Business Communication by Edwards 2012
.pdfProvide several alternative suggestions per a problem in order to find the best solution without wasting time at the meeting.
It is advisable that each suggestion spoken out as an idea, should be supported with facts and reasons.
The procedure of formulating suggestions as possible problem-solving variations proceeds from previously formulated problems:
1)If the procedure takes place for a whole group, each participant may write down a suggestion for a focal problem – i.e. the problem that they consider to be the central point of the overall problem situation;
2)In brainstorm, one person should act as moderator,
to explain the exercise, take suggestions from the group, write them down and summarize the findings.
! Through offers and counter offers there is a lot of information exchange that might yield a common definition of the problem
Pay little attention to initial offers: these are points of departure they tend to be extreme and idealistic.
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
51 |
The document set (in the language specified for the talks):
Power-attorney letters;
Agreements ;
Contracts or Protocols and appendices, both on paper and as an e-version for making all necessary alterations and amendments to the text;
supporting, confirming, guiding and legislative papers or fact sheets;
|
copies of previous agreements and |
two |
|
languages; |
|
|
Agenda and social program (list |
|
of events).
Sometimes copies are forwarded
to all key persons as drafts in advance.
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
52 |
Once the negotiating team participants have been identified, they should be consulted to determine what problems they face. It is important to bring together representatives of all key groups involved in the pre-negotiation phase:
involves the collection of information about the current situation ;
is a reasonable action to avoid possible in-team arguing and misunderstanding;
allows some key persons involved in the negotiation to vent out and speak out their original opinion or reasons;
the people involved make efforts to act as a team;
the team tends to have an unbiased look on the subject matter, to share the info and to obtain an integral position of the party.
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
53 |
Instructing the future participants takes place during the in-company talks, prior to
the negotiation event. Provides information about:
who and what problems they will face during the negotiation process;
which resources should be involved in the negotiation process from the receiving party;
cross-cultural specific aspects involved in this inter-national negotiation;
in case of strictly formal talks: consult the people involved about table manners or etiquette rules - cultural trainers or coaches render a shortterm training
May be in written: a brief written profile of the visiting company, its key persons
and products/services; the draft
agenda or a fact sheet; or as a conversation.
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
54 |
Arrangements to be undertaken:
Define the formality rate
Fix the date and time
Agree about the place
Build the team and assign the leader
Calculate expenses
Prepare the accessories and equipment
Make business cards
Make invitations and notification letters
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
55 |
|
There exist three formality rates depending on the guests’ status and the character of the negotiations:
strictly formal (governmental level);
formal (business talks resulting in contracts, formally signed agreements, etc.)
non-formal (working visits in the course of established joint cooperation work).
The receiving procedure strongly specifies the level of funds on the negotiations. The funding covers: business presents, invited specialists fees, transfer and hotel reservation, social program, lunch and coffee-breaks and other visit-related procedures.
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
56 |
Date and time
Fixing the date of the talks, the following factors are taken into account:
•specific time of the year, month and day;
•agreement or contract deadline;
•readiness to the negotiation,
•availability of all specialists needed;
Place
Home territory, neutral place, or the partner’s territory. Factors taken into account:
•specific territorial conditions;
•pro and cons of conducting the negotiations at your side;
•ambitions and finance;
•arrangements difficulties;
•agreeing with third parties;
•approval from the authorities if necessary.
Optimal negotiating team
The optimal number: the subject(s) to be discussed may require a wide range of specialists involved; a cross-cultural habit to make up multiple teams (China, Korea, and Japan); or the general visit objectives which may cover several comprehensive tasks.
Three people are mostly enough for making a team:
•Leader - the person who will do the talking and conduct the negotiations;
•Summarizer - the person who will ask questions and summarize for control;
•Observer – the person not involved in the actual negotiations, whose role is to watch, listen and record.
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
57 |
All necessary accessories, equipment and supportive actions are planned in advance:
responsible persons
type and number of appliances needed due to requirements
communication means, etc.
the table for the negotiations: small national flags and symbols; documents on the table ; company leaflets; an agenda given to all; paper for notes; pens and pencils with company brand, etc.
means of communication: technical aids are necessary nowadays. Demonstrating visual proofs is a strong persuading facility. In that case,
technical personnel should be available in order to avoid confusing situation with technical aids.
Mass media or public opinion representation
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
58 |
Business cards:
Business cards and company brand business gifts
(souvenirs) should be ready prior to
the negotiation date: cards or lists of participants with
major responsibilities in case
of big teams involved (six or more people).
Invitations and notifications:
Invitations and notifications (written notes notifying
each participant of the negotiations,
invitations to external specialists).
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
59 |
Aspects to remember:
The table, participants positioning
Language, interpretation
Timing, outset/start
Teams, experts, expert groups
Authority representation
Time limits
Phases
Hierarchy and status differences
Effective negotiator’s values
Formalities and papers
Natalie M. Edwards 2012 |
60 |