vaipan_g_v_disser
.pdf193
257.Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava v 7 t. T.2. Osnovnyye printsipy mezhdunarodnogo prava / G.V. Ignatenko, V.A. Kartashkin, B.M. Klimenko i dr. M., 1989.
258.Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava v 7 t. T.3. Osnovnyye instituty mezhdunarodnogo prava / Avakov M.M., Boguslavskiy M.M., Vadapalas V.A. i dr. M., 1990.
259.Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava v 7 t. T.6. Otrasli mezhdunarodnogo prava / I.N. Artsibasov, I.I. Lukashuk, B.M. Ashavskiy i dr. M., 1992.
260.Lapayeva V.V. Tipy pravoponimaniya: pravovaya teoriya i praktika. M., 2012.
261.Levin D.B. Sanktsii v mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravovedeniye. 1981. No. 1. S. 40-48.
262.Lukashuk I.I. Mezhdunarodnoye pravo. Obshchaya chast’. M., 2008.
263.Lukashuk I.I. Mezhdunarodnoye pravo: Osobennaya chast’. M., 2008.
264.Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti. M., 2004.
265.Mal’tsev G.V. Ponimaniye prava. Podkhody i problemy. M., 1999.
266.Mezhdunarodnoye pravo: uchebnik / otv. red. B.R. Tuzmukhamedov. 4-ye izd., pererab. M., 2014.
267.Mezhdunarodnoye pravo: uchebnik / otv. red. G.V. Ignatenko i O.I. Tiunov. 5- ye izd., pererab i dop. M., 2010.
268.Mezhdunarodnoye pravo: Uchebnik / Otv. red. S.A. Egorov. M., 2016.
269.Mezhdunarodnoye pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. G.I. Tunkina. M., 1982.
270.Mezhdunarodnoye pravo: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / pod red. A.N. Vylegzhanina. 2-ye izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2012.
271.Mezhdunarodnoye pravo: Uchebnik. 5-ye izd., pererab. i dop. / Otv. red. F.I. Kozhevnikov. M., 1987.
272.Mezhdunarodnoye publichnoye pravo: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / otv. red. K.A. Bekyashev. 5-ye izd., pererab i dop. M., 2013.
273.Mingazov L.Kh. Effektivnost’ norm mezhdunarodnogo prava: teoreticheskiye problemy. Kazan, 1999.
194
274.Möller K. Printsip sorazmernosti: v otvet na kritiku // Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. 2014. No. 4. S. 86-106 [Translated from:
Möller K. Proportionality: Challenging the Critics // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2012. P. 709-731].
275.Neshatayeva T.N. Sud i obshchepriznannyye printsipy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava // Antologiya nauchnoy mysli: K 10-letiyu Rossiyskoy akademii pravosudiya: Sbornik statey. M, 2008. S. 626-647.
276.Paulus A. Zashchita prav cheloveka v khode vnutrennikh vooruzhonnykh konfliktov v Yevrope: zametki v otnoshenii resheniy Yevropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka po delam Isayeva i Isayeva i drugiye protiv Rossii // Rossiyskaya Federatsiya v Yevrope: pravovyye aspekty sotrudnichestva Rossii s yevropeyskimi organizatsiyami. Sbornik statey / Pod red. D. Rauschninga i V.N. Rusinovoy. M., 2008. S. 59-78.
277.Pokrovskiy I.A. Gosudarstvo i chelovechestvo. M., 1919.
278.Poltorak A.I., Savinskiy L.I. Vooruzhonnyye konflikty i mezhdunarodnoye pravo: osnovnyye problemy. M., 1976.
279.Rumyantsev A.G. Verhältnismässigkeit – proportionality – sorazmernost’ // Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. 2014. No. 5. S. 156-158.
280.Rusinova V.N. Prava cheloveka v vooruzhonnykh konfliktakh: problemy sootnosheniya norm mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo prava prav cheloveka. M., 2017.
281.Sadurski W. “Razumnost’” i plyuralizm tsennostey v prave i politike // Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. 2008. No. 4. S. 21-36 [Translated from: Sadurski W. Reasonableness and Value Pluralism in Law and Politics // Reasonableness and Law / Ed. by G. Bongiovanni, G. Sartor, C. Valentini. Dordrecht; N.Y., 2009. P. 129-146].
282.Schlink B. Proportsional’nost’. K probleme balansa fundamental’nykh prav i obshchestvennykh tseley // Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. 2012. No. 2. S. 56-76 [Translated from: Schlink B. Proportionality (1) // The Oxford
195
Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law / Ed. by M. Rosenfeld, A. Sajó.
