- •1496 Corba - Object-Oriented Technology)
- •1432 Five Object Oriented Development Methods, Research report, hp Laboratories,
- •1866 Corba Implementation Descriptions: Object-Oriented Technologies dome
- •135 Based approaches (e.G. Smalltalk handles) allow powerful dynamic typing, as
- •83 There are many definitions of an object, such as found in [Booch 91, p77]:
- •83 There are many definitions of an object, such as found in [Booch 91, p77]:
- •48 Languages that are historically procedural languages, but have been extended with some oo features. Examples: Visual Basic (derived from basic), Fortran 2003, Perl, cobol 2002, php, abap.
- •121 Interface - e.G. Gui
- •197 Sharing and often instances will simply delegate to parents to access methods
- •670 Polymorphic languages can be statically typed to provide strong type checking,
- •Inclusion
- •209 Usage is atypical] See [Booch 94, pp 154-155] for a brief discussion of
- •203 Parents (as any other member) can be added or changed dynamically, providing
- •23 Subtype polymorphism
- •18 A survey by Deborah j. Armstrong of nearly 40 years of computing literature identified a number of "quarks", or fundamental concepts, found in the strong majority of definitions of oop.
- •24 Object inheritance (or delegation)
- •295 1.4) What Is a Meta-Class? (Object-Oriented Technology)
- •228 [Booch 91, p. 45] defines: "Encapsulation is the process of hiding all of the
- •912 Polymorphism is the ability of an object (or reference) to assume (be replaced
- •702 See also section 3.7, the Annotated Bibliography, and appendix d. The
- •120 Application Objects - In the Object Model
- •210 Prototype theory in the context of ooa and ood.
- •180 Derived class, parent class
- •400 Specify required attributes of a matching object (see sections 2.1, 2.7 and
- •2282 Garbage collection (gc) is a facility in the run-time system associated with a
- •1540 From a joint proposal (named "corba") of Hewlett-Packard, ncr Corp.,
- •170 Inheritance. This is an example of dynamic binding, which replaces a
- •1519 1) The Object Request Broker, or key communications element, for
- •714 Of externally observable behavior; a complete, consistent, and feasible
- •749 (User-)environment). The product, or resultant model,
- •302 The Meta-Class can also provide services to application programs, such as
- •1511 In late 1990 the omg published its Object Management Architecture
- •621 Term "multi-method") consider the functional and receiver based forms
- •1617 Between applications on different machines in heterogeneous
- •192 Objects contain fields, methods and delegates (pseudo parents), whereas
- •159 Function taking an object of the record type, called the receiver, as the
- •1346 Information, updates to Release 1.1 of The Object Database Standard:
- •458 Or change parents from objects (or classes) at run-time. Actors, clos, and
- •774 Should be made into a public standard, perhaps to be adopted by the omg. The
- •140 Objects [Kim 89, ch 19 and Yaoqing 93]. Simple static approaches are found in
- •18 A survey by Deborah j. Armstrong of nearly 40 years of computing literature identified a number of "quarks", or fundamental concepts, found in the strong majority of definitions of oop.
- •18 A survey by Deborah j. Armstrong of nearly 40 years of computing literature identified a number of "quarks", or fundamental concepts, found in the strong majority of definitions of oop.
- •168 [Stroustrup 90] covers the implementation details of virtual member functions
- •220 Parents when certain predicates are true. This can support a types
- •148 In more conventional languages to fully emulate this style of dynamically typed
- •2052 - Naming - network implementation of X.500 directory
- •2082 2 V1.X. Development
- •2182 Functionality than specified by the X.500 standard. Because dome goes
- •2191 - True messaging for workflow management and edi
- •1166 Used for assignment compatibility forcing an assigned object to inherit
- •2065 Registering services and entities in a distributed
- •1541 HyperDesk Corp., Digital Equipment Corp., Sun Microsystems and Object
- •2038 Toolkits (others are planned for future release) --
- •2434 Testing of Object-Oriented Programming (toop) faq
- •863 See also [Yourdon 92], [Wilkie 93], and [Booch 94] for discussions on this
- •1465 [Wilkie 93] summarizes, compares, and provides examples of Booch, Wirfs-Brock,
- •2311 Length, include file nesting and macro stack depth. This causes
- •2257 Optical or magnetic media containing all files required to load and
- •2489 Bezier, Boris, "Software Testing Techniques", 2nd edition, Van Nostrand
- •602 Notations for invoking a method, and this invocation can be called a message
- •1776 Object-communication mechanism across heterogeneous networks by using the
- •1391 It covers extensible objected-oriented programming from hardware up.
- •1317 Structured subobjects, each object has its own identity, or object-id (as
- •434 1.9) Does Multiple Inheritance Pose Any Additional Difficulties? (Object-Oriented Technology)
- •1751 Hp believes it is best positioned to help customers take advantage of
- •2709 One. This is a beta release and _should_ compile on any posix.1 system.
