Fitts D.D. - Principles of Quantum Mechanics[c] As Applied to Chemistry and Chemical Physics (1999)(en)
.pdf222 |
Systems of identical particles |
ging two columns and hence changes the sign of the determinant. Moreover, if any pair of particles are in the same single-particle state, then two rows of the Slater determinant are identical and the determinant vanishes, in agreement with the Pauli exclusion principle.
Although the concept of non-interacting particles is an idealization, the model may be applied to real systems as an approximation when the interactions between particles are small. Such an approximation is often useful as a starting point for more extensive calculations, such as those discussed in Chapter 9.
Probability densities
The difference in behavior between bosons and fermions is clearly demonstrated by their probability densities jØS j2 and jØAj2. For a pair of noninteracting bosons, we have from equation (8.49a)
jØS j2 12jøa(1)j2jøb(2)j2 12jøa(2)j2jøb(1)j2 Re[øa (1)øb (2)øa(2)øb(1)]
(8:52)
For a pair of non-interacting fermions, equation (8.49b) gives
jØAj2 12jøa(1)j2jøb(2)j2 12jøa(2)j2jøb(1)j2 ÿ Re[øa (1)øb (2)øa(2)øb(1)]
(8:53)
The probability density for a pair of distinguishable particles with particle 1 in state a and particle 2 in state b is jøa(1)j2jøb(2)j2. If the distinguishable particles are interchanged, the probability density is jøa(2)j2jøb(1)j2. The probability density for one distinguishable particle (either one) being in state a and the other in state b is, then
12jøa(1)j2jøb(2)j2 12jøa(2)j2jøb(1)j2
which appears in both jØS j2 and jØAj2. The last term on the right-hand sides of equations (8.52) and (8.53) arises because the particles are indistinguishable and this term is known as the exchange density or overlap density. Since the exchange density is added in jØS j2 and subtracted in jØAj2, it is responsible for the different behavior of bosons and fermions.
The values of jØS j2 and jØAj2 when the two particles have the same coordinate value, say q0, so that q1 q2 q0, are
8.4 Non-interacting particles |
223 |
jØS j20 12jøa(q0)j2jøb(q0)j2 12jøa(q0)j2jøb(q0)j2
Re[øa (q0)øb (q0)øa(q00øb(q0)]
2jøa(q0)j2jøb(q0)j2
jØAj20 12jøa(q0)j2jøb(q0)j2 12jøa(q0)j2jøb(q0)j2
ÿ Re[øa (q0)øb (q0)øa(q0)øb(q0)]
0
Thus, the two bosons have an increased probability density of being at the same point in space, while the two fermions have a vanishing probability density of being at the same point. This conclusion also applies to systems with N identical particles. Identical bosons (fermions) behave as though they are under the in¯uence of mutually attractive (repulsive) forces. These apparent forces are called exchange forces, although they are not forces in the mechanical sense, but rather statistical results.
The exchange density in equations (8.52) and (8.53) is important only when the single-particle wave functions øa(q) and øb(q) overlap substantially. Suppose that the probability density jøa(q)j2 is negligibly small except in a region A and that jøb(q)j2 is negligibly small except in a region B, which does not overlap with region A. The quantities øa (1)øb(1) and øb (2)øa(2) are then negligibly small and the exchange density essentially vanishes. For q1 in region A and q2 in region B, only the ®rst term jøa(1)j2jøb(2)j2 on the right-hand sides of equations (8.52) and (8.53) is important. This expression is just the probability density for particle 1 con®ned to region A and particle 2 con®ned to region B. The two particles become distinguishable by means of their locations and their joint wave function does not need to be made symmetric or antisymmetric. Thus, only particles whose probability densities overlap to a non-negligible extent need to be included in the symmetrization process. For example, electrons in a non-bonded atom and electrons within a molecule possess antisymmetric wave functions; electrons in neighboring atoms and molecules are too remote to be included.
