- •Contents
- •List of abbreviations
- •Preface
- •Introduction
- •Germanic languages
- •Classification of germanic languages
- •Ancient germanic tribes and their classification
- •Germanic alphabets
- •Some phonetic peculiarities of germanic languages
- •Consonants
- •The First Consonant Shift (Grimm’s Law)
- •Ііі. Act The ie aspirated voiced plosives bh, dh, gh changed in Gc to corresponding unaspirated plosives b, d, g, e.G.
- •Verner`s Law
- •Word – Stress
- •Stressed vowels
- •Germanic Fracture (Breaking)
- •Gradation or Ablaut
- •Unstressed Vowels
- •Grammatical peculiarities of germanic languages
- •The Noun
- •The Adjective
- •The Verb
- •Gothic Strong Verbs
- •Vocabulary
- •Old english
- •2.1. Periods in the History of English
- •2.2. Historical Background
- •2.2.1. The Roman Conquest of Britain
- •2.2.2. The Anglo-Saxon Conquest of Britain
- •2.3. Alphabet and Pronunciation
- •Old English Alphabet
- •2.4. Old English Dialects and Written Records
- •2.5. Some Phonetic Changes of the Old English Period
- •2.5.1. Vowels
- •2.5.2. Old English Breaking
- •2.5.3. Palatal Mutation (I-mutation)
- •Monophthongs
- •Diphthongs
- •2.5.4. Back or Velar Mutation (Velarization)
- •2.5.5. Diphthongization of Vowels after Palatal Consonants
- •2.5.6. Lengthening of Short Vowels
- •2.5.7. Unstressed Vowels
- •2.5.8. Consonants
- •2.5.9. Palatalization of Velar Consonants
- •2.5.10. Assimilation, Metathesis, Doubling of Consonants, Loss of Consonants
- •2.6. Old English Morphology
- •2.6.1. Old English Noun: General Characteristics
- •Vowel Stems
- •Consonant Stems
- •2.6.2. Vowel Stems Strong Declension
- •2.6.3. Consonant Stems: Weak Declension, Minor Declensions
- •2.6.4. Root-Stems
- •2.6.5. Pronouns
- •2.6.5.1. Personal Pronouns
- •2.6.5.2. Demonstrative Pronouns
- •Declension of the Demonstrative Pronoun þes
- •2.6.6. Adjectives
- •2.6.6.1. Strong Declension of Adjectives
- •2.6.6.2. Weak Declension of Adjectives
- •2.6.6.3. Degrees of Comparison
- •2.6.7. Adverbs
- •2.6.7.1. Formation of Adverbs
- •2.6.7.2. Comparison of Adverbs
- •2.6.8. The Verb: General Characteristics
- •Conjugation of verbs
- •2.6.8.1. Strong Verbs
- •2.6.8.2. Weak Verbs
- •Conjugation of Weak Verbs
- •2.6.8.3. Preterite-Present Verbs
- •Conjugation of Preterite - Present verbs
- •2.6.8.4. Anomalous verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb dōn
- •Indicative mood
- •2.6.8.5. Suppletive Verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon
- •Indicative mood
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān
- •Indicative mood
- •2.7. Old English Syntax
- •2.8. The Old English Vocabulary
- •2.8.1. Word-Building
- •Suffixation
- •Prefixation
- •Composition
- •2.8.2. Borrowings
- •Latin borrowings
- •Celtic Borrowings
- •Middle english
- •3.1. Historical Background
- •3.1.1. Scandinavian Invasions
- •3.1.2. The Norman Conquest
- •3.2. Middle English Dialects Rise of the London Dialect
- •3.3. Early Middle English Written Records
- •3.4. Word Stress
- •3.5. Vowels
- •3.5.1. Unstressed Vowels
- •3.5.2. Stressed vowels
- •3.5.2.1. Quantitative Vowel Changes
- •3.5.2.2. Qualitative Vowel Changes
- •Monophthongs
- •3.5.2.3. Monophthongization of Old English Diphthongs
- •3.5.2.4. Rise of New Diphthongs
- •3.6. Evolution of Consonants in Middle English
- •3.7. Spelling Changes in Middle English
- •3.7.1. Changes in the Designation of Vowels
- •3.7.2. Changes in the designation of Consonants
- •3.8. Changes in the Grammatical System
- •3.8.1. Preliminary Remarks
- •3.8.2. The Noun
- •3.8.2.1. Gender
- •3.8.2.2. Number
- •3.8.2.3. Decay of Noun Declensions
