feR7cEJkk3
.pdf581.5(470.22)
28.581(2 -6 )
. . |
, .Ю. |
« |
» |
. |
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
: |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
- |
|
|
: |
|
|
. |
|
|
, |
. |
, |
. |
, |
|
, |
, |
|
|
. |
|
E.V. Andrianova, T.Yu. Dyachkova
Petrozavodsk State University
Petrozavodsk, Russia
THE ANALYSIS OF FLORAS OF THE TWO LOCALITIES
OF THE NORTHERN KARELIA
Abstract. The species list of vascular plants of local floras of two localities of Northern Karelia – village Kuusiniemi and urban-type locality Kalevala – analyzed in the article. Taxonomical, typological and geographical analysis of the local flora has been conducted. The similarity of the floras on the of habitat types has been confirmed. Significant differences in the structure of species due to the different degree of anthropogenic transformation of the investigated territories were estimated.
Key words: Vascular plants, local floras, taxonomical, typological, geographical analysis, Northern Karelia.
30-
,
,
[1].
,
.
( )
. |
: |
,
,
11
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
. |
|
|
- |
: 65°10 00 . . |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
31°29 00 . |
.), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
||
|
|
|
( |
|
|
. |
|
|
: 65°12 00 |
|
. |
|
. 31°10 00 |
. |
), |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
. 1). |
|
||
« |
|
|
» |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
« |
|
|
|
|
», |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: |
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
« |
|
|
» |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
||
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
. |
1. |
. |
1. |
ё |
- |
|
1. |
- |
1. |
|
|
, |
1. |
- |
||
2. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
2. |
- |
2. |
|
. |
|
2. |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
- |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
, |
|
47 |
|
, |
7 |
|
, |
5 |
. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnoliophyta ( |
|
|
), |
|||||
|
Magnoliopsida ( |
|
|
) – 160 |
|
|
|
( |
. 2). |
|
2 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lycopodiophyta |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
||
Equisetophyta |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
||
Polypodiophyta |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
12
Pinophyta |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
Magnoliophyta |
2 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
221 |
|
Magnoliopsida |
|
|
29 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
160 |
|
Liliopsida |
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
61 |
|
7 |
|
47 |
|
64 |
|
|
237 |
||
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
||
63 |
, |
45 |
, 7 |
, 5 |
|
. |
||||
Magnoliopsida ( |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
) – 172 |
( |
. 3). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lycopodiophyta |
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
||
Equisetophyta |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
Polypodiophyta |
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
Pinophyta |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
Magnoliophyta |
2 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
235 |
|
Magnoliopsida |
|
|
30 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
172 |
|
Liliopsida |
|
|
10 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
63 |
|
7 |
|
45 |
|
63 |
|
|
249 |
. |
. |
|
– 201 |
, |
|
– 206, |
|
|
|||||
|
|
85 83,7 % |
|
( |
. 1). |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60% |
|
83,7 |
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
и |
и |
|
|||
50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
и |
и |
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
16,3 |
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
К |
|
. К и и и |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– |
50% ( . |
|
– 119 |
, |
|
|
|
|
– |
13
123), |
– |
– |
25% ( . |
|
– 63 |
, |
|
– 64). |
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
. 2). |
|
|
– |
40% ( . |
– 94, |
|
– 104 |
) |
|
). |
35% ( . |
– 92, |
|
|
– 90 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
: |
|
|
(2007) |
|
|
|
(2008): Isoёtes lacustris L. – |
|
( |
: 3, |
|
: 3(LC), Lobelia dortmanna L. – |
|
( |
: 3, |
: |
||
3(LC), Epilobium hornemannii Reichenb. – |
|
( |
: 3(NT). |
. 2. |
|
|
|
(KJ. |
= 0.9) |
. |
. |
, |
, |
||
|
. |
, 12 |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
.
14
|
|
|
. |
|
1. |
. ., |
. . |
// |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
. |
. |
. – |
|
, 2001. – |
. 2. – . 59–64. |
|
|
2. |
|
. – |
, 2007. – 368 . |
|
3. |
|
( |
). – |
.: |
, 2008. – 885 .
582
28.59
N. Tkach, M.H. Hoffmann, M. Roeser
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical Garden Halle, Germany
PHYLOGENY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF LARGE HEMIPARASITIC
GENUS PEDICULARIS (OROBANCHACEAE)
Abstract. Article is devoted to taxonomy, phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical distribution of Pedicularis. For investigation were sampled more than 200 Pedicularis species from different sections worldwide. The molecular phylogeny based on nuclear ribosomal (ITS) and chloroplast (matK-trnK) markers resolved eight major clades, which showed little agreement with traditional classifications of the genus. Results shows that the major clades of Pedicularis reflect general biogeographical diversification patterns of the genus.
Key words: taxonomy, biogeography, hemiparasitic plants, nuclear ribosomal markers, ribosomal markers.
The large highly diverse hemiparasitic genus Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae) encompasses about 800 species, which are prevailingly distributed in the northern hemisphere. The species occupy different habitats and most of them occur in the high mountains of the Himalayas, Tian Shan, Caucasus and the Alps. Pedicularis shows a high morphological diversity, particularly in flower and vegetative characters.
The taxonomy of Pedicularis is complicated due the lack of a genus-wide monographic treatment and suffers from many different and barely compatible approaches to evaluate morphological characters of regionally delineated sets of species. To trace the phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical distribution of Pedicularis we sampled more than 200 Pedicularis species from different sections worldwide.
