Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Lavoie Economics and hermeneutics.pdf
Скачиваний:
53
Добавлен:
22.08.2013
Размер:
1.7 Mб
Скачать

312 HERMENEUTICAL REASON

individual claim. Individuals make the law, insofar as they make claims’ (see Leoni 1963).

31For a discussion of the emergence of law as defining salient points for strategic interaction, and the normative status such rules can attain, see Postema (1982). For a game-theoretic approach to the spontaneous emergence of property rights, see Sugden (1986). For a juristic approach to the spontaneous emergence of law, see Leoni (1972). For a legal historical approach, see Trakman (1983).

32For a brief discussion of the kinds of ignorance (‘optimal’ versus ‘sheer’ ignorance) relevant to discussion of the market process, see Thomsen (1987) who notes that:

the market system is, at any time, full of regrettable inefficiencies and mistakes (many of which will be in the process of being entrepreneurially discovered and corrected). But it is scientifically invalid simply to assume the existence of a government authority in possession of all the knowledge necessary for their solution. The analysis should, more appropriately, consider which social arrangement has the means for the discovery of such knowledge. Viewed in the light of such a standard, the market has at least one major advantage over other systems: through its translation of innumerable inefficiencies and mistakes into opportunities for pecuniary profit it alone seems to have the power to awaken and mobilize the entrepreneurial alertness of market participants and thus to promote the discovery of these inefficiencies and their solutions.

(Thomsen 1987, p. 1–17)

33 Schelling found consistently uniform responses to simple questions asked in various co-ordination games played by experimental subjects. The games played included asking two isolated respondents to name a number, such that if they name the same number, they would receive a prize. A remarkable number (given the infinite choice set) chose the same number, i.e. 1. The number one has a kind of natural prominence, as has, for example, the choice of Grand Central Station at noon as a meeting place and time for two people to meet in New York. As Sugden (1986) shows, such prominent points can provide the foundation for the spontaneous emergence of conventions.

34On the significance of private property and contract for the creation of a public sphere, see Grace Goodell’s (1980) anthropological study.

REFERENCES

Anderson, Terry L. and Hill, P.J. (1975) ‘The evolution of property rights: a study of the American West’, Journal of Law and Economics 18 (April), pp. 163–79.

Baumol, William (1969) Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Brubaker, Earl (1975) ‘Free ride, free revelation, or golden rule?’, Journal of Law Economics XVIII (April), pp. 147–61.

THE HERMENEUTICAL VIEW OF FREEDOM 313

Buchanan, James (1979) ‘Natural and artefacted man’, in Buchanan, What Should Economists Do?, Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

——(1985) ‘Order defined in the process of its emergence’, in Buchanan, Liberty, Market and State: Political Economy in the 1980s, New York: New York University Press, pp. 73–4.

Coase, R.H. (1977) ‘Advertising and free speech’, in Allen Hyman and M. Bruce Johnson (eds) Advertising and Free Speech, Lexington: Lexington Books.

Cowen, Tyler (1985) ‘Public goods definitions and their institutional context: a critique of public goods theory’, Review of Social Economy XLII (April).

Dallmayr, Fred R. (1984) ‘Public policy and critical discourse’, in Dallmayr, Polis and Praxis: Exercises in Contemporary Political Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. and McCarthy, Thomas, A. (eds) (1977) Understanding and Social Inquiry, Notre Dame,

Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Demsetz, Harold (1974) ‘Toward a theory of property rights’, in Erik G. Furubotn and Svetozar Pejovich (eds) The Economics of Property Rights, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Co.

Ebeling, Richard (1986) ‘Toward a hermeneutical economics: expectations, prices, and the role of interpretation in a theory of the market process’, in Israel M. Kirzner (ed.)

Subjectivism, Intelligibility and the Economic Understanding: Essays in Honor of Ludwig M.Lachmann, New York: New York University Press.

Engelhardt, H. Tristram, Jr. (1986) The Foundations of Bioethics, New York: Oxford University Press.

Etzioni, Amitai (1986a) ‘The case for a multiple-utility conception’, Economics and Philosophy 2 (2) October, pp. 159–83.

——(1986b) ‘Founding a new socioeconomics’, Challenge Nov.—Dec., pp. 13–17. Forester, John (ed.) (1985) Critical Theory and Public Life, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT

Press.

Friedman, Milton (1967) ‘Value judgements in economics’, in Sidney Hook (ed.) Human Values and Economic Policy, New York: New York University Press, pp. 85–93.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1976) ‘On the scope and function of hermeneutical reflection’, in Gadamer, Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. and ed. by David Linge, Berkeley: University of California Press.

——(1982) Truth and Method, New York: Crossroad.

Goldin, Kenneth (1977) ‘Equal access vs. selective access: a critique of public goods theory’, Public Choice XXIX (Spring), pp. 53–71.

Goodell, Grace (1980) ‘From status to contract: the significance of agrarian relations of production in the west, Japan, and in “Asiatic” Persia’, European Journal of Sociology, XXI, pp. 285–325.

Gray, John (1980) ‘F.A.Hayek on liberty and tradition’, Journal of Libertarian Studies 4 (Spring) pp. 119–37.

Habermas, Jürgen (1977) ‘A review of Gadamer’s Truth and Method’, in Fred Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy (eds) Understanding and Social Inquiry, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

——(1970) ‘Summation and response’, Continuum 8, pp. 123–33.