- •3.8.3. The Adjective
- •3.8.3.1. Declension of Adjectives in Late Middle English
- •3.8.3.2. Degrees of Comparison
- •3.8.4. Adverbs
- •3.8.4.1. Formation of Adverbs
- •3.8.4.2. Comparison of Adverbs
- •3.8.5. The Pronoun
- •3.8.5.1. Personal Pronouns
- •3.8.5.2. Possessive pronouns
- •3.8.5.3. Demonstrative Pronouns
- •3.8.5.4. Rise of the Articles
- •3.8.6. The Verb: General Characteristics
- •Conjugation of Verbs
- •Conjugation of Verbs Past Indicative
- •3.8.5.1. Changes in the Morphological Classes of Verbs in Middle English and Early New English
- •3.8.6.1. Strong Verbs
- •3.8.6.2. Weak Verbs
- •3.8.6.3. Preterite-present Verbs
- •3.8.6.4. Suppletive verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •3.8.6.5. Rise of Analytical Forms
- •Future Forms
- •Perfect Forms
- •Passive Forms
- •Continuous Forms
- •3.8.7. Development of the Syntactic System
- •3.9. Middle English Vocabulary Changes
- •3.9.1. Native Derivational Affixes
- •3.9.2. French Derivational Affixes
- •3.9.3. Scandinavian Borrowings
- •3.9.4. French Borrowings
- •New english
- •4.1. The formation of the English National Language
- •4.2. Changes in Pronunciation
- •4.2.1. Development of Unstressed Vowels
- •4.2.1.1. Loss of unstressed –e [ə]
- •4.2.1.2. Loss of Vowels in Intermediate Syllables
- •4.2.2. Stressed Vowels
- •4.2.2.1. The Great Vowel Shift
- •4.2.2.2. Shortening of Long Vowels
- •4.2.2.3. Development of Short Vowels
- •4.2.2.4. The Development of the New Short [л]
- •4.2.2.5. Changes in Diphthongs
- •4.2.2.6. Vowel Changes under the Influence of Consonants
- •4.2.3. Consonants
- •4.2.3.1. Voicing of Voiceless Consonants
- •4.2.3.2. Loss of Consonants Development of [X]
- •Simplification of Consonant Clusters
- •4.2.3.3. Change of [d] to [ð] when Close to [r]
- •4.2.3.4. Development of Sibilants and Affricates in Early New English
- •4.3. Changes in Spelling
- •4.4. Local Dialects in New English
- •4.4.1. Scottish Dialect
- •4.4.2. Northern Dialects
- •4.4.3. Western, Central and Southern Dialects
- •4.5. Some Essential Grammatical Changes of the New English Period: Morphology
- •4.5.1. The Noun
- •4.5.1.1. Number
- •4.5.1.2. Cases
- •4.5.2. The Pronoun
- •4.5.2.1. Personal Pronouns
- •4.5.2.2. Possessive Pronouns
- •4.5.3. The Adjective
- •4.5.4. The Adverb
- •4.5.5. The Verb
- •4.5.5.1. Personal Endings
- •4.5.5.2. Changes in Strong Verbs
- •4.5.5.3. Changes in Weak Verbs
- •4.5.5.4. Rise of Invariable Verbs
- •4.5.5.5. Changes in Preterite-Present Verbs
- •4.5.5.6. Irregular Verbs
- •4.6. New English Syntax
- •4.7. New English Vocabulary Changes
- •4.7.1. Latin Loanwords
- •4.7.2. Latinization of French Loanwords
- •4.7.3. Greek loanwords
- •4.7.4. French Loanwords
- •4.7.5. Mixed vocabulary of New English
- •4.7.6. Italian and Spanish Loanwords
- •4.7.7. Russian Loanwords
- •4.8. The Expansion of English
- •4.9. The English Language in the usa
- •4.9.1. Some peculiarities of American Pronunciation
- •4.9.2. American Spelling
- •4.9.3. Some peculiarities of American Grammar
- •4.9.4. Vocabulary of American English
- •Conclusion
- •Bibliography
Germanic alphabets
Germanic tribes used three different Alphabets: Runic, Greek and Latin. The earliest of these was the Runic alphabet presumably derived either from the Latin or some other Italic alphabet close to the Latin. The runes (rune originally meant whisper, mystery) were mostly used for carving or scratching inscriptions (evidently thought to have magic power) on wood, stone or metal and consisted of vertical and diagonal strokes. The alphabet is also known as the futhark, from its first six runes.
