- •Contents
- •Unit 2: The Comparative Method ………………………..8 Unit 3: The First Consonant Shift, or Grimm’s Law ………………………10
- •Unit 1 The Indo-European Family
- •Centum and Satem Groups of ie Languages
- •Unit 2 The Comparative Method
- •Unit 3 The First Consonant Shift, or Grimm’s Law
- •Exceptions to Grimm’s law:
- •Unit 4 The Accent Shift and Verner’s Law
- •Rhotacism
- •The Palatal Mutation
- •Unit 6 The Early Germans
- •The Life and Social Organization of the Germans
- •The Great Migration
- •Unit 7 Ancient Germanic Tribes and Their Classification
- •The Proto-Germanic Language
- •Unit 8 The East Germanic Group The Goths
- •Ulfilas and the Gothic Bible
- •Unit 9 The North Germanic Group
- •Unit 10 Northern Mythology
- •The Joys of Valhalla
- •Thor and the Other Gods
- •The Death of Balder
- •Unit 11 The West Germanic Group
- •Unit 12 Old English
- •Three Periods of the History of English
- •Unit 13 Old English Alphabet and Pronunciation
- •Diphthongs
- •Consonants in Old English
- •Unit 14 Some Phonetic Changes of the Old English Period
- •Stressed Vowels
- •Oe Fracture, or Breaking
- •II. Unstressed Vowels
- •III. Consonants
- •Palatalization of Velar Consonants
- •Voicing and Unvoicing of Fricatives
- •Metathesis
- •IV. Word Stress
- •Unit 15 The Noun Grammatical Categories
- •Declensions
- •Unit 16 The Adjective
- •The Weak Declension
- •D. Other classes of pronouns
- •Unit 18 The Verb
- •Mutation or Umlaut
- •The Grammatical Forms and Categories of the Verb
- •Unit 19 Strong Verbs
- •Weak Verbs
- •To Class III belong only four verbs:
- •Preterite-Present Verbs
- •Irregular Verbs
- •Unit 20 The Middle English Period Early Middle English
- •Changes in the Orthographic System
- •Unit 21 Middle English Phonetic Changes
- •Consonants
- •Unstressed Vowels
- •Stressed Vowels
- •Quantitative Changes
- •Qualitative Changes
- •Monophthongs
- •New Diphthongs
- •Unit 22 Middle English Morphology Nouns
- •Articles
- •Pronouns
- •Adjectives
- •Unit 23 The Formation of the National English Language
- •The Great Vowel Shift (gvs)
- •Unit 25 The Mood
- •Conjugation of Strong Verbs
- •Conjugation of Weak Verbs
- •Unit 26 Development of the System of Verbids and Their Grammatical Categories
- •Unit 27 Syntactic Structure
- •Unit 28
- •Varieties of English
- •Unit 29 Etymological Composition of the English Vocabulary
- •Unit 30 The connection of the history of the English language with the history of the English people
The Weak Declension
The weak declension of adjectives has the same endings as the weak declension of nouns, except that the adjectives generally have the strong ending -rа instead of - (e)na in the Gen. pl.
-
Singular
Masc.
Neut.
Fem.
Plural
N.
blinda
blinde
blinde
blindan
G.
blindan
blindan
blindan
blindra, -ena
D.
blindan
blindan
blindan
blindum
A.
blindan
blinde
blindan
blindan
Degrees of Comparision
The suffices we are used to see in Modern English, those -er and -est in weak, weaker, the weakest, are the direct descendants of the Old English ones. At that time they sounded as -ra and -est.
The IE parent language had several suffixes by means of which the comparative degree was formed. But in the individual branches of the parent language, one of the suffixes generally became more productive than the rest. The other suffixes later were preserved in isolated forms. The only IE comparative suffix which remained productive in the Germanic languages is -is-, which became -iz-and then —ir- by Verner's law.
Beside the suffix -iz- there was also in PG a suffix -ōz- or -ōr-which did not exist in IE. This suffix is a special Germanic new formation, and arose from the comparative of adverbs. And then at a later period it became extended to adjectives.
The superlative degree was formed in the IE parent language by means of several suffixes. But in the individual branches of the parent language, one of the suffixes generally became more productive than the rest. The only superlative suffix which remained productive in the Germanic language is -to- in the combination -isto-, formed by adding the original superlative suffix -to- to the comparative suffix -is-.
The simple superlative suffix -to- has been preserved in Greek, Latin, and the Germanic languages in the formation of the ordinal numerals:
Goth, saihsta, OHG sehsto, OE siexta.
The Germanic suffix -ōst- was a new formation like -ōz- in the comparative; -ōst, -ist regularly became -ost, -est in OE.
The regular means used to form the comparative and the superlative from the positive were the suffixes —ra (< -ira, -ōra) and -est/ost.
-
OE earm (poor)
earmra
earmost
blæc (black)
blæcra
blacost
In some adjectives the root vowel undergoes mutation in the comparative and superlative:
eald (old) |
ieldra (< *ealdira) |
ieldest (< *ealdist) |
strong |
strengra (< *strongira) |
strengest (< *strongist) |
long |
lengra (< *longira) |
lengest (< *longist). |
Several adjectives have suppletive forms:
-
gōd (good)
sēlra
betera
sēlest
betst
yfel (bad)
wiersa
wierest
micel (large)
mārа
mæst
lӯtel (little)
læssа
læst
Occasionally, comparative and superlative adjective forms are derived from adverbs:
-
fear (far)
fierra
fierrest, fyrrest
nēah (near)
nēarra
nīehst, nӯhst, etc.
The comparatives are declined as strong adjectives. The superlatives rarely take the forms of the strong declension and mostly follow the weak declension.
Unit 17
The Pronoun
OE pronouns fell under the same main classes as modern pronouns: personal, demonstrative, interrogative and indefinite. As for the other groups - possessive, reflexive, relative - they were not fully developed. The grammatical categories of the pronouns were either similar to those of nouns, or corresponded to those of adjectives. Some features of pronouns were peculiar to them alone.
A. Personal Pronouns
The personal pronouns of the first person, ic and of the second, pu, have three numbers: singular, plural and dual. Thus wit means ‘we two’, git ‘you two’.
Like their parallels in other IE languages the pronouns of the 1st and 2nd person have suppletive forms. This suppletivity confirms the fact that they belong to the most ancient layer of the language. All of them decline alike.
In the old English period pronouns began to lose some of their case distinctions. The Dative case of the pronouns of the 1st and 2nd person was frequently used instead of the Accusative. The ponouns revealed the tendency to generalise the form of the Dative for the both cases.
As there was no dual verb form, dual pronouns agreed with plural verbs. The distinction between the dual and the plural was disappearing from the pronoun in OE [Viney, 2008].
-
First person
Sg
Dual
Pl
Nom.
ic
wit
wē
Gen.
mīn
uncer
ūre, ūser
Dat.
mē
unc
ūs
Acc.
mē, mēc
unc, uncit
ūs, ūsic
-
Second person
Sg
Dual
Pl
Nom.
þū
git
gē
Gen.
þin
incer
ēower
Dat.
þē
inc
ēow
Acc.
þē,þēc
inc, incit
ēow, ēowic
Notes:
The personal pronouns of the 3rd, having originated from the demonstrative pronouns, have many affinities with the latter. They decline in a similar way.
The pronouns of the 3rd person have gender distinctions in the singular. The plural forms are identical for all genders.
-
Third person
Singular
Plural
Masc.
Fem.
Neut.
All genders
Nom.
hē
hēo, hīo
hit
hīe, hī, hӯ, hēo
Gen.
his
hire, hi(e)re
his
hi(e)re, heora, hyra
Dat.
him
hire, hi(e)re
him
him, heom
Acc.
hine
hīe
hit
hīe, hī, hӯ, hēo
Notes:
There is no separate genitive for it, and no third-person plural th-forms (ancestors of they, etc.). These, along with she, are later developments. There is already considerable ambiguity: the feminine singular and all plurals show extensive overlap [Hogg, 2006].
