Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Mankiw Principles of Macroeconomics (3rd ed)

.pdf
Скачиваний:
203
Добавлен:
22.08.2013
Размер:
7.31 Mб
Скачать

260

PART FIVE THE REAL ECONOMY IN THE LONG RUN

 

 

 

 

IN THE NEWS

A Solution to

Africa’s Problems

with the IMF, the World Bank, donors, and creditors.

What a shame. So many good ideas, so few results. Output per head fell 0.7 percent between 1978 and 1987, and 0.6 percent during 1987–1994. Some growth is estimated for 1995 but only at 0.6 percent—far below the fastergrowing developing countries. . . .

The IMF and World Bank would be absolved of shared responsibility for slow growth if Africa were structurally incapable of growth rates seen in other parts of the world or if the continent’s low growth were an impenetrable mystery. But Africa’s growth rates are not huge mysteries. The evidence on cross-country growth suggests that Africa’s chronically low growth can be explained by standard economic variables linked to identifiable (and remediable) policies. . . .

Studies of cross-country growth show that per capita growth is related to:

• the initial income level of the country, with poorer countries tending to grow faster than richer countries;

the extent of overall market orientation, including openness to trade, domestic market liberalization, private rather than state ownership, protection of private property rights, and low marginal tax rates;

the national saving rate, which in turn is strongly affected by the government’s own saving rate; and

the geographic and resource structure of the economy. . . .

These four factors can account broadly for Africa’s long-term growth predicament. While it should have grown faster than other developing areas because of relatively low income per head (and hence larger opportunity for “catch-up” growth), Africa grew more slowly. This was mainly because of much

Economists differ in their views of the role of government in promoting economic growth. At the very least, government can lend support to the invisible hand by maintaining property rights and political stability. More controversial is whether government should target and subsidize specific industries that might be

CHAPTER 12 PRODUCTION AND GROWTH

261

 

 

 

 

higher trade barriers; excessive tax rates; lower saving rates; and adverse structural conditions, including an unusually high incidence of inaccessibility to the sea (15 of 53 countries are landlocked). . . .

If the policies are largely to blame, why, then, were they adopted? The historical origins of Africa’s antimarket orientation are not hard to discern. After almost a century of colonial depredations, African nations understandably if erroneously viewed open trade and foreign capital as a threat to national sovereignty. As in Sukarno’s Indonesia, Nehru’s India, and Peron’s Argentina, “self sufficiency” and “state leadership,” including state ownership of much of industry, became the guideposts of the economy. As a result, most of Africa went into a largely self-imposed economic exile. . . .

Adam Smith in 1755 famously remarked that “little else is requisite to carry a state to the highest degrees of opulence from the lowest barbarism, but peace, easy taxes, and tolerable administration of justice.” A growth agenda need not be long and complex. Take his points in turn.

Peace, of course, is not so easily guaranteed, but the conditions for peace on the continent are better than today’s ghastly headlines would suggest. Several of the large-scale conflicts that have ravaged the continent are over or nearly so. . . . The ongoing disasters, such as in Liberia, Rwanda and Somalia, would be

better contained if the West were willing to provide modest support to Africanbased peacekeeping efforts.

“Easy taxes” are well within the ambit of the IMF and World Bank. But here, the IMF stands guilty of neglect, if not malfeasance. African nations need simple, low taxes, with modest revenue targets as a share of GDP. Easy taxes are most essential in international trade, since successful growth will depend, more than anything else, on economic integration with the rest of the world. Africa’s largely self-imposed exile from world markets can end quickly by cutting import tariffs and ending export taxes on agricultural exports. Corporate tax rates should be cut from rates of 40 percent and higher now prevalent in Africa, to rates between 20 percent and 30 percent, as in the outward-oriented East Asian economies. . . .

Adam Smith spoke of a “tolerable” administration of justice, not perfect justice. Market liberalization is the primary key to strengthening the rule of law. Free trade, currency convertibility and automatic incorporation of business vastly reduce the scope for official corruption and allow the government to focus on the real public goods—internal public order, the judicial system, basic public health and education, and monetary stability. . . .

All of this is possible only if the government itself has held its own spending to the necessary minimum. The Asian economies show how to function with

government spending of 20 percent of GDP or less (China gets by with just 13 percent). Education can usefully absorb around 5 percent of GDP; health, another 3 percent; public administration, 2 percent; the army and police, 3 percent. Government investment spending can be held to 5 percent of GDP but only if the private sector is invited to provide infrastructure in telecommunications, port facilities, and power. . . .

