72–3 along transects, 67 location selection, 53 shape, 72–3, 73
size, 53 – 4
adaptive sampling, 65, 66 population size estimation, 54, 72
see also sampling strategies
r (intrinsic rate of growth), 5, 158 definitions, 139 – 40
R0 (basic reproductive number), 12, 286, 288
host–parasite interaction, 309 –10
rmax (maximum rate of increase), 139 – 40 estimation from Euler–Lotka equation,
144 – 6
346 I N D E X |
|
rabbits |
rescaling, 16 –18 |
fox predation see fox–rabbit predation |
density dependence, 160 –1 |
myxomatosis, 303 |
host–parasite model, 19 –20 |
radioactive tracers, 186 |
residual deviance, 31–2 |
radiotelemetry, 186 |
resource manipulation, 174 |
distribution of dispersal distances, 192–3 |
resource usage, 221–2, 224 |
predator–prey functional responses, |
Richards equation, 134, 136 |
262–3 |
Ricker model, 17, 175, 176, 183 |
RAMAS, 47, 169 |
ring-necked ducks, 62–5 |
random sampling |
@Risk risk analysis package, 23, 46 |
sensitivity analysis, 21 |
rodent competition modelling, 233 |
Latin hypercube sampling, 22, 22–3 |
Runge–Kutta method, 234, 235 |
simple, 52– 4 |
|
population density confidence |
S-Plus, 47 |
intervals, 53 |
St Paul island reindeer population, 149 –51 |
stratified see stratified random sampling |
sample size for mark–recapture methods, |
range expansion rate, 211–13 |
96 –7 |
parameters, 212 |
sampling distribution, 12 |
raptor diet analysis, 257, 259 |
sampling effort allocation |
estimated functional responses, 260 |
double sampling, 70 |
rare animal population size estimation, |
mark–recapture methods, 97– 8, 98 |
100 –1 |
random sample site location, 54 |
rate of increase, 139 –56 |
stratified random sampling, 56, 59 |
allometric approaches, 151–3 |
Taylor’s power law, 59 |
context dependence, 139, 155 |
sampling error |
definitions, 139 – 40 |
line transects, 78 |
effect of age distribution, 140, 144, 145, |
time series data, 147, 149 |
145 |
sampling strategies, 50, 51–2 |
estimation from life-history information, |
adaptive sampling, 60 – 6 |
140 – 6 |
cluster sampling, 66 –7 |
estimation from time series, 147–9 |
double sampling, 70 –1 |
application, 149 –51 |
patchiness, 54 |
production/biomass (P/B) ratios, 153 |
periodicity in data, 60, 60 |
stage-structured populations, 146 |
ratio estimation, 68 –70 |
stochasticity, 153 – 4 |
simple random sampling, 52– 4 |
ratio-dependent predation, 248, 249, 250 –1 |
stratified random sampling, 54 –9 |
ratio estimation, 68 –70 |
systematic sampling, 59 – 60 |
auxiliary variables, 68 |
two-stage designs, 67– 8 |
double sampling, 70 |
sampling units see study areas |
population size estimation, 98 –9 |
SAS, 28, 42, 47 |
Rattus lutreolus, 233 |
satellite tracking, 186 |
reaction-diffusion models, 185 |
Saurida (lizard fish), 305 |
recruitment |
scat counts, 99, 257 |
mark–recapture/resight methods, 84, 97 |
Schaefer model, 175 |
stage-frequency data, 126 |
Schistosoma mansoni snail infection, 285, 291, |
stock–relationship, 174 – 8 |
292–3, 293 |
red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus), 291–2, |
Schnabel estimates, 87, 88 –9 |
292 |
sensitivity analysis, 4 |
red kangaroo (Macropus rufus), 269, 270, |
algebraic forms examination, 18, 19 –20 |
272 |
differential equation models, 5 |
redimensioning, 16 |
factorial models, 21 |
see also rescaling |
one-at-a-time parameter variation, 18, |
regression, 24, 70 |
21 |
remote sensing vegetation cover estimation, |
parameter interaction, 18, 21 |
69 |
parameter uncertainty, 18 –23 |
removal methods |
random sampling, 21 |
interaction coefficients, 221 |
Latin hypercube sampling, 22, 22–3 |
population size estimation, 98 –9 |
rescaling, 16 |
resampling |
host–parasite interaction, 19 –20 |
computer-intensive methods, 39 – 44 |
sentinel animal approach, 290 |
confidence intervals for maximum |
shrew dispersal, 201 |
likelihood estimates, 39 |
Sigara ornata, 305 |
line transects sampling error, 78 |
silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis), 164 –7 |
single species models, 2 SIR models, 286 –7
Skeena River sockeye salmon, 176 snowshoe hare, 262
lynx predation model, 278, 282 Soay sheep, 301, 301–2
sockeye salmon, 176 sparse data, 27 spatial models
diffusion models, 210 –14, 211, 215 genetic approaches, 196 –201 incidence function models, 204 –7, 215
application, 208 –9 metapopulations, 201, 203 – 4, 215
spatial parameters, 184 –215, 317 individual movements see movement of
individuals spatial refuges, 253 spatial scale, 317
spatially explicit (landscape) models, 184, 318
species interaction models, 2 spotted owl (Strix occidentalis), 184 spreadsheets, 2, 46 –7
risk-analysis add-ins, 46
spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana),
260, 261 SPSS, 47
stable age distribution, 130, 131, 132 stage–frequency data, 126 –30, 127 stage-structured populations, 6
rate of increase (r) estimations, 146 staggered entry, 105, 107
standard error, 12, 38 –9 see also variance
standing age distribution, 132–3 starling (Sturnus vulgaris), 211 stationary age distribution, 131 Statistica, 47
statistical models complexity levels, 14 selection, 15 –16
