- •CONTENTS
- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •1 Introduction to Toxicology
- •1.1 Definition and Scope, Relationship to Other Sciences, and History
- •1.1.2 Relationship to Other Sciences
- •1.1.3 A Brief History of Toxicology
- •1.3 Sources of Toxic Compounds
- •1.3.1 Exposure Classes
- •1.3.2 Use Classes
- •1.4 Movement of Toxicants in the Environment
- •Suggested Reading
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Cell Culture Techniques
- •2.2.1 Suspension Cell Culture
- •2.2.2 Monolayer Cell Culture
- •2.2.3 Indicators of Toxicity in Cultured Cells
- •2.3 Molecular Techniques
- •2.3.1 Molecular Cloning
- •2.3.2 cDNA and Genomic Libraries
- •2.3.3 Northern and Southern Blot Analyses
- •2.3.4 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
- •2.3.5 Evaluation of Gene Expression, Regulation, and Function
- •2.4 Immunochemical Techniques
- •Suggested Reading
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 General Policies Related to Analytical Laboratories
- •3.2.1 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
- •3.2.2 QA/QC Manuals
- •3.2.3 Procedural Manuals
- •3.2.4 Analytical Methods Files
- •3.2.5 Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS)
- •3.3 Analytical Measurement System
- •3.3.1 Analytical Instrument Calibration
- •3.3.2 Quantitation Approaches and Techniques
- •3.4 Quality Assurance (QA) Procedures
- •3.5 Quality Control (QC) Procedures
- •3.6 Summary
- •Suggested Reading
- •4 Exposure Classes, Toxicants in Air, Water, Soil, Domestic and Occupational Settings
- •4.1 Air Pollutants
- •4.1.1 History
- •4.1.2 Types of Air Pollutants
- •4.1.3 Sources of Air Pollutants
- •4.1.4 Examples of Air Pollutants
- •4.1.5 Environmental Effects
- •4.2 Water and Soil Pollutants
- •4.2.1 Sources of Water and Soil Pollutants
- •4.2.2 Examples of Pollutants
- •4.3 Occupational Toxicants
- •4.3.1 Regulation of Exposure Levels
- •4.3.2 Routes of Exposure
- •4.3.3 Examples of Industrial Toxicants
- •Suggested Reading
- •5 Classes of Toxicants: Use Classes
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Metals
- •5.2.1 History
- •5.2.2 Common Toxic Mechanisms and Sites of Action
- •5.2.3 Lead
- •5.2.4 Mercury
- •5.2.5 Cadmium
- •5.2.6 Chromium
- •5.2.7 Arsenic
- •5.2.8 Treatment of Metal Poisoning
- •5.3 Agricultural Chemicals (Pesticides)
- •5.3.1 Introduction
- •5.3.3 Organochlorine Insecticides
- •5.3.4 Organophosphorus Insecticides
- •5.3.5 Carbamate Insecticides
- •5.3.6 Botanical Insecticides
- •5.3.7 Pyrethroid Insecticides
- •5.3.8 New Insecticide Classes
- •5.3.9 Herbicides
- •5.3.10 Fungicides
- •5.3.11 Rodenticides
- •5.3.12 Fumigants
- •5.3.13 Conclusions
- •5.4 Food Additives and Contaminants
- •5.5 Toxins
- •5.5.1 History
- •5.5.2 Microbial Toxins
- •5.5.3 Mycotoxins
- •5.5.4 Algal Toxins
- •5.5.5 Plant Toxins
- •5.5.6 Animal Toxins
- •5.6 Solvents
- •5.7 Therapeutic Drugs
- •5.8 Drugs of Abuse
- •5.9 Combustion Products
- •5.10 Cosmetics
- •Suggested Reading
- •6 Absorption and Distribution of Toxicants
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Cell Membranes
- •6.3 Mechanisms of Transport
- •6.3.1 Passive Diffusion
- •6.4 Physicochemical Properties Relevant to Diffusion
- •6.4.1 Ionization
- •6.5 Routes of Absorption