This fiscal agenda excludes many popular areas for government spending. There is little room for transfers or social spending beyond education and health (though on my proposals, these would get a hefty 8 percent of GDP). Subsidies to publicly owned companies or marketing boards should be scrapped. Food and housing subsidies for urban workers cannot be financed. And, notably, interest payments on foreign debt are not budgeted for. This is because most bankrupt African states need a fresh start based on deep debt-reduction, which should be implemented in conjunction with far-reaching domestic reforms.

Source: Economist, June 29, 1996, pp. 19–21.

especially important for technological progress. There is no doubt that these issues are among the most important in economics. The success of one generation’s policymakers in learning and heeding the fundamental lessons about economic growth determines what kind of world the next generation will inherit.

262

PART FIVE THE REAL ECONOMY IN THE LONG RUN

Summar y

Economic prosperity, as measured varies substantially around the income in the world’s richest times that in the world’s poorest growth rates of real GDP also relative positions of countries over time.

The standard of living in an economy’s ability to produce Productivity, in turn, depends physical capital, human capital, technological knowledge available

Government policies can influence growth rate in many ways: investment, encouraging investment

Key Concepts

maintaining property rights and allowing free trade, controlling

and promoting the research and technologies.

capital is subject to diminishing capital an economy has, the less the economy gets from an extra unit

of diminishing returns, higher saving for a period of time, but growth

down as the economy approaches a productivity, and income. Also returns, the return to capital is poor countries. Other things equal, grow faster because of the catch-up

productivity, p. 245

-up effect, p. 251

physical capital, p. 246

 

human capital, p. 246

 

Questions for Review

1.What does the level of a nation’s does the growth rate of GDP rather live in a nation with a high low growth rate, or in a nation high growth rate?

2.List and describe four determinants

3.In what way is a college degree

4.Explain how higher saving leads living. What might deter a

raise the rate of saving?

of saving lead to higher growth indefinitely?

a trade restriction, such as a tariff, economic growth?

of population growth influence the person?

in which the U.S. government tries in technological knowledge.

Problems and Applications

1.Most countries, including the United States, import substantial amounts of goods and services from other countries. Yet the chapter says that a nation can enjoy a high standard of living only if it can produce a large quantity of goods and services itself. Can you reconcile these two facts?

2.List the capital inputs necessary to produce each of the following:

a.cars

b.high school educations

c.plane travel

d.fruits and vegetables

3.U.S. income per person today is roughly eight times what it was a century ago. Many other countries have also experienced significant growth over that period. What are some specific ways in which your standard of living differs from that of your great-grandparents?

4.The chapter discusses how employment has declined relative to output in the farm sector. Can you think of another sector of the economy where the same phenomenon has occurred more recently? Would you consider the change in employment in this sector to represent a success or a failure from the standpoint of society as a whole?

5.Suppose that society decided to reduce consumption and increase investment.

a.How would this change affect economic growth?

b.What groups in society would benefit from this change? What groups might be hurt?

6.Societies choose what share of their resources to devote to consumption and what share to devote to investment. Some of these decisions involve private spending; others involve government spending.

a.Describe some forms of private spending that represent consumption, and some forms that represent investment.

b.Describe some forms of government spending that represent consumption, and some forms that represent investment.

7.What is the opportunity cost of investing in capital? Do you think a country can “over-invest” in capital? What is the opportunity cost of investing in human capital?

CHAPTER 12 PRODUCTION AND GROWTH

263

Do you think a country can “over-invest” in human capital? Explain.

8.Suppose that an auto company owned entirely by German citizens opens a new factory in South Carolina.

a.What sort of foreign investment would this represent?

b.What would be the effect of this investment on U.S. GDP? Would the effect on U.S. GNP be larger or smaller?

9.In the 1980s Japanese investors made significant direct and portfolio investments in the United States. At the time, many Americans were unhappy that this investment was occurring.

a.In what way was it better for the United States to receive this Japanese investment than not to receive it?

b.In what way would it have been better still for Americans to have done this investment?

10.In the countries of South Asia in 1992, only 56 young women were enrolled in secondary school for every 100 young men. Describe several ways in which greater educational opportunities for young women could lead to faster economic growth in these countries.

