- •Introduction
- •Increasing Demand for Wireless QoS
- •Technical Approach
- •Outline
- •The Indoor Radio Channel
- •Time Variations of Channel Characteristics
- •Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
- •The 5 GHz Band
- •Interference Calculation
- •Error Probability Analysis
- •Results and Discussion
- •IEEE 802.11
- •IEEE 802.11 Reference Model
- •IEEE 802.11 Architecture and Services
- •Architecture
- •Services
- •802.11a Frame Format
- •Medium Access Control
- •Distributed Coordination Function
- •Collision Avoidance
- •Post-Backoff
- •Recovery Procedure and Retransmissions
- •Fragmentation
- •Hidden Stations and RTS/CTS
- •Synchronization and Beacons
- •Point Coordination Function
- •Contention Free Period and Superframes
- •QoS Support with PCF
- •The 802.11 Standards
- •IEEE 802.11
- •IEEE 802.11a
- •IEEE 802.11b
- •IEEE 802.11c
- •IEEE 802.11d
- •IEEE 802.11e
- •IEEE 802.11f
- •IEEE 802.11g
- •IEEE 802.11h
- •IEEE 802.11i
- •Overview and Introduction
- •Naming Conventions
- •Enhancements of the Legacy 802.11 MAC Protocol
- •Transmission Opportunity
- •Beacon Protection
- •Direct Link
- •Fragmentation
- •Traffic Differentiation, Access Categories, and Priorities
- •EDCF Parameter Sets per AC
- •Minimum Contention Window as Parameter per Access Category
- •Maximum TXOP Duration as Parameter per Access Category
- •Collisions of Frames
- •Other EDCF Parameters per AC that are not Part of 802.11e
- •Retry Counters as Parameter per Access Category
- •Persistence Factor as Parameter per Access Category
- •Traffic Streams
- •Default EDCF Parameter Set per Draft 4.0, Table 20.1
- •Hybrid Coordination Function, Controlled Channel Access
- •Controlled Access Period
- •Improved Efficiency
- •Throughput Improvement: Contention Free Bursts
- •Throughput Improvement: Block Acknowledgement
- •Delay Improvement: Controlled Contention
- •Maximum Achievable Throughput
- •System Saturation Throughput
- •Modifications of Bianchi’s Legacy 802.11 Model
- •Throughput Evaluation for Different EDCF Parameter Sets
- •Lower Priority AC Saturation Throughput
- •Higher Priority AC Saturation Throughput
- •Share of Capacity per Access Category
- •Calculation of Access Priorities from the EDCF Parameters
- •Markov Chain Analysis
- •The Priority Vector
- •Results and Discussion
- •QoS Support with EDCF Contending with Legacy DCF
- •1 EDCF Backoff Entity Against 1 DCF Station
- •Discussion
- •Summary
- •1 EDCF Backoff Entity Against 8 DCF Stations
- •Discussion
- •Summary
- •8 EDCF Backoff Entities Against 8 DCF Stations
- •Discussion
- •Summary
- •Contention Free Bursts
- •Contention Free Bursts and Link Adaptation
- •Simulation Scenario: two Overlapping QBSSs
- •Throughput Results with CFBs
- •Throughput Results with Static PHY mode 1
- •Delay Results with CFBs
- •Conclusion
- •Radio Resource Capture
- •Radio Resource Capture by Hidden Stations
- •Solution
- •Mutual Synchronization across QBSSs and Slotting
- •Evaluation
- •Simulation Results and Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •Prioritized Channel Access in Coexistence Scenarios
- •Saturation Throughput in Coexistence Scenarios
- •MSDU Delivery Delay in Coexistence Scenarios
- •Scenario
- •Simulation Results and Discussion
- •Conclusions about the HCF Controlled Channel Access
- •Summary and Conclusion
- •ETSI BRAN HiperLAN/2
- •Reference Model (Service Model)
- •System Architecture
- •Medium Access Control
- •Interworking Control of ETSI BRAN HiperLAN/2 and IEEE 802.11
- •CCHC Medium Access Control
- •CCHC Scenario
- •CCHC and Legacy 802.11
- •CCHC Working Principle
- •CCHC Frame Structure
- •Requirements for QoS Support
- •Coexistence Control of ETSI BRAN HiperLAN/2 and IEEE 802.11
- •Conventional Solutions to Support Coexistence of WLANs
- •Coexistence as a Game Problem
- •The Game Model
- •Overview
- •The Single Stage Game (SSG) Competition Model