Just when and where the Runic alphabet was created is unknown. According to some scientists, it originated approximately at some time in the 2nd and 3d centuries A.D., somewhere on the Rhine or the Danube where Gothic tribes came into touch with Roman culture. The Runic alphabet was used by different Germanic tribes: Goths, Anglo-Saxons and Scandinavians.
Next comes Ulfila`s Gothic alphabet (4 c.) based on the Greek alphabet with some admixture of Latin and Runic letters.
The latest alphabet used by Germanic tribes is the Latin alphabet. As it was inadequate to represent all sounds of Germanic languages, it was adapted to the peculiar needs of separate languages.
Some phonetic peculiarities of germanic languages
Consonants
The First Consonant Shift (Grimm’s Law)
One of the most distinctive features marking off the Germanic languages from all the other Indo-European languages is the so-called First Consonant Shift. It is called the first to distinguish it from the second consonant shift, which occurred in High German (i.e. Southern German) dialects in the V –VII centuries. It was first formulated by the Danish scholar R.Ch. Rask and explained by the German linguist J.L.Grimm in 1822 in his work German Grammar (Deutsche Grammatik) and therefore called Grimm`s Law. As proved by J. Grimm all the IE plosives seem to have gradually changed in Old Germanic. Regular correspondences of Germanic and those of other IE languages were grouped under three categories called by him Acts.
I. ACT The IE voiceless plosives p, t, k changed in Gc. to corresponding voiceless fricatives f, θ, h, e.g.
p > f R полный, L plēnus, Gt fulls
t > θ R три, L trēs, E three
k > h L canis, Gk kunos, E hound
II. ACT The IE voiced plosives b, d, g became in Gc voiceless p, t, k, e.g.
b > p R болото, E pool, R. слаб, E sleep
d > t R два, E. two, R вода, E water
g > k R иго, E yoke, Gk agros, E acre
Ііі. Act The ie aspirated voiced plosives bh, dh, gh changed in Gc to corresponding unaspirated plosives b, d, g, e.G.
bh > b Skt bhrātar, E brother
dh > d Skt vidhavā, E widow
gh > g Skt vāhanam < *vaghanam, E wagon
Verner`s Law
Further investigations of the Gc consonantal system showed that in some cases it is voiced plosives, rather than voiceless fricatives that correspond in Gc to IE voiceless plosives. Instead of the expected f, θ, h we find v, d, g. Cf
t – d Gk. pater, O.E. fæder
k – g Gk.dekas, Gt. tigus
According to Grimm’s Law the sound t should have corresponded to the sound θ, e.g.
t > θ R брат, E brother;
The sound k should have corresponded to the sound h, e.g.
k > h L. canis, E. hound
In 1877 the Danish scholar Karl Verner explained these inconsistencies in Grimm’s Law. The explanation given by Karl Verner is that the sound quality depended on the position of the accent in the IE word: after an unstressed vowel the voiceless fricatives f, θ, h < p, t, k were voiced and later on changed to b, d, g, e.g. Skt pi΄tar, OE fæder.
The connection between the Gc sounds and the position of the IE accent, discovered by Karl Verner, is usually called Verner`s Law. It was of great importance for the study of the Gc languages as it explained many seeming irregularities in their grammatical forms and drew attention of linguists to word stress.
Besides the voiceless fricative consonants resulting from the consonant shift, one more voiceless fricative consonant is affected by Verner`s Law, viz, the consonant s. If the preceding vowel is unstressed, s in Gc languages becomes voiced, i. e. s changes into z. Eventually this z becomes r in West Germanic and North Germanic languages (but not in Gothic). This latter change of z > r is termed rhotacism (from the name of the Greek letter ρ [rho]).
Gt hausjan, OE hīeran, G hören, E was – were