11.International data show a positive correlation between political stability and economic growth.

a.Through what mechanism could political stability lead to strong economic growth?

b.Through what mechanism could strong economic growth lead to political stability?

S A V I N G , I N V E S T M E N T , A N D

T H E F I N A N C I A L S Y S T E M

Imagine that you have just graduated from college (with a degree in economics, of course) and you decide to start your own business—an economic forecasting firm. Before you make any money selling your forecasts, you have to incur substantial costs to set up your business. You have to buy computers with which to make your forecasts, as well as desks, chairs, and filing cabinets to furnish your new office. Each of these items is a type of capital that your firm will use to produce and sell its services.

How do you obtain the funds to invest in these capital goods? Perhaps you are able to pay for them out of your past savings. More likely, however, like most entrepreneurs, you do not have enough money of your own to finance the start of your business. As a result, you have to get the money you need from other sources.

IN THIS CHAPTER YOU WILL . . .

Lear n about some of the impor tant financial institutions in the U . S . economy

Consider how the financial system is r elated to key macr oeconomic variables

Develop a model of the supply and demand for loanable funds in financial markets

Use the loanable - funds model to analyze various gover nment policies

Consider how gover nment budget deficits af fect the U . S . economy

265

266

PART FIVE THE REAL ECONOMY IN THE LONG RUN

financial system

the group of institutions in the economy that help to match one person’s saving with another person’s investment

There are various ways for you to finance these capital investments. You could borrow the money, perhaps from a bank or from a friend or relative. In this case, you would promise not only to return the money at a later date but also to pay interest for the use of the money. Alternatively, you could convince someone to provide the money you need for your business in exchange for a share of your future profits, whatever they might happen to be. In either case, your investment in computers and office equipment is being financed by someone else’s saving.

The financial system consists of those institutions in the economy that help to match one person’s saving with another person’s investment. As we discussed in the previous chapter, saving and investment are key ingredients to long-run economic growth: When a country saves a large portion of its GDP, more resources are available for investment in capital, and higher capital raises a country’s productivity and living standard. The previous chapter, however, did not explain how the economy coordinates saving and investment. At any time, some people want to save some of their income for the future, and others want to borrow in order to finance investments in new and growing businesses. What brings these two groups of people together? What ensures that the supply of funds from those who want to save balances the demand for funds from those who want to invest?

This chapter examines how the financial system works. First, we discuss the large variety of institutions that make up the financial system in our economy. Second, we discuss the relationship between the financial system and some key macroeconomic variables—notably saving and investment. Third, we develop a model of the supply and demand for funds in financial markets. In the model, the interest rate is the price that adjusts to balance supply and demand. The model shows how various government policies affect the interest rate and, thereby, society’s allocation of scarce resources.

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE U.S. ECONOMY

At the broadest level, the financial system moves the economy’s scarce resources from savers (people who spend less than they earn) to borrowers (people who spend more than they earn). Savers save for various reasons—to put a child through college in several years or to retire comfortably in several decades. Similarly, borrowers borrow for various reasons—to buy a house in which to live or to start a business with which to make a living. Savers supply their money to the financial system with the expectation that they will get it back with interest at a later date. Borrowers demand money from the financial system with the knowledge that they will be required to pay it back with interest at a later date.

The financial system is made up of various financial institutions that help coordinate savers and borrowers. As a prelude to analyzing the economic forces that drive the financial system, let’s discuss the most important of these institutions. Financial institutions can be grouped into two categories—financial markets and financial intermediaries. We consider each category in turn.

CHAPTER 13 SAVING, INVESTMENT, AND THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM

267

FINANCIAL MARKETS

Financial markets are the institutions through which a person who wants to save can directly supply funds to a person who wants to borrow. The two most important financial markets in our economy are the bond market and the stock market.

The Bond Market When Intel, the giant maker of computer chips, wants to borrow to finance construction of a new factory, it can borrow directly from the public. It does this by selling bonds. A bond is a certificate of indebtedness that specifies the obligations of the borrower to the holder of the bond. Put simply, a bond is an IOU. It identifies the time at which the loan will be repaid, called the date of maturity, and the rate of interest that will be paid periodically until the loan matures. The buyer of a bond gives his or her money to Intel in exchange for this promise of interest and eventual repayment of the amount borrowed (called the principal). The buyer can hold the bond until maturity or can sell the bond at an earlier date to someone else.

