- •Contents
- •Acknowledgements
- •Introduction
- •1 Preliminaries to translation as a process
- •PRACTICAL 1
- •1.1 Intralingual translation
- •1.2 Intralingual translation
- •1.3 Gist translation
- •2 Preliminaries to translation as a product
- •EQUIVALENCE AND TRANSLATION LOSS
- •PRACTICAL 2
- •2.1 Translation loss
- •2.2 Degrees of freedom; translation loss
- •3 Cultural transposition
- •CULTURAL TRANSPOSITION
- •Exoticism and calque
- •Cultural transplantation
- •Cultural borrowing
- •Communicative translation
- •PRACTICAL 3
- •3.1 Cultural transposition
- •4 Compensation
- •CATEGORIES OF COMPENSATION
- •PRACTICAL 4
- •4.1 Compensation
- •The formal properties of texts: Introduction
- •5 The formal properties of texts: Phonic/graphic and prosodic issues in translation
- •THE PHONIC/GRAPHIC LEVEL
- •THE PROSODIC LEVEL
- •Rudiments of Italian and English versification
- •PRACTICAL 5
- •5.1 Phonic/graphic and prosodic issues
- •5.2 Phonic/graphic and prosodic issues
- •6 The formal properties of texts: Grammatical and sentential issues in translation
- •THE GRAMMATICAL LEVEL
- •Words
- •Grammatical arrangement
- •THE SENTENTIAL LEVEL
- •PRACTICAL 6
- •6.1 Grammatical and sentential issues
- •6.2 Grammatical and sentential issues
- •7 The formal properties of texts: Discourse and intertextual issues in translation
- •THE DISCOURSE LEVEL
- •THE INTERTEXTUAL LEVEL
- •PRACTICAL 7
- •7.1 Discourse and intertextual issues
- •8 Literal meaning and translation issues
- •SYNONYMY
- •HYPERONYMY-HYPONYMY
- •PARTIALLY OVERLAPPING TRANSLATION
- •PRACTICAL 8
- •8.1 Particularizing, generalizing and partially overlapping translation
- •9 Connotative meaning and translation issues
- •ATTITUDINAL MEANING
- •ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
- •ALLUSIVE MEANING
- •REFLECTED MEANING
- •COLLOCATIVE MEANING
- •AFFECTIVE MEANING
- •PRACTICAL 9
- •9.1 Connotative meaning
- •10 Language variety: Translation issues in register, sociolect and dialect
- •REGISTER
- •Tonal register
- •Social register
- •Social or tonal?
- •SOCIOLECT
- •DIALECT
- •CODE-SWITCHING
- •PRACTICAL 10
- •10.1 Language variety
- •10.2 Language variety
- •11 Textual genre and translation issues
- •SUBJECT MATTER
- •ORAL TEXTS AND WRITTEN TEXTS
- •NOTES ON SUBTITLING
- •Sample subtitling exercise
- •PRACTICAL 11
- •11.1 Genre and translation
- •11.2 Genre and translation
- •11.3 Genre and translation
- •12 Scientific and technical translation
- •PRACTICAL 12
- •12.1 Scientific and technical translation
- •12.2 Scientific and technical translation
- •13 Official, legal and business translation
- •PREMESSA
- •BILANCIO AL 31.12.96
- •PRACTICAL 13
- •13.1 Official and legal translation
- •13.2 Official and legal translation
- •14 Translating consumeroriented texts
- •PRACTICAL 14
- •14.1 Consumer-oriented texts
- •14.2 Consumer-oriented texts
- •15 Revising and editing TTs
- •PRACTICAL 15
- •15.1 Revising and editing
- •Contrastive topics and practicals: Introduction
- •16 Contrastive topic and practical: Nominalization
- •17 Contrastive topic and practical: Determiners
- •LINGUA E LINGUACCE
- •Il Novissimo Ceccarelli Illustrato
- •UN MONDO IMBOTTITO DI MAZZETTE
- •18 Contrastive topic and practical: Adverbials
- •19 Contrastive topic and practical: Condition and future in the past
- •20 Summary and conclusion
- •Postscript: A career in translation?
- •Bibliography
- •Index
86 THINKING ITALIAN TRANSLATION
PARTIALLY OVERLAPPING TRANSLATION
There is a third degree of semantic equivalence. Take the phrase `My niece's joke'. In the context of joking, `La battuta di mia nipote' is as close a literal rendering as possible. But the English does not specify the kind of joke, whereas the Italian TT specifies that it is a witty remark. That is, `battuta', as opposed to `scherzo' (practical joke) or `barzelletta' (funny story), is a particularization. Conversely, in the English phrase, the relationship between the speaker and the girl is specified unambiguously, whereas the Italian TT leaves it ambiguous: here, the TT generalizes, because `mia nipote' can mean either `my niece' or `my granddaughter'. This TT, then, combines particularization and generalization: it keeps the reference to a jest on the part of a junior female relative, but it adds a detail not found in the ST and it omits a detail that is given in the ST. This can be visualized as two partially overlapping circles, as in the figure opposite. The unshaded area, where the circles overlap, represents the material the ST and TT have in common. The shaded areas represent what is omitted and what is added in the TT. This is another category of degree in the translation of literal meaning. We shall call it partially overlapping translation, or partial overlap for short.
Partial overlap is almost unavoidable in whole sentences, common in phrases, and not infrequent even in single words. Take the word `professoressa'. If, in a given context, this is translated as `teacher' and not `lecturer', the TT certainly keeps the reference to someone who instructs. But it also particularizes, because it adds the specific detail that she works in a school and not a university; and at the same time it generalizes, because it omits the detail of her gender.