- •Unit 1 ‘The Environment’
- •1. Complete the questionnaire below about your everyday activities. Analyze your answers and decide if you can call yourself a friend of planet Earth.
- •2. Share your analysis with the class to find out who is the most planet-friendly student in your group. Explain your choice.
- •The environment
- •It is not uncommon today to see people picking up and recycling trash left in public recreation areas.
- •Unit 2 ‘Ecological Problems’
- •1. Student a and Student в: your texts deal with air pollution.
- •Air Pollution
- •Water Pollution
- •1. Complete the table with the derivatives of the following words:
- •2. Match the words in Column a and Column b to form collocations. In several cases more than one variant is possible.
- •3. Now use the expressions from Exercise 2 to complete the following sentences. Pay attention to the form of the verb.
- •4. Use the texts and consult a collocations dictionary to complete the word maps below with collocations for the words ‘pollution’, ‘harm’ and ‘waste’.
- •5. Fill in the gaps in the text with suitable words: Top 5 Environmental Issues in Australia
- •Storm clouds on the horizon
- •1. Match the sentences a-c with pictures 1-3.
- •2. Complete the sentences using the future perfect or future continuous.
- •3. Complete the dialogue with verbs in the future continuous or future perfect.
- •1. Work with a partner and discuss the following question.
- •2. Read What can you do to help? about what you can do to help prevent climate change. Talk to a partner or in small groups.
- •What can you do to help? The top tips
- •Unit 3 ‘Working out solutions’
- •1. Answer the following questions about the article.
- •2. Arguments for and against using nuclear power
- •1. Explain or paraphrase the word(s) in italics in the following sentences.
- •2. Match the collocations from paragraphs 4 and 5.
- •3. Complete the following sentences using one of the collocations from Exercise 2.
- •4. Find words in the text that match the definitions below.
- •1. Discuss the questions in small groups.
- •2. Analyse the following survey report and present the results of your analysis to the group.
- •Recycling - How Important Is It Really?
- •In the comprehension check you were asked how you think people should be encouraged to participate in recycling programmes. Discuss your opinion with the class.
- •1. Work with a partner. What benefits of recycling do you remember?
- •2. Match the underlined words with their definitions. You will hear these words in the listening activity.
- •1. Now listen to a talk on recycling and answer the following question.
- •2. Compare with a partner what you understood.
- •3. Listen again and take notes of myths about recycling that the speaker destroys.
- •1. Listen to a radio interview with an animal protection activist and answer the question.
- •2. Compare with a partner what you understood.
- •3. Listen again and take notes of the solutions mentioned.
- •And the environment”
- •Bibliography
Unit 3 ‘Working out solutions’
THINKING ABOUT THE TOPIC
Look at the graph below. Discuss the following questions with a partner.
1 What does the graph show about the use of different sources of energy?
2 What is your reaction to the information in the graph?
Present your analysis of the graph to the group.
Reading 1 Nuclear energy
PRE-READING TASK
Work with a partner and fill in the table below with some of the arguments for and against using nuclear power.
+ |
- |
|
|
READING
Now read the article from the Financial Times and compare the arguments for and against using nuclear power presented in the article with those that you wrote in the pre-reading task.
Nuclear energy: Come-back kid or ugly duckling? | ||
by Fiona Harvey
(1) For environmentalists, it is thinking the unthinkable. Nuclear power, once the target of protests and demonstrations, has been transformed into the unexpected darling of some sections of the green lobby. The reason is simple: nuclear energy offers the hope of producing power on a large scale without burning fossil fuel. That would solve what many regard as the biggest threat the planet faces: global warming, caused by a dramatic rise in the level of carbon dioxide since industrialisation.
(2) As people still want the benefits of industrialisation, and as developing nations pursue economic development - leading to predictions that our energy consumption and thus levels of atmospheric carbon could more than double - some experts depict the once-maligned nuclear industry as the best solution. The nuclear industry has itself assisted this transformation, through the development of new technologies designed to make nuclear power safer and to deal with long-term problems such as the disposal of waste.
(3) But critics argue that the technology still suffers from problems. For instance, any nuclear reactor takes a long time to build and to produce energy. Safety concerns have also been heightened by the escalation in terrorist threats. Not only is there the possibility of a terrorist attack on a |
nuclear installation, but the creation of nuclear material for use in reactors and the waste generated provides terrorists with opportunities to steal valuable nuclear materials for use in nuclear bombs, or 'dirty' bombs.
(4) Another question is whether nuclear energy would be economically viable. The upfront costs are discouragingly high at an estimated $1,300 to $1,500 per kilowatt to build a nuclear plant, which works out as roughly twice what it costs to build a gas-fired power station. However, proponents claim that over the life of a nuclear plant, it can generate energy at a cost comparable to or even cheaper than that of conventional fossil-fuel power.
(5) Detractors counter that the industry has been subsidised by the public purse in so many ways, from research and development to clear-up operations, that the energy is much more expensive than the sector admits. For all these reasons, though some green lobbyists support a nuclear future, most remain opposed. They argue that alternatives, from better energy conservation and natural sources such as wind, to technologies such as hydrogen fuel cells, are more realistic and less risky.
(6) Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Centre on Global Climate Change, believes there may be a role for nuclear |
energy, but only when certain conditions have been met. 'You have to make sure you have enough safeguards and that you don't have nuclear proliferation.' Some governments also remain opposed to the idea. Sweden recently confirmed plans to shut down one of its 11 nuclear reactors, to reduce its dependence on nuclear power.
(7) By contrast, Sweden's neighbour Finland has heartily embraced nuclear power. The Finnish parliament recently ratified a decision to build a final spent-nuclear-fuel storage facility and approved a new nuclear reactor. France generates three-quarters of its energy from nuclear sources, and President George W. Bush has indicated his support for new nuclear reactors in the US.
(8) Perhaps the most important government in the debate is China, whose appetite for energy requires sweeping solutions. It plans to build as many as 30 nuclear plants, and to generate as much as 300 gigawatts from nuclear means by 2050. This has made other governments nervous. The development of a problem-free alternative, nuclear fusion, is as far as 50 years away. Long before then, governments and the public will have to decide what part they want nuclear power to play in energy production.
FINANCIAL TIMES |
/From Market Leader. Advanced. Teacher’s Book. Iwonna Dubicka, Margaret O’Keeffe/
COMPREHENSION CHECK