There are literally millions of different bonds in the U.S. economy. When large corporations, the federal government, or state and local governments need to borrow to finance the purchase of a new factory, a new jet fighter, or a new school, they usually do so by issuing bonds. If you look at The Wall Street Journal or the business section of your local newspaper, you will find a listing of the prices and interest rates on some of the most important bond issues. Although these bonds differ in many ways, three characteristics of bonds are most important.

The first characteristic is a bond’s term—the length of time until the bond matures. Some bonds have short terms, such as a few months, while others have terms as long as 30 years. (The British government has even issued a bond that never matures, called a perpetuity. This bond pays interest forever, but the principal is never repaid.) The interest rate on a bond depends, in part, on its term. Longterm bonds are riskier than short-term bonds because holders of long-term bonds have to wait longer for repayment of principal. If a holder of a long-term bond needs his money earlier than the distant date of maturity, he has no choice but to sell the bond to someone else, perhaps at a reduced price. To compensate for this risk, long-term bonds usually pay higher interest rates than short-term bonds.

The second important characteristic of a bond is its credit risk—the probability that the borrower will fail to pay some of the interest or principal. Such a failure to pay is called a default. Borrowers can (and sometimes do) default on their loans by declaring bankruptcy. When bond buyers perceive that the probability of default is high, they demand a higher interest rate to compensate them for this risk. Because the U.S. government is considered a safe credit risk, government bonds tend to pay low interest rates. By contrast, financially shaky corporations raise money by issuing junk bonds, which pay very high interest rates. Buyers of bonds can judge credit risk by checking with various private agencies, such as Standard & Poor’s, which rate the credit risk of different bonds.

The third important characteristic of a bond is its tax treatment—the way in which the tax laws treat the interest earned on the bond. The interest on most bonds is taxable income, so that the bond owner has to pay a portion of the interest in income taxes. By contrast, when state and local governments issue bonds, called municipal bonds, the bond owners are not required to pay federal income tax on the interest income. Because of this tax advantage, bonds issued by state and

financial markets financial institutions through which savers can directly provide funds to borrowers

bond

a certificate of indebtedness

268

PART FIVE THE REAL ECONOMY IN THE LONG RUN

local governments pay a lower interest rate than bonds issued by corporations or the federal government.

stock

a claim to partial ownership in a firm

THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE

The Stock Market Another way for Intel to raise funds to build a new semiconductor factory is to sell stock in the company. Stock represents ownership in a firm and is, therefore, a claim to the profits that the firm makes. For example, if Intel sells a total of 1,000,000 shares of stock, then each share represents ownership of 1/1,000,000 of the business.

The sale of stock to raise money is called equity finance, whereas the sale of bonds is called debt finance. Although corporations use both equity and debt finance to raise money for new investments, stocks and bonds are very different. The owner of shares of Intel stock is a part owner of Intel; the owner of an Intel bond is a creditor of the corporation. If Intel is very profitable, the stockholders enjoy the benefits of these profits, whereas the bondholders get only the interest on their bonds. And if Intel runs into financial difficulty, the bondholders are paid what they are due before stockholders receive anything at all. Compared to bonds, stocks offer the holder both higher risk and potentially higher return.

After a corporation issues stock by selling shares to the public, these shares trade among stockholders on organized stock exchanges. In these transactions, the corporation itself receives no money when its stock changes hands. The most important stock exchanges in the U.S. economy are the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange, and NASDAQ (National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation system). Most of the world’s countries have their own stock exchanges on which the shares of local companies trade.

The prices at which shares trade on stock exchanges are determined by the supply and demand for the stock in these companies. Because stock represents ownership in a corporation, the demand for a stock (and thus its price) reflects people’s perception of the corporation’s future profitability. When people become optimistic about a company’s future, they raise their demand for its stock and thereby bid up the price of a share of stock. Conversely, when people come to expect a company to have little profit or even losses, the price of a share falls.

