- •Краткие основы аннотирования, реферирования и перевода оригинальных материалов по специальности.
- •1. Просмотровое чтение и аннотация.
- •2. Ознакомительное чтение и реферат.
- •3. Перевод.
- •The professional set
- •I. Basic professional set behavior for each person on set -
- •II. Working on a professional set
- •The Director has the last word about every decision on set. Not always off set.
- •III. Running a professional set
- •Prep is everything!!!!
- •In moviemaking cheap is always more expensive.
- •If you treat actors like stars, they start to behave like stars.
- •IV. Before shooting
- •V. On the day of the shoot (1)
- •VI. On the day of the shoot (2)
- •Not having 2nd team means that the camera operators are framing up air and have to adjust the camera height and positions when 1st team steps back in front of the lens. Which is a total waste of time.
- •The holy ground is not a meeting place to hang out.
- •If you want to be in front of the camera, become an actor!
- •Professional crew knows that the equipment that’s in front of the camera needs to be cleared out.
- •It’s also strongly encouraged for the key crew members to watch the monitor before the camera rolls.
- •VII. On the day of the shoot (3)
- •1St team has the set
- •Never ever can a crew member be in the line of view of the actor or even worse look into their eyes during a take.
- •In between takes
- •In between takes is not the moment when the set becomes like the working floor of the stock market after the bell rings.
- •Having the take doesn’t mean that work is done and time for a coffee and cigarette break. This is when work starts.
- •It’s during the takes the majority of the crew has time to relax and have a coffee off set.
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Киноведение” doing film history
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Драматургия” writing a screenplay
- •Insiders
- •Dialogue
- •1St Act Watershed
- •1St Focus Point
- •2Nd Focus Point
- •2Nd Act Watershed
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Звукорежиссура аудиовизуальных искусств”
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Продюсерство” the film producer
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Режиссура кино и телевидения”
- •Introduction
- •What and who is a director?
- •Entering the business
- •The script
- •Budget and studio involvement
- •Bringing a script to life
- •Casting
- •Rehearsal
- •Shooting the picture
- •Film editing
- •Previews
- •Reviews from critics
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности “Кинооператорство” what is a director of photography?
- •The director of photography: responsibilities
- •In early pre-production
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальности
- •The actor
- •Acting in cinema
- •Constantin stanislavski
- •A theatre in decline
- •The birth of the moscow art theatre
- •Training
- •Working as an extra
- •Casting
- •Preparing for a role
- •Rehearsals
- •Dealing with critics. Part I
- •Dealing with critics. Part II
- •Actors on acting
- •Хрестоматия для самостоятельного чтения по специальностям “Живопись”, “Графика” art department overview
- •Production designer
- •How to be a production designer
- •Art director
- •A history of animation
- •Early peek at “avatar” production design
Previews
Once a film is complete, the time for an audience to view the picture begins. Studios will typically have a sneak preview for a film, in which they can gauge audience reception to the picture. Unfortunately, there have been instances where a studio has hindered a great picture because they felt the audience reaction was not what was to be expected. They then go back and interject unnecessary sex or action scenes to try and compensate, essentially butchering the film. The reception of the previewing audience is, however, a good device to estimate the overall reception of the film. These audiences are often given a form to fill out, stating what parts of the picture they liked, disliked, what made sense, what was confusing, which parts dragged and were unimportant, etc. Through this, the directors and editors can go back and make any revisions needed before releasing the film nation (and eventually world) wide. Having finally received the approval needed from the studio, a film will finally be scheduled for release. Depending on how the studio feels the film will fare on the market, it may be released in anywhere from a dozen to thousands of theaters across the U.S. Predicting how well a film will do is never foolproof however. Some small budget films have gone above and beyond all expectations, for example, the multimillion-dollar success of the independently directed and produced film The Blair Witch Project. Other big-budget films such as Waterworld, even with big name stars, studio support and directing, lost a great deal of money. There are mixed feelings amongst directors as to whether the concern for the audience will affect the final product which he produces. Samuel Fuller (House of Bamboo) stated that he is “positive that every director or artist, painter, whether he says,”I don't care whether the people like it”, instinctively does. Otherwise he wouldn’t be doing it for public acceptance. There are others whom say they are indifferent as to whether an audience will affect the final outcome of a picture. One such director is John Huston, who explains, “I can’t do any more than make a picture that I believe in and hope that there are enough like me that want to see the picture too”.
There are of course, those directors whom emphatically deny that the audience has anything to do with the pictures they make. Stanley Kramer (Guess who's coming to Dinner?) said making his pictures has nothing to do with the audience. Jacques Demy (Lola) says he never considers the audience. Both Federico Fellini and Roberto Rossellini have admitted that they have never seen any of their own pictures and therefore cannot even comment on audience reactions to their pictures.
Reviews from critics
Many directors take what critics have to say very personally, and therefore find it better not to read reviews of their films. There will be some critics that dislike a film very much, while others find the exact same film very enduring and delightful. From a critical standpoint a film may not possess all the qualities of an Oscar-caliber picture, although the film will still bring in millions of dollars at the box office due to audience appeal. It is important for the director to take constructive criticism well but with a grain of salt. The director cannot allow one bad remark about their film to alter their thoughts and beliefs about that film. If a director truly believes in the quality of their work than reviews should account very little to them. As Paul Mazursky once stated, “I don’t take most of the critics seriously. I don’t see how you can see ten pictures a week and do a legitimate job day to day”. Robert Altman has mentioned that the only thing that he has really learned from critics is that there are people that look at film from a different point of view then his own.
An example of how reviews do not necessarily reflect the impact a movie may have is seen in a 1980 review in Variety magazine of the film Raging Bull. Directed by Martin Scorsese, Raging Bull was given mixed reviews for both its so-called “lack of quieter, introspective moments” along with “audience alienation”. Scorsese was also criticized for DeNiro’s character being a “turn-off” in that same article. Despite these criticisms, Raging Bull went on to be nominated for several Academy Awards including those for Best Actor and Best Director, and is today considered on the of the American Film Institute’s 100 best films of all time.
“If a movie gets spectacular reviews but doesn’t do business, the director is off the hook”, Michael Crichton (Westworld) explains, “If a picture gets hideous reviews and does a lot of business, everybody is content. A picture that gets bad reviews and does no business is probably going to be laid at the feet of the director. That's the style of the times.” Directors are the individuals who “translate” the script from the written page into a film. To do this a typical director may supervise hundreds of people at a time, including (but not limited to) the scriptwriters, cameramen, costume and set designers, etc. Directors are in charge of both the technical and artistic aspects of the film.
They conduct the auditions, supervise the rehearsals, and approve locations, scenery, costumes, and even the music. In short, they direct the entire cast and crew during shooting. Frequently they will have several assistant directors helping them with details such as handling extras, transporting equipment, and arranging for food and accommodations when needed. Usually, individuals who want to become directors start in another phase of filmmaking (like assisting or acting) and use their experience and varied job opportunities to eventually advance to directing. It is rare that even those who attend film school specifically for directing will graduate and immediately become a leading director on a film. There are exceptions (as mentioned), like Quentin Tarantino. Ultimately, the screenwriter’s concern is with the situational flow and the vocal sound of the film. The cameraman must attend to the particularities of each shot. The actors must concentrate on specific gestures and movements.
The editor will be confronted with the piecing together raw materials that either make implicit an already finished artistic vision, or evidence so little unity that his work becomes one of reconstruction, of attempting to produce some coherence, although his contribution in such a case will have been obstructed at the level of professionalism rather than art. Successful directors are involved in every phase of production, from the very beginning to the very end. Some directors will assume multiple roles in their films, such as director-producer, writer-director, or even writer-director-actor-producer. Whatever the role they take on, as the director, they must know how to hire the right people, fire the wrong people, and how to handle people so that they work as effectively as possible in a team atmosphere.