- •6.5.1 Extent of Absorption
- •6.5.2 Gastrointestinal Absorption
- •6.5.3 Dermal Absorption
- •6.5.4 Respiratory Penetration
- •6.6 Toxicant Distribution
- •6.6.1 Physicochemical Properties and Protein Binding
- •6.7 Toxicokinetics
- •Suggested Reading
- •7 Metabolism of Toxicants
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Phase I Reactions
- •7.2.4 Nonmicrosomal Oxidations
- •7.2.5 Cooxidation by Cyclooxygenases
- •7.2.6 Reduction Reactions
- •7.2.7 Hydrolysis
- •7.2.8 Epoxide Hydration
- •7.2.9 DDT Dehydrochlorinase
- •7.3 Phase II Reactions
- •7.3.1 Glucuronide Conjugation
- •7.3.2 Glucoside Conjugation
- •7.3.3 Sulfate Conjugation
- •7.3.4 Methyltransferases
- •7.3.7 Acylation
- •7.3.8 Phosphate Conjugation
- •Suggested Reading
- •8 Reactive Metabolites
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Activation Enzymes
- •8.3 Nature and Stability of Reactive Metabolites
- •8.4 Fate of Reactive Metabolites
- •8.4.1 Binding to Cellular Macromolecules
- •8.4.2 Lipid Peroxidation
- •8.4.3 Trapping and Removal: Role of Glutathione
- •8.5 Factors Affecting Toxicity of Reactive Metabolites
- •8.5.1 Levels of Activating Enzymes
- •8.5.2 Levels of Conjugating Enzymes
- •8.5.3 Levels of Cofactors or Conjugating Chemicals
- •8.6 Examples of Activating Reactions
- •8.6.1 Parathion
- •8.6.2 Vinyl Chloride
- •8.6.3 Methanol
- •8.6.5 Carbon Tetrachloride
- •8.6.8 Acetaminophen
- •8.6.9 Cycasin
- •8.7 Future Developments
- •Suggested Reading
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nutritional Effects
- •9.2.1 Protein
- •9.2.2 Carbohydrates
- •9.2.3 Lipids
- •9.2.4 Micronutrients
- •9.2.5 Starvation and Dehydration
- •9.2.6 Nutritional Requirements in Xenobiotic Metabolism
- •9.3 Physiological Effects
- •9.3.1 Development
- •9.3.2 Gender Differences
- •9.3.3 Hormones
- •9.3.4 Pregnancy
- •9.3.5 Disease
- •9.3.6 Diurnal Rhythms
- •9.4 Comparative and Genetic Effects
- •9.4.1 Variations Among Taxonomic Groups
- •9.4.2 Selectivity
- •9.4.3 Genetic Differences
- •9.5 Chemical Effects
- •9.5.1 Inhibition
- •9.5.2 Induction
- •9.5.3 Biphasic Effects: Inhibition and Induction
- •9.6 Environmental Effects
- •9.7 General Summary and Conclusions
- •Suggested Reading
- •10 Elimination of Toxicants
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Transport
- •10.3 Renal Elimination
- •10.4 Hepatic Elimination
- •10.4.2 Active Transporters of the Bile Canaliculus
- •10.5 Respiratory Elimination
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •11 Acute Toxicity
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Acute Exposure and Effect
- •11.3 Dose-response Relationships
- •11.4 Nonconventional Dose-response Relationships
- •11.5 Mechanisms of Acute Toxicity
- •11.5.1 Narcosis
- •11.5.2 Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition
- •11.5.3 Ion Channel Modulators
- •11.5.4 Inhibitors of Cellular Respiration
- •Suggested Reading
- •12 Chemical Carcinogenesis
- •12.1 General Aspects of Cancer
- •12.2 Human Cancer
- •12.2.1 Causes, Incidence, and Mortality Rates of Human Cancer
- •12.2.2 Known Human Carcinogens
- •12.3 Classes of Agents Associated with Carcinogenesis
- •12.3.2 Epigenetic Agents
- •12.4 General Aspects of Chemical Carcinogenesis