Various stock indexes are available to monitor the overall level of stock prices. A stock index is computed as an average of a group of stock prices. The most famous stock index is the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which has been computed regularly since 1896. It is now based on the prices of the stocks of 30 major U.S. companies, such as General Motors, General Electric, Microsoft, Coca-Cola, AT&T, and IBM. Another well-known stock index is the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, which is based on the prices of 500 major companies. Because stock prices reflect expected profitability, these stock indexes are watched closely as possible indicators of future economic conditions.

financial intermediaries financial institutions through which savers can indirectly provide funds to borrowers

FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES

Financial intermediaries are financial institutions through which savers can indirectly provide funds to borrowers. The term intermediary reflects the role of these institutions in standing between savers and borrowers. Here we consider two of the most important financial intermediaries—banks and mutual funds.

CHAPTER 13 SAVING, INVESTMENT, AND THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM

269

F Y I

Most daily newspapers include

How to Read

stock tables, which contain in-

the Newspaper’s

formation about recent trading

Stock Tables

in the stocks of several thou-

sand companies. Here is the

 

 

kind of information these ta-

 

bles usually provide:

Price. The single most important piece of information about a stock is the price of a share. The newspaper usually pre-

sents several prices. The “last” or “closing” price is the price of the last transaction that occurred before the stock exchange closed the previous day. Many newspapers also give the “high” and “low” prices over the past day of trading and, sometimes, over the past year as well.

Volume. Most newspapers present the number of shares sold during the past day of trading. This figure is called the daily volume.

Dividend. Corporations pay out some of their profits to their stockholders; this amount is called the dividend. (Profits not paid out are called retained earnings and are used by the corporation for additional investment.) Newspapers often report the dividend paid over the previous year for each share of stock. They sometimes

report the dividend yield, which is the dividend expressed as a percentage of the stock’s price.

Price-earnings ratio. A corporation’s earnings, or profit, is the amount of revenue it receives for the sale of its products minus its costs of production as measured by its accountants. Earnings per share is the company’s total earnings divided by the number of shares of stock outstanding. Companies use some of their earnings to pay dividends to stockholders; the rest is kept in the firm to make new investments. The price–earnings ratio, often called the P/E, is the price of a corporation’s stock divided by the amount the corporation earned per share over the past year. Historically, the typical price–earnings ratio is about 15. A higher P/E indicates that a corporation’s stock is expensive relative to its recent earnings; this might indicate either that people expect earnings to rise in the future or that the stock is overvalued. Conversely, a lower P/E indicates that a corporation’s stock is cheap relative to its recent earnings; this might indicate either that people expect earnings to fall or that the stock is undervalued.

Why does the newspaper report all these data every day? Many people who invest their savings in stock follow these numbers closely when deciding which stocks to buy and sell. By contrast, other stockholders follow a buy-and-hold strategy: They buy the stock of well-run companies, hold it for long periods of time, and do not respond to the daily fluctuations reported in the paper.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last price at which

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend

 

 

Trading volume over

the stock traded

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Symbol for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yield

 

 

 

the previous day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

company’s stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highest and lowest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Price–

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highest and

 

 

 

closing price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

price of the stock

 

Name of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend

 

 

 

 

earnings

 

 

 

 

lowest price over

 

 

 

from the

 

over the past year

company

 

 

 

 

 

 

amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ratio

 

 

 

 

the previous day

 

 

 

day before

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52 Weeks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yld

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi

Lo

 

 

 

Stock

 

 

 

 

Sym

 

 

 

 

Div

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

PE

 

 

100s

 

 

Hi

Lo

 

 

 

Close

 

 

Chg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

263/16 237/16

 

 

CslFnl

TOPrS

2.09

 

 

8.6

 

 

...

 

 

59

 

 

241/4 2313/16

241/4

+

1/16

 

 

 

 

127/8

67/8

 

 

Coastcast

 

 

PAR

 

 

 

 

 

 

...

 

 

17

 

 

171

 

 

113/8

107/8

113/8

+

3/8

 

 

 

 

757/16

475/16

 

 

CocaCola

 

 

KO

.64

 

 

1.3

 

 

40

 

 

39384

 

 

51

493/4

51

+ 11/16

 

 

 

 

221/2

93/4

 

 

CCFemsa ADR

 

 

KOF

 

 

.12e

.9

 

 

...

 

 

2121

 

 

1313/16

127/8

133/4

+

1/16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banks

If the owner of a small grocery store wants to finance an expansion of his business, he probably takes a strategy quite different from Intel. Unlike Intel, a small grocer