Metonymy

A different type of interaction between logical and contextual logical meanings is called metonymy. It is based on definite relations between the object implied and the object named.

The interaction between the logical and the contextual meanings of the words is based on close relations objectively existing between the part and the body itself.

In metonymy relations between the object named and the object implied are various and numerous. Here are the most frequent types of relations:

1) The relations that exist between an instrument and the action it performs (or between an organ of the body and its function).

2) The relations that exist between an article of clothing and the person wearing it.

3) The relations that exist between the symbol and the phenomenon it symbolized.

Apart from this group of metonymies some other trite types of metonymies should be mentioned – that is metonymies based on very close, common relations between objects. They are:

a) The relations between the creator and his creation.

b) The relations between the material and the thing made of it.

c) The relations between the singular and the plural. This type of metonymy is called synecdochy.

The stylistic effect of trite metonymies is in most cases weak.

Metonymy as a genuine stylistic device is used to achieve concreteness of description. By giving a specific detail connected with the phenomenon, the author evokes a concrete and life-like image and reveals certain feelings of his own.

By mentioning only one seemingly insignificant feature or detail connected with the phenomenon the author draws the reader’s attention to it and makes him see the character he describes as he himself sees it.

e.g. Then a pause, as the bonnet and dress neared the top of the Square.

№4

Pun and zeugma. The effect of these lexical stylistic devices is humorous. Contextual conditions leading to the simultaneous realization of two meanings.

The formation of pun may vary. One speaker’s utterance may be wrong interpreted by the other due to the existence of different meaning of the misinterpreted word or its homonym. For example, “Have you been seeing any spirits?” “Or taking any?” The first “spirits” refers to supernatural forces, the second one – to strong drinks. Punning may be also the result of the speaker’s intended violation of the listener’s expectation.

We deal with zeugma when polysemantic verbs that can be combined with nouns of most varying semantic groups are deliberately usedwith two or more homogeneous members which are not connected semantically , as in such example: “He took his hat and his leave”. Zeugma is highly characteristic of English prose of previous centuries.

When the number of homogeneous members , semantically disconnected but attached to the same verb increases we deal with semantically false chains, which are thus a variation of zeugma. As a rule, it is the last member of the chain that falls out of the semantic group, producing humorous effect. The following case may serve an example: “A Governess wanted. Must possess knowledge of Rumanian, Italian, Spanish, German, Music and Mining Engineering”.