Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Lavoie Economics and hermeneutics.pdf
Скачиваний:
53
Добавлен:
22.08.2013
Размер:
1.7 Mб
Скачать

THE ECONOMICS OF RATIONALITY 229

expressed a ‘coherent’ world view. He also argued that truth could not be determined outside the context of language (Lilla 1984).

46In Rescher’s view, cognitive systematization ‘is intimately intertwined with that of planning in its generic sense of the rational organization of materials’ (Rescher 1979, p. 14). For Rescher, this planning and ‘control over nature leads us to an interventionist theory of knowledge’ (Rescher 1979, p. 103). In contrast with this view, Gadamer’s understanding of the subject/object relationship leads him to reject the view that subjects can stand outside their conceptual system or nature and exercise ‘control’ over them. For Gadamer, understanding does not mean that we have the ability to control nature but rather that ‘we are able to cope with an experience by grasping it in language’ (Gadamer 1975, p. 411).

47A similar ontological point is made by Lehe who notes that:

The only world that makes any sense to us is that which we understand within the context of our conceptual framework…. As soon as we specify anything at all determinate about the world, we are already operating within a conceptual framework or theory of some sort and are no longer concerned with a world radically independent of our thought. To be concerned with a world in that sense is to think the unthinkable.

(Lehe 1983, p. 182)

48 Gadamer, for example, notes: ‘We are simply following an internal necessity of the thing itself if we go beyond the idea of the object and the objectivity of understanding, towards the idea of the coordination of subject and object’ (Gadamer 1975, p. 418). When describing the ‘best fit’ criteria, Rescher has also characterized the coherence theory as one of co-ordination (Rescher 1979, p. 155).

49 Gadamer has recognized this similarity. He writes that:

the theory of trial and error that Popper worked out is not at all confined to the logic of specialized inquiry…it makes plain a notion of logical rationality that reaches far beyond the field of scientific research and describes the basic structures of all rationality, even that of practical reason.

(Gadamer 1981, p. 165)

50 See Lavoie (1987) for a more complete discussion of issues regarding the interpretation of economic data by agents.

REFERENCES

Addleson, Mark (1986) ‘Radical subjectivism and the language of Austrian economics’,

in Israel Kirzner (ed.) Subjectivism, Intelligibility, and Economic Understanding,

New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–15.

Airaksinen, Timo (1978) ‘Five types of knowledge’, American Philosophical Quarterly 15, pp. 263–74.

——(1981) ‘On nonfoundationalist theories of epistemic justification’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 19, pp. 403–23.

230 ALTERNATIVE VIEWS OF HERMENEUTICS

——(1982) ‘Contextualism, a new theory of epistemic justification?’, Philosophia 12, pp. 37–50.

Alston, W.P. (1976a) ‘Has foundationalism been refuted?’, Philosophical Studies 29, pp. 287–305.

——(1976b) ‘Self-warrant: a neglected form of privileged access’, American

Philosophical Quarterly 13, pp. 257–72.

——(1976c) ‘Two types of foundationalism’, The Journal of Philosophy 73, pp. 165–85. ——(1985) ‘Concepts of epistemic justification’, The Monist 68, pp. 57–89.

——(1986) ‘Epistemic circularity’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47, pp. 1–30.

Annis, David B. (1977) ‘Epistemic foundationalism’, Philosophical Studies 31, pp. 345– 52.

——(1978) ‘A contextualist theory of epistemic justification’, The American

Philosophical Quarterly 15, pp. 213–19.

——(1982) ‘The social and cultural component of epistemic justification’, Philosophia 12, pp. 51–4.

Attfield, C.L.F., Demery, D., and Duck, N.W. (1985) Rational Expectations in Macroeconomics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Aune, B. (1967) Knowledge, Mind and Nature, New York: Random House. Blanshard, Brand (1939) The Nature of Thought, London: George Allen & Unwin.

BonJour, Laurence (1976) ‘The coherence theory of empirical knowledge’, Philosophical Studies 30, pp. 281–312.

——(1985) The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Brandt, R.B. (1985) ‘The concept of rational belief’, The Monist 68, pp. 3–23.

Brodbeck, May (1962) ‘Explanations, predictions, and “imperfect” knowledge’, in Feigl and Maxwell (eds) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3.