- •12.5 Initiation-Promotion Model for Chemical Carcinogenesis
- •12.6 Metabolic Activation of Chemical Carcinogens and DNA Adduct Formation
- •12.7 Oncogenes
- •12.8 Tumor Suppressor Genes
- •12.8.1 Inactivation of Tumor Suppressor Genes
- •12.8.2 p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene
- •12.9 General Aspects of Mutagenicity
- •12.10 Usefulness and Limitations of Mutagenicity Assays for the Identification of Carcinogens
- •Suggested Reading
- •13 Teratogenesis
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Principles of Teratology
- •13.3 Mammalian Embryology Overview
- •13.4 Critical Periods
- •13.5 Historical Teratogens
- •13.5.1 Thalidomide
- •13.5.2 Accutane (Isotetrinoin)
- •13.5.3 Diethylstilbestrol (DES)
- •13.5.4 Alcohol
- •13.6 Testing Protocols
- •13.6.1 FDA Guidelines for Reproduction Studies for Safety Evaluation of Drugs for Human Use
- •13.6.3 Alternative Test Methods
- •13.7 Conclusions
- •Suggested Reading
- •14 Hepatotoxicity
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.1.1 Liver Structure
- •14.1.2 Liver Function
- •14.2 Susceptibility of the Liver
- •14.3 Types of Liver Injury
- •14.3.1 Fatty Liver
- •14.3.2 Necrosis
- •14.3.3 Apoptosis
- •14.3.4 Cholestasis
- •14.3.5 Cirrhosis
- •14.3.6 Hepatitis
- •14.3.7 Oxidative Stress
- •14.3.8 Carcinogenesis
- •14.4 Mechanisms of Hepatotoxicity
- •14.5 Examples of Hepatotoxicants
- •14.5.1 Carbon Tetrachloride
- •14.5.2 Ethanol
- •14.5.3 Bromobenzene
- •14.5.4 Acetaminophen
- •14.6 Metabolic Activation of Hepatotoxicants
- •Suggested Reading
- •15 Nephrotoxicity
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 Structure of the Renal System
- •15.1.2 Function of the Renal System
- •15.2 Susceptibility of the Renal System
- •15.3 Examples of Nephrotoxicants
- •15.3.1 Metals
- •15.3.2 Aminoglycosides
- •15.3.3 Amphotericin B
- •15.3.4 Chloroform
- •15.3.5 Hexachlorobutadiene
- •Suggested Reading
- •16 Toxicology of the Nervous System
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 The Nervous system
- •16.2.1 The Neuron
- •16.2.2 Neurotransmitters and their Receptors
- •16.2.3 Glial Cells
- •16.3 Toxicant Effects on the Nervous System
- •16.3.1 Structural Effects of Toxicants on Neurons
- •16.3.2 Effects of Toxicants on Other Cells
- •16.4 Neurotoxicity Testing
- •16.4.1 In vivo Tests of Human Exposure
- •16.4.2 In vivo Tests of Animal Exposure
- •16.4.3 In vitro Neurochemical and Histopathological End Points
- •16.5 Summary
- •Suggested Reading
- •17 Endocrine System
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Endocrine System
- •17.2.1 Nuclear Receptors
- •17.3 Endocrine Disruption
- •17.3.1 Hormone Receptor Agonists
- •17.3.2 Hormone Receptor Antagonists
- •17.3.3 Organizational versus Activational Effects of Endocrine Toxicants
- •17.3.4 Inhibitors of Hormone Synthesis
- •17.3.5 Inducers of Hormone Clearance
- •17.3.6 Hormone Displacement from Binding Proteins
- •17.4 Incidents of Endocrine Toxicity
- •17.4.1 Organizational Toxicity
- •17.4.2 Activational Toxicity
- •17.4.3 Hypothyroidism
- •17.5 Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •18 Respiratory Toxicity
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.1.1 Anatomy
- •18.1.2 Cell Types
- •18.1.3 Function
- •18.2 Susceptibility of the Respiratory System