statistical population, 50 statistical significance, 25, 26 statistical software packages, 47 statistical tools, 23 – 48
step length
continuous-time models, 5 discrete-time models, 6 matrix-based models, 7, 8
stepping stone models, 196, 197 stochastic density dependence, 160, 161,
178, 183
transition matrix, 178 –9 stochastic models, 4, 10 –12
event-based, 13
frequency distribution of parameters, 12 individual-based, 12–13
matrix-based, 8 observation error, 11
population viability analysis, 136 –7, 138 probability distributions, 11, 136 –7 process error, 11
I N D E X 347
r (intrinsic rate of growth), 153 – 4 sensitivity analysis, 23
stochasticity, 10, 11 stock–recruitment relationship, 183
Beverton–Holt model, 175, 176, 183 data variability, 175, 176, 177 density dependence, 174 – 8
Schaefer model, 175 depensation (inverse density
dependence), 181, 182 observation error, 177, 177, 178 process error, 175, 177, 178 Ricker model, 175, 176, 183
stochastic density dependence, 179, 179 stomach contents analysis, 259, 261–2 strata, 54 –5
mapping, 56 numbers, 56
strategic models, 3, 4, 155 parameter numbers, 14
stratified random sampling, 54, 69, 70 application, 57– 8
mean density estimation, 55 – 6 post-sampling stratification, 59
double sampling, 71
sampling effort allocation, 56, 59 variance estimation, 55 – 6
Streptopelia decaocto (collared dove), 211 strip transects, 74
study areas (sampling units), 53 adaptive sampling, 60 –1, 66 definition, 50
mark–recapture methods, 84 –5 problems with random points, 54 strata, 54 –5, 56
Sturnus vulgaris (starling), 211 SURGE, 124
survival analysis, 26, 31, 103 –33, 137– 8 age structure comparison at different
times, 131
censored observations, 105, 107, 118 density dependence studies, 173 explanatory variables, 109
failure time, 105
hazard function, 105, 108, 108 functional form, 108 –9, 109
life tables, 104, 116 –19, 117 mark–recapture/resight methods, 84, 94,
96, 97, 119 –23 application, 124 – 6
maximum likelihood estimates, 29 –32,
30
method selection, 106 methods of last resort, 130 –3 parametric, 108 –16 ‘pick-up’ sample, 131 probability, 108, 108
stage-frequency data, 126 –30, 127 staggered entry, 105, 107 standing age distribution, 132–3 survival curves, 104, 105, 107
survival curves, 104, 105 types, 105, 107
348 I N D E X
sustainability, 2
swine fever epidemic transmission, 295, 296 Synedra ulna, 239, 240
Systat, 47
systematic sampling, 59 – 60
problems with periodicity in density, 60, 60
t test, 24, 25 – 6 tactical models, 3, 155
parameter numbers, 14 Taylor series, 159 Taylor’s power law, 59 territory size, 185
see also home range
tidepool fish competition modelling, 233, 234, 235
time modelling, 5 – 6
time series analysis, 147–9, 158 autocorrelation, 147– 8, 150 density dependence see density
dependence
dynamic competition modelling, 234, 243 observation error, 147, 162, 278, 279, 280 predator–prey models, 278 – 82
process error, 147, 162, 278 total response, 248
Trachyrachys kiowa, 231 track counts, 99, 100 tracking methods, 186 transects, 50, 72–3, 74
location selection, 53 shape, 72–3, 73
size, 72
see also line transects transition matrix, 178 –9 translocated populations, 144 transmission process, 289 –99
contact stage, 289 –90, 298 density-dependent transmission, 293, 299 development stage, 290, 298
force of infection, 290 –3 age-prevalence/age-intensity
approach, 290 –3, 292, 293 sentinel animal approach, 290
frequency-dependent transmission, 293, 299
transmission rate, 293 –9 allometric approaches, 297– 8 binary collision model, 298 –9
estimation from observed epidemics, 294 –7, 296
experimental estimation, 294, 295 scaling problems, 298 –9
spatial structure, 298, 299
Trichostrongylus tenuis, 291–2, 292
two-stage designs, 67
two-way analysis of variance, 15
univoltine species, 6
variables rescaling, 16 –18 variance
adaptive sampling, 61, 62 double sampling, 71
line transects, 78 ratio estimation, 69
stratified random samples, 55 – 6 two-stage sampling, 68
vegetation cover line-intercept transects, 74
remote sensing estimation, 69 vertebrates
large, 74 long-lived, 6 survival rates, 104
vole–predator interactions, 271 carrying capacity estimation, 275 environmental fluctuations, 273, 274 functional responses
type II, 273
type III, 273, 276
generalist predators, 271, 273 parameters, 275 – 6, 276
maximum consumption rate estimation, 275
mustelid predators, 273 parameters, 274
predicted versus acutal dynamics, 277 r (intrinsic rate of growth) estimations,
274 –5
von Bertalanffy model, 133, 134 growth curves, 135
recapture data, 135 VORTEX, 47
wallaroo (Macropus robustus), 78 – 82 Weibull distribution, 108, 109
dispersal distribution models, 192 survival rate modelling, 109 –10, 113 –15
maximum likelihood estimate, 111–12 white-tailed deer, 145
wolf (Canis lupus)–moose (Alces alces) functional responses, 260, 263
data-fitting procedure, 266 –7
wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus), 305 – 6
yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris), 193
Zeiraphera diniana (larch budmoth), 170 –2
Zosterops lateralis (silvereyes), 164 –7