- •Contents
- •List of abbreviations
- •Preface
- •Introduction
- •Germanic languages
- •Classification of germanic languages
- •Ancient germanic tribes and their classification
- •Germanic alphabets
- •Some phonetic peculiarities of germanic languages
- •Consonants
- •The First Consonant Shift (Grimm’s Law)
- •Ііі. Act The ie aspirated voiced plosives bh, dh, gh changed in Gc to corresponding unaspirated plosives b, d, g, e.G.
- •Verner`s Law
- •Word – Stress
- •Stressed vowels
- •Germanic Fracture (Breaking)
- •Gradation or Ablaut
- •Unstressed Vowels
- •Grammatical peculiarities of germanic languages
- •The Noun
- •The Adjective
- •The Verb
- •Gothic Strong Verbs
- •Vocabulary
- •Old english
- •2.1. Periods in the History of English
- •2.2. Historical Background
- •2.2.1. The Roman Conquest of Britain
- •2.2.2. The Anglo-Saxon Conquest of Britain
- •2.3. Alphabet and Pronunciation
- •Old English Alphabet
- •2.4. Old English Dialects and Written Records
- •2.5. Some Phonetic Changes of the Old English Period
- •2.5.1. Vowels
- •2.5.2. Old English Breaking
- •2.5.3. Palatal Mutation (I-mutation)
- •Monophthongs
- •Diphthongs
- •2.5.4. Back or Velar Mutation (Velarization)
- •2.5.5. Diphthongization of Vowels after Palatal Consonants
- •2.5.6. Lengthening of Short Vowels
- •2.5.7. Unstressed Vowels
- •2.5.8. Consonants
- •2.5.9. Palatalization of Velar Consonants
- •2.5.10. Assimilation, Metathesis, Doubling of Consonants, Loss of Consonants
- •2.6. Old English Morphology
- •2.6.1. Old English Noun: General Characteristics
- •Vowel Stems
- •Consonant Stems
- •2.6.2. Vowel Stems Strong Declension
- •2.6.3. Consonant Stems: Weak Declension, Minor Declensions
- •2.6.4. Root-Stems
- •2.6.5. Pronouns
- •2.6.5.1. Personal Pronouns
- •2.6.5.2. Demonstrative Pronouns
- •Declension of the Demonstrative Pronoun þes
- •2.6.6. Adjectives
- •2.6.6.1. Strong Declension of Adjectives
- •2.6.6.2. Weak Declension of Adjectives
- •2.6.6.3. Degrees of Comparison
- •2.6.7. Adverbs
- •2.6.7.1. Formation of Adverbs
- •2.6.7.2. Comparison of Adverbs
- •2.6.8. The Verb: General Characteristics
- •Conjugation of verbs
- •2.6.8.1. Strong Verbs
- •2.6.8.2. Weak Verbs
- •Conjugation of Weak Verbs
- •2.6.8.3. Preterite-Present Verbs
- •Conjugation of Preterite - Present verbs
- •2.6.8.4. Anomalous verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb dōn
- •Indicative mood
- •2.6.8.5. Suppletive Verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon
- •Indicative mood
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān
- •Indicative mood
- •2.7. Old English Syntax
- •2.8. The Old English Vocabulary
- •2.8.1. Word-Building
- •Suffixation
- •Prefixation
- •Composition
- •2.8.2. Borrowings
- •Latin borrowings
- •Celtic Borrowings
- •Middle english
- •3.1. Historical Background
- •3.1.1. Scandinavian Invasions
- •3.1.2. The Norman Conquest
- •3.2. Middle English Dialects Rise of the London Dialect
- •3.3. Early Middle English Written Records
- •3.4. Word Stress
- •3.5. Vowels
- •3.5.1. Unstressed Vowels
- •3.5.2. Stressed vowels
- •3.5.2.1. Quantitative Vowel Changes
- •3.5.2.2. Qualitative Vowel Changes
- •Monophthongs
- •3.5.2.3. Monophthongization of Old English Diphthongs
- •3.5.2.4. Rise of New Diphthongs
- •3.6. Evolution of Consonants in Middle English
- •3.7. Spelling Changes in Middle English
- •3.7.1. Changes in the Designation of Vowels
- •3.7.2. Changes in the designation of Consonants
- •3.8. Changes in the Grammatical System
- •3.8.1. Preliminary Remarks
- •3.8.2. The Noun
- •3.8.2.1. Gender
- •3.8.2.2. Number
- •3.8.2.3. Decay of Noun Declensions
- •3.8.3. The Adjective
- •3.8.3.1. Declension of Adjectives in Late Middle English
- •3.8.3.2. Degrees of Comparison
- •3.8.4. Adverbs
- •3.8.4.1. Formation of Adverbs
