Part IV - Well productivity estimating methods
.pdfA Fully Penetrated Slant Well
MZ-solution (2004):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2kh p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L sin h |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|
L |
|
|
|
|
|
L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
B |
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
ln |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
ln |
|
|
L |
2rw |
|
|
|
2rw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2kh p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L sin h |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2r |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L sin |
|
|
|
|
h sin |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
B |
ln |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arctan |
|
|
|
ln |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
L sin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L sin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2re |
|
|
L |
|
2erw |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
21 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
A Fully Penetrated Slant Well
Pressure distribution (MZ-solution):
x_z |
y_z |
x_y |
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
22 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
A Fully Penetrated Slant Well
Comparison of solutions (MZ, Cinco et al., Van der Vlis et al.):
0.05 70.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
q_ MZ2( h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
q_ CC( h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
q_ VV( h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.77 2 10 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
10 0 |
|
2 |
|
|
h |
|
10 0 |
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
23 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
A Partially Penetrated Vertical Well
Muscat (1937):
2kh p qMus B
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 ln |
|||
|
||||
|
2b |
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
4h |
|
|
4h |
||
|
|
(b) |
ln |
|
|
|
|
||||
rw |
|
|
|
re |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) ln |
(0.875b) (0.125b) |
|
|
(1 0.875b) (1 0.125b) |
Brons and Marting (1961):
qBM |
|
|
|
|
2 kh p |
|
|
|
k |
0.5 |
|
h |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
re |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
1 |
|
|
hD k |
|
|
|
r |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
v |
|
|
|
w |
|||||||||
|
B ln |
rw |
b |
|
ln h |
G(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G(b) 2.948 7.363b 11.45b2 |
4.675b3 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
24 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
A Partially Penetrated Vertical Well
MZ-solution (2004):
q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2k h p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
r |
|
|
h |
|
L |
|
L |
|
|
|
h |
|
1 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
B |
e |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
ln |
|
|
|
ln |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
L |
2rw |
|
2L |
2 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
h |
|
|
|
|
2rw |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
25 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
A Partially Penetrated Vertical Well
Pressure distribution (MZ-solution):
x_z |
y_z |
x_y |
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
26 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
A Partially Penetrated Vertical Well
Comparisons of results (MZ, Muskat, Brons and Marting):
1.693 10 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q _M Z(L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q _M US(L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q _BM(L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.239 10 |
4 |
10 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
L |
|
|
|
10 |
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
27 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
An Arbitrary Straight Well
MZ-solution (2004):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2kh p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L sin h |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|
L |
|
|
|
|
|
L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
B |
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
ln |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
ln |
|
|
L |
2rw |
|
|
|
2rw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2kh p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L sin h |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2r |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L sin |
|
|
|
|
h sin |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
B |
ln |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arctan |
|
|
|
ln |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
L sin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L sin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2re |
|
|
L |
|
2erw |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
28 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
Production Rate of an Arbitrary
Straight Well
Prod rate of different wells
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
m3/d |
250 |
|
|
|
|
VW |
|
|
|
|
|
||
200 |
|
|
|
|
Slant, 45 degr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate, |
150 |
|
|
|
|
HW |
|
|
|
|
|
||
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
10 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
Well length, m
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
29 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
Production Rate of an Arbitrary
Straight Well
Prod rate of different wells
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m3/d |
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HW |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
100 |
120 |
140 |
160 |
180 |
200 |
Well length, m
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
30 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|