- •18.2.1 Nasal
- •18.2.2 Lung
- •18.3 Types of Toxic Response
- •18.3.1 Irritation
- •18.3.2 Cell Necrosis
- •18.3.3 Fibrosis
- •18.3.4 Emphysema
- •18.3.5 Allergic Responses
- •18.3.6 Cancer
- •18.3.7 Mediators of Toxic Responses
- •18.4 Examples of Lung Toxicants Requiring Activation
- •18.4.1 Introduction
- •18.4.2 Monocrotaline
- •18.4.3 Ipomeanol
- •18.4.4 Paraquat
- •18.5 Defense Mechanisms
- •Suggested Reading
- •19 Immunotoxicity
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 The Immune System
- •19.3 Immune Suppression
- •19.4 Classification of Immune-Mediated Injury (Hypersensitivity)
- •19.5 Effects of Chemicals on Allergic Disease
- •19.5.1 Allergic Contact Dermatitis
- •19.5.2 Respiratory Allergens
- •19.5.3 Adjuvants
- •19.6 Emerging Issues: Food Allergies, Autoimmunity, and the Developing Immune System
- •Suggested Reading
- •20 Reproductive System
- •20.1 Introduction
- •20.2 Male Reproductive Physiology
- •20.3 Mechanisms and Targets of Male Reproductive Toxicants
- •20.3.1 General Mechanisms
- •20.3.2 Effects on Germ Cells
- •20.3.3 Effects on Spermatogenesis and Sperm Quality
- •20.3.4 Effects on Sexual Behavior
- •20.3.5 Effects on Endocrine Function
- •20.4 Female Reproductive Physiology
- •20.5 Mechanisms and Targets of Female Reproductive Toxicants
- •20.5.1 Tranquilizers, Narcotics, and Social Drugs
- •20.5.2 Endocrine Disruptors (EDs)
- •20.5.3 Effects on Germ Cells
- •20.5.4 Effects on the Ovaries and Uterus
- •20.5.5 Effects on Sexual Behavior
- •Suggested Reading
- •21 Toxicity Testing
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Experimental Administration of Toxicants
- •21.2.1 Introduction
- •21.2.2 Routes of Administration
- •21.3 Chemical and Physical Properties
- •21.4 Exposure and Environmental Fate
- •21.5 In vivo Tests
- •21.5.1 Acute and Subchronic Toxicity Tests
- •21.5.2 Chronic Tests
- •21.5.3 Reproductive Toxicity and Teratogenicity
- •21.5.4 Special Tests
- •21.6 In vitro and Other Short-Term Tests
- •21.6.1 Introduction
- •21.6.2 Prokaryote Mutagenicity
- •21.6.3 Eukaryote Mutagenicity
- •21.6.4 DNA Damage and Repair
- •21.6.5 Chromosome Aberrations
- •21.6.6 Mammalian Cell Transformation
- •21.6.7 General Considerations and Testing Sequences
- •21.7 Ecological Effects
- •21.7.1 Laboratory Tests
- •21.7.2 Simulated Field Tests
- •21.7.3 Field Tests
- •21.8 Risk Analysis
- •21.9 The Future of Toxicity Testing
- •Suggested Reading
- •22 Forensic and Clinical Toxicology
- •22.1 Introduction
- •22.2 Foundations of Forensic Toxicology
- •22.3 Courtroom Testimony
- •22.4.1 Documentation Practices
- •22.4.2 Considerations for Forensic Toxicological Analysis
- •22.4.3 Drug Concentrations and Distribution
- •22.5 Laboratory Analyses
- •22.5.1 Colorimetric Screening Tests
- •22.5.2 Thermal Desorption
- •22.5.6 Enzymatic Immunoassay
- •22.6 Analytical Schemes for Toxicant Detection
- •22.7 Clinical Toxicology
- •22.7.1 History Taking
- •22.7.2 Basic Operating Rules in the Treatment of Toxicosis
- •22.7.3 Approaches to Selected Toxicoses
- •Suggested Reading
- •23 Prevention of Toxicity
- •23.1 Introduction
- •23.2 Legislation and Regulation
- •23.2.1 Federal Government
- •23.2.2 State Governments
- •23.2.3 Legislation and Regulation in Other Countries
