- •Краткие основы аннотирования, реферирования и перевода оригинальных материалов по специальности.
- •1. Просмотровое чтение и аннотация.
- •2. Ознакомительное чтение и реферат.
- •3. Перевод.
- •The professional set
- •I. Basic professional set behavior for each person on set -
- •II. Working on a professional set
- •The Director has the last word about every decision on set. Not always off set.
- •III. Running a professional set
- •Prep is everything!!!!
- •In moviemaking cheap is always more expensive.
- •If you treat actors like stars, they start to behave like stars.
- •IV. Before shooting
- •V. On the day of the shoot (1)
- •VI. On the day of the shoot (2)
- •Not having 2nd team means that the camera operators are framing up air and have to adjust the camera height and positions when 1st team steps back in front of the lens. Which is a total waste of time.
- •The holy ground is not a meeting place to hang out.
- •If you want to be in front of the camera, become an actor!
- •Professional crew knows that the equipment that’s in front of the camera needs to be cleared out.
- •It’s also strongly encouraged for the key crew members to watch the monitor before the camera rolls.
- •VII. On the day of the shoot (3)
- •1St team has the set
- •Never ever can a crew member be in the line of view of the actor or even worse look into their eyes during a take.
- •In between takes
- •In between takes is not the moment when the set becomes like the working floor of the stock market after the bell rings.
- •Having the take doesn’t mean that work is done and time for a coffee and cigarette break. This is when work starts.
- •It’s during the takes the majority of the crew has time to relax and have a coffee off set.
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Киноведение” doing film history
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Драматургия” writing a screenplay
- •Insiders
- •Dialogue
- •1St Act Watershed
- •1St Focus Point
- •2Nd Focus Point
- •2Nd Act Watershed
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Звукорежиссура аудиовизуальных искусств”
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Продюсерство” the film producer
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Режиссура кино и телевидения”
- •Introduction
- •What and who is a director?
- •Entering the business
- •The script
- •Budget and studio involvement
- •Bringing a script to life
- •Casting
- •Rehearsal
- •Shooting the picture
- •Film editing
- •Previews
- •Reviews from critics
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Кинооператорство” what is a director of photography?
- •The director of photography: responsibilities
- •In early pre-production
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности
- •The actor
- •Acting in cinema
- •Constantin stanislavski
- •A theatre in decline
- •The birth of the moscow art theatre
- •Training
- •Working as an extra
- •Casting
- •Preparing for a role
- •Rehearsals
- •Dealing with critics. Part I
- •Dealing with critics. Part II
- •Actors on acting
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальностям “Живопись”, “Графика” art department overview
- •Production designer
- •How to be a production designer
- •Art director
- •A history of animation
- •Early peek at “avatar” production design
Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Режиссура кино и телевидения”
Introduction
A good director makes sure that all parts of a film are creatively produced and brought together in a single totality. A director interprets the script, coaches the performers, works together with the montagist, etc., interrelating them all to create a work of art. According to Film Scholar Eric Sherman, the director begins with a vague idea of the entire film and uses this to help him determine what is to be done. He gains most when others are given their freedom to show what they know. The position of the director in the traditional filmmaking process varies greatly and is extremely complex. The film director is seen as a leader of others, as providing a kind of guiding force. According to this view, the final outcome is more or less predetermined by requirements of the script, camerawork, acting, and editing; the director providing certain organizational context to the picture. Judging from the comments of most professional directors, there is very little agreement as to what exactly their function is. There are some directors who say that they must concentrate primarily on the structures of the script. If their films are to be works of art, it will be because of the inherent beauty in the narrative and dialogue patterns in the script. Other directors are occupied primarily with the performance of actors. To them, the beauty of the film will be correlative with the quality of acting. These directors attend not only to the performance as a whole, but to endless minor nuances and gestures throughout.
Some directors attend primarily to the camerawork, their chief concern being for a pictorial beauty and smoothness of execution. There are still other directors who say that the art of film resides in the editing process. For them, all steps prior to editing yield crude material, which will be finally shaped and lent an artistic worth through their imaginative juxtaposition. The point is that there have evolved nearly as many theories of film directing as there are directors.
We cannot, while watching a film for the first time, point out particular shots or lines of dialogue and fully appreciate their ultimate relationship to the entirety of the picture. Similarly, the actor concentrating on every gesture, the writer concerned with logical narrative and captivating dialogue, the cameraman dealing with isolated images, and the editor concerned with the rhythmic flow are not in the position that the director is to grasp the film as a whole.
Only the director stands apart from any one particular contributory element but lends to all of them a sense of the pictures entirety. Many of the strongest directors have refrained from virtually any function besides that of an overseer of the film. The director, whether he explicitly controls all the subordinate work in a film or merely creates a certain context through his very presence, is the only participant in a film’s creation whose moment of self-expression is wide enough and, thus, whose artistic vision may come to characterize the film as a whole. The director's very role in the filmmaking process forces him to attend explicitly or implicitly to the entire film.
The director approaches a film with more or less a well-defined sense of its meaning. For him, this limits and determines what the basic drive should be of all the other contributing elements. As previously stated, the director’s concern is always conditioned by a sense of the whole. He selects and guides all work and shapes it along the necessary route to achieve (as close as possible) what he has in mind.
When it is said that the director approaches a film with a sense of the whole in mind, obviously it is not meant that he has a complete knowledge of the finished product in all its parts. In fact, a director learns, as the production of the film progresses, exactly what it was that he had envisioned. There is no “beautiful shot” or “great cut” that has not been conditioned by the overriding vision of the whole that only the director provides.