- •Chapter 15 Leases
- •Question 15-1
- •Question 15-7
- •Question 15-8
- •Question 15-9
- •Question 15-10
- •Question 15-11
- •Question 15-12
- •Question 15-13
- •Question 15-14
- •Question 15-15
- •Question 15-16
- •Question 15-17
- •Question 15-18
- •Question 15-19
- •Question 15-20
- •Question 15-21
- •Question 15-22
- •Question 15-23
- •Brief Exercise 15-1
- •Brief Exercise 15-2
- •Brief Exercise 15-3
- •Brief Exercise 15-5
- •Brief Exercise 15-6
- •Brief Exercise 15-7
- •Brief Exercise 15-9
- •Brief Exercise 15-11
- •Brief Exercise 15-12
- •Brief Exercise 15-14
- •Exercise 15-1
- •Present Value of Minimum Lease Payments:
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •120,000 7,920 112,080
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •120,000 7,920 112,080
- •Lessor’s Calculation of Lease Payments
- •Lessee’s Application of Classification Criteria
- •Lessee’s Application of Classification Criteria
- •Lessee’s Application of Classification Criteria
- •Lessee’s Application of Classification Criteria
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •1. Calculation of the present value of lease payments
- •2. Liability at December 31, 2011
- •3. Expenses for year ended December 31, 2011
- •1. Receivable at December 31, 2011
- •2. Interest revenue for year ended December 31, 2011
- •1. Calculation of the present value of lease payments (“selling price”)
- •2. Receivable at December 31, 2011
- •3. Income effect for year ended December 31, 2011
- •1 2 3 4
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •1. January 1, 2011
- •2. Effective rate of interest revenue:
- •3. December 31, 2011
- •Inception of the Lease, January 1, 2011
- •Exercise 15-29
- •1. Definition of a bargain purchase option:
- •Problem 15-1
- •1. Effective rate of interest implicit in the agreement
- •1. Receivable at December 31, 2011
- •2. Interest revenue for year ended December 31, 2011
- •3. Statement of cash flows for year ended December 31, 2011
- •1. Calculation of the present value of lease payments (“selling price”)
- •2. Receivable at December 31, 2011
- •3. Income effect for year ended December 31, 2011
- •4. Statement of cash flows for year ended December 31, 2011
- •Lessor’s Calculation of Lease payments
- •Application of Classification Criteria
- •Present Value of Minimum Lease Payments
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Lessor’s Calculation of Lease payments
- •Application of Classification Criteria
- •Present Value of Minimum Lease Payments
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Lessor’s Calculation of Lease payments
- •Application of Classification Criteria
- •Present Value of Minimum Lease Payments
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Lessor’s Calculation of Lease payments
- •Lessee’s Calculation of the Present Value of Minimum Lease Payments
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Problem 15-12
- •1 2 3 4
- •1 2 3 4
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •30,000 3,573 26,427
- •Lessee’s Application of Classification Criteria
- •Schedule 1: Lessee’s Calculation of the Present Value of Minimum Lease Payments
- •Application of Classification Criteria
- •Schedule 2: Lessor’s Calculation of the Present Value of Minimum Lease Payments
- •Lessor’s Calculation of Lease Payments
- •Lessee’s Amortization Schedule
- •46,000 6,436 39,564
- •Lessor’s Amortization Schedule
- •55,000 9,886 45,114
- •Application of Classification Criteria
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •880,000 216,375 663,625
- •Application of Classification Criteria
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •880,000 234,474 645,526
- •Income Statement
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Analysis Case 15-1
- •9 Commitment (in part)
- •Lease Amortization Schedule
- •Ifrs Case 15-5
- •Suggested Grading Concepts and Grading Scheme:
- •Ifrs Case 15-10
Lease Amortization Schedule
Effective Decrease Outstanding Dec. Payments Interest in Balance Balance 31 10% x Outstanding Balance
2011 659,805
2011 200,000 200,000 459,805
2012 200,000 .10 (459,805) = 45,981 154,019 305,786
2013 200,000 .10 (305,786) = 30,579 169,421 136,365