- •660 Dominate and double dispatch can be suffered, or an embedded dynamic typing
23 Subtype polymorphism
26 Similarly, in his 2003 book, Concepts in programming languages, John C. Mitchell identifies four main features: dynamic dispatch, abstraction, subtype polymorphism, and inheritance.Michael Lee Scott in Programming Language Pragmatics considers only encapsulation, inheritance and dynamic dispatch.[16]
40 records are basis for understanding objects if function literals can be stored in fields (like in functional programming languages), but the actual calculi need be considerably more complex to incorporate essential features of OOP. Several extensions of System F<: that deal with mutable objects have been studied;[18] these allow both subtype polymorphism and parametric polymorphism (generics)
56 It is intuitive to assume that inheritance creates a semantic "is a" relationship, and thus to infer that objects instantiated from subclasses can always be safely used instead of those instantiated from the superclass. This intuition is unfortunately false in most OOP languages, in particular in all those that allow mutable objects. Subtype polymorphism as enforced by the type checker in OOP languages (with mutable objects) cannot guarantee behavioral subtyping in any context. Behavioral subtyping is undecidable in general, so it cannot be implemented by a program (compiler). Class or object hierarchies need to be carefully designed considering possible incorrect uses that cannot be detected syntactically. This issue is known as the Liskov substitution principle.
470 common subtype as its type). C++ provides an alternative, where only parents
668 violates subtype polymorphism, because only subclass polymorphism is based on
921 provided by base classes or types (subclass and subtype polymorphism,
969 On inheritance is subtype polymorphism:
981 insta nce of a superclass is required. For subtyping (subtype polymorphism),
983 in the subtype (subtype is subset of supertype). Cardelli and Wegner view
984 classes as sets of objects (resulting in subtype objects are a subset of
1004 ("bounded quantification" by C+W. C+W's parameters are subtype polymorphic
1006 acceptable and no inheritance relation is required (subtype polymorphism).
1011 [As inclusion polymorphism covers both subtype and subclass polymorphism,
1061 typed subtype polymorphism, as provided in Emerald, can be implemented
1153 Subtype Polymorphism, as opposed to Subclass Polymorphism, is the best answer
1174 satisfy the operations or type constraints of a polymorphic object (subtype
1192 similar to subtype polymorphism; however, ACs require type compatible classes
1202 [Jones 92] are all examples of OO systems providing subtype polymorphism.
1263 variables - with subtype polymorphism making up the difference.
functional
10 Objects as a formal concept in programming were introduced in the 1960s in Simula 67, a major revision of Simula I, a programming language designed for discrete event simulation, created by Ole-Johan Dahl and Kristen Nygaard of the Norwegian Computing Center in Oslo. Simula 67 was influenced by SIMSCRIPT and Hoare's proposed "record classes". Simula introduced the notion of classes and instances or objects (as well as subclasses, virtual methods, coroutines, and discrete event simulation) as part of an explicit programming paradigm. The language also used automatic garbage collection that had been invented earlier for the functional programming language Lisp. Simula was used for physical modeling, such as models to study and improve the movement of ships and their content through cargo ports. The ideas of Simula 67 influenced many later languages, including Smalltalk, derivatives of LISP (CLOS), Object Pascal, and C++.
12 In the 1970s, Kay's Smalltalk work had influenced the Lisp community to incorporate object- based techniques that were introduced to developers via the Lisp machine. Experimentation with various extensions to Lisp (like LOOPS and Flavors introducing multiple inheritance and mixins), eventually led to the Common Lisp Object System (CLOS, a part of the first standardized object-oriented programming language, ANSI Common Lisp), which integrates functional programming and object-oriented programming and allows extension via a Meta- object protocol. In the 1980s, there were a few attempts to design processor architectures that included hardware support for objects in memory but these were not successful. Examples include the Intel iAPX 432 and the Linn Smart Rekursiv.
40 records are basis for understanding objects if function literals can be stored in fields (like in functional programming languages), but the actual calculi need be considerably more complex to incorporate essential features of OOP. Several extensions of System F<: that deal with mutable objects have been studied;[18] these allow both subtype polymorphism and parametric polymorphism (generics)
80 Steve Yegge, making a roundabout comparison with Functional programming, writes, "Object Oriented Programming puts the Nouns first and foremost. Why would you go to such lengths to put one part of speech on a pedestal? Why should one kind of concept take precedence over another? It's not as if OOP has suddenly made verbs less important in the way we actually think. It's a strangely skewed perspective."
82 Carnegie-Mellon University Professor Robert Harper in March 2011 wrote: "This semester Dan Licata and I are co-teaching a new course on functional programming for first-year prospective CS majors... Object-oriented programming is eliminated entirely from the introductory curriculum, because it is both anti-modular and anti-parallel by its very nature, and hence unsuitable for a modern CS curriculum. A proposed new course on object- oriented design methodology will be offered at the sophomore level for those students who wish to study this topic."
612 See also section 1.19 below for a discussion on the functional (prefix) verses
620 imply a functional prefix notation, although the CLOS designers (who coined the
621 term "multi-method") consider the functional and receiver based forms
622 (messages) equivalent. Functional syntax was chosen "in order to minimize the
715 statement of what is needed; a coverage of both functional and quantified
763 analysis methodologies with such constructs as associations (E-R), functional
953 a value, it has many functional types and is therefore polymorphic.
971 (subclass) in languages, especially if records are allowed to have functional
1040 [The Author notes this is a functional view of polymorphism (as provided in
1134 2.6) What Is This I Hear About ML And Functional Programming Languages? (Typing - Object-Oriented Technology)
1135 ML, Metalanguage, is a functional programming language with a strongly typed
1137 recent functional language and Haskell [Hudak 92] provides a more modern and
1203 Functional languages such as ML, Russell, and Haskell provide a separation with
1233 languages. One such popular functional language is ML, in which all functions
2663 dynamic testing, including: functional testing, structural
j