- •23.3 Prevention in Different Environments
- •23.3.1 Home
- •23.3.2 Workplace
- •23.3.3 Pollution of Air, Water, and Land
- •23.4 Education
- •Suggested Reading
- •24 Human Health Risk Assessment
- •24.1 Introduction
- •24.2 Risk Assessment Methods
- •24.2.2 Exposure Assessment
- •24.2.3 Dose Response and Risk Characterization
- •24.3 Noncancer Risk Assessment
- •24.3.1 Default Uncertainty and Modifying Factors
- •24.3.2 Derivation of Developmental Toxicant RfD
- •24.3.3 Determination of RfD and RfC of Naphthalene with the NOAEL Approach
- •24.3.4 Benchmark Dose Approach
- •24.3.5 Determination of BMD and BMDL for ETU
- •24.3.6 Quantifying Risk for Noncarcinogenic Effects: Hazard Quotient
- •24.3.7 Chemical Mixtures
- •24.4 Cancer Risk Assessment
- •24.5 PBPK Modeling
- •Suggested Reading
- •25 Analytical Methods in Toxicology
- •25.1 Introduction
- •25.2 Chemical and Physical Methods
- •25.2.1 Sampling
- •25.2.2 Experimental Studies
- •25.2.3 Forensic Studies
- •25.2.4 Sample Preparation
- •25.2.6 Spectroscopy
- •25.2.7 Other Analytical Methods
- •Suggested Reading
- •26 Basics of Environmental Toxicology
- •26.1 Introduction
- •26.2 Environmental Persistence
- •26.2.1 Abiotic Degradation
- •26.2.2 Biotic Degradation
- •26.2.3 Nondegradative Elimination Processes
- •26.3 Bioaccumulation
- •26.4 Toxicity
- •26.4.1 Acute Toxicity
- •26.4.2 Mechanisms of Acute Toxicity
- •26.4.3 Chronic Toxicity
- •26.4.5 Abiotic and Biotic Interactions
- •26.5 Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •27.1 Introduction
- •27.2 Sources of Toxicants to the Environment
- •27.3 Transport Processes
- •27.3.1 Advection
- •27.3.2 Diffusion
- •27.4 Equilibrium Partitioning
- •27.5 Transformation Processes
- •27.5.1 Reversible Reactions
- •27.5.2 Irreversible Reactions
- •27.6 Environmental Fate Models
- •Suggested Reading
- •28 Environmental Risk Assessment
- •28.1 Introduction
- •28.2 Formulating the Problem
- •28.2.1 Selecting Assessment End Points
- •28.2.2 Developing Conceptual Models
- •28.2.3 Selecting Measures
- •28.3 Analyzing Exposure and Effects Information
- •28.3.1 Characterizing Exposure
- •28.3.2 Characterizing Ecological Effects
- •28.4 Characterizing Risk
- •28.4.1 Estimating Risk
- •28.4.2 Describing Risk
- •28.5 Managing Risk
- •Suggested Reading
- •29 Future Considerations for Environmental and Human Health
- •29.1 Introduction
- •29.2 Risk Management
- •29.3 Risk Assessment
- •29.4 Hazard and Exposure Assessment
- •29.5 In vivo Toxicity
- •29.6 In vitro Toxicity
- •29.7 Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology
- •29.8 Development of Selective Toxicants
- •Glossary
- •Index
80 ABSORPTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TOXICANTS
(e.g., anesthetics). Several types of lipids are found in membranes, with phospholipids and cholesterol predominating. Sphingolipids comprise the primary minor component. Phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, and phosphatidylethanolamine are the primary phosphatides, and their two fatty acid hydrocarbon chains (typically 16 to 18, but varying from 12 to 22) comprise the nonpolar region. Some of the fatty acids are unsaturated and contribute appreciably to the fluidity of the membrane.