Oxford, 2012. P. 718-737].
283.Sharmazanashvili G.V. Pravo mira. Tbilisi, 1961.
284.Starzhenetskiy V.V. Rossiya i Sovet Yevropy: pravo sobstvennosti. M., 2004.
285.Timoshina E.V., Krayevskiy A.A. Problemy yuridicheskoy argumentatsii v situatsii konkurentsii prav cheloveka: “vzveshivaniye” pravovykh printsipov ili tolkovaniye pravovykh norm? // Yuridicheskaya germenevtika v XXI veke: monografiya / pod obshch. red. E.N. Tonkova, Yu.Yu. Vetyutneva. SPb., 2016. S. 243-278.
286.Tolstykh V.L. Konstitutsionnoye pravosudiye i printsip proportsional’nosti // Rossiyskoye pravosudiye. 2009. No. 12. S. 47-56.
287.Tolstykh V.L. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava: uchebnik. M., 2010.
288.Tolstykh V.L. Mezhdunarodnoye pravo kak metanarrativ // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. No. 3. S. 8-14.
289.Tsakyrakis S. Proportsional’nost’: posyagatel’stvo na prava cheloveka? //
Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. 2011. No. 2. S. 47-66
[Translated from: Tsakyrakis S. Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?
// International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2009. P. 468-493].
290.Tumanov V.A. Burzhuaznaya pravovaya ideologiya. K kritike ucheniy o prave. M., 1971.
291.Tunkin G.I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 1970.
292.Ulyanitskiy V. Mezhdunarodnoye pravo. Tomsk, 1911.
293.Urbina F. “Balansirovaniye kak argumentirovaniye” i problemy, svyazannyye s razresheniyem sporov na osnovanii nepravovykh kriteriyev: otvet Kaiu Mölleru // Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. 2014. No. 4. S. 107113 [Translated from: Urbina F. “Balancing as reasoning” and the Problems of
Legally Unaided Adjudication: A Reply to Kai Möller // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2014. P. 214-221].
196
294.Varlamova N.V. Printsip proportsional’nosti kak osnova osushchestvleniya publichno-vlastnykh polnomochiy // Aequum ius. Ot druzey i kolleg k 50letiyu professora D.V. Dozhdeva / Otv. red. A.M. Shirvindt. M., 2014. S. 4-30.
295.Vasilenko V.A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovyye sanktsii. Kiev, 1982.
296.Zor’kin V.D. Pozitivistskaya teoriya prava v Rossii. M., 1978.
6. Dissertations
[In Russian:]
297.Batrshin R.R. Otvetstvennost’ gosudarstva i primeneniye kontrmer v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.
Kazan, 2005.
298.Petrovskiy Yu.V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya otvetstvennost’ gosudarstv. Dis.
… kand. yurid. nauk. L., 1968.
299.Skakunov E.I. Samopomoshch’ kak forma prinuditel’nogo obespecheniya sub’yektivnykh prav gosudarstva. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. L., 1970.
300.Smbatyan A.S. Resheniya organov mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya i ikh rol’ v ukreplenii mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka. Dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk.
M., 2013.
301.Suvorov V.K. Retorsii i repressalii po sovremennomu mezhdunarodnomu pravu. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1982.
302.Shinkaretskaya G.G. Sudebnyye sredstva razresheniya mezhdunarodnykh sporov: tendentsii razvitiya. Dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2010.
7. Other references
303.Amnesty International. NATO/Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: “Collateral
Damage” or Unlawful Killings? Violations of the Laws of War by NATO
during |
Operation |
Allied |
Force. |
2000. |
URL: |
https:// |
www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/140000/eur700182000en.pdf.
197
304.Elements of Crimes, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court // U.N. Doc. ICC-ASP/1/3.
305.Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 31. Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the Covenant. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (2004).
306.International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. URL: http://www.icty.org/en/press/final-report-prosecutor-committee-established- review-nato-bombing-campaign-against-federal#IVA64d.
307.Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts. Geneva (1974-1977). Vol. XIV. Bern, 1978.
308.Operational Law Experts Roundtable on the Gotovina Judgment: Military
Operations, Battlefield Reality and the Judgment’s Impact on Effective
Implementation and Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law // Emory University School of Law. Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series. 2012. Research Paper No. 12-186.
309.Régime des Représailles en Temps de Paix // Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International. Vol. 38. 1934.
310.Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1987).
311.Rules of Aerial Warfare. The Hague, 19 February 1923 // American Journal of International Law Supplement. 1938. P. 12-56.
312. Shakespeare W. |
The |
Merchant |
of |
Venice. |
URL: |
http://shakespeare.mit.edu/merchant/full.html.