- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Introduction
- •Oren M. Becker
- •Alexander D. MacKerell, Jr.
- •Masakatsu Watanabe*
- •III. SCOPE OF THE BOOK
- •IV. TOWARD A NEW ERA
- •REFERENCES
- •Atomistic Models and Force Fields
- •Alexander D. MacKerell, Jr.
- •II. POTENTIAL ENERGY FUNCTIONS
- •D. Alternatives to the Potential Energy Function
- •III. EMPIRICAL FORCE FIELDS
- •A. From Potential Energy Functions to Force Fields
- •B. Overview of Available Force Fields
- •C. Free Energy Force Fields
- •D. Applicability of Force Fields
- •IV. DEVELOPMENT OF EMPIRICAL FORCE FIELDS
- •B. Optimization Procedures Used in Empirical Force Fields
- •D. Use of Quantum Mechanical Results as Target Data
- •VI. CONCLUSION
- •REFERENCES
- •Dynamics Methods
- •Oren M. Becker
- •Masakatsu Watanabe*
- •II. TYPES OF MOTIONS
- •IV. NEWTONIAN MOLECULAR DYNAMICS
- •A. Newton’s Equation of Motion
- •C. Molecular Dynamics: Computational Algorithms
- •A. Assigning Initial Values
- •B. Selecting the Integration Time Step
- •C. Stability of Integration
- •VI. ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC TRAJECTORIES
- •B. Averages and Fluctuations
- •C. Correlation Functions
- •D. Potential of Mean Force
- •VII. OTHER MD SIMULATION APPROACHES
- •A. Stochastic Dynamics
- •B. Brownian Dynamics
- •VIII. ADVANCED SIMULATION TECHNIQUES
- •A. Constrained Dynamics
- •C. Other Approaches and Future Direction
- •REFERENCES
- •Conformational Analysis
- •Oren M. Becker
- •II. CONFORMATION SAMPLING
- •A. High Temperature Molecular Dynamics
- •B. Monte Carlo Simulations
- •C. Genetic Algorithms
- •D. Other Search Methods
- •III. CONFORMATION OPTIMIZATION
- •A. Minimization
- •B. Simulated Annealing
- •IV. CONFORMATIONAL ANALYSIS
- •A. Similarity Measures
- •B. Cluster Analysis
- •C. Principal Component Analysis
- •REFERENCES
- •Thomas A. Darden
- •II. CONTINUUM BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
- •III. FINITE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
- •IV. PERIODIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
- •REFERENCES
- •Internal Coordinate Simulation Method
- •Alexey K. Mazur
- •II. INTERNAL AND CARTESIAN COORDINATES
- •III. PRINCIPLES OF MODELING WITH INTERNAL COORDINATES
- •B. Energy Gradients
- •IV. INTERNAL COORDINATE MOLECULAR DYNAMICS
- •A. Main Problems and Historical Perspective
- •B. Dynamics of Molecular Trees
- •C. Simulation of Flexible Rings
- •A. Time Step Limitations
- •B. Standard Geometry Versus Unconstrained Simulations
- •VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS
- •REFERENCES
- •Implicit Solvent Models
- •II. BASIC FORMULATION OF IMPLICIT SOLVENT
- •A. The Potential of Mean Force
- •III. DECOMPOSITION OF THE FREE ENERGY
- •A. Nonpolar Free Energy Contribution
- •B. Electrostatic Free Energy Contribution
- •IV. CLASSICAL CONTINUUM ELECTROSTATICS
- •A. The Poisson Equation for Macroscopic Media
- •B. Electrostatic Forces and Analytic Gradients
- •C. Treatment of Ionic Strength
- •A. Statistical Mechanical Integral Equations
- •VI. SUMMARY
- •REFERENCES
- •Steven Hayward
- •II. NORMAL MODE ANALYSIS IN CARTESIAN COORDINATE SPACE
- •B. Normal Mode Analysis in Dihedral Angle Space