Proteins, which have many physiological roles in normal cell function, are intimately associated with lipids and may be located throughout lipid bilayers. These proteins may be located on either the surface or traverse the entire structure. Hydrophobic forces are responsible for maintaining the structural integrity of proteins and lipids within membranes, but movement within the membranes may occur. External and internal membrane proteins can function as receptors. Many proteins that traverse the membrane are transport proteins, and are involved in translocation of ligands; that is, they are involved in active and facilitated transport.
Complexes of intrinsic membrane proteins and lipids can form hydrophilic or hydrophobic channels that allow transport of molecules with different physicochemical characteristics. The amphipathic nature of the membrane creates a barrier for ionized, highly polar drugs, although it does not completely exclude them. The presence of pores of approximately 4 A˚ are believed to allow for ready movement of small molecules such as water. Thus certain molecules that ordinarily would be excluded can rapidly traverse the highly lipid membrane barrier.
It is worth noting that differences among membranes, such as the presence of different lipids, the amount of surface lipid, differences in size and shape of proteins, or physical features of bonding, may cause differences in permeability among membranes. These biochemical and biophysical differences are thought to be responsible for permeability differences in skin from different anatomical regions of the body.
6.3MECHANISMS OF TRANSPORT
In general, there are four main ways by which small molecules cross biological lipid membranes:
1.Passive diffusion. Diffusion occurs through the lipid membrane.
2.Filtration. Diffusion occurs through aqueous pores.
3.Special transport. Transport is aided by a carrier molecule, which act as a “ferryboat.”
4.Endocytosis. Transport takes the form of pinocytosis for liquids and phagocytosis for solids.
The first and third routes are important in relation to pharmacokinetic mechanisms. The aqueous pores are too small in diameter for diffusion of most drugs and toxicant, although important for movement of water and small polar molecules (e.g., urea). Pinocytosis is important for some macromolecules (e.g., insulin crossing the bloodbrain barrier).
6.3.1Passive Diffusion
Most drugs and toxicant pass through membranes by simple diffusion down a concentration gradient. The driving force being the concentration gradient across the membrane.
MECHANISMS OF TRANSPORT |
81 |
This diffusion process can continue until equilibrium, although in reality there is always movement but the net flux is zero. Eventually the concentration of unionized or unbound (free) toxicant is the same on either side of the membrane. In other words, there is no competition of molecules and there is generally a lack of saturation. Solubility in the lipid bilayer is important, and the greater the partition coefficient, the higher is the concentration in the membrane, and the greater is the rate of diffusion across the membrane. For ionized toxicants the steady state concentration is dependent on the differences in pH across the membrane. Most membranes are relatively permeable to water either by diffusion or by flow that results from hydrostatic or osmotic differences across the membrane, and bulk flow of water can also carry with it small and water soluble molecules by this mechanism. These substances generally have a molecular weight of less than 200. Although inorganic ions are small and will readily diffuse across some membranes, their hydrated ionic radius is relatively large. In such cases active transport is required (see below). Specific ion fluxes are also controlled by specific channels that are important in nerves, muscles, and signal transduction.
We can now quantitate the rate at which a toxicant can be transported by passive diffusion, and this can be described by Fick’s law of diffusion as follows:
|
|
= |
d |
× Pc |
H − |
L |
|
|
Rate of diffusion |
|
D × Sa |
(C |
C ), |
||
|
|
|
|
||||
where |
D is the diffusion coefficient, Sa is the |
surface area of the membrane, Pc |
|||||
is the |
partition coefficient, d is the |
membrane |
|
thickness, |
and CH and CL are the |
concentrations at both sides of the membrane (high and low, respectively). The first part of this equation (DPc /d) represents the permeability coefficient of the drug. The permeability expresses the ease of penetration of a chemical and has units of velocity, distance/time (cm/h).
