Part IV - Well productivity estimating methods
.pdfForecasting Production Rate
of a Single Well…
|
Porosity |
Perm., |
Net |
Oil |
Oil |
GOR, |
Skin |
Prod rate, |
|
% |
md |
pay, m |
visc., cp |
FVF |
m3/m3 |
bopd |
|
|
|
|||||||
Min |
11 |
1.2 |
30 |
2 |
1.1 |
20 |
-7 |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean |
12 |
12 |
50 |
2.5 |
1.2 |
20 |
-6 |
2670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Max |
13 |
25 |
70 |
3 |
1.3 |
20 |
-5 |
21000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Rate as a Fuzzy Number |
|
|
|
Prod Rate Cum. Distribution Curve |
|
|||
|
|
All input parameters are triangular FNs |
|
|
|
(Triassic sandstones) |
|
|||
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membershipgrade |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
distributionCum. |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|||
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
100 |
1000 |
10000 |
100000 |
|
100 |
1000 |
10000 |
100000 |
|
|
Production rate, bopd |
|
|
|
|
Production rate, bopd |
|
||
15 September 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Uncertainty in Production Forecast
|
|
|
|
bbl |
|
|
Uncertainty in cumulative production |
||
|
|
|
|
3000 |
|
|
|
||
|
350 |
|
|
Cumulative production, mill |
|
|
|
||
Production rate, Kbopd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
300 |
|
|
2500 |
|
|
|
|||
250 |
|
|
2000 |
712 mill bbls |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
150 |
|
|
1500 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
100 |
|
|
1000 |
|
|
|
|||
50 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
0 |
10 |
20 |
30 |
0 |
40 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scenarios |
|
|
15 September 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
Field-scale Production Forecast
|
Contribution of each reservoir into overall |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UJ-E |
|
|
|
|
Kbopd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UJ-W |
|
|
|
|
rate, |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of acting wells |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
prod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
IW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
wells |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
IW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
2019 |
2022 |
2025 |
2028 |
2031 |
2034 |
2037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
|
of |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
2020 |
2024 |
2028 |
2032 |
2036 |
Water Cut – 90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
15 September 2012 |
73 |
Field-scale Production Forecast
Contribution of each reservoir into overall production
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UJ-E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kbopd |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UJ-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rate, |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production forecast |
|
Water |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Oil prod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
rate, MMscf/d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
2016 |
2019 |
2022 |
2025 |
2028 |
2031 |
2034 |
2037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kbopdrate, |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil prod |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas prod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
Water Cut – 90% |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
2015 |
2020 |
2025 |
2030 |
2035 |
2040 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 September 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
Field-scale Production Forecast
|
|
Reservoir 1 |
Reservoir 2 |
Total |
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOOIP, MM STB |
|
1193 |
892 |
2085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area, кm2 |
|
200 |
220 |
220 |
|
Oil recovery, % |
|
22.9 |
22.7 |
22.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves, MM STB |
|
272.7 |
202.6 |
475.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production plateau, Kbopd |
100 |
66.6 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Max rate of production (per |
13.3 |
12.0 |
7.7 |
|
|
year), % |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of wells: |
Prod |
50* |
50 |
50 |
* Recompleted |
|
Inj |
17* |
17 |
17 |
from the lower |
|
Total |
67* |
67 |
67 |
reservoir |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area per PW, кm2 |
|
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
|
STOOIP/PW, MM STB |
|
23.9 |
17.8 |
41.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial well production rate, bopd |
4442* |
3314* |
N/A |
HW 250 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves /PW, MM STB |
|
5.45 |
4.05 |
9.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Max watercut, % |
|
90 |
90 |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Min bottomwhole pressure, bar |
291 |
294 |
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of the drilling platforms |
2M |
2M |
2M |
M (S)– mobile |
|
required |
|
(stationary) unit |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duration of production, years |
15 |
14 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 September 2012 |
75 |
Sensitivity Analysis
The main idea – to identify parameters which uncertainty most influences the project value
Tornado diagram illustrates dependency of the project value on parameter’s uncertainty
15 September 2012 |
76 |
Transient
Pressure
Analysis
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
77 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
Production Rate Decline Analysis
Reservoir pressure, pe
p pe pwf
Flowing well pressure, pwf Radius, r
Well
re (t) a t
k / o Ct
q(t) |
|
2 kh p |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
re (t) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
B ln |
S |
||
|
rw |
|||
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
78 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
Transient Pressure Analysis
Horizontal well
In transient flow case pressure p(x,y,z,t) should satisfy the following equation:
2 p 2 p 2 p 2 p 1 p x2 y 2 z 2 t
|
k |
|
|
||
ct |
||
|
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
79 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|
Transient Pressure Analysis
Horizontal well
Applying the same method of images for the no cross-flow boundary conditions at the reservoir top and bottom and satisfying a constant wellbore pressure conditions the following equation for a transient pressure flow caused by an arbitrary well can be written:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
(x x )2 |
( y y )2 z jh 1 j z |
2 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
i |
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
qi erfc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
n |
|
|
|
|
4 t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
p(x, y, z, t) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|||
4k |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
j |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
j i n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
(x xi ) ( y yi ) z jh 1 |
zi |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2012 |
Part IV - Modern well stimulation |
80 |
|
methods (Gubkin - IFP program) |
|