- •Preface to the Second Edition
- •Preface to the First Edition
- •ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- •Contents
- •1.1 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND PROBLEMS
- •2.1 INTRODUCTION
- •2.2 CORROSION BY LIQUIDS
- •2.2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.2 Crystalline Materials
- •Attack by Molten Glasses
- •Attack by Molten Salts
- •Electrochemical Corrosion
- •Attack by Molten Metals
- •Attack by Aqueous Media
- •2.2.3 Glasses
- •Bulk Glasses
- •Fiber Glass
- •Bioactive Glass
- •2.3 CORROSION BY GAS
- •2.3.1 Crystalline Materials
- •2.3.2 Vacuum
- •2.3.3 Glasses
- •2.4 CORROSION BY SOLID
- •2.5 SURFACE EFFECTS
- •2.5.1 Surface Charge
- •2.5.2 Porosity and Surface Area
- •2.5.3 Surface Energy
- •2.6 ACID/BASE EFFECTS
- •2.7 THERMODYNAMICS
- •2.7.1 Mathematical Representation
- •2.7.2 Graphical Representation
- •2.8 KINETICS
- •2.9 DIFFUSION
- •2.10 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT CONCEPTS
- •2.11 ADDITIONAL RELATED READING
- •2.12 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND PROBLEMS
- •REFERENCES
- •3.1 INTRODUCTION
- •3.2 LABORATORY TEST VS. FIELD TRIALS
- •3.3 SAMPLE SELECTION AND PREPARATION
- •3.4 SELECTION OF TEST CONDITIONS
- •3.5 CHARACTERIZATION METHODS
- •3.5.1 Microstructure and Phase Analysis
- •Visual Observation
- •Optical Microscopy
- •X-ray Diffractometry
- •Transmission Electron Microscopy
- •3.5.2 Chemical Analysis
- •Bulk Analysis
- •Surface Analysis
- •3.5.3 Physical Property Measurement
- •Gravimetry and Density
- •Porosity-Surface Area
- •Mechanical Property Tests
- •3.6 DATA REDUCTION
- •3.7 ADDITIONAL RELATED READING
- •3.8 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND PROBLEMS
- •REFERENCES
- •4.1 INTRODUCTION
- •4.2 ASTM STANDARDS
- •4.2.16 Permeability of Refractories, C-577
- •4.2.26 Lead and Cadmium Extracted from Glazed Ceramic Surfaces, C-738
- •4.3 NONSTANDARD TESTS
- •4.4 ADDITIONAL RELATED READING
- •4.5 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND PROBLEMS
- •REFERENCES
- •5.1 ATTACK BY LIQUIDS
- •5.1.1 Attack by Glasses
- •Alumina-Containing Materials
- •Zircon
- •Zirconia
- •Carbides and Nitrides
- •5.1.2 Attack by Aqueous Solutions
- •Alumina
- •Silica and Silicates
- •Concrete, Cement, Limestone, Marble, and Clay
- •Zirconia-Containing Materials
- •Superconductors
- •Titanates and Titania
- •Transition Metal Oxides
- •Carbides and Nitrides
- •5.1.3 Attack by Molten Salts
- •Oxides
- •Carbides and Nitrides
- •Superconductors
- •5.1.4 Attack by Molten Metals
- •5.2 ATTACK BY GASES
- •5.2.1 Oxides
- •Alumina
- •Alumino-Silicatcs
- •Magnesia-Containing Materials
- •Zirconia
- •5.2.2 Nitrides and Carbides
- •Silicon Nitride
- •Other Nitrides
- •Silicon Carbide
- •Other Carbides
- •5.2.3 Borides
- •5.2.4 Silicides
- •5.2.5 Superconductors
- •5.3 ATTACK BY SOLIDS
- •5.3.1 Silica
- •5.3.2 Magnesia
- •5.3.3 Superconductors
- •5.3.4 Attack by Metals
- •5.4 ADDITIONAL RELATED READING
- •5.5 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND PROBLEMS
- •REFERENCES
- •6.1 INTRODUCTION
- •6.2 SILICATE GLASSES
- •6.3 BOROSILICATE GLASSES
- •6.4 LEAD-CONTAINING GLASSES
- •6.5 PHOSPHORUS-CONTAINING GLASSES
- •6.6 FLUORIDE GLASSES
- •6.7 CHALCOGENIDE-HALIDE GLASSES
- •6.8 ADDITIONAL RELATED READING
- •6.9 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND PROBLEMS
- •REFERENCES
- •7.1 INTRODUCTION
- •7.2 REINFORCEMENT
- •7.2.1 Fibers
- •7.2.2 Fiber Coatings or Interphases
- •7.2.3 Particulates
- •7.3 CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES
- •7.3.1 Oxide-Matrix Composites
- •Al2O3-Matrix Composites
- •Other Oxide-Matrix Composites
- •7.3.2 Nonoxide-Matrix Composites
- •Si3N4 Matrix Composites
- •SiC-Matrix Composites
- •Carbon-Carbon Composites
- •Other Nonoxide Matrix Composites
- •7.4 METAL MATRIX COMPOSITES
- •7.5 POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES
- •7.6 ADDITIONAL RELATED READINGS
- •7.7 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND PROBLEMS
- •REFERENCES
- •8.1 INTRODUCTION
- •8.2 MECHANISMS
- •8.2.1 Crystalline Materials
- •8.2.2 Glassy Materials
- •8.3 DEGRADATION OF SPECIFIC MATERIALS
- •8.3.1 Degradation by Oxidation
- •Carbides and Nitrides
- •Oxynitrides
- •8.3.2 Degradation by Moisture
- •8.3.3 Degradation by Other Atmospheres
- •Carbides and Nitrides
- •Zirconia-Containing Materials
- •8.3.4 Degradation by Molten Salts
- •Carbides and Nitrides
- •Zirconia-Containing Materials
- •8.3.5 Degradation by Molten Metals
- •8.3.6 Degradation by Aqueous Solutions
- •Bioactive Materials
- •Nitrides
- •Glassy Materials
- •8.4 ADDITIONAL RELATED READING
- •8.5 EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND PROBLEMS
- •REFERENCES
- •9.1 INTRODUCTION
- •9.2 CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS—OXIDES
- •9.2.1 Property Optimization
- •9.2.2 External Methods of Improvement
- •9.3 CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS—NONOXIDES
- •9.3.1 Property Improvement
- •9.3.2 External Methods of Improvement
- •9.4 GLASSY MATERIALS
- •9.4.1 Property Optimization
- •9.4.2 External Methods of Improvement
- •REFERENCES
- •Glossary
- •Epilog
Epilog
The literature and data available on the corrosion of ceramics indicate that corrosion occurs by either one of several possible mechanisms or a combination of these mechanisms. Many similarities exist between the corrosion of crystalline and glassy ceramics, although in general glass corrodes more rapidly under identical environmental conditions.
Corrosion in either crystalline or glassy ceramics can occur by a direct process where the ceramic congruently dissolves into the corroding medium. Reaction rates are generally linear, being proportional to the duration of the test. One way to minimize this type is to saturate the corroding medium with the same chemical species that are dissolving from the ceramic. Another way to minimize this type of corrosion is to add something to the ceramic that will diffuse to the surface and react with the corroding medium forming a protective interface layer.
393
Copyright © 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
394 |
Epilog |
In another type, apparently the more common type of corrosion process, indirect, in either crystalline or glassy ceramics, species from both the corroding medium and the ceramic counterdiffuse and react at the interface forming a glassy, a crystalline, or a gaseous interface reaction product. If the interface reaction product is solid, continued corrosion can occur only by continued diffusion through the interface. In some cases, the interface reaction product may be multilayered. The reaction layer thickness may vary from a few nanometers to several hundred micrometers. Reaction rates are generally parabolic, being proportional to the square root of time. One way to minimize this type of corrosion is to prereact the ceramic to form an initial interface reaction layer that, if protective, will slow continued reaction. Another way is to add something to the ceramic that will form a layer through which diffusion will be more difficult.
In the first case discussed above, the corroding medium can be either a liquid or a gas; however, in gaseous corrosion one may not consider the dissolution to be congruent if the products are two different gases, as in the active oxidation of SiC to SiO and CO2. In the second case above, the medium can again be either liquid or gaseous with either all or part of the ceramic forming the layer. In most cases, only part of the ceramic forms the layer (i.e., selective dissolution). In corrosion by liquids, the mechanisms are different if the corroding medium is a glass/ slag versus water. In water, the first step is usually ion exchange, whereas in glass/slag attack, the first step is counter-diffusion, not quite the same as ion exchange, although ion exchange may take place in glass/slag attack.
Multicomponent ceramics generally corrode by a mixed mechanism with each step exhibiting a different and unique reaction rate. In these cases, the overall reaction rate will exhibit a mixed rate law, being neither linear nor parabolic.
Extended duration tests have indicated that the mechanism of corrosion may change after some extended time. This is especially true for oxide layers formed on nonoxide ceramics during gaseous corrosion. This change in mechanism is due to
Copyright © 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Epilog |
395 |
one or more of the following changes: crystallization of amorphous layers, alteration of crystalline phases as diffusion continues, cracking due to crystallization and alteration, and spalling. The few studies that have shown these changes indicate that one must be careful in making life-time predictions based upon data from short-time laboratory tests.
In all cases, an increase in temperature increases the rate of corrosion. The mechanism of corrosion, however, may change as temperature is increased due to crystallization of amorphous reaction layers, polymorphic transitions, melting of crystalline layers, vaporization of various species in the layer, cracking, etc.
One method of minimizing corrosion that requires more emphasis appears to be the various coating methods. These could be used to advantage in composites where the initial step is, for example, oxidation of SiC fibers. By coating the fibers before incorporation into the matrix, oxidation may be slowed or even eliminated. The object is to find a material through which the diffusion of oxygen is a minimum and then use this material to coat the fibers. The technique of electrostatic attraction in an aqueous dispersion appears attractive as a coating method for materials such as fibers.
Although the above discussion may be an oversimplification of the corrosion processes that occur in ceramics, it is a step in the direction of simplifying and unifying the whole area. All of the data and discussion about corrosion point towards the need for more in-depth diffusion and solubility studies of the various species in the different corroding media encountered in practice.
Corrosion, being an interfacial process, requires a thorough understanding of the surface structure of the materials being corroded. Thus the study of single crystals is the best method to determine the fundamentals of corrosion mechanisms. Although the crystal surface characteristics determine shortterm corrosion behavior, they may not be as important for long-term corrosion. Single crystals do lend themselves to the evaluation of the effects that various dopants have upon
Copyright © 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
396 |
Epilog |
leaching kinetics. In addition, various types of defects (e.g., vacancies, dislocations, etc.) could be incorporated into the lattice during production of the single crystals.
A large amount of published data on the corrosion of crystalline and glassy ceramics points toward the fact that more compact structures are more durable. In the study of glasses, references are made to corrosion being a function of glass structures, which are related to parameters such as composition, the number of nonbridging oxygens, the amount of crosslinking of the network structure, the degree of network packing, the density, the strength of the bonding, and the amount of covalent bonding. References have also been made to compact, strongly bonded glass structures being those with low thermal expansion and high softening points. Thus a technique that would determine the structural tightness may be sufficient to rank the durability of various materials, at least in the various compositional classes and to a specific environment. In addition to thermal expansion and softening point determinations, the determination of hardness may also yield information related to durability. Hardness is a measurement, however, that must be performed with some care, since hardness varies with the applied load and cracking and friction may interfere with the measurements. There has been no systematic study reported in the literature of the corrosion of ceramics related to properties such as expansion, hardness, or softening point.
Only through a thorough understanding of all the parameters involved can the engineer make an intelligent selection of the material that will best resist corrosion for a particular application. Only through intelligent materials selection can the cost of corrosion be minimized. Since the application of ceramics requires the optimization of properties other than corrosion resistance, a compromise among corrosion resistance, properties, and cost is generally needed.
Copyright © 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.