Hayek, F.A.von (1969) ‘The non sequitur of the dependence effect’, in Hayek, Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, New York: Simon & Schuster.

——(1978) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas,

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

314 HERMENEUTICAL REASON

——(1988) The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Heidegger, Martin (1962) Being and Time, New York: Harper & Row. Heilbroner, Robert (1978) ‘What is socialism?’, Dissent, Summer, pp. 341–8.

Hekman, Susan J. (1986) Hermeneutics and the Sociology of Knowledge, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Hume, David (1978) [1739–40] A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. by L.A.SelbyBrigge, rev. by P.H.Nidditch, New York: Oxford University Press.

Husserl, Edmund (1970) ‘On the theory of wholes and parts’, in Husserl, Logical Investigations, translated by J.N.Findlay, New York: Humanities Press, vol. II, pp. 435–89.

Ingram, David (1985) ‘Hermeneutics and truth’, in Robert Hollinger (ed.) Hermeneutics and Praxis, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 32–53.

de Jasay, Anthony (1989) Social Contract, Free Ride: A Study of the Public Goods Problem, New York: Oxford University Press.

Kalt, Joseph (1981) ‘Public goods and the theory of government’, Cato Journal 1 (2), Fall, pp. 565–84.

Kemp, Ray (1985) ‘Planning, public hearings, and the politics of discourse’, in John Forester (ed.) Critical Theory and Public Life, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 177–201.

Kirzner, Israel (1979) ‘Equilibrium versus market process’, in Kirzner, Perception, Opportunity and Profit, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Klein, Daniel (1987) ‘Tie-ins and the market provision of collective goods’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy x (2) Spring, pp. 452–74.

Lachmann, Ludwig (1977) ‘Methodological individualism and the market economy’, in Walter Grinder (ed.) Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process: Essays on the Theory of the Market Economy, Kansas City: Sheed Andrews & McMeel.

Lange, Oskar (1964) ‘On the economic theory of socialism’, in Oskar Lange and Fred Taylor On the Economic Theory of Socialism, ed. by Benjamin E. Lippincott, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Lardner, James (1987) Fast Forward: Hollywood, the Japanese and the VCR Wars, New York: W.W.Norton & Co.

Leoni, Bruno (1963) Lectures given at the Freedom School Phrontistery, Colorado Springs, Colorado, December 2–6.

——(1972) Freedom and the Law, Los Angeles: Nash Publishing.

Levy, David (1986) ‘Can we trade if we do not talk? Adam Smith and the Texas A&M Rats’, unpublished manuscript, Fairfax: Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University.

Littlechild, S.C. (1986) The Fallacy of the Mixed Economy, 2nd edn, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

McCloskey, Donald (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Menger, Carl (1985 [1883]) Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics, New York: New York University Press.

Mises, Ludwig von (1978 [1962]) The Ultimate Foundations of Economc Science, Kansas City: Sheed Andrews & McMeel.

THE HERMENEUTICAL VIEW OF FREEDOM 315

Mueller, Milton (1983) ‘Reforming telecommunications regulation’, in Edwin Diamond, Norman Sandler, and Milton Mueller (eds) Telecommunications in Crisis: The First Amendment, Technology and Deregulation, Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.

Nozick, Robert (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.

O’Driscoll, Gerald and Rizzo, Mario (1985) The Economics of Time and Ignorance, New York: Basil Blackwell.

Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Palmer, Tom G. (1983) ‘Infrastructure: public or public?’, Policy Report v (5) May. ——(1987) ‘Gadamer’s hermeneutics and social theory’, Critical Review I (3) Summer,

pp. 1–11.

——(1989) ‘Intellectual property rights: a non-Posnerian law and economics approach’, Hamline Law Review 12, no. 2, pp. 261–304.

——(1990) ‘Are patents and copyrights morally justified? The philosophy of property rights and ideal objects’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol. 13, no. 3.

Popper, Karl (1950) ‘Indeterminism in quantum physics and classical physics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1, pp. 113–73.

——(1972) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Postema, Gerald L. (1982) ‘Co-ordination and convention at the foundation of law’, Journal of Legal Studies xi (January), pp. 165–203.

Schelling, Thomas (1960) The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Schick, F. (1979) ‘Self knowledge, uncertainty and choice’, British Journal for the

Philosophy of Science, 30.

Schmidtz, David (1987) ‘Contracts and public goods’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy x (2) Spring, pp. 475–503.

Smith, Adam (1978a [1776]) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, New York: Oxford University Press.

——(1978b [1896]) Lectures on Jurisprudence, New York: Oxford University Press. Sokolowski, Robert (l985) Moral Action: A Phenomenological Study, Bloomington:

Indiana University Press.

Stroup, Richard L. and Baden, John A. (1983) Natural Resources: Bureaucratic Myths and Environmental Management, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

Stubblebine, William Craig (1975) ‘On property rights and institutions’, in Henry Manne (ed.) The Economics of Legal Relationships, New York: West Publishing Co., pp. 11– 22.

Sugden, Robert (1986) The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Thomsen, Esteban F. (1987) ‘Knowledge, discovery and prices’, Humane Studies Review v (1), Fall.

Trakman, Leon (1983) The Law Merchant: The Evolution of Commercial Law, Littleton, Colorado: Fred B. Rothman & Co.

Van Dun, Frank (1986) ‘Economics and the limits of value-free science’, Reason Papers no. 11 (Spring), pp. 17–32.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1968) Philosophical Investigations, vol. I, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.