- •Introduction
- •Increasing Demand for Wireless QoS
- •Technical Approach
- •Outline
- •The Indoor Radio Channel
- •Time Variations of Channel Characteristics
- •Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
- •The 5 GHz Band
- •Interference Calculation
- •Error Probability Analysis
- •Results and Discussion
- •IEEE 802.11
- •IEEE 802.11 Reference Model
- •IEEE 802.11 Architecture and Services
- •Architecture
- •Services
- •802.11a Frame Format
- •Medium Access Control
- •Distributed Coordination Function
- •Collision Avoidance
- •Post-Backoff
- •Recovery Procedure and Retransmissions
- •Fragmentation
- •Hidden Stations and RTS/CTS
- •Synchronization and Beacons
- •Point Coordination Function
- •Contention Free Period and Superframes
- •QoS Support with PCF
- •The 802.11 Standards
- •IEEE 802.11
- •IEEE 802.11a
- •IEEE 802.11b
- •IEEE 802.11c
- •IEEE 802.11d
- •IEEE 802.11e
- •IEEE 802.11f
- •IEEE 802.11g
- •IEEE 802.11h
- •IEEE 802.11i
- •Overview and Introduction
- •Naming Conventions
- •Enhancements of the Legacy 802.11 MAC Protocol
- •Transmission Opportunity
- •Beacon Protection
- •Direct Link
- •Fragmentation
- •Traffic Differentiation, Access Categories, and Priorities
- •EDCF Parameter Sets per AC
- •Minimum Contention Window as Parameter per Access Category
- •Maximum TXOP Duration as Parameter per Access Category
- •Collisions of Frames
- •Other EDCF Parameters per AC that are not Part of 802.11e
- •Retry Counters as Parameter per Access Category
- •Persistence Factor as Parameter per Access Category
- •Traffic Streams
- •Default EDCF Parameter Set per Draft 4.0, Table 20.1
- •Hybrid Coordination Function, Controlled Channel Access
- •Controlled Access Period
- •Improved Efficiency
- •Throughput Improvement: Contention Free Bursts
- •Throughput Improvement: Block Acknowledgement
- •Delay Improvement: Controlled Contention
- •Maximum Achievable Throughput
- •System Saturation Throughput
- •Modifications of Bianchi’s Legacy 802.11 Model
- •Throughput Evaluation for Different EDCF Parameter Sets
- •Lower Priority AC Saturation Throughput
- •Higher Priority AC Saturation Throughput
- •Share of Capacity per Access Category
- •Calculation of Access Priorities from the EDCF Parameters
- •Markov Chain Analysis
- •The Priority Vector
- •Results and Discussion
- •QoS Support with EDCF Contending with Legacy DCF
- •1 EDCF Backoff Entity Against 1 DCF Station
- •Discussion
- •Summary
- •1 EDCF Backoff Entity Against 8 DCF Stations
- •Discussion
- •Summary
- •8 EDCF Backoff Entities Against 8 DCF Stations
- •Discussion
- •Summary
- •Contention Free Bursts
- •Contention Free Bursts and Link Adaptation
- •Simulation Scenario: two Overlapping QBSSs
- •Throughput Results with CFBs
- •Throughput Results with Static PHY mode 1
- •Delay Results with CFBs
- •Conclusion
- •Radio Resource Capture
- •Radio Resource Capture by Hidden Stations
- •Solution
- •Mutual Synchronization across QBSSs and Slotting
- •Evaluation
- •Simulation Results and Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •Prioritized Channel Access in Coexistence Scenarios
- •Saturation Throughput in Coexistence Scenarios
- •MSDU Delivery Delay in Coexistence Scenarios
- •Scenario
- •Simulation Results and Discussion
- •Conclusions about the HCF Controlled Channel Access
- •Summary and Conclusion
- •ETSI BRAN HiperLAN/2
- •Reference Model (Service Model)
- •System Architecture
- •Medium Access Control
- •Interworking Control of ETSI BRAN HiperLAN/2 and IEEE 802.11
- •CCHC Medium Access Control
- •CCHC Scenario
- •CCHC and Legacy 802.11
- •CCHC Working Principle
- •CCHC Frame Structure
- •Requirements for QoS Support
- •Coexistence Control of ETSI BRAN HiperLAN/2 and IEEE 802.11
- •Conventional Solutions to Support Coexistence of WLANs
- •Coexistence as a Game Problem
- •The Game Model
- •Overview
- •The Single Stage Game (SSG) Competition Model
- •The Superframe as SSG
- •Action, Action Space A, Requirements vs. Demands
- •Abstract Representation of QoS
- •Utility
- •Preference and Behavior
- •Payoff, Response and Equilibrium
- •The Multi Stage Game (MSG) Competition Model
- •Estimating the Demands of the Opponent Player
- •Description of the Estimation Method
- •Evaluation
- •Application and Improvements
- •Concluding Remark
- •The Superframe as Single Stage Game
- •The Markov Chain P
- •Illustration and Transition Probabilities
- •Definition of Corresponding States and Transitions
- •Solution of P
- •Collisions of Resource Allocation Attempts
- •Transition Probabilities Expressed with the QoS Demands
- •Average State Durations Expressed with the QoS Demands
- •Result
- •Evaluation
- •Conclusion
- •Definition and Objective of the Nash Equilibrium
- •Bargaining Domain
- •Core Behaviors
- •Available Behaviors
- •Strategies in MSGs
- •Payoff Calculation in the MSGs, Discounting and Patience
- •Static Strategies
- •Definition of Static Resource Allocation Strategies
- •Experimental Results
- •Scenario
- •Discussion
- •Persistent Behavior
- •Rational Behavior
- •Cooperative Behavior
- •Conclusion
- •Dynamic Strategies
- •Cooperation and Punishment
- •Condition for Cooperation
- •Experimental Results
- •Conclusion
- •Conclusions
- •Problem and Selected Method
- •Summary of Results
- •Contributions of this Thesis
- •Further Development and Motivation
- •IEEE 802.11a/e Simulation Tool “WARP2”
- •Model of Offered Traffic and Requirements
- •Table of Symbols
- •List of Figures
- •List of Tables
- •Abbreviations
- •Bibliography
Chapter 2
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION IN UNLICENSED
BANDS
2.1 |
The Indoor Radio Channel .................................................. |
5 |
2.2 |
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing.................... |
8 |
2.3 |
The 5 GHz Band.................................................................. |
11 |
2.4Error Model for the OFDM Transmission applied
in the 5 GHz Unlicensed Band ........................................... |
11 |
FOR THE UNDERSTANDING of wireless communication, spectrum issues and the transmission scheme of interest for the 5 GHz unlicensed band are discussed in this chapter. The radio channel characteristics are
discussed and a model for error calculation of the Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex (OFDM) transmission scheme is developed to provide knowledge about wireless communication and the environment the WLANs of interest are operating in. he design of a wireless network requires an accurate characterization of the radio channel, specifically a precise model that can be used in time-consuming computer simulation. With an accurate channel characterization and with a detailed mathematical model of the channel, the performance and attributes of a radio transmission scheme and protocols are predictable by means of simulation. The characteristics of an indoor radio channel vary from with the environment, which must be considered when modeling the indoor radio channel.
