Литература

1. Baron, Naomi S. (2008). Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. New York: Oxford University Press.

2. Boase, Jeffrey, John B. Horrigan, Barry Wellman, and Lee Rainie (2006), “The Strength of Internet Ties,” Pew Internet & American Life Project, January 25. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/The-Strength-of-Internet-Ties.aspx

3. Brady, Diane (2006), “*#?@the E-Mail. Can We Talk?,” Business Week, December 4, p.109.

4. Cassidy, John (2006), “Me Media,” New Yorker, May 15, pp.50-59.

5. Cohen, Noam (2007), “A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source,” New York Times, February 21.

6. Conlin, Michelle (2007), “Cheating – or Postmodern Learning?,” Business Week, May 14, p.42.

7. Dux, Paul E., Jason Ivanoff, Christopher L. Asplund, and René Marois (2006), “Isolation of a Central Bottleneck of Information Processing with Time-Resolved fMRI,” Neuron 52:1109-1120.

8. Eng, Patricia M., Eric B. Rimm, Garrett Fitzmaurice, and Ichiro Kawachi (2002), “Social Ties and Change in Social Ties in Relation to Subsequent Total and Cause-Specific Mortality and Coronary Heart Disease Incidence in Men,” American Journal of Epidemiology 155(8):700-709.

9. Eriksen, Thomas H. (2001). Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.

10. Freedman, David H. (2007), “What’s Next: Taskus Interruptus,” Inc Magazine, February. Available at http://www.inc.com/magazine/20070201/column-freedman.html

11. Friedman, Thomas (2006), “The Taxi Driver,” Op-Ed, New York Times, November 1.

12. Gardner, Ralph Jr. (2006), “In College, You Can Go Home Again and Again,” New York Times, December 14, E9.

13. Gergen, Kenneth (1991). The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.

14. Greenfield, Susan (2003). Tomorrow’s People. London: Allen Lane.

15. Iqbal, Shamsi T. and Eric Horvitz (2007), “Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks: Field Study, Analysis, and Directions. CHI 2007, April 28-May 3, San Jose, CA.

16. Kinsley, Michael (2006), “Like I Care,” Op-Ed, Washington Post, November 28, A19.

17. Kraut, Robert, Sara Kiesler, Bonka Boneva, Jonathon Cummings, Vicki Helgeson, and Anne Crawford (2002), “Internet Paradox Revisited,” Journal of Social Issues 58(1):49-74.

18. Kraut, Robert, Michael Patterson, Vicki Lundmark, Sara Kiesler, Tridas Mukopadhyay, and William Scherlis (1998), “Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?,” American Psychologist 53(9):1017-1031.

19. Levy, Steven (2006), “Digital Distractions Bad for the Workplace,” Newsweek, March 27. Available at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11899893/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/

20. Lewis, Peter (1988), “A Basic Choice with Laser Printers,” New York Times, February 7, F12.

21. Locke, John L. (1998). The De-Voicing of Society: Why We Don’t Talk to Each Other Anymore. New York: Simon & Schuster.

22. Lohr, Steve (2007), “Slow Down, Multitaskers, and Don’t Read in Traffic,” New York Times, March 25.

23. Manguel, Alberto (1996). A History of Reading. New York: Viking.

24. Markus, M. Lynne (1994), “Finding a Happy Medium: Explaining the Negative Effects of Electronic Communication on Social Life at Work,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12(1):119-149.

25. Matsuda, Misa (2005), “Mobile Communication and Selective Sociality,” in M. Ito, D. Okabe, and M. Matsuda, eds., Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.123-142.

26. McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Matthew E. Brashears (2006), “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades,” American Sociological Review 71(3):353-375.

27. McWhorter, John (2003). Doing Our Own Thing: The Degradation of Language and Music and Why We Should, Like, Care. New York: Gotham Books.

28. Moss, Rose (1996), “No Space Like Shared Space,” New York Times, January 15, A17.

29. Nie, Norman H. and D. Sunshine Hillygus (2002), “The Impact of Internet Use on Sociability: Time-Diary Findings,” IT& Society 1(1): 1-20.

30. Okada, Tomoyuki (2002), “Keitai kara Manabu to Iukoto (What It Means to Learn from Keitai),” in T. Okada and M. Matsuda, eds., Keitai-Gaku Nyumon (Understanding Mobile Media). Tokyo: Yuhikaku, pp.3-19.

31. Putnam, Robert (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

32. Quan-Haase, Anabel and Barry Wellman (2002), “Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community,” in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite, eds., The Internet in Everyday Life. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 291-324.

33. Rheingold, Howard (1999), “Look Who’s Talking,” Wired 7.01, January.

34. Richtel, Matt (2007), “Hands on the Wheel, Not on the BlackBerry Keys,” New York Times, May 12.

35. Riesman, David (1950). The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven: Yale University Press.

36. “Schools Say iPods Become Tool for Cheaters” (2007), Associated Press, April 27. Available at CNN News at http://www.iin.oea.org/2007/Noticias_pasadas_2007/Noticias_mayo_2007/noticia2ingles.htm

37. “Some Tech-Gen Youth Go Offline” (2006), Associated Press, October 6. Available at Wired News at http://wired.com/news/wireservice/1,71918-0.html

38. Stone, Brad (2007), “Bereft of Blackberries, the Untethered Make Do,” New York Times, April 19, C1.

39. Umble, Diane Zimmerman (1996). Holding the Line: The Telephone in Old Order Mennonite and Amish life. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

40. “US Highway Deaths on the Rise” (2006), Associated Press, August 22. Available at MSNBC at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14470457/

41. Wellman, Barry, Anabel Quan, James Witte, and Keith Hampton (2001), “Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment,” American Behavioral Scientist 45:436-455.

42. Wright, Robert (2007), “E-Mail and Prozac,” Op-Ed, New York Times, April 17.

43. Wurtzel, Alan H. and Colin Turner (1977), “What Missing the Telephone Means,” Journal of Communication 27(2): 48-57

____________________________________