- •Lecture 1 history of language as a linguistic discipline
- •Sources Used for Studying Language History
- •Periods in the History of English
- •The Role of the Discipline in Training the Teacher of a Foreign Culture
- •Lecture 2 germanic languages Classification of Modern Germanic Languages and their Distribution
- •Table 1 Germanic Languages
- •Old Germanic Languages and their Classification
- •Earliest records of Germanic tribes
- •Table 2 Classification of Ancient Germanic Tribes
- •Material Culture
- •Warfare
- •Form of Government
- •Conversion to Christianity
- •Germanic Alphabets and Old Germanic Writings
- •Linguistic Features of Germanic Languages Phonetic peculiarities of Germanic Languages. Word Stress and its role in further development of Germanic languages
- •The First or Proto-Germanic Consonant Shift (Grimm's Law)
- •Verner’s Law
- •Old English Kingdoms and Dialects
- •Scandinavian Raids
- •King Alfred and His Literary Activity
- •The Middle English Period The Norman Conquest and its Influence on the Linguistic Situation in England
- •Middle English Dialects. Growth of Dialectal Differences
- •The New English Period The XVI century – the Period of the Development of the National Literary Language
- •Economic and Political Unification. Conditions for Linguistic Unity
- •Progress of Culture. Introduction of Printing
- •Foreign Contacts in the Early New English Period
- •Expansion of English over the British Isles
- •Flourishing of Literature in Early New English (Literary Renaissance)
- •New Sources of Information about the Language. Private Papers and Didactic Compositions
- •Normalising Tendencies. Grammars and Dictionaries in the Late 17th and 18th c
- •Word Stress
- •Old English Vowel System
- •Changes in the system of vowels:
- •Middle english period
- •Word Stress
- •Vowel Changes in MdE and Early MnE Unstressed vowels
- •Stressed Vowels
- •Monophthongization of oe Diphthongs
- •Quantitative vowel changes
- •Modern english period
Stressed Vowels
One of the most important sound changes of the Early MDE period of the loss of OE diphthongs and the growth of new diphthongs, with new qualitative and quantitative distinctions.
Monophthongization of oe Diphthongs
All OE diphthongs were monophthongized in ME.: eald – ald, healf –half, earm –arm (poor). But before ‘ld’ ‘ea’ yielded different results in different dialects. OE short ‘eo’ changed first into the vowel ‘ö’ spelt ‘eo’. In other dialects it changed into ‘e’ heorte – hörte-herte. (heart). OE long eo: changed into long closed e:, often spelt ‘ee’: deo:p – de:p, deep.
At the same time a new set of diphthongs developed from some sequences of vowels and consonants due to the vocalization of OE [j] and [γ], that is to their change into vowels: these sounds between after vowels changed into [i] and [u] and formed diphthongs together with the preceding vowel: OE dæg developed into day[dai]. These changes gave rise to two sets of diphthongs: with i-glides and u-glides {ei, ai, au, ou). In addition to the diphthongs developed from native sources, similar diphthongs – with i-and u-glides are found in some MdE loan words: boy, joy, pause, cause. The formation of new diphthongs was an important event in the history of the language. By that time the OE diphthongs had been contracted into monophthongs; the newly formed MdE diphthongs differed from the OE in structure: they had an open nucleus and a closer glide; they were arranged into a system consisting of two sets o (with i-glides and u-glides) but were not contrasted through quantity as long to short.
Quantitative vowel changes
Shortening and Lengthening of Vowels: a long vowel before two consonants is shortened: OE – ce:pan (infinitive), ME ke:pen, but Past tense – kepte; but it remains long in other environments. But long vowels remain long before ‘the lengthening’ consonant groups: ld, nd, mb: we:nen, but we:nde (past simple). Long consonants also remain long before – st: lae:sta (least) – le:st. In the 13th c. short vowels were lengthened in open syllables. Lengthening affected the short vowels a, e, o.: talu (tale) - ta:le, macian – ma:ken, etc. The narrow vowels i and u remained as a rule unaffected by this change, and thus the difference between short i and long and also between short u and long retained its quality as a phonemically relevant feature.
Changes of individual vowels:
Short and long ‘a’: OE short ‘a’ usually remained unchanged in ME. OE a/o before a nasal developed differently in different dialects. In West Midland ‘o’ was preserved: mon, con; in other dialects (Northern, East Midland and Southern) there is ‘a’ man, can. OE long ‘a’ also developed in different ways in different dialects. In Northern it remained unchanged, while in Midland and Southern it changed into long ‘o’: fa:- fo: (foe); ha:m – ho:m, etc.
Short ‘ae’ and long ‘ae’. OE short ‘ae’ in most dialects developed into short ‘a’: glaed – glad, aeppel – appel. But in the West Midland and Kentish it developed into ‘e’: gled, eppal. OE West Saxon long ‘ae’ changed into long open ‘e:’ slae:pan – sle:pen; in other dialects this ‘ae:’ had changed into closed ‘e:’. This closed ‘e:’ is preserved in ME.
Short Y and long Y: OE short ‘y’ developed differently in different dialects. In Northern and East Midland it changed into short ‘i’. In Kentish it became ‘e’ in the remaining dialects it was unchanged. Hence three dialectal variants: ‘first’, ferst’, ‘fyrst’. For example, the word ‘bury ‘– here the pronunciation is Kentish, but the spelling is South-Western. OE long’y’ developed in the same way as the short ‘y’.
Conclusion: The ME sound system differs from the OE system: 1) OE dipthongs or ‘ea’ and ‘eo’ type disappeared 2) diphthongs of the ‘ei’ ‘ai’ type arose 3) vowel quantity became dependent on phonetic environment.
From the phonemic point of view the following points should me stated: 1) vowel quantity lost its phonemic significance, that is two vowel phonemes can no longer be distinguished by quantity: length versus shortness. Thus the number of vowel phonemes was reduced. 2) on the other hand, the appearance of new diphthongs [ai], [ei] [ au], [ou] marks the rise of four new vowel phonemes. In this way the reduction in the number of vowel phonemes due to changes in quantity is partly counteracted. 3) the number of consonant phonemes increased; the sounds [f, v] which had been allophones of one phoneme, became separate phonemes, no longer dependent on their environment, the same is true with [s,z].