Historically the forms they, their, and them are of Scandinavian origin (from the Viking invasions and settlement in northeastern England during the Danelaw period from the 9th to the 11th centuries).
The third person plural form ’em is believed to be a survival of the late Old English form heom, which appears as hem in Chaucer, and has apparently lost its aspiration due to being used as an unstressed form [Freeborn, 1998].
The oblique cases of personal pronouns in combination with the adjective ‘self’ could also serve as reflexive pronouns: him selfum (himself).
B. Possessive Pronouns
The genitive case of personal pronouns had two main applications: a) it could be an object, like other oblique cases of personal pronouns; b) it was used as an attribute, like a possessive pronoun: sunu mīn, his fæder
Though forms of the genitive case were employed as possessive pronouns, some linguists believe that they cannot be regarded as possessive pronouns proper, that is, as a separate class of pronouns. The grammatical characteristics of these forms were not homogeneous:
1) mīn, þin, ūre, ēower, and the duals uncer and incer, and the pronoun sīn (Russian свой) , took the strong adjective inflexions. That is, they were declined like adjectives to show agreement with the nouns they modified;
2) the forms of the 3rd person, the genitives his, hi(e)re, hi(e)ra, etc. were not declined, therefore they did not agree with the nouns they modified.
С. Demonstrative Pronouns
There were two demonstrative pronouns in OE: the prototype of NE that and the prototype of this. Both of them distinguished three genders in the singular and had one form for all the genders in the plural. Modern English ‘that’ descends from the neuter nominative/accusative form of ‘sē’, ‘this’ - from the neuter nominative/accusative form of ‘pes’ and ‘the’ - from the masculine nominative form, with [s] replaced analogously by the [ð] of the other forms. The feminine nominative form ‘sēo’ was probably the source of Modern English ‘she’.
The paradigm of the demonstrative pronoun ‘sē’ contains many homonymous forms. In the Nom. masc. and fem. sg. and in the Nom. pl. this pronoun has suppletive forms containing no interdental sound. Some case endings resembled those of personal pronouns, e.g. –m Dat. Masc. and Neut. sg. and in Gen. pl.; the element –r- in the Dat. and Gen. sg. and in the Dat. pl. [Rastorgueva, 2001].
During the OE period the demonstrative pronouns sē, sēo, þæt, gradually came to be used more and more in the function of the definite article. In this way ‘sē stān’ meant both ‘that stone’ and ‘the stone’. Being frequently used as noun determiners, they indicated its number, gender and case.
Note: The vowel in ‘sē’ when it was used as a demonstrative remained long, but when it was used as the article was shortened.
Singular |
Masc. |
Fem. |
Neut. |
Plural |
Nom. |
sē, se |
sēo |
þæt |
þā |
Gen. |
þæs |
þǣre |
þæs |
þāra, þǣra |
Dat. |
þǣm, þām |
þǣre |
þǣm, þām |
þām, þǣm |
Ace. |
þone |
þā |
þæt |
þā |
Instr. |
þӯ, þon |
(þære) |
þӯ, þon |
(þǣm, þām) |
Nom. |
sē/ sĕ stān |
þā stānas |
Gen. |
þæs stānes |
þāra stāna |
Dat. |
þǣm stāne |
þǣm stānum |
Ace. |
þone stān |
þā stānas |
Instr. |
þӯ stāne |
þǣm stānum |
The demonstrative pronouns pes, pēos, pis.
Singular |
Masc. |
Fem. |
Neut. |
Plural |
Nom. |
þes |
þēos |
þis |
þās |
Gen. |
þisses (þeossum) |
þisse |
þisses |
þissa |
Dat. |
þǣm, þām |
þisse |
þissum |
þissum (þeossum) |
Acc. |
þone |
þās |
þis |
þās |
Instr. |
þӯ, þon |
(þisse) |
þӯs (þis) |
(þissum, þeossum) |