- •3.8.4.2. Comparison of Adverbs
- •3.8.5. The Pronoun
- •3.8.5.1. Personal Pronouns
- •3.8.5.2. Possessive pronouns
- •3.8.5.3. Demonstrative Pronouns
- •3.8.5.4. Rise of the Articles
- •3.8.6. The Verb: General Characteristics
- •Conjugation of Verbs
- •Conjugation of Verbs Past Indicative
- •3.8.5.1. Changes in the Morphological Classes of Verbs in Middle English and Early New English
- •3.8.6.1. Strong Verbs
- •3.8.6.2. Weak Verbs
- •3.8.6.3. Preterite-present Verbs
- •3.8.6.4. Suppletive verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •3.8.6.5. Rise of Analytical Forms
- •Future Forms
- •Perfect Forms
- •Passive Forms
- •Continuous Forms
- •3.8.7. Development of the Syntactic System
- •3.9. Middle English Vocabulary Changes
- •3.9.1. Native Derivational Affixes
- •3.9.2. French Derivational Affixes
- •3.9.3. Scandinavian Borrowings
- •3.9.4. French Borrowings
- •New english
- •4.1. The formation of the English National Language
- •4.2. Changes in Pronunciation
- •4.2.1. Development of Unstressed Vowels
- •4.2.1.1. Loss of unstressed –e [ə]
- •4.2.1.2. Loss of Vowels in Intermediate Syllables
- •4.2.2. Stressed Vowels
- •4.2.2.1. The Great Vowel Shift
- •4.2.2.2. Shortening of Long Vowels
- •4.2.2.3. Development of Short Vowels
- •4.2.2.4. The Development of the New Short [л]
- •4.2.2.5. Changes in Diphthongs
- •4.2.2.6. Vowel Changes under the Influence of Consonants
- •4.2.3. Consonants
- •4.2.3.1. Voicing of Voiceless Consonants
- •4.2.3.2. Loss of Consonants Development of [X]
- •Simplification of Consonant Clusters
- •4.2.3.3. Change of [d] to [ð] when Close to [r]
- •4.2.3.4. Development of Sibilants and Affricates in Early New English
- •4.3. Changes in Spelling
- •4.4. Local Dialects in New English
- •4.4.1. Scottish Dialect
- •4.4.2. Northern Dialects
- •4.4.3. Western, Central and Southern Dialects
- •4.5. Some Essential Grammatical Changes of the New English Period: Morphology
- •4.5.1. The Noun
- •4.5.1.1. Number
- •4.5.1.2. Cases
- •4.5.2. The Pronoun
- •4.5.2.1. Personal Pronouns
- •4.5.2.2. Possessive Pronouns
- •4.5.3. The Adjective
- •4.5.4. The Adverb
- •4.5.5. The Verb
- •4.5.5.1. Personal Endings
- •4.5.5.2. Changes in Strong Verbs
- •4.5.5.3. Changes in Weak Verbs
- •4.5.5.4. Rise of Invariable Verbs
- •4.5.5.5. Changes in Preterite-Present Verbs
- •4.5.5.6. Irregular Verbs
- •4.6. New English Syntax
- •4.7. New English Vocabulary Changes
- •4.7.1. Latin Loanwords
- •4.7.2. Latinization of French Loanwords
- •4.7.3. Greek loanwords
- •4.7.4. French Loanwords
- •4.7.5. Mixed vocabulary of New English
- •4.7.6. Italian and Spanish Loanwords
- •4.7.7. Russian Loanwords
- •4.8. The Expansion of English
- •4.9. The English Language in the usa
- •4.9.1. Some peculiarities of American Pronunciation
- •4.9.2. American Spelling
- •4.9.3. Some peculiarities of American Grammar
- •4.9.4. Vocabulary of American English
- •Conclusion
- •Bibliography
3.5.2. Stressed vowels
The changes, vowels underwent during the ME period, may be divided into quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative changes affected only the lengh of a vowel, while qualitative changes altered the nature of the sound.
3.5.2.1. Quantitative Vowel Changes
In OE quantity was the main basis of correlation in the vowel system: short vowels were phonemically opposed to long ones, roughly identical in quality.
In later OE and Early ME vowel length began to depend on phonetic conditions.
Beginning with the IX c. a series of quantitative changes occurred which influenced greatly the rhythm of the English language.
As already described, in Late OE short vowels were lengthened before the combinations of consonants -ld, -nd, -mb unless followed by a third consonant: cīld but cildru.
In the XIII c. short vowels (chiefly a, o, e) were lengthened in stressed open syllables of disyllabic words while [u] and [i], as a rule, remained unchanged:
a > ā OE talu > ME tāle (tale)
o > ō OE open > ME ōpen (open)
e > ē OE etan > ME ēten (eat)
Sometimes [u] and [i] were lengthened in the same position, but with a simultaneous change in quality: u > ō, i > ē
u > ō OE dure > ME dōre (door), OE wudu > ME wōde (wood)
i > ē OE wike > ME wēke (week), OE bitel > ME bētel (beetle)
Thus, quantitative and qualitative changes often proceeded together.
Simaltuneously the reverse process of shortening of long vowels took place in closed syllables.A long vowel before two or more consonants was shortened, but it remained long in other environments,e.g.
OE dūst > ME dust
OE wīsdom > ME wisdom
OE cēpte > ME kepte
OE mētte > ME mette
OE fēdde > ME fedde
Vowels remained long:
before one consonant, e.g.
OE wīs – ME wīs (wise), OE mētan – ME mēten (meet), OE cēpan – ME kēpen (keep), OE fēdan – ME fēden;
before consonant clusters belonging to the following syllable (mostly -st), e.g.
OE ēasten > ME ēsten (from the East), OE mǣsta > mǭst;
In polysyllabic words shortening of long vowels took place not only before two consonants (in the closed syllable) but also before one consonant (in the open syllable), e.g.
OE hāliʒdæʒ > ME holiday.
As the result of these changes, too long syllables, like cēpte, became shorter, while too short syllables, like etan, became longer, so that the rhythm of English speech became more measured.
3.5.2.2. Qualitative Vowel Changes
Both monophthongs and diphthongs underwent radical changes during the ME period. They affected several monophthongs and all diphthongs and displayed considerable dialectal variety.
Monophthongs
OE a, o, ō, u, ū, e, ē, ı, ī remained more or less unchanged in ME, while OE ā, æ, ǣ, y, ӯ, å changed radically.
OE long ā developed into long open Ǭ everywhere but in the Northern dialect. This new [Ǭ] was of much more open nature than the OE [ ] inherited from OE.
(1) In ME manuscripts, the two types of ō were mostly represented by the same symbols: o – in open syllables, and oo – in closed ones. Later they were distinguished not only in sound but in spelling too: [ ] was, as a rule, represented by the digraph oo and [Ǭ] - by the digraph oa in closed syllables and by the letter o – in open ones: OE stān > ME stoon, OE āc > ME oak, OE nā > ME no.
Note. ME [ā] from OE [o] in open syllables was also of an open nature and mostly coincided with [ǭ] from OE [ā]. Therefore, we find the same way of representation of ME [ǭ] in hope < OE hopa and stone < OE stān.
(2) OE short æ in most dialects developed into short a, e.g.
OE ʒlæd > ME glad, OE æppel > ME appel, OE wæs > ME was.
(3) OE long ǣ changed into long open (more open than ).Thus in ME there were two types of long ē: an open [ ] and a close [ ]. In ME manuscripts they were often expressed in the same way: by a single letter e in open syllables and a double ee in closed ones. Later these different sounds were distinguished also in writing: [ ] was represented by digraphs ea and [ ] by the digraph ee, e.g.
OE sǣ > ME sea, OE mǣl > ME meal, OE fēlan > ME felen, OE fēt > ME feet.
Note. The sound [ ] developed in ME also as the result of the lengthening of e in open syllables: OE etan > ME ēten (eat), OE mete > ME mēte (meat)
OE å developed into ME o only in West Midland. In all other dialects OE å changed into a:
West Midland OE lånd > ME lond, OE mån > ME mon, OE lånʒ > ME long.
Other dialects: land, man, lang.
In most cases, the Modern English form is based on that of the Eastern dialects. Only before -ng forms with o predominate: long, strong, song.
The vowels y and ӯ existed in OE dialects up to the the X c. Then they changed into i/ ī
in the North-East (NrE): OE hyll > NrE hill (hill), OE fӯr > NrE > fir (fire).
y, ӯ remained unchanged in the South-West (SW)(written u, ui):
OE hyll > SW hull, OE fӯr > SW fuir
y, ӯ were replaced by e, ē in the South East (SE) (Kent):
OE hyll > SE hell, OE fӯr > SE fēr
In most cases ME forms with i/ī predominate. Sometimes the influence of other dialects is evident. In the word busy the spelling reflects the influence of the Western dialects. The same is true about the verb to build. The pronunciation of the verb to bury is due to the South -Eastern dialects, while the spelling is of Western origin.