2014 150,000 .10 (136,365) = 13,635* 136,365 0
750,000 90,195 659,805
* rounded
Problem 15-11 (continued)
Requirement 5
December 31, 2012
Poole (Lessee) Rent expense 200,000 Prepaid rent(2011 payment; 2012 expense) 200,000 Prepaid rent 200,000 Cash(2012 payment; 2013 expense) 200,000 Allied (Lessor) Cash(lease payment) 200,000 Lease receivable (difference) 154,019
Interest revenue(10% x [$659,805 – 200,000]) 45,981
December 31, 2013
Poole (Lessee) Rent expense 200,000 Prepaid rent(2012 payment; 2013 expense) 200,000 Prepaid rent 200,000 Cash(2013 payment; 2014 expense) 200,000 Allied (Lessor) Cash(lease payment) 200,000 Lease receivable 169,421 Interest revenue(10% x 305,786: from schedule) 30,579
Problem 15-11 (concluded)
December 31, 2014
Poole (Lessee) Rent expense 200,000 Prepaid rent(2013 payment; 2014 expense) 200,000 Allied (Lessor) Inventory of equipment(actual residual value) 105,000 Cash ($150,000 – 105,000: from 3rd party guarantor) 45,000 Lease receivable (account balance) 136,365 Interest revenue(10% x 136,365: from schedule) 13,635
Problem 15-12
Situation
1 2 3 4
A. The lessor’s:
1. Minimum lease payments1 $40,000 $44,000 $44,000 $40,000
2. Gross investment in the lease2 40,000 44,000 44,000 44,000
3. Net investment in the lease3 34,437 37,072 37,072 37,072
B. The lessee’s:
4. Minimum lease payments4 40,000 44,000 40,000 40,000
5. Leased asset5 34,437 37,072 34,437 34,437
6. Lease liability6 34,437 37,072 34,437 34,437
1 ($10,000 x number of payments) + Residual value guaranteed by lessee and/or by third party.
2 Minimum lease payments plus unguaranteed residual value.
3 Present value of gross investment.
4 ($10,000 x number of payments) + Residual value guaranteed by lessee.
5 Present value of minimum lease payments; should not exceed fair value.
6 Present value of minimum lease payments; should not exceed fair value.
Problem 15-13
Situation
1 2 3 4
A. The lessor’s:
1. Minimum lease payments1 $400,000 $553,000 $640,000 $510,000
2. Gross investment in the lease2 $430,000 553,000 675,000 550,000
3. Net investment in the lease3 369,175 433,809 533,685 451,137
4. Sales revenue4 N/A N/A 512,816 423,817
5. Cost of goods sold5 N/A N/A 479,131 372,680
6. Dealer’s profit6 N/A N/A 33,685 51,137
B. The lessee’s:
7. Minimum lease payments7 $400,000 553,000 640,000 460,000
8. Leased asset8 353,129 449,896 512,816 389,666
9. Lease liability9 353,129 449,896 512,816 389,666
Note:Since executory costs are excluded from minimum lease payments, they have no effect on any of the calculated amounts.
1 ($100,000 x Number of payments) + Residual value guaranteed by lessee and/or by third party; for situation 4: ($100,000 x 4) + ($60,000 + 50,000)
2 Minimum lease payments plus unguaranteed residual value; for situation 4: ($510,000 + $40,000)
3Present value of gross investment (discounted at lessor’s rate); for situation 4: ($100,000 x 3.48685) + ($150,000 x .68301)
4Present value of minimum lease payments; also, Net investment – Present value of unguaranteed residual value; for situation 4: ($100,000 x 3.48685) + ($110,000 x .68301); also, $451,137 – 27,320 ($40,000 x .68301)
5Lessor’s cost – Present value of unguaranteed residual value; for situation 4: ($400,000 – 40,000 x .68301)
6Sales revenue – cost of goods sold; also, Net investment – Lessor’s cost ; for situation 4: ($423,817 – 372,680); also, ($451,137 – 400,000)
7 ($100,000 x number of payments) + Residual value guaranteed bylessee; for situation 4: ($100,000 x 4) + $60,000
8Present value of minimum lease payments (discounted at lower of lessor’s rate and lessee’s incremental borrowing rate); should not exceed fair value; for situation 4: ($100,000 x 3.48685) + ($60,000 x .68301)
9Present value of minimum lease payments (discounted at lower of lessor’s rate and lessee’s incremental borrowing rate); should not exceed fair value; for situation 4: ($100,000 x 3.48685) + ($60,000 x .68301)
Problem 15-14
Requirement 1
Branson Construction (Lessee) Interest expense(10% x [$936,500 – 100,000]) 83,650 Lease payable (difference) 16,350 Cash(lease payment) 100,000 Maintenance expense 3,000 Cash (2012 expenses as incurred) 3,000 Depreciation expense ($936,500 ÷ 20 years) 46,825 Accumulated depreciation 46,825 Branif Leasing (Lessor) Cash(lease payment) 100,000 Lease receivable (difference) 16,350