The diffusion coefficient or diffusivity of the toxicant, D, is primarily dependent on solubility of the toxicant in the membrane and its molecular weight and molecular conformation. Depending on the membrane, there is a functional molecular size and/or weight cutoff that prevents very large molecules from being passively absorbed across any membrane. One would expect small molecular weight molecules to diffuse more rapidly than larger molecular weight toxicants. Therefore the magnitude of a toxicant’s diffusion coefficient really reflects the ease with which it is able to diffuse through the membrane. The reader should also be aware that as a toxicant crosses from the donor or aqueous medium and through the membrane medium, there are really two diffusion environments and thus two diffusion coefficients to consider. Another important factor that can influence the diffusion coefficient is membrane viscosity. This physicochemical characteristic should remain constant in biological systems but can be modified in skin membranes exposed to various pharmaceutical or pesticide formulations. Formulation additives or excipients may enter the membrane barrier and reversibly or irreversibly change viscosity and thus diffusion coefficient of the drug or pesticide in the barrier membranes of the skin.
The partition coefficient, which will be described in more detail later in this chapter, is the relative solubility of the compound in lipid and water, and the compound’s solubility really reflects the ability of the toxicant to move from a relatively aqueous environment across a lipid membrane. It is this factor that is often manipulated in pesticide and drug formulations to create a vehicle. Membrane permeability is therefore strongly correlated to the lipid solubility of the toxicant in the membrane as well as
82 ABSORPTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TOXICANTS
the aqueous environment surrounding the membrane. Please be aware that there are instances where partition coefficient or lipid solubility of the toxicant may be very large, and there may be a tendency for the drug to sequester in the membrane. Membrane surface area and membrane thickness can also vary across different organs in the body, but one does not expect these two factors in Fick’s equation to vary considerably. The final component of Fick’s equation is the concentration gradient (CH − CL) across the membrane, which is the driving force for diffusion, and as will be demonstrated below in our discussion on first-order kinetics, is the most important factor dictating the rate of transport across most biological membranes.
First-Order Kinetics. When the rate of a process is dependent on a rate constant and a concentration gradient, a linear or first-order kinetic process will be operative. The reader should be aware that there are numerous deviations from the first-order process when chemical transport in vivo is analyzed, and this can be deemed an approximation since, in many barriers, penetration is slow and a long period of time is required to achieve steady state.
The rate of movement of a toxicant across a membrane may be expressed as the change in amount of toxicant, A, (dA) or toxicant concentration, C, (dC) per unit of time (dt), which equals dA/dt. Calculus can be used to express instantaneous rates over very small time intervals (dt). Thus rate processes may then be generally expressed as
dA = KAn dt
where dA/dt is the rate of chemical (X) movement (e.g. absorption, distribution, elimination), K is the rate constant of the process, and n is the kinetic order of the transport process (e.g., absorption). The n either equals 1 (first order) or 0 (zero order). Thus the first-order rate equation is written as
dA = KA1 = KA, dt
and the zero-order rate equation as
dA = KA0 = K. dt
We know from Fick’s law that the rate of diffusion (now expressed as dA/dt) is
dA |
= |
DžSažPc(A1 − A2) |
. |
dt |
|
||
d |
Once a toxicant crosses a membrane, it is rapidly removed from the “receiving side” (compartment B in Figure 6.3) either by uptake into the blood stream or elimination from the organism. Thus it is A1 that is the primary driving force, and if we replace this with A in all equations, then
dt |
= |
ž dž |
A. |
dA |
|
D Sa |
Pc |
MECHANISMS OF TRANSPORT |
83 |
Figure 6.3 Illustration of concentration gradient generated by administration of a drug that can travel down this gradient from area A and across a biological membrane to area B.
If we let K = (DžSažPc/d), then, since A is present in the equation, n must equal 1, so we have a first-order rate process. Fick’s law of diffusion, which is important for quantitating rates of absorption, distribution, and elimination, is thus the basis for using first-order kinetics in most pharmacokinetic models.
Therefore in a first-order process, the rate of drug movement is directly proportional to the amount of drug (A) in the body, which is usually a function of the dose. K is the first-order fractional rate constant with units of liters/time (time−1) and represents the fraction of drug that is transported per unit of time. Thus in a first-order process, the rate of drug movement is proportional to dose but the fraction moved per unit of time is constant and independent of dose.