2.1The Indoor Radio Channel
Wireless LANs operate mainly in the indoor environment. Radio propagation in indoor environments is complicated because the direct path between transmitter
6 |
2. Wireless Communications in Unlicensed Bands |
and receiver (i.e., Line of Sight, LOS) is often obstructed by intervening structures (Mangold, 1997). The result is an effect referred to as multi-path fading.
2.1.1Multi-path Fading in Indoor Environment
A radio signal transmitted in an indoor environment reaches a receiver by more than only the LOS path, and from various directions. Before arriving at the receiver antenna, all paths except the LOS go through at least one order of reflection, transmission or diffraction. This is known as multi-path fading. Multipath fading is caused by constructive and destructive interference between the signal waves. They combine at the receiver antenna to a resultant signal, which can vary widely in amplitude and phase. The multi-path phenomenon produces a series of delayed and attenuated echoes for a transmitted signal. Radio channel models describe how this transmitted signal is affected by the radio channel. The frequency band of interest in this thesis is the 5 GHz unlicensed band.
Figure 2.1 shows plots of the amplitude of a typical time domain response |h(t,x)| measured at a receiver location x, and the corresponding frequency response |H(f,x)| obtained from the Fourier transform of h(t,x). The amplitude of the frequency response in dB, and the amplitude of the time response on a linear scale are shown. The frequency response consists of samples at a frequency spacing of 2.5 MHz for a frequency span of 2.0 GHz, which is centered at 5.0 GHz. Such a large frequency span is necessary for a high precision of the time response. The interval between 5.0 GHz and 5.4 GHz is shown in the figures to show the frequency selective fading for the discussed frequency band. The frequency selective nature of the channel can be seen at certain frequencies in Figure 2.1, right.
|h(t)| |
|
|H(f)| |
10ns |
time |
frequency |
|
||
|
5GHz |
40MHz |
|
5.4GHz |
Figure 2.1: (Mangold, 1997) Left: time domain response of the multi-path channel with linear scaling.Right: presentation in frequency domain, amplitude in dB. The normalized signal envelope is indicated with a 5dB/unit scale.
2.1 The Indoor Radio Channel |
7 |
There are frequencies at which a transmission may be successful, but other frequencies may be useless for transmissions. The channel is referred to as frequency selective radio channel.
From the frequency response, a periodic time response of a maximum duration of 400 ns can be derived. An impulse response in indoor scenarios is typically smaller than 400 ns. Figure 2.1, left, is an illustration of such a periodic time response. The effects of the multi-path characteristic of the indoor environment can be clearly seen. The time domain response illustrates the multi-path propagation. Multiple delayed peaks in the signal arrive at the receiver antenna later than the first received signal. This is a result of the multi-path channel, which causes frequency selectivity. The phase is linear for most of the frequency band (Mangold, 1997).
2.1.2Time Variations of Channel Characteristics
A radio channel can be modeled as time varying linear filter for a given transmitter and receiver location. In indoor environments, when employing local area radio networks with high data rates, it can be assumed that the channel is slowly time varying compared to the transmission cycles1 of radio networks. For this reason, the impulse response can be assumed time invariant for short time intervals of some milliseconds. The radio channel is interpreted as Wide Sense Stationary (WSS) (Höher 1992).
The time varying nature of the indoor radio channel is caused either by the relative motion between the transmitter and the receiver station, or by movements of objects in the transmission path. It is generally described by the Doppler spread BD. The Doppler effect causes frequency shifts in the received signal, which makes the reception difficult. The Doppler spread BD is a measure of the spectral broadening caused by the speed of changes of the indoor radio channel. The larger the velocities of moving stations or objects in the environment, the larger the Doppler spread. For example, If a pure sinusoidal harmonic wave is transmitted with frequency fc , the signal at the receiver will have spectrum components in the range of fc ± BD/2 where BD = v fc/c, where v is the velocity of objects in near distances or of the antenna, and c is the speed of the electromagnetic waves. The coherence time Tc is a measure of the average time duration over which the indoor radio channel is stationary. The Doppler spread and the coherence time are
1A transmission cycle of a radio network is a transmission of data by one radio station, for example a data frame exchange in 802.11. Typically durations are less than 1 ms.