- •C. Approximate Methods
- •IV. NORMAL MODE REFINEMENT
- •C. Validity of the Concept of a Normal Mode Important Subspace
- •A. The Solvent Effect
- •B. Anharmonicity and Normal Mode Analysis
- •VI. CONCLUSIONS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- •REFERENCES
- •Free Energy Calculations
- •Thomas Simonson
- •II. GENERAL BACKGROUND
- •A. Thermodynamic Cycles for Solvation and Binding
- •B. Thermodynamic Perturbation Theory
- •D. Other Thermodynamic Functions
- •E. Free Energy Component Analysis
- •III. STANDARD BINDING FREE ENERGIES
- •IV. CONFORMATIONAL FREE ENERGIES
- •A. Conformational Restraints or Umbrella Sampling
- •B. Weighted Histogram Analysis Method
- •C. Conformational Constraints
- •A. Dielectric Reaction Field Approaches
- •B. Lattice Summation Methods
- •VI. IMPROVING SAMPLING
- •A. Multisubstate Approaches
- •B. Umbrella Sampling
- •C. Moving Along
- •VII. PERSPECTIVES
- •REFERENCES
- •John E. Straub
- •B. Phenomenological Rate Equations
- •II. TRANSITION STATE THEORY
- •A. Building the TST Rate Constant
- •B. Some Details
- •C. Computing the TST Rate Constant
- •III. CORRECTIONS TO TRANSITION STATE THEORY
- •A. Computing Using the Reactive Flux Method
- •B. How Dynamic Recrossings Lower the Rate Constant
- •IV. FINDING GOOD REACTION COORDINATES
- •A. Variational Methods for Computing Reaction Paths
- •B. Choice of a Differential Cost Function
- •C. Diffusional Paths
- •VI. HOW TO CONSTRUCT A REACTION PATH
- •A. The Use of Constraints and Restraints
- •B. Variationally Optimizing the Cost Function
- •VII. FOCAL METHODS FOR REFINING TRANSITION STATES
- •VIII. HEURISTIC METHODS
- •IX. SUMMARY
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- •REFERENCES
- •Paul D. Lyne
- •Owen A. Walsh
- •II. BACKGROUND
- •III. APPLICATIONS
- •A. Triosephosphate Isomerase
- •B. Bovine Protein Tyrosine Phosphate
- •C. Citrate Synthase
- •IV. CONCLUSIONS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- •REFERENCES
- •Jeremy C. Smith
- •III. SCATTERING BY CRYSTALS
- •IV. NEUTRON SCATTERING
- •A. Coherent Inelastic Neutron Scattering
- •B. Incoherent Neutron Scattering
- •REFERENCES
- •Michael Nilges
- •II. EXPERIMENTAL DATA
- •A. Deriving Conformational Restraints from NMR Data
- •B. Distance Restraints
- •C. The Hybrid Energy Approach
- •III. MINIMIZATION PROCEDURES
- •A. Metric Matrix Distance Geometry
- •B. Molecular Dynamics Simulated Annealing
- •C. Folding Random Structures by Simulated Annealing
- •IV. AUTOMATED INTERPRETATION OF NOE SPECTRA
- •B. Automated Assignment of Ambiguities in the NOE Data
- •C. Iterative Explicit NOE Assignment
- •D. Symmetrical Oligomers
- •VI. INFLUENCE OF INTERNAL DYNAMICS ON THE
- •EXPERIMENTAL DATA
- •VII. STRUCTURE QUALITY AND ENERGY PARAMETERS
- •VIII. RECENT APPLICATIONS
- •REFERENCES
- •II. STEPS IN COMPARATIVE MODELING
- •C. Model Building
- •D. Loop Modeling
- •E. Side Chain Modeling
- •III. AB INITIO PROTEIN STRUCTURE MODELING METHODS
- •IV. ERRORS IN COMPARATIVE MODELS
- •VI. APPLICATIONS OF COMPARATIVE MODELING
- •VII. COMPARATIVE MODELING IN STRUCTURAL GENOMICS
- •VIII. CONCLUSION
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •Roland L. Dunbrack, Jr.
- •II. BAYESIAN STATISTICS
- •A. Bayesian Probability Theory
- •B. Bayesian Parameter Estimation
- •C. Frequentist Probability Theory
- •D. Bayesian Methods Are Superior to Frequentist Methods
- •F. Simulation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods
- •III. APPLICATIONS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- •B. Bayesian Sequence Alignment
- •IV. APPLICATIONS IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
- •A. Secondary Structure and Surface Accessibility
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •Computer Aided Drug Design
- •Alexander Tropsha and Weifan Zheng
- •IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- •REFERENCES
- •Oren M. Becker
- •II. SIMPLE MODELS
- •III. LATTICE MODELS
- •B. Mapping Atomistic Energy Landscapes
- •C. Mapping Atomistic Free Energy Landscapes
- •VI. SUMMARY
- •REFERENCES
- •Toshiko Ichiye
- •II. ELECTRON TRANSFER PROPERTIES
- •B. Potential Energy Parameters
- •IV. REDOX POTENTIALS
- •A. Calculation of the Energy Change of the Redox Site
- •B. Calculation of the Energy Changes of the Protein
- •B. Calculation of Differences in the Energy Change of the Protein
- •VI. ELECTRON TRANSFER RATES
- •A. Theory
- •B. Application
- •REFERENCES
- •Fumio Hirata and Hirofumi Sato
- •Shigeki Kato
- •A. Continuum Model
- •B. Simulations
- •C. Reference Interaction Site Model
- •A. Molecular Polarization in Neat Water*
- •B. Autoionization of Water*
- •C. Solvatochromism*
- •F. Tautomerization in Formamide*
- •IV. SUMMARY AND PROSPECTS
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •Nucleic Acid Simulations
- •Alexander D. MacKerell, Jr.
- •Lennart Nilsson
- •D. DNA Phase Transitions
- •III. METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
- •A. Atomistic Models
- •B. Alternative Models
- •IV. PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
- •A. Starting Structures
- •C. Production MD Simulation
- •D. Convergence of MD Simulations
- •WEB SITES OF INTEREST
- •REFERENCES
- •Membrane Simulations
- •Douglas J. Tobias
- •II. MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF MEMBRANES
- •B. Force Fields
- •C. Ensembles
- •D. Time Scales
- •III. LIPID BILAYER STRUCTURE
- •A. Overall Bilayer Structure
- •C. Solvation of the Lipid Polar Groups
- •IV. MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN MEMBRANES
- •A. Overview of Dynamic Processes in Membranes
- •B. Qualitative Picture on the 100 ps Time Scale
- •C. Incoherent Neutron Scattering Measurements of Lipid Dynamics
- •F. Hydrocarbon Chain Dynamics
- •ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- •REFERENCES
- •Appendix: Useful Internet Resources
- •B. Molecular Modeling and Simulation Packages
- •Index
148 |
Roux |
the methods for deriving knowledge-based potentials for protein folding. Their potential is obtained by a global optimization procedure that simultaneously maximizes thermodynamic stability for all proteins in the database. This field is in rapid expansion, and it is beyond the scope of the present review to cover all possible developments. For more information, see Refs. 113–115 and references therein.
VI. SUMMARY
A statistical mechanical formulation of implicit solvent representations provides a robust theoretical framework for understanding the influence of solvation biomolecular systems. A decomposition of the free energy in terms of nonpolar and electrostatic contributions, ∆W ∆W (np) ∆W (elec), is central to many approximate treatments. An attractive and widely used treatment consists in representing the nonpolar contribution ∆W (np) by a SASA surface tension term with Eq. (15) and the electrostatic contribution ∆W (elec) by using the finite-difference PB, Eq. (19). These two approximations constitute the SASA/PB implicit solvent model. Although SASA/PB does not incorporate solvation effects with all atomic details, it nevertheless relies on a physically consistent picture of solvation. A relationship with first principles and statistical mechanics can be established, and the significance of the approximations at the microscopic level can be clarified. The results can be compared with computer simulations including explicit solvent molecules [15,26–28]. Implicit solvent models based on the SASA/PB approximation have been used to address a wide range of questions concerning biomolecular systems, e.g., to discriminate misfolded proteins [116], assess the conformational stability of nucleic acids [71], and examine protein– ligand [117], protein–DNA [72], and protein–membrane association [73,118].
It is possible to go beyond the SASA/PB approximation and develop better approximations to current implicit solvent representations with sophisticated statistical mechanical models based on distribution functions or integral equations (see Section V.A). An alternative intermediate approach consists in including a small number of explicit solvent molecules near the solute while the influence of the remain bulk solvent molecules is taken into account implicitly (see Section V.B). On the other hand, in some cases it is necessary to use a treatment that is markedly simpler than SASA/PB to carry out extensive conformational searches. In such situations, it possible to use empirical models that describe the entire solvation free energy on the basis of the SASA (see Section V.C). An even simpler class of approximations consists in using information-based potentials constructed to mimic and reproduce the statistical trends observed in macromolecular structures (see Section V.D). Although the microscopic basis of these approximations is not yet formally linked to a statistical mechanical formulation of implicit solvent, full SASA models and empirical information-based potentials may be very effective for particular problems.
REFERENCES
1.CL Brooks III, M Karplus, BM Pettitt. Proteins. A Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure and Thermodynamics. Adv Chem Physics, Vol 71. New York: Wiley, 1988.
2.MP Allen, DJ Tildesley. Computer Simulation of Liquids. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1989.
3.DA McQuarrie. Statistical Mechanics. New York: Harper and Row, 1976.
Implicit Solvent Models |
149 |
4.JG Kirkwood. J Chem Phys 3:300, 1935.
5.WD Cornell, P Cieplak, CI Bayly, IR Gould, KM Merz Jr, DM Ferguson, DC Spellmeyer, T Fox, JW Caldwell, PA Kollman. J Am Chem Soc 117:5179–5197, 1995.
6.AD MacKerell Jr, D Bashford, M Bellot, RL Dunbrack, JD Evanseck, MJ Field, S Fischer, J Gao, H Guo, S Ha, D Joseph-McCarthy, L Kuchnir, K Kuczera, FTK Lau, C Mattos, S Michnick, T Ngo, DT Nguyen, B Prodhom, WE Reiher III, B Roux, B Schlenkrich, J Smith, R Stote, J Straub, M Watanabe, J Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, M Karplus. J Phys Chem B 102: 3586–3616, 1998.
7.WL Jorgensen, DS Maxwell, J Tirado-Rives. J Am Chem Soc 118:11225–11236, 1996.
8.S Boresch, G Archontis, M Karplus. Proteins 20:25, 1994.
9.B Lee, FM Richards. J Mol Biol 55:379, 1971.
10.M Born. Z Phys 1:45, 1920.
11.P Debye, E Hu¨ckel. Phys Z 24:305–325, 1923.
12.JG Kirkwood. J Chem Phys 2:351, 1934.
13.L Onsager. J Am Chem Soc 58:1468–1493, 1936.
14.K Lum, D Chandler, JD Weeks. Adv Protein Chem 14:1, 1959.
15.JP Postma, HC Berendsen, JR Haak. Faraday Symp Chem Soc 17:55, 1982.
16.K Sharp, A Nicholls, R Fine, B Honig. Science 252:106–109, 1991.
17.K Sharp, A Nicholls, R Friedman, B Honig. Biochemistry 30:9696–9697, 1991.
18.T Simonson, AT Bru¨nger. J Phys Chem 98:4683–4694, 1994.
19.C Tanford. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:4175–4176, 1979.
20.H Reiss. Adv Chem Phys 9:1–84, 1965.
21.F Stillinger. J Solut Chem 2:141–158, 1973.
22.RA Pierotti. Chem Rev 76:717–726, 1976.
23.G Hummer, S Garde, AE Garcia, A Pohorille, LR Pratt. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8951, 1996.
24.G Hummer, LR Pratt, AE Garcia. J Chem Phys 107:9275, 1997.
25.K Lum, D Chandler, JD Weeks. J Phys Chem 1999.
26.A Jean-Charles, A Nicholls, K Sharp, B Honig, A Tempczyk, T Hendrickson, WC Still. J Am Chem Soc 113:1454–1455, 1991.
27.M Nina, D Beglov, B Roux. J Phys Chem 101:5239–5248, 1997.
28.D Sitkoff, KA Sharp, B Honig. J Phys Chem 98:1978, 1994.
29.B Honig, A Nicholls. Science 268:1144, 1995.
30.KA Sharp, B Honig. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 19:301–332, 1990.
31.JD Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics. New York: Wiley, 1962.
32.J Warwicker, HC Watson. J Mol Biol 157:671–679, 1982.
33.I Klapper, R Hagstrom, R Fine, K Sharp, B Honig. Proteins 1:47, 1986.
34.MK Gilson, KA Sharp, BH Honig. J Comput Chem 9:327–335, 1987.