When first-order kinetics hold, a simple relationship exists between the penetration rate constant, K, and t0.5 (time necessary for one-half of the applied dose to penetrate):
K = 0.693 ,
t0.5
where the units of K are a percentage of the change/time unit. We can also derive the concentration of the toxicant if we know the volume or volume of distribution (Vd ) of the toxicant compartment as
Vd (volume) = |
A(mass) |
|
|
. |
|
C(mass/volume) |
(Vd is discussed in more detail later in this chapter.)
6.3.2Carrier-Mediated Membrane Transport
This mechanism is important for compounds that lack sufficient lipid solubility to move rapidly across the membrane by simple diffusion. A membrane-associated protein is usually involved, specificity, competitive inhibition, and the saturation phenomenon and their kinetics are best described by Michaelis-Menton enzyme kinetic models. Membrane penetration by this mechanism is more rapid than simple diffusion and, in the case of active transport, may proceed beyond the point where concentrations are equal on both
84 ABSORPTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TOXICANTS
sides of the membrane. Generally, there are two types of specialized carrier-mediated transport processes:
Passive facilitated diffusion involves movement down a concentration gradient without an input of energy. This mechanism, which may be highly selective for specific conformational structures, is necessary for transport of endogenous compounds whose rate of transport by simple diffusion would otherwise be too slow. The classical example of facilitated diffusion is transport of glucose into red blood cells.
Active transport requires energy, and transport is against a concentration. Maintenance against this gradient requires energy. It is often coupled to energy-producing enzymes (e.g., ATPase) or to the transport of other molecules (e.g., Na+, Cl−, H+) that generate energy as they cross the membranes. Carrier-mediated drug transport can occur in only a few sites in the body, and the main sites are
žBBB, neuronal membranes, choroid plexus
žRenal tubular cells
žHepatocytes, biliary tract
There are instances in which toxicants have chemical or structural similarities to endogenous chemicals that rely on these special transport mechanisms for normal physiological uptake and can thus utilize the same system for membrane transport. Useful examples of drugs known to be transported by this mechanism include levodopa, which is used in treating Parkinson’s disease, and fluorouracil, a cytotoxic drug. Levodopa is taken up by the carrier that normally transports phenylalanine, and fluorouracil is transported by the system that carries the natural pyrimidines, thymine, and uracil. Iron is absorbed by a specific carrier in the mucosal cells of the jejunum, and calcium by a vitamin D-dependent carrier system. Lead may be more quickly moved by a transport system that is normally involved in the uptake of calcium.
For carrier-mediated transport, the rate of movement across a membrane will now be constant, since flux is dependent on the capacity of the membrane carriers and not the mass of the chemical to be transported. These processes are described by zero-order kinetic rate equations of the form:
dX = KX0 = K0. dt
K0 is now the zero-order rate constant and is expressed in terms of mass/time. In an active carrier-mediated transport process following zero-order kinetics, the rate of drug transport is always equal to K once the system is fully loaded or saturated. At subsaturation levels, the rate is initially first order as the carriers become loaded with the toxicant, but at concentrations normally encountered in pharmacokinetics, the rate becomes constant. Thus, as dose increases, the rate of transport does not increase in proportion to dose as it does with the fractional rate constant seen in first-order process. This is illustrated in the Table 6.1 where it is assumed that the first-order rate constant is 0.1 (10% per minute) and the zero-order rate is 10 mg/min.
In the case of first order, these amounts will subsequently diminish (10% of 900 is 90, etc.). In the case of zero order, the amount transported does not vary with time (constant rate of transport).
- #15.08.20134.04 Mб14Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. - The Elements of Statistical Learning Data Mining, Inference and Prediction (2002)(en).djvu
- #
- #
- #
- #
- #
- #
- #
- #15.08.201315.44 Mб23Hudlicky M, Pavlath A.E. (eds.) - Chemistry of Organic Fluorine Compounds 2[c] A critical Review (1995)(en).djvu
- #
- #