Bruzina, Ronald (1981) ‘Dependence on language and the autonomy of reason: an Husserlian perspective’, Man and World 14, pp. 355–68.

Chisholm, Roderick M. (1980) Theory of Knowledge, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: PrenticeHall.

——(1982) The Foundations of Knowing, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ——(1986) ‘The place of epistemic justification’, Philosophical Topics 14, pp. 85–92. Cohen, Stewart (1983) ‘Justification and truth’, Philosophical Studies 46, pp. 279–95.

Cornman, James W. (1977) ‘Foundational versus nonfoundational theories of empirical justification’, American Philosophical Quarterly 14, pp. 287–97.

Dancy, Jonathan (1985) An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Ebeling, Richard (1986) ‘Toward a hermeneutical economics: expectations, prices, and the role of interpretation in a theory of the market process’, in Kirzner (ed.) Method,

Process and Austrian Economics, pp. 39–55.

Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds) (1962) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Firth, R. (1964) ‘Coherence, certainty, and epistemic priority’, Journal of Philosophy 61, pp. 545–57.

Foley, Richard (1979) ‘Justified inconsistent beliefs’, American Philosophical Quarterly 16, pp. 247–57.

——(1980) ‘Chisholm and coherence’, Philosophical Studies 38, pp. 53–63.

THE ECONOMICS OF RATIONALITY 231

Friedman, Milton (1953) ‘The methodology of positive economics’, in Friedman, Essays In Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–43.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1975) Truth and Method, New York: Crossroad Publishing Company.

——(1981) Reason in the Age of Science, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Gettier, Edmund (1963) ‘Is justified true belief knowledge?’, Analysis 23, pp. 121 -3. Gill, Jerry H. (1985) ‘Knowledge as justified belief, period’, International Philosophical

Quarterly 25, pp. 381–91.

Goldman, Alan H. (1979) ‘Appearing statements and epistemological foundations’,

Metaphilosophy 10, pp. 227–46.

(1981) ‘The death of epistemology: a premature burial’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62, pp. 203–10.

Goodman, Nelson (1978) Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis: Hackett. Harman, G. (1973) Thought, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Havrilesky, Thomas (1985) Modern Concepts In Macroeconomics, Arlington Heights, 111.: Harlan Davidson.

Hayek, F.A. (1967) ‘Rules, perception and intelligibility’, in Hayek, Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 43– 65.

Hekman, Susan J. (1986) Hermeneutics and the Sociology of Knowledge, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Hogarth, Robin and Reder, Melvin (eds) (1987) Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hornstein, Norbert (1982) ‘Foundationalism and Quine’s indeterminacy of translation thesis’, Social Research 49, pp. 32–67.

Jason, G.James (1986) ‘Epistemologies and apologies’, Dialectica 40, pp. 45–58.

Kagel, John H. (1981) ‘Demand curves for animal consumers’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 96, pp. 1–16.

Kekes, John (1977) ‘Recent trends and future prospects in epistemology’, Metaphilosophy 8, pp. 87–107.

Kirzner, Israel (ed.) (1982a) Method, Process, and Austrian Economics, Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

——(1982b) ‘Uncertainty, discovery, and human action: a study of the entrepreneurial profile in the Miseian system’, in Kirzner (ed.) Method, Process, and Austrian Economics, pp. 139–59.

——(ed.) (1986) Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding, New York: New York University Press.

Klamer, Arjo (1984) Conversations with Economists, Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld.

Krausz, Michael (1984) ‘Relativism and foundationalism: some distinctions and strategies’, The Monist 67, pp. 395–404.

Lachmann, Ludwig M. (1971) The Legacy of Max Weber, Berkeley: The Glendessary Press.

Larmore, Charles (1986) ‘Tradition, objectivity, and hermeneutics’, in Wachterhauser (ed.) Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy, pp. 147–67.

Laszlo, Eryin (1972) Introduction To Systems Philosophy, New York: Harper & Row.

232 ALTERNATIVE VIEWS OF HERMENEUTICS

Lavoie, Don (1987) ‘The accounting of interpretations and the interpretation of accounts: the communicative function of “The Language of Business”’, Accounting Organizations and Society 18, pp. 579–604.

Lehe, Robert Tad (1983) ‘Coherence—criterion and nature of truth’, Idealistic Studies 13, pp. 177–89.