35.ME Davis, JD Madura, B Luty, JA McCammon. Comput Phys Commun 62:187–197, 1991.
36.W Im, D Beglov, B Roux. Comput Phys Commun 111:59–75, 1998.
37.BR Brooks, RE Bruccoleri, BD Olafson, DJ States, S Swaminathan, M Karplus. J Comput Chem 4:187–217, 1983.
38.R Zauhar, R Morgan. J Mol Biol 186:815–820, 1985.
39.J Liang, S Subramaniam. Biophys J 73:1830–1841, 1997.
40.CM Cortis, RA Friesner. J Comput Chem 18:1570–1590, 1997.
41.CM Cortis, RA Friesner. J Comput Chem 18:1591–1608, 1997.
42.YN Vorobjev, HA Scheraga. J Comput Chem 18:569–583, 1997.
˚
43. A Warshel, J Aqvist. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 20:267–298, 1991. 44. D Beglov, B Roux. J Chem Phys 104:8678–8689, 1996.
45. B Roux, H-A Yu, M Karplus. J Phys Chem 94:4683–4688, 1990.
46. J Antosiewicz, JA McCammon, MK Gilson. Biochemistry 18:7819–7833, 1996. 47. MK Gilson, JA McCammon, JD Madura. J Comput Chem 16:1081, 1995.
150 |
Roux |
48.M Friedrichs, RH Zhou, SR Edinger, RA Friesner. J Phys Chem B 103:3057–3061, 1999.
49.WC Still, A Tempczyk, RC Hawley, T Henderickson. J Am Chem Soc 112:6127–6129, 1990.
50.H Sklenar, F Eisenhaber, M Poncin, R Lavery. In: DL Beveridge, R Lavery, eds. Theoretical Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics. New York: Adenine Press, 1990.
51.ME Davis. J Chem Phys 100:5149–5159, 1994.
52.M Schaefer, M Karplus. J Phys Chem 100:1578–1599, 1996.
53.CJ Cramer, DG Truhlar. In: KB Lipkowitz, ed. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. New York: VCH, 1995.
54.SR Edinger, C Cortis, PS Shenkin, RA Friesner. J Phys Chem B 101:1190, 1997.
55.B Jayaram, D Sprous, DL Beveridge. J Phys Chem B 102:9571–9576, 1998.
56.B Jayaram, Y Liu, DL Beveridge. J Chem Phys 109:1465–1471, 1998.
57.A Ghosh, CS Rapp, RA Friesner. J Phys Chem B 102:10983–10990, 1998.
58.BN Dominy, CL Brooks. J Phys Chem B 103:3765–3773, 1999.
59.SB Dixit, B Jayaram. J Biomol Struct Dyn 16:237–242, 1998.
60.D Mohanty, BN Dominy, A Kolinski, CL Brooks, J Skolnick. Proteins 35:447–452, 1999.
61.M Scarsi, J Apostolakis, A Caflisch. J Phys Chem B 102:3637–3641, 1998.
62.J Srinivasan, MW Trevathan, P Beroza, DA Case. Theor Chem Acc 101:426–434, 1999.
63.B Jayaram, KJ McConnell, SB Dixit, DL Beveridge. J Comput Phys 151:333–357, 1999.
64.R Luo, L David, H Hung, J Devaney, MK Gilson. J Phys Chem B 103:727–736, 1999.
65.J Srinivasan, J Miller, PA Kollman, DA Case. J Biomol Struct Dyn 16:671, 1998.
66.CS Rapp, RA Friesner. Proteins 35:173–183, 1999.
67.R Luo, MS Head, JA Given, MK Gilson. Biophys Chem 78:183–193, 1999.
68.J Bostrom, PO Norrby, T Liljefors. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 12:383–396, 1998.
69.RH Fowler, EA Guggenheim. Statistical Thermodynamics. Oxford, UK: Cambridge Univ Press, 1939.
70.KA Sharp, B Honig. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:323–328, 1995.
71.VK Misra, B Honig. Biochemistry 35:1115–1124, 1996.
72.VK Misra, JL Hecht, AS Yang, B Honig. Biophys J 75:2262–2273, 1998.
73.B Roux. Biophys J 73:2980–2989, 1997.
74.B Hille. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 1992.
75.FJ Sigworth. Quart Rev Biophys 27:1–40, 1993.
76.JP Hansen, IR McDonald. Theory of Simple Liquids, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press, 1986.
77.D Chandler. The equilibrium theory of polyatomic fluids. In: EW Montroll, JL Lebowitz, eds. The Liquid State of Matter: Fluids, Simple and Complex, Vol. 8. Amsterdam: NorthHolland, 1982.
78.MB Pettitt, M Karplus. Chem Phys Lett 121:194–201, 1985.
79.MB Pettitt, M Karplus. Chem Phys Lett 136:383–386, 1987.
80.WF Lau, BM Pettitt. Biopolymer 26:1817–1831, 1987.
81.D Beglov, B Roux. J Phys Chem 101:7821–7826, 1997.
82.CM Cortis, PJ Rossky, RA Friesner. J Chem Phys 107:6400–6414, 1997.
83.Q Du, D Beglov, B Roux. J Phys Chem B 104:796–805, 2000.
84.Y Liu, T Ichiye. Chem Phys Lett 231:380–386, 1994.
85.J-K Hyun, CS Babu, T Ichiye. J Chem Phys 99:5187–5185, 1995.
86.G Hummer, DM Soumpasis. Phys Rev E 50:5085–5095, 1994.
87.AE Garcı´a, G Hummer, DM Soumpasis. Biophys J 72(2):A104, 1997.
88.M Berkowitz, JA McCammon. Chem Phys Lett 90:215, 1982.
89.CL Brooks III, M Karplus. J Chem Phys 79:6312–6325, 1983.
90.A Brunger, CL Brooks III, M Karplus. Chem Phys Lett 105:495–500, 1984.
91.JW Essex, WL Jorgensen. J Comput Chem 16:951–972, 1995.
92.A Warshel, G King. Chem Phys Lett 121:124, 1985.
93.G King, A Warshel. J Chem Phys 91:3647, 1989.
Implicit Solvent Models |
151 |
94.JA Rullmann, PTh van Duijnen. Mol Phys 61:293, 1987.
95.D Beglov, B Roux. J Chem Phys 100:9050–9063, 1994.
96.D Eisenberg, A McClachlan. Nature 319:199–203, 1986.
97.L Wesson, D Eisenberg. Protein Sci 1:227–235, 1992.
98.F Fraternali, WF van Gunsteren. J Mol Biol 256:939–948, 1996.
99.HA Scheraga. Acc Chem Res 12:7–14, 1979.
100.YK Kang, KD Gibson, G Nemethy, H Scheraga. J Phys Chem 92:4739–4742, 1988.
101.F Colonna-Cesari, C Sander. Biophys J 57:1103–1107, 1990.
102.P Stouten, C Fro¨mmel, H Nakamura, C Sander. Mol Simul 10:97–120, 1993.
103.T Lazaridis, M Karplus. Science 278:1928–1931, 1997.
104.MD Cummings, TN Hart, RJ Read. Protein Sci 4:2087–2089, 1995.
105.MJ Sippl. J Mol Biol 213:859–883, 1990.
106.MJ Sippl. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 7:473–501, 1993.
107.K Yue, KA Dill. Protein Sci 5:254–261, 1996.
108.I Bahar, RL Jernigan. J Mol Biol 266:195–214, 1997.
109.SH Bryant, CE Lawrence. Proteins 16:92–112, 1993.
110.SE DeBolt, J Skolnick. Protein Eng 9:637–655, 1996.
111.KK Koretke, Z Luthey-Schulten, PG Wolynes. Protein Sci 5:1043–1059, 1996.
112.LA Mirny, EI Shakhnovich. J Mol Biol 264:1164–1179, 1996.
113.S Vajda, M Sippl, J Novotny. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7:222–228, 1997.
114.DT Jones, JM Thornton. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:210–216, 1996.
115.RL Jernigan, I Bahar. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:195–209, 1996.
116.YN Vorobjev, JC Almagro, J Hermans. Protein Struct Funct Genet 32:399–413, 1998.
117.KA Sharp. Protein 1:39–48, 1998.
118.N Ben-Tal, A Ben-Shaul, A Nicholls, BH Honig. Biophys J 70:1803–1812, 1996.