- •Contents
- •Preface
- •1. Main dimensions and main ratios
- •1.3 Depth, draught and freeboard
- •1.7 The design equation
- •1.8 References
- •2. Lines design
- •2.1 Statement of the problem
- •2.2 Shape of sectional area curve
- •2.3 Bow and forward section forms
- •2.4 Bulbous bow
- •2.5 Stern forms
- •2.6 Conventional propeller arrangement
- •2.7 Problems of design in broad, shallow-draught ships
- •2.8 Propeller clearances
- •2.9 The conventional method of lines design
- •2.10 Lines design using distortion of existing forms
- •2.12 References
- •3. Optimization in design
- •3.1 Introduction to methodology of optimization
- •3.2 Scope of application in ship design
- •3.3 Economic basics for optimization
- •3.4 Discussion of some important parameters
- •3.5 Special cases of optimization
- •3.6 Developments of the 1980s and 1990s
- •3.7 References
- •4. Some unconventional propulsion arrangements
- •4.1 Rudder propeller
- •4.2 Overlapping propellers
- •4.3 Contra-rotating propellers
- •4.4 Controllable-pitch propellers
- •4.5 Kort nozzles
- •4.6 Further devices to improve propulsion
- •4.7 References
- •5. Computation of weights and centres of mass
- •5.1 Steel weight
- •5.3 Weight of engine plant
- •5.4 Weight margin
- •5.5 References
- •6. Ship propulsion
- •6.1 Interaction between ship and propeller
- •6.2 Power prognosis using the admiralty formula
- •6.3 Ship resistance under trial conditions
- •6.4 Additional resistance under service conditions
- •6.5 References
- •Appendix
- •A.1 Stability regulations
- •References
- •Nomenclature
- •Index
Lines design 83
Wave pattern
Plots of contourlines of the wave elevation are mainly used for quality control. Reflections on the border of the computational domain and waves at the upstream border of the grid indicate that the grid was too small and the computation should be repeated with a larger grid. Typically but with no indication of numerical error, waves at the stern are higher than at the bow. This is due to larger run angles than entrance angles and the neglect of viscosity, which in reality reduces the waves at the aftbody.
Perspective view of water surface
Perspective views of the water surface, often with `hidden-lines' or shading are popular, but have no value for designing better hull forms.
Often pressure, velocity and wave elevation are combined in one plot.
CFD reports should contain, as a minimum, the following information (Bertram, 1992):
Information for form improvement
1.Pressure contour lines (preferably in colour) in all perspectives needed to show the relevant regions. Oblique views from top and bottom have been proven as suitable.
2.Wave profile at hull with information on how the profile was interpolated and the vertical scale factor.
3.Velocity contribution at forebody showing the flow directions. The ship speed should be given as a reference vector.
4.An estimate of the relative change in resistance for comparison of variants versus a basis form.
Information for quality control
1.Plots of grids, especially on the hull, to provide a reference for the accuracy of interpolated results.
2.Information on the convergence of iterative solutions.
3.Plots of wave pattern to detect implausible results at the outer boundary of the computational domain or at the ship ends.
Generally, plots of the hull should contain main reference lines (CWL, sections) to facilitate the reference to the lines plan.
2.12 References
BERTRAM, V. (1992). CFD im Schiffbau. Handbuch der Werften Vol. XXI, Hansa, p. 19 BERTRAM, V. (1994). Numerische Schiffshydrodynamik in der Praxis. IFS-Report 545, Univ.
Hamburg
BERTRAM, V. and JENSEN, G. (1994). Recent applications of computational fluid dynamics. Schiffstechnik, p. 131
DANCKWARDT, E. (1969). Ermittlung des Widerstandes von Frachtschiffen und Hecktrawlern beim Entwurf. Schiffbauforschung, p. 124
ECKERT, E. and SHARMA, S. (1970). Bugwulste¨ fur¨ langsame, vollige¨ Schiffe. Jahrbuch Schiffbautechn. Gesellschaft, p. 129
¨ , . and , . (1968). Systematische Widerstandsuntersuchungen fur¨ schnelle
HAHNEL G LABES K.-H
Frachtschiffe mit und ohne Bugwulst. Schiffbauforschung, p. 85
HOEKSTRA, M. (1975). Prediction of full scale wake characteristics. International Shipbuilding Progress, p. 204
84 Ship Design for Efficiency and Economy
HOLDEN, K. O., FAGERJORD, O. and FROSTAD, R. (1980). Early design-stage approach to reducing hull surface forces due to propeller cavitation. Trans. SNAME 88, p. 403
HOYLE, J. W., CHENG, B. H., HAYS, B., JOHNSON, B. and NEHRLING, B. (1986). A bulbous bow design methodology for high-speed ships. Trans. SNAME 94, p. 31
JENSEN, G. (1994). Moderne Schiffslinien. Handbuch der Werften Vol. XXII, p. 93
KERLEN, H. (1971). Entwurf von Bugwulsten¨ fur¨ vollige¨ Schiffe aus der Sicht der Praxis. Hansa, p. 1031
KRACHT, A. (1973). Theoretische und Experimentelle Untersuchungen fur¨ die Anwendung von Bugwulsten¨. Report 36, Forschungszentrum des Deutschen Schiffbaus, Hamburg
¨ , . (1997). Moderne hydrodynamische Entwurfsmethoden in der Werftpraxis. Jahrbuch
KRUGER S
Schiffbautechn. Gesellschaft
LAP, A. J. W. (1954). Diagrams for determining the resistance of single-screw ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, p. 179
LARSSON, L. (1994). CFD as a tool in ship design. In N. N. (1994)
MILLER, W. and SZANTYR, J. (1998), Model experiments with surface piercing propellers, Schiffstechnik 45
N. N. (1994). CFD Workshop Tokyo 1994. Ship Research Institute
POPHANKEN, E. (1939). SchiffbaukalenderÐHilfsbuch der Schiffbauindustrie. Deutsche Verlagswerke, Berlin
SCHNEEKLUTH, H. (1959). Einige Verfahren und Naherungsformeln¨ zum Gebrauch beim Linienentwurf. Schiffstechnik, p. 130
STRUNK, H. (1986). Systematische Freifahrtsversuche mit teilgetauchten Propellern unter Druckahnlichkeit¨. Report 180, Forschungszentrum des Deutschen Schiffbaus, Hamburg
TZABIRAS, G. (1997). A numerical study of additive bulb effects on the resistance and selfpropulsion of a full ship form. Schiffstechnik, p. 98
WURR, D. (1979). Heckwulst in vereinfachter Bauweise fur¨ Einschraubenschiffe. Hansa, p. 1796