Interest revenue(10% x [$936,500 – 100,000]) 83,650
Requirement 2
Branson Construction (Lessee) Interest expense(10% x [$936,500 – 100,000]) 83,650 Lease payable (to balance) 16,350 Maintenance expense (annual fee)* 3,000 Cash(lease payment) 103,000 Depreciation expense ($936,500 ÷ 20 years) 46,825 Accumulated depreciation 46,825
* This debit to maintenance expense is the net effect of (a) expensing the current year’s costs that were prepaid with the first lease payment the last day of 2011 and (b) prepaying next year’s expense with the 2012 payment:
Maintenance expense (2012 costs) 3,000 Prepaid maintenance expense (paid in 2011) 3,000 Interest expense (10% x [$936,500 – 100,000]) 83,650 Lease payable (difference) 16,350 Prepaid maintenance expense (2013 costs) 3,000 Cash (lease payment) 103,000
Problem 15-14 (concluded)
Branif Leasing (Lessor) Cash(lease payment) 103,000 Lease receivable (to balance) 16,350 Maintenance fee payable [or cash] 3,000 Interest revenue(10% x [$936,500 – 100,000]) 83,650
Requirement 3
Branson Construction (Lessee) Interest expense(10% x [$936,500 – 100,000]) 83,650 Lease payable (to balance) 16,350 Maintenance expense (annual fee)* 3,300 Cash(lease payment) 103,300 Depreciation expense ($936,500 ÷ 20 years) 46,825 Accumulated depreciation 46,825
* This debit to maintenance expense is the net effect of (a) expensing the current year’s costs that were prepaid with the first lease payment the last day of 2011 and (b) prepaying next year’s expense with the 2012 payment:
Maintenance expense (2012 costs) 3,300 Prepaid maintenance expense (paid in 2011) 3,300 Interest expense (10% x [$936,500 – 100,000]) 83,650 Lease payable (difference) 16,350 Prepaid maintenance expense (2013 costs) 3,300 Cash (lease payment) 103,300
Branif Leasing (Lessor) Cash(lease payment) 103,300 Maintenance fee payable [or cash] 3,000 Miscellaneous revenue 300 Lease receivable (to balance) 16,350 Interest revenue(10% x [$936,500 – 100,000]) 83,650
Problem 15-15
Requirement 1
Note:
Because exercise of the option appears at the inception of the lease to be reasonably assured, payment of the option price ($6,000) is expected to occur when the option becomes exercisable (at the end of the eighth quarter). Also, the lease contract specifies that the BPO becomes exercisable before the designated lease term ends. Since a BPO is expected to be exercised, the lease term ends for accounting purposes when the option becomes exercisable (after two years of the three-year lease term).
Present value of quarterly lease payments ($3,000 x 7.23028**) $21,691
Plus: Present value of the BPO price ($6,000 x .78941*) 4,736
Present value of minimum lease payments $26,427
* present value of $1: n=8, i=3%
** present value of an annuity due of $1: n=8, i=3%
“Selling price” $26,427
minus
Truck’s cost (25,000)
equals
Dealer’s profit $ 1,427
Problem 15-15 (continued)
Not required in the problem, but helpful to see that the present value calculation is precisely the reverse of the lessor’s calculation of quarterly payments:
Amount to be recovered (fair value) $26,427 Less: Present value of the BPO price ($6,000 x .78941*) (4,736)
Amount to be recovered through quarterly lease payments $21,691
_____________________
Lease payments at the beginning
each of the next eight quarters: ($21,691 ÷ 7.23028**) $3,000
* present value of $1: n=8, i=3%
** present value of an annuity due of $1: n=8, i=3%
Requirement 2
September 30, 2011
Anything Grows (Lessee) Leased equipment 26,427 Lease payable (present value of minimum lease payments) 26,427 Lease payable 3,000 Cash(lease payment) 3,000
Mid-South Auto Leasing (Lessor) Lease receivable (calculated above) 26,427 Cost of goods sold (lessor’s cost) 25,000 Sales revenue (calculated above) 26,427 Inventory of equipment (lessor’s cost) 25,000 Cash(lease payment) 3,000 Lease receivable 3,000
Problem 15-15 (continued)
Requirement 3
Since both use the same discount rate, the amortization schedule for the lessee and lessor is the same: