- •November 16, 2002
- •February 14, 2003
- •February 21
- •February 28
- •March 7
- •March 10
- •March 12
- •March 14
- •March 15
- •March 17
- •March 19
- •March 21
- •March 24
- •March 26
- •March 28
- •March 30
- •March 31
- •April 2
- •April 2
- •April 8-10
- •April 12
- •April 16
- •April 20
- •April 20
- •April 23
- •April 25
- •April 27
- •April 29
- •June 6
- •June 13
- •June 17
- •June 21
- •June 23
- •June 24
- •July 2
- •July 5
- •August 14
- •September 8
- •September 24
- •References
- •Virology
- •Discovery of the SARS Virus
- •Initial Research
- •The Breakthrough
- •Coronaviridae
- •SARS Co-V
- •Genome Sequence
- •Morphology
- •Organization
- •Detection
- •Stability and Resistance
- •Natural Host
- •Antiviral Agents and Vaccines
- •Antiviral Drugs
- •Vaccines
- •Outlook
- •References
- •Routes of Transmission
- •Factors Influencing Transmission
- •Patient Factors in Transmission
- •Asymptomatic Patients
- •Symptomatic Patients
- •Superspreaders
- •The Unsuspected Patients
- •High-Risk Activities
- •Transmission during Quarantine
- •Transmission after Recovery
- •Animal Reservoirs
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Modeling the Epidemic
- •Starting Point
- •Global Spread
- •Hong Kong
- •Vietnam
- •Toronto
- •Singapore, February 2003
- •China
- •Taiwan
- •Other Countries
- •Eradication
- •Outlook
- •References
- •Introduction
- •International Coordination
- •Advice to travelers
- •Management of SARS in the post-outbreak period
- •National Measures
- •Legislation
- •Extended Case Definition
- •Quarantine
- •Reduce travel between districts
- •Quarantine after Discharge
- •Infection Control in Healthcare Settings
- •General Measures
- •Protective Measures
- •Hand washing
- •Gloves
- •Face Masks
- •Additional protection
- •Getting undressed
- •Special Settings
- •Intensive Care Units
- •Intubating a SARS Patient
- •Anesthesia
- •Triage
- •Internet Sources
- •Additional information
- •Infection Control in Households
- •Possible Transmission from Animals
- •After the Outbreak
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Case Definition
- •WHO Case Definition
- •Suspect case
- •Probable case
- •Exclusion criteria
- •Reclassification of cases
- •CDC Case Definition
- •Diagnostic Tests
- •Introduction
- •Laboratory tests
- •Molecular tests
- •Virus isolation
- •Antibody detection
- •Interpretation
- •Limitations
- •Biosafety considerations
- •Outlook
- •Table, Figures
- •References
- •Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Hematological Manifestations
- •Atypical Presentation
- •Chest Radiographic Abnormalities
- •Chest Radiographs
- •CT Scans
- •Diagnosis
- •Clinical Course
- •Viral Load and Immunopathological Damage
- •Histopathology
- •Lung Biopsy
- •Postmortem Findings
- •Discharge and Follow-up
- •Psychosocial Issues
- •References
- •Appendix: Guidelines
- •WHO: Management of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
- •Management of Suspect and Probable SARS Cases
- •Definition of a SARS Contact
- •Management of Contacts of Probable SARS Cases
- •Management of Contacts of Suspect SARS Cases
- •SARS Treatment
- •Antibiotic therapy
- •Antiviral therapy
- •Ribavirin
- •Neuraminidase inhibitor
- •Protease inhibitor
- •Human interferons
- •Human immunoglobulins
- •Alternative medicine
- •Immunomodulatory therapy
- •Corticosteroids
- •Other immunomodulators
- •Assisted ventilation
- •Non-invasive ventilation
- •Invasive mechanical ventilation
- •Clinical outcomes
- •Outlook
- •Appendix 1
- •A standardized treatment protocol for adult SARS in Hong Kong
- •Appendix 2
- •A treatment regimen for SARS in Guangzhou, China
- •References
- •Pediatric SARS
- •Clinical Manifestation
- •Radiologic Features
- •Treatment
- •Clinical Course
- •References
132 Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
Table 4: Features of SARS that may commonly help with clinical diagnosis. Source: WHO
SARS |
|
Example |
|
|
Caution |
|
||
Clinical history |
Sudden |
onset |
of |
Take a travel history, history of |
||||
|
|
flu-like |
prodrome, |
hospitalisation and history of contact |
||||
|
|
dry |
cough, |
non- |
with healthcare facility. The absence |
|||
|
|
respiratory |
sym- |
of such a history should not automa- |
||||
|
|
ptoms |
e.g. |
|
di- |
tically exclude diagnosis of SARS. |
||
|
|
arrhoea common |
|
|
||||
Clinical |
ex- |
Does not correlate |
Lack of respiratory signs particularly |
|||||
amination |
|
with chest radiolo- |
in groups such as the elderly |
|||||
|
|
gy changes |
|
|
|
|
||
Bedside |
mo- |
Hypoxia |
|
|
|
Temperature may not be elevated on |
||
nitoring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
admission, respiratory rate should be |
|
Haematology |
Low |
lymphocyte |
documented |
|
||||
|
|
|||||||
investigations |
count |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Biochemistry |
Raised LDH |
|
|
Check profile for electrolytes and |
||||
investigations |
|
|
|
|
|
liver function |
|
|
Radiology |
|
CXR |
|
changes |
May present as a lobar pneumonia, |
|||
investigations |
poorly |
defined, |
pneumothorax and |
pneumomedia- |
||||
|
|
patchy, |
progressi- |
stinum may occur |
|
|||
|
|
ve changes |
|
|
|
|
||
Microbiology |
Investigate |
|
for |
Concurrent infections may occur |
||||
investigations |
community, |
|
and |
|
|
|||
|
|
hospital |
acquired |
|
|
|||
|
|
pneumonias |
inclu- |
|
|
|||
|
|
ding |
|
atypical |
|
|
||
|
|
pneumonias |
|
|
|
|
||
Virology |
inve- |
Investigate |
|
for |
Interpret SARS test results with |
|||
stigations |
|
other |
causes |
of |
caution |
|
||
|
|
atypical |
pneumo- |
|
|
|||
|
|
nia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
As yet there is not |
Lack of response to treatment with |
||||||
|
|
proven |
treatment |
standard antibiotics |
for community |
|||
|
|
for SARS, suppor- |
acquired pneumonia including atypi- |
|||||
|
|
tive measures are |
cal pneumonia may be indicative of |
|||||
|
|
recommended |
|
SARS |
|
Clinical Course
The incubation period of SARS is short. Two large studies consistently noted a median incubation period of six days (Lee, Booth). However, the time from exposure to the onset of symptoms may vary considerably, ranging from 2 to 16 days (Lee, Tsang). This may re
www.SARSreference.com
Clinical Course 133
flect biases in reporting, different routes of transmission, or varying doses of the virus (Donnelly). The WHO continues to conclude that the current best estimate of the maximum incubation period is 10 days (WHO Update 49).
The clinical course of SARS is highly variable, ranging from mild symptoms to a severe disease process with respiratory failure and death. Clinical deterioration combined with oxygen desaturation, requiring intensive care and ventilatory support, generally occurs 7 to 10 days after the onset of symptoms (Lee, Peiris). In severe cases, SARS is a fulminant disease, progressing from being “comfortable” to respiratory failure requiring intubation within less than 24 hours (Tsang, Fisher).
The first prospective study on the clinical course was published on May 24, 2003, in the Lancet (Peiris 2003b). This 24-day study included 75 adult patients from Hong Kong. The clinical course of SARS was remarkably uniform in this cohort, following a tri-phasic pattern in most cases:
1.Week 1 was characterized by fever, myalgia, and other systemic symptoms that generally improved after a few days. In terms of disease progression, all except one patient became afebrile within 48h using the standard treatment protocol, consisting of intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanate, oral azithromycin, intravenous ribavirin and a tailing regimen of corticosteroids.
2.As the disease progressed into week 2, the patients frequently had recurrence of fever, onset of diarrhea, and oxygen desaturation. Fever recurred in 85% of the patients at a mean of 8.9 days. Radiological worsening was noted in 80% at a mean of 7.4 days: Nearly half the patients developed shifting of radiological lesions, evidenced by improvement of the original lesions followed by the appearance of new lesions. IgG seroconversion, apparently correlating with falls in viral load, could be detected from day 10 to 15. Severe clinical worsening also occurred at this time.
3.20% of patients progressed to the third phase, characterized by ARDS necessitating ventilatory support. Several patients developed nosocomial sepsis during this phase of end-organ damage and severe lymphopenia.
Kamps and Hoffmann (eds.)
134 Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
In total, 32% of patients required intensive care at a mean of 11.0 days after onset of symptoms, among whom 79% had to be intubated at a mean of 12.9 days. The mean length of stay for 75 patients was 22.1 days, whereas for the 15 patients who developed ARDS, the mean length of stay was 26.8 days at the time of writing. In this cohort, the total mortality was 7%.
The two retrospective cohorts from Canada and Hong Kong demonstrated a comparable outcome (Booth, Lee). Within both cohorts, 2023% of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 5969% of these received mechanical ventilation. Mortality was lower in these studies, ranging from 3.6% (Lee) to 6.5% (Booth) within the first 21 days.
However, it should be mentioned that the WHO revised its initial estimates of the case fatality ratio of SARS on May 7 (WHO Update 49). The revision was based on an analysis of the latest data from Canada, China, Hong Kong SAR, Singapore, and Vietnam. On the basis of more detailed and complete data, and more reliable methods, the WHO estimates that the case fatality ratio of SARS ranges from 0% to 50% depending on the age group affected, with an overall estimate of case fatality of 14% to 15%. According to the WHO, estimates of the case fatality ratio range from 11% to 17% in Hong Kong, from 13% to 15% in Singapore, from 15% to 19% in Canada, and from 5% to 13% in China.
Several studies have demonstrated a number of risk factors for a poor outcome. In most studies, multivariate analysis revealed an older age and co-morbid conditions as being independent predictors (Table 4).
www.SARSreference.com
|
|
Clinical Course 135 |
Table 5 – Risk factors associated with clinical deterioration |
||
|
|
|
Authors |
N |
Risk factors |
Lee et al. |
138 |
Older age, high neutrophil count, high LDH peak |
Peiris 2003a |
50 |
Older age, severe lymphopenia, impaired ala- |
|
|
nine aminotransferase, delayed starting of riba- |
|
|
virin and steroids |
Peiris 2003b |
75 |
Older age, chronic hepatitis B infection |
Booth et al. |
144 |
Diabetes mellitus and other co-morbid condi- |
|
|
tions, (trend for older age) |
Wong et al. |
157 |
Older age, high LDH |
Wong et al. |
31 |
Low CD4 and CD8 counts at presentation |
|
|
|
There is currently no information as to whether virulent mutants of SARS viruses are associated with fatal cases. Comparison of the genomes of SARS isolates from fatal versus milder cases will identify any virus mutations that may be associated with an increased virulence (Holmes).
In a small percentage of patients, various degrees of pulmonary fibrosis have been reported following recovery. The pathophysiological mechanism of this finding is unclear. It will be important to perform follow-up evaluation of these patients to determine the long-term repercussions of SARS.
Viral Load and Immunopathological Damage
Quantitative RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal aspirates have shown a peak viral load at day 10 and a decrease to admission levels at day 15 (Peiris 2003b).
The increasing viral load at the end of the first week of the disease suggests that the symptoms and signs (recurrent fever, diarrhea, worsening of radiographic findings) could be related to the effect of viral replication and cytolysis (Peiris 2003b).
However, further deterioration at the end of week 2, when some patients had severe clinical worsening, may not be related to uncontrolled viral replication, but may rather be caused by immunopathological damage (Peiris 2003b). This assumption is supported by the
Kamps and Hoffmann (eds.)