Electron spin and the helium atom
We may express the single-particle wave function øn(qi) as the product of a spatial wave function ön(ri) and a spin function ÷(i). For a fermion with spin 12, such as an electron, there are just two spin states, which we designate by á(i) for ms 12 and â(i) for ms ÿ12. Therefore, for two particles there are three symmetric spin wave functions
224 |
Systems of identical particles |
||
|
á(1)á(2) |
||
|
â(1)â(2) |
||
|
2ÿ1=2[á(1)â(2) |
|
á(2)â(1)] |
|
|
|
|
and one antisymmetric spin wave function |
|
||
|
2ÿ1=2[á(1)â(2) |
ÿ |
á(2)â(1)] |
|
|
|
where the factors 2ÿ1=2 are normalization constants. When the spatial and spin wave functions are combined, there are four antisymmetric combinations: a singlet state (S 0)
12[öa(1)öb(2) öa(2)öb(1)][á(1)â(2) ÿ á(2)â(1)]
and three triplet states (S 1)
8 <á(1)á(2)
2ÿ1=2[öa(1)öb(2) ÿ öa(2)öb(1)]: â(1)â(2)
2ÿ1=2[á(1)â(2) á(2)â(1)]
These four antisymmetric wave functions are normalized if the single-particle spatial wave functions ön(ri) are normalized. If the two fermions are in the same state öa(ri), then only the singlet state occurs
2ÿ1=2öa(1)öa(2)[á(1)â(2) ÿ á(2)â(1)]
The helium atom serves as a simple example for the application of this
construction. If the nucleus (for which |
Z 2) is considered to be ®xed in |
|||||||||||
space, the Hamiltonian operator |
^ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
H for the two electrons is |
|
|||||||||||
^ |
|
"2 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
Ze92 |
|
Ze92 |
|
e92 |
|
H |
ÿ |
2me (=1 |
=2) |
ÿ r1 |
ÿ r2 |
r12 |
(8:54) |
where r1 and r2 are the distances of electrons 1 and 2 from the nucleus, r12 is the distance between the two electrons, and e9 e for CGS units or e9 e=(4ðå0)1=2 for SI units. Spin±orbit and spin±spin interactions of the electrons are small and have been neglected. The electron±electron interaction is relatively small in comparison with the interaction between an electron and a nucleus, so that as a crude ®rst-order approximation the last term on the right-
hand side of equation (8.54) may be neglected. The operator ^ then becomes
H
the sum of two hydrogen-atom Hamiltonian operators with Z 2. The corresponding single-particle states are the hydrogen-like atomic orbitals ønlm discussed in Section 6.4. The energy of the helium atom depends on the principal quantum numbers n1 and n2 of the two electrons and is the sum of two hydrogen-like atomic energies with Z 2
|
ÿ |
2"2 |
n12 |
n22 |
ÿ |
n12 |
n22 |
||
|
|
me Z2 e94 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
En1,n2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54:4 eV |
|
|
8.4 Non-interacting particles |
225 |
In the ground state of helium, according to this model, the two electrons are in the 1s orbital with opposing spins. The ground-state wave function is
Ø0(1, 2) 2ÿ1=21s(1)1s(2)[á(1)â(2) ÿ á(2)â(1)]
and the ground-state energy is ÿ108:8 eV. The energy of the ground state of the helium ion He , for which n1 1 and n2 1, is ÿ54.4 eV. In Section 9.6, we consider the contribution of the electron±electron repulsion term to the ground-state energy of helium and obtain more realistic values.
Although the orbital energies for a hydrogen-like atom depend only on the principal quantum number n, for a multi-electron atom these orbital energies increase as the azimuthal quantum number l increases. The reason is that the electron probability density near the nucleus decreases as l increases, as shown in Figure 6.5. Therefore, on average, an electron with a larger l value is screened from the attractive force of the nucleus by the inner electrons more than an electron with a smaller l value, thereby increasing its energy. Thus, the 2s orbital has a lower energy than the 2p orbitals.