Lehrer, Keith (1974) Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

——(1986) ‘The coherence theory of knowledge’, Philosophical Topics 14, pp. 5–25. Lemos, Noah M. (1982) ‘Coherence and epistemic priority’, Philosophical Studies 41, pp.

299–315.

Lewis, C.I. (1946) An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, La Salle, 111.: Open Court. Lilla, Mark (1984) ‘On Goodman, Putnam, and Rorty: the return to the “given”’,

Partisian Review Two 51, pp. 220–35.

Loasby, Brian J. (1982) ‘Economics of dispersed and incomplete information’, in Kirzner

(ed.) Method, Process, and Austrian Economics, pp. 111–29.

Lucas, Jr., Robert E. (1987) ‘Adaptive behavior and economic theory’, in Hogarth and

Reder (eds) Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, pp. 217–42.

Malcolm, Norman (1977) Thought and Knowledge, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

McCloskey, Donald (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Moser, Paul K. (1984) ‘On negative coherentism and subjective justification’, The

Southern Journal of Philosophy 22, pp. 83–90.

——(1985) ‘Whither infinite regress of justification?’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 23, pp. 65–74.

Muth, John (1961) ‘Rational expectations and the theory of price movements’, Econometrica 29, pp. 315–35.

Nielsen, Kai (1981) ‘On the rationality of groundless believing’, Idealistic Studies 11, pp. 215–29.

O’Driscoll, Gerald P. and Rizzo, Mario J. (1985) The Economics of Time and Ignorance, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Pappas, George S. (ed.) (1979) Justification and Knowledge, Dordrecht: Reidel.

—and Swain, Marshall (eds) (1978) Essays on Knowledge and Justification, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Pastin, Mark (1975) ‘C.I.Lewis’s radical foundationalism’, Nous 9, pp. 407–20. ——(1978) ‘Modest foundationalism and self-warrant’, in Pappas and Swain, 1978, pp.

279–88.

Polanyi, Michael (1962) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy,

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Pollock, John, L. (1974) Knowledge and Justification, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

——(1984) ‘Reliability and justified belief’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14, pp. 103– 14.

Popper, Karl R. (1979) Objective Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Putnam, Hilary (1981) Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Quine, W.V.O. (1953) ‘Two dogmas of empiricism’, in Quine From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.

THE ECONOMICS OF RATIONALITY 233

Rescher, N. (1973) The Coherence Theory of Truth, London: Oxford University Press.

(1979) Cognitive Systematization: A Systems-Theoretic Approach to a Coherent Theory of Knowledge. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.

——(1985) ‘Truth as ideal coherence’, The Review of Metaphysics 38, pp. 795–806. Rorty, Richard (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton

University Press.

Seidler, Michael J. (1979) ‘Problems of systems epistemology’, International

Philosophical Quarterly 19, pp. 29–60.

Sellars, W.S. (1963) Science, Perception, and Reality, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ——(1973) ‘Givenness and explanatory coherence’, Journal of Philosophy 70, pp. 612–

24.

——(1979) ‘More on givenness and explanatory coherence’, in G.S.Pappas (ed.)

Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology, Dordrecht, Holland: D.Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 169–82.

Sheffrin, Steven (1983) Rational Expectations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Simson, Rosalind S. (1986) ‘An internalist view of the epistemic regress problem’,

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47, pp. 179–208.

Sosa, Ernest (1980) ‘The foundations of foundationalism’, Nous 14, pp. 547–64. Stiffler, Eric (1984) ‘A definition of foundationalism’, Metaphilosophy 15, pp. 16–25.

Suppe, Frederick (1977) The Structure of Scientific Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Cleve, James (1979) ‘Foundationalism, epistemic principles, and the Cartesian circle’, The Philosophical Review 88, pp. 55–91.

Wachterhauser, Brice R. (ed.) (1986) Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press.

Weinsheimer, Joel C. (1985) Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method,

New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Will, Frederick (1977) Induction and Justification, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Williams, Michael (1977) Groundless Belief: An Essay on The Possibility of

Epistemology, New Haven: Yale University Press.

——(1980) ‘Coherence, justification, and truth’, Review of Metaphysics 34, pp. 243–72. ——(1986) ‘Do we (epistemologists) need a theory of truth?’, Philosophical Topics 14,

pp. 223–42.

Part IV

Hermeneutical reason: applications in macro, micro, and public policy