- •1 Introduction
- •1.1 Historical Survey
- •1.2 Patterns in Nonlinear Optical Resonators
- •1.2.1 Localized Structures: Vortices and Solitons
- •1.2.2 Extended Patterns
- •1.3.3 Optical Feedback Loops
- •1.4 The Contents of this Book
- •References
- •2 Order Parameter Equations for Lasers
- •2.1 Model of a Laser
- •2.2 Linear Stability Analysis
- •2.3 Derivation of the Laser Order Parameter Equation
- •2.3.1 Adiabatic Elimination
- •2.3.2 Multiple-Scale Expansion
- •References
- •3 Order Parameter Equations for Other Nonlinear Resonators
- •3.1 Optical Parametric Oscillators
- •3.2.1 Linear Stability Analysis
- •3.2.2 Scales
- •3.2.3 Derivation of the OPE
- •3.3.1 Linear Stability Analysis
- •3.3.2 Scales
- •3.3.3 Derivation of the OPE
- •3.4 The Order Parameter Equation for Photorefractive Oscillators
- •3.4.1 Description and Model
- •3.4.2 Adiabatic Elimination and Operator Inversion
- •3.5 Phenomenological Derivation of Order Parameter Equations
- •References
- •4.1 Hydrodynamic Form
- •4.2 Optical Vortices
- •4.2.3 Intermediate Cases
- •4.3 Vortex Interactions
- •References
- •5.2 Domains of Tilted Waves
- •5.3 Square Vortex Lattices
- •References
- •6 Resonators with Curved Mirrors
- •6.1 Weakly Curved Mirrors
- •6.2 Mode Expansion
- •6.2.1 Circling Vortices
- •6.2.2 Locking of Transverse Modes
- •6.3 Degenerate Resonators
- •References
- •7 The Restless Vortex
- •7.1 The Model
- •7.2 Single Vortex
- •7.3 Vortex Lattices
- •7.3.2 Parallel translation of a vortex lattice
- •7.4.1 Mode Expansion
- •7.4.2 Phase-Insensitive Modes
- •7.4.3 Phase-Sensitive Modes
- •References
- •8 Domains and Spatial Solitons
- •8.1 Subcritical Versus Supercritical Systems
- •8.2 Mechanisms Allowing Soliton Formation
- •8.2.1 Supercritical Hopf Bifurcation
- •8.2.2 Subcritical Hopf Bifurcation
- •8.3 Amplitude and Phase Domains
- •8.4 Amplitude and Phase Spatial Solitons
- •References
- •9 Subcritical Solitons I: Saturable Absorber
- •9.1 Model and Order Parameter Equation
- •9.2 Amplitude Domains and Spatial Solitons
- •9.3 Numerical Simulations
- •9.3.1 Soliton Formation
- •9.4 Experiments
- •References
- •10.2 Spatial Solitons
- •10.2.1 One-Dimensional Case
- •10.2.2 Two-Dimensional Case
- •References
- •11 Phase Domains and Phase Solitons
- •11.2 Phase Domains
- •11.3 Dynamics of Domain Boundaries
- •11.3.1 Variational Approach
- •11.4 Phase Solitons
- •11.5 Nonmonotonically Decaying Fronts
- •11.7 Domain Boundaries and Image Processing
- •References
- •12 Turing Patterns in Nonlinear Optics
- •12.1 The Turing Mechanism in Nonlinear Optics
- •12.2.1 General Case
- •12.2.2 Laser with Saturable Absorber
- •12.3.1 Turing Instability in a DOPO
- •12.3.2 Stochastic Patterns
- •References
- •13 Three-Dimensional Patterns
- •13.1 The Synchronously Pumped DOPO
- •13.1.1 Order Parameter Equation
- •13.3 The Nondegenerate OPO
- •13.4 Conclusions
- •13.4.1 Tunability of a System with a Broad Gain Band
- •13.4.2 Analogy Between 2D and 3D Cases
- •References
- •14 Patterns and Noise
- •14.1 Noise in Condensates
- •14.1.1 Spatio-Temporal Noise Spectra
- •14.1.2 Numerical Results
- •14.1.3 Consequences
- •14.2 Noisy Stripes
- •14.2.1 Spatio-Temporal Noise Spectra
- •14.2.2 Stochastic Drifts
- •14.2.3 Consequences
- •References
214 14 Patterns and Noise
temporal step ∆t is equivalent to a particular cuto frequency ωmax of the temporal spectrum, with ωmax = 2π/∆t. In order to account for this finite temporal resolution, the integration of (14.9) should be performed not over all frequencies, but over [0, ωmax]. This integration, however, leads to a power-law decay for short wavenumbers, and not to the expected exponential decay. We have no explanation for this discrepancy between the analytical and numerical results.
We performed a series of numerical calculations in which the size of the temporal step was varied, in order to interpolate the spectra over the total range of spatial frequencies. The result can be represented as
S(k) = |
T πC/ωmax |
(14.13) |
exp (k2C/ωmax) − 1 . |
Here C is a constant of order one. Equation (14.13) reproduces correctly the numerically obtained spectra in both asymptotic limits of k → 0 and k → ∞. For intermediate values of wavelength, a transition between a power law and an exponential decay is predicted by (14.11), exactly as found in the numerical calculations. In this way, the numerical results show that the spatial spectrum of the CGL equation in the case of limited temporal resolution coincides precisely with a Bose–Einstein distribution, whereas the spectrum in the case of unlimited temporal resolution follows a power law.
14.1.3 Consequences
To conclude this section, we show analytically and numerically that the power spectra of spatially extended systems with order–disorder transitions obey power laws: the spatial noise spectra are of 1/k2 form, thus being Bose– Einstein-like. The temporal noise spectra of the CGL equation are shown to be of 1/ωα form, with the exponent α = 2 − D/2 depending explicitly only on the dimension of the space D. Spatially extended systems with order– disorder transitions are described by a CGL equation with stochastic forces (14.1); this equation accounts for the symmetries of the phase space (Hopf bifurcation) and the symmetries of the physical space (rotational and translational invariance).
All ordered states in nature are, presumably, oneto three-dimensional. This corresponds to exponents of the 1/ωα noise satisfying 1/2 < α < 3/2, according to our model, which corresponds well with the experimentally observed exponents of 1/ωα noise (for reviews of 1/f noise, see [7]). The exponent is found experimentally to lie in the range 0.6 < α < 1.4 [7], depending on the particular system. Another prominent feature of 1/ω noise is that the spectrum usually extends over many decades of frequency with constant α, which also follows simply and naturally from our model.
The model presented here for 1/ω noise comprises the two most accepted models for 1/ω noise. In [8], 1/ω noise is interpreted as a result of a superposition of Lorentzian spectra, requiring a somewhat unphysical assumption of
14.1 Noise in Condensates |
215 |
a specific distribution of damping rates. In our model, the 1/ω spectrum also results formally from a superposition of stochastic spatial modes (see (14.5) and (14.6)). However, the distribution of the damping rates f(γ) (γ = k2 in our case) results naturally from the dimensionality of the space and is universally valid.
There is also a relation to the model of self-organized criticality [9], in that the phase variable in our model is always in a critical state, as (14.3b) indicates. This analogy with self-organized criticality for the phase variable is a consequence of the phase invariance in the Hopf bifurcation. Consequently, one would expect that the noise power spectra of models of self-organized criticality would show the same dependence on the spatial dimension, α = 2 − D/2, as found here. To our knowledge, no detailed investigations of the dependence of α on the dimension of the space have been performed for self-organized criticality.
The above dependence of α on the dimension of the space leads to general conclusions concerning the stability of the ordered state of the system. The integral of the 1/ωα power spectrum always diverges in the limit of either large or small frequency, indicating a breakup of the ordered state in the limit of small or of large times, respectively. For example, in the case of a low-dimensional system with D < 2, α > 1, the integral of the temporal power spectrum diverges at low frequencies, which means that the average size of the fluctuations of the order parameter grows to infinity for large times. The average size of a fluctuation is
∞
|a(t)|2 ≈ S(ω)dω , (14.14)
ωmin
where ωmin = 2π/t is the lower cuto boundary of the temporal spectrum; thus this average size grows as
a(t) |
2 |
|
tα−1 |
(14.15) |
| |
| |
|
|
with increasing time. This generalizes the Wiener stochastic di usion process,
|
|
|
|a(t)|2 |
t , |
(14.16) |
well known for zero-dimensional systems, and predicts that di usion in spatially extended systems is weaker than in zero-dimensional systems. For example, the fluctuations of the order parameter in a 1D system (α = 1.5) should di use as
|
|
|
|a(t)|2 |
t1/2 . |
(14.17) |
This also means that for large times, the fluctuations of the order parameter become, on average, of the order of magnitude of the order parameter