Following this argument, in the ®rstand second-excited states, the electrons are placed in the 1s and 2s orbitals. The antisymmetric spatial wave function has the lower energy, so that the ®rst-excited state Ø1(1, 2) is a triplet state,
8 <á(1)á(2)
Ø1(1, 2) 2ÿ1=2[1s(1)2s(2) ÿ 1s(2)2s(1)] â(1)â(2)
:2ÿ1=2[á(1)â(2) á(2)â(1)]
and the second-excited state Ø2(1, 2) is a singlet state
Ø2(1, 2) 12[1s(1)2s(2) 1s(2)2s(1)][á(1)â(2) ÿ á(2)â(1)]
Similar constructions apply to higher excited states. The triplet states are called orthohelium, while the singlet states are called parahelium. For a given pair of atomic orbitals, the orthohelium has the lower energy. In constructing these excited states, we place one of the electrons in the 1s atomic orbital and the other in an excited atomic orbital. If both electrons were placed in excited orbitals (n1 > 2, n2 > 2), the resulting energy would be equal to or greater than ÿ27.2 eV, which is greater than the energy of He , and the atom would ionize.
This same procedure may be used to explain, in a qualitative way, the chemical behavior of the elements in the periodic table. The application of the Pauli exclusion principle to the ground states of multi-electron atoms is discussed in great detail in most elementary textbooks on the principles of chemistry and, therefore, is not repeated here.
226 |
Systems of identical particles |
|
8.5 The free-electron gas |
The concept of non-interacting fermions may be applied to electrons in a metal. A metal consists of an ordered three-dimensional array of atoms in which some of the valence electrons are so weakly bound to their parent atoms that they form an `electron gas'. These mobile electrons then move in the Coulombic ®eld produced by the array of ionized atoms. In addition, the mobile electrons repel each other according to Coulomb's law. For a given mobile electron, its Coulombic interactions with the ions and the other mobile electrons are longranged and are relatively constant over the range of the electron's position. Consequently, as a ®rst-order approximation, the mobile electrons may be treated as a gas of identical non-interacting fermions in a constant potential energy ®eld.
The free-electron gas was ®rst applied to a metal by A. Sommerfeld (1928) and this application is also known as the Sommerfeld model. Although the model does not give results that are in quantitative agreement with experiments, it does predict the qualitative behavior of the electronic contribution to the heat capacity, electrical and thermal conductivity, and thermionic emission. The reason for the success of this model is that the quantum effects due to the antisymmetric character of the electronic wave function are very large and dominate the effects of the Coulombic interactions.
Each of the electrons in the free-electron gas may be regarded as a particle in a three-dimensional box, as discussed in Section 2.8. Energies may be de®ned relative to the constant potential energy ®eld due to the electron±ion and electron±electron interactions in the metallic crystal, so that we may arbitrarily set this potential energy equal to zero without loss of generality. Since the mobile electrons are not allowed to leave the metal, the potential energy outside the metal is in®nite. For simplicity, we assume that the metallic crystal is a cube of volume v with sides of length a, so that v a3. As given by equations (2.82) and (2.83), the single-particle wave functions and energy
levels are |
r••• |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
nxðx |
|
nyðy |
|
nzðz |
|
|||||
ønx,n y,nz |
|
8 |
|
sin |
sin |
sin |
(8:55) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
v |
|
|
|
a |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
a |
a |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
h2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Enx,n y,nz |
|
|
|
(n2x n2y n2z ) |
|
|
(8:56) |
||||||
|
8me a2 |
|
|
where me is the electronic mass and the quantum numbers nx, ny, nz have values nx, ny, nz 1, 2, 3, . . . :
We next consider a three-dimensional cartesian space with axes nx, ny, nz. Each point in this n-space with positive (but non-zero) integer values of nx, ny,
228 Systems of identical particles
|
|
|
|
8ðv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Etot |
|
|
|
(2me)3=2 EF |
5=2 |
||||||
|
5h3 |
|
|||||||||||
which may be simpli®ed to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Etot |
3 |
NEF |
(8:62) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
5 |
|||||||||
The average energy E per electron is, then |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Etot |
|
|
|
3 |
|
||
|
|
|
E |
|
|
(8:63) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
EF |
|||||||
|
|
|
N |
|
5 |
Equations (8.57) and (8.58) are valid only for values of E suf®ciently large and for energy levels suf®ciently close together that E can be treated as a continuous variable. For a metallic crystal of volume 1 cm3, the lowest energy level is about 10ÿ14 eV and the spacing between levels is likewise of the order of 10ÿ14 eV. Since metals typically possess about 1022 to 1023 free electrons per cm3, the Fermi energy EF is about 1.5 to 8 eV and the average energy E per electron is about 1 to 5 eV. Thus, for all practical purposes, the energy of the lowest level may be taken as zero and the energy values may be treated as continuous.