15
The molecular phylogeny based on nuclear ribosomal (ITS) and chloroplast (matK-trnK) markers resolved eight major clades, which showed little agreement with traditional classifications of the genus. Most traditional groups turned out to be paraor polyphyletic. The major clades of Pedicularis reflect general biogeographical diversification patterns of the genus. Species of the early diverging clade occur predominantly in North America and/or in East Asia. The distribution of species from six clades concentrates on the diversity hot spot of the genus, the Hengduan Mountains of south-western China and the Himalayas. About two thirds of the approximately 350 Pedicularis species of this area are endemic. Species of one clade are entirely absent from this region. This clade comprises species from Europe, North America, but also from northern and Central Asia.
598.2(470.21)
28.693.35
. . |
, |
. |
. |
«
»
. ,
.
– |
. |
. |
. |
12 |
. |
|
|
.
.
: |
, |
, |
.
R.V. Zhitova, M.N. Kharlamova
Murmansk Arctic State University Murmansk, Russia
THE COMPOSITION OF AVIFAUNA IN URBAN AREAS OF THE MURMANSK REGION ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE VILLAGE OF UMBA IN THE WINTER
Abstract. Considered the main trends in the dynamics of avifauna in urban areas of the urban settlement of Umba (the Village Umba). The species composition of avifauna of the Umba Village in winter period was represented by 12 species. The avi-
16
fauna of the urban settlement of Umba in winter was compared with the data of previous researches. When comparing, a relative constancy of species composition in that period was observed.
Key words: avifauna, biodiversity, urban areas.
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
. |
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
||
|
|
|
|
[7]. |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
. |
: |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
. |
, |
– |
|
|
|
, |
5,5 |
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2014 |
2016 . |
– 100 |
). |
|
|
2013, |
|
|
|
, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
. |
|
|
, |
, |
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
. |
, |
|
|
|
- |
|
. |
|
|
12 |
|
: |
(Anas platyrhynchos), |
(Tetrastes |
|
bonasia), |
|
(Columba livia), |
(Dendrocopos ma- |
|||
jor), |
(Pica pica), |
(Corvus (corone) cornix), |
||||
(Corvus corax), |
|
|
(Parus montanus), |
|
||
(Parus |
major), |
|
|
(Passer |
domesticus), |
|
|
(Pyrrhula |
pyrrhula), |
|
(Carduelis |
||
chloris). |
[3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
, |
|
, |
2002 . |
2,51; |
2013 . – |
2,79; |
|
|
2014 . |
– |
2,56; |
|
2016 |
. – 2,43. |
|
|
|
|
|
17
t- |
, |
1. |
, |
, 2013 . |
|
|
|
||
. |
, |
|
|
2012 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
ё |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. . . |
|
|
[7] |
|
|
|
|
|
: |
1) |
|
|
|
|
|
; |
2) |
|
|
|
; |
3) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
, |
, |
|
. |
|
|
, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
, |
, |
|
ё |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ё |
. . |
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
||
: |
, |
[ |
. |
7]. |
|||||
|
|
||||||||
|
: 2002 |
. – 900, |
2013 |
. – 1 164, |
2014 |
. – |
|||
1 467, 2016 . – 1 619. |
|
|
. |
|
|
, |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|||
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
. |
[6]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
, |
. |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
||
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
||
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
, |
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
. |
2016 . |
|
, |
, |
|
|
, |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
t |
|
|
t0,05, |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
< 0,05. |
|
|
|
|
|
18
.
,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
4 |
: |
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
( |
. 1). |
2013 |
2014 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
2016 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
, |
« |
» |
|
|
|
« |
|
» |
|
|
|
. |
. |
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
[1]. |
|
|
, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
||
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
, % |
1 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
№ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
2016 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
1. |
|
Anas plathyrhynchos |
|
|
– |
|
12 |
|
12 |
19 |
|
2. |
|
Columba livia |
|
|
– |
|
14 |
|
17 |
22 |
|
3. |
|
Pica pica |
|
|
13 |
|
11 |
|
11 |
– |
|
4. |
|
Corvus cornix |
|
|
16 |
|
15 |
|
19 |
12 |
|
5. |
|
|
Parus major |
|
|
19 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
– |
6. |
|
|
Passer domesticus |
|
21 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
21 |
-2,43–2,27
. |
|
|
2,6–3,0 |
[2], |
|
– 2,48–2,84 [4]. |
|
||
2013 . |
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
||
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
: |
, |
, |
, |
. |
. |
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
. |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
[5, 7–9]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. – .: |
- |
, 1991. – 256 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2. |
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. – |
|
// |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, 2008. – |
. 6. – |
. 50–54. |
|
|
||
3. |
|
|
|
|
( |
, |
|
, |
, |
) / |
. |
, |
. |
|
, |
. |
|
|
. – |
: |
|
|
. . |
, 2002. – 45 . |
« |
|
» . . |
|
|
|||
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
// |
||||
68–71. |
: |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
. – |
, 2012. – . |
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
// |
|
-2000. |
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
. – |
: |
, 2000. – |
. 159–161. |
|
|
|
6. |
A.C., |
|
.X., |
|
. . |
|
|
// |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: |
. |
. – |
|
, 1991. – |
. 19–20. |
|
|
|
7. |
. . |
|
|
|
|
// |
|
|
|
|
|
. – 2008. – . 15. – № 1. – |
. 123–132. |
|
|
|
|
||||
8. |
. |
., |
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// |
|
. |
. |
. – 2011. |
– № 7. – |
.79–84.
9.Sasvari L. Interinolividualis veselkedes mint tarsasdinamikai teneeso a modarpopulacioban // Mady. Pszishol. szemee, 1977. – Vol. 36. – № 3. – P. 238–249.
20