Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Analysis and Application of Analog Electronic Circuits to Biomedical Instrumentation - Northrop.pdf
Скачиваний:
205
Добавлен:
10.08.2013
Размер:
4.41 Mб
Скачать

346

 

Analysis and Application of Analog Electronic Circuits

 

Si(f)

 

 

 

 

So(f)

 

 

H(jf)

 

G(jf)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIGURE 9.8

Two cascaded linear systems through which Gaussian noise is propagating.

9.3Propagation of Noise through LTI Filters

In a formal rigorous treatment of noise in linear systems, it is possible to show that the PDF of the output of a linear system is Gaussian, given a Gaussian noise input. In addition, it can be shown rigorously (James et al., 1947) that the PDS of the system’s output noise is given by

Sy (f ) = Sx (f )

 

H(j f )

 

2

MS units Hz

(9.41)

 

 

This is the scalar product of the positive-real input PDS and the magnitude squared of the LTI system’s transfer function. This relation can be extended to include two or more cascaded systems, as shown in Figure 9.8.

Sy (f ) = Sx (f )

 

H(j f