- •The Superframe as SSG
- •Action, Action Space A, Requirements vs. Demands
- •Abstract Representation of QoS
- •Utility
- •Preference and Behavior
- •Payoff, Response and Equilibrium
- •The Multi Stage Game (MSG) Competition Model
- •Estimating the Demands of the Opponent Player
- •Description of the Estimation Method
- •Evaluation
- •Application and Improvements
- •Concluding Remark
- •The Superframe as Single Stage Game
- •The Markov Chain P
- •Illustration and Transition Probabilities
- •Definition of Corresponding States and Transitions
- •Solution of P
- •Collisions of Resource Allocation Attempts
- •Transition Probabilities Expressed with the QoS Demands
- •Average State Durations Expressed with the QoS Demands
- •Result
- •Evaluation
- •Conclusion
- •Definition and Objective of the Nash Equilibrium
- •Bargaining Domain
- •Core Behaviors
- •Available Behaviors
- •Strategies in MSGs
- •Payoff Calculation in the MSGs, Discounting and Patience
- •Static Strategies
- •Definition of Static Resource Allocation Strategies
- •Experimental Results
- •Scenario
- •Discussion
- •Persistent Behavior
- •Rational Behavior
- •Cooperative Behavior
- •Conclusion
- •Dynamic Strategies
- •Cooperation and Punishment
- •Condition for Cooperation
- •Experimental Results
- •Conclusion
- •Conclusions
- •Problem and Selected Method
- •Summary of Results
- •Contributions of this Thesis
- •Further Development and Motivation
- •IEEE 802.11a/e Simulation Tool “WARP2”
- •Model of Offered Traffic and Requirements
- •Table of Symbols
- •List of Figures
- •List of Tables
- •Abbreviations
- •Bibliography
54 |
4. IEEE 802.11e Hybrid Coordination Function |
4.2.5Traffic Streams
To determine and classify MSDUs that are delivered within a QBSS with certain QoS requirements, 802.11e stations use so-called Traffic Streams (TSs) that are identified by Traffic Stream Identifiers (TSID). A TS is a set of MSDUs that are delivered using a certain EDCF parameter set. A TS is in this thesis referred to as stream. An 802.11e station has to be capable of supporting 8 streams from the HC to itself and 8 streams from itself to any other station, including the HC, at the same time. Before a stream is delivered, 802.11e stations have to negotiate with the HC the so-called Traffic Specification (TSPEC) for this stream. The TSPEC includes objectives and limits for traffic characteristics such as the MSDU frame body sizes, arrival rates, maximum MSDU Delivery delay, and variance. A socalled Traffic Classification (TCLASS) is used between the 802.11e MAC and the higher layer at the MAC SAP, in order to classify MSDUs into the TSPECs, by using the Traffic Identifier (TID). TID structure and TCLAS specification is implementation dependent and beyond the scope of the standard, as is the classification process itself.
4.2.6Default EDCF Parameter Set per Draft 4.0, Table 20.1
Table 4.2 is a short version of a table in IEEE 802.11 WG (2002c), and shows recommended default values for the EDCF parameter sets for the four ACs, as defined by 802.11e. An HC may use these values when setting up a QBSS, and may change them dynamically upon change of channel and traffic condition.
Table 4.2: 802.11e recommended default values (IEEE 802.11 WG, 2002c).
|
|
|
TXOPlimit* |
AIFSN |
AIFS |
earliest channel |
PF |
|
AC |
CWmin * |
CWmax * |
(802.11a, |
|
||||
access |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
802.11g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
CWmin |
CWmax |
0 |
2 |
DIFS |
DIFS+aSlotTime |
32/16=2 |
|
1 |
CWmin |
CWmax |
1.5 ms |
1 |
PIFS |
PIFS+aSlotTime |
32/16=2 |
|
2 |
(CWmin+1) |
CWmin |
3.0 ms |
1 |
PIFS |
PIFS+aSlotTime |
32/16=2 |
|
|
/2-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
(CWmin+1) |
(CWmin+1) |
1.5 ms |
1 |
PIFS |
PIFS+aSlotTime |
32/16=2 |
|
|
/4-1 |
/2-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*) PHY dependent