The smooth surface of the spherical octant in n-space which de®nes the Fermi energy cuts through some of the unit cubic cells that represent singleparticle states. The replacement of what should be a ragged surface by a smooth surface results in a negligible difference because the density of singleparticle states near the Fermi energy EF is so large that E is essentially continuous. At the Fermi energy EF, the density of single-particle states is
|
2ðvm 3N |
|
1=3 |
||
ù(EF) |
e |
|
|
|
(8:64) |
h2 |
ðv |
which typically is about 1022 to 1023 states per eV. Thus, near the Fermi energy EF, a differential energy range dE of 10ÿ10 eV contains about 1011 to 1012 doubly occupied single-particle states.
Since the potential energy of the electrons in the free-electron gas is assumed to be zero, all the energy of the mobile electrons is kinetic. The electron velocity uF at the Fermi level EF is given by
|
21me uF2 EF |
(8:65) |
|||||
and the average electron velocity |
u |
is given by |
|
||||
21me |
|
2 |
|
53EF |
(8:66) |
||
|
|
E |
|||||
u |
|||||||
For electrons in a metal, these velocities are on the order of 108 cm sÿ1. |
|
||||||
The Fermi temperature TF is de®ned by the relation |
|
||||||
|
EF kB TF |
(8:67) |
8.6 |
Bose±Einstein condensation |
229 |
where kB is Boltzmann's |
constant, and typically ranges |
from 18 000 K to |
90 000 K for metals. At temperatures up to the melting temperature, we have the relationship
kB T EF
Thus, even at temperatures well above absolute zero, the electrons are essentially all in the lowest possible energy states. As a result, the electronic heat capacity at constant volume, which equals dEtot=dT, is small at ordinary temperatures and approaches zero at low temperatures.
The free-electron gas exerts a pressure on the walls of the in®nite potential well in which it is contained. If the volume v of the gas is increased slightly by an amount dv, then the energy levels Enx,n y,nz in equation (8.56) decrease slightly and consequently the Fermi energy EF in equation (8.60) and the total energy Etot in (8.62) also decrease. The change in total energy of the gas is equal to the work ÿP dv done on the gas by the surroundings, where P is the pressure of the gas. Thus, we have
P ÿ |
dEtot |
ÿ |
3N dEF |
|
2NEF |
|
2Etot |
(8:68) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
dv |
5 dv |
|
5v |
|
3v |
where equations (8.60) and (8.62) have been used. For a typical metal, the pressure P is of the order of 106 atm.
8.6 Bose±Einstein condensation
The behavior of a system of identical bosons is in sharp contrast to that for fermions. At low temperatures, non-interacting fermions of spin s ®ll the single-particle states with the lowest energies, 2s 1 particles in each state. Non-interacting bosons, on the other hand, have no restrictions on the number of particles that can occupy any given single-particle state. Therefore, at extremely low temperatures, all of the bosons drop into the ground singleparticle state. This phenomenon is known as Bose±Einstein condensation.
Although A. Einstein predicted this type of behavior in 1924, only recently has Bose±Einstein condensation for weakly interacting bosons been observed experimentally. In one study,2 a cloud of rubidium-87 atoms was cooled to a temperature of 170 3 10ÿ9 K (170 nK), at which some of the atoms began to condense into the single-particle ground state. The condensation continued as the temperature was lowered to 20 nK, ®nally giving about 2000 atoms in the ground state. In other studies, small gaseous samples of sodium atoms3 and of
2 M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell (1995) Science 269, 198.
3K. B. Davis, M.-O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle (1995) Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969.
Problems |
231 |
8.8The atomic weight of silver is 107.9 g molÿ1 and its density is 10.49 g cmÿ3. Assuming that each silver atom has one conduction electron, calculate
(a)the Fermi energy and the average electronic energy (in joules and in eV),
(b)the average electronic velocity,
(c)the Fermi temperature,
(d)the pressure of the electron gas.
8.9The bulk modulus or modulus of compression B is de®ned by
@P @v T
Show that B for a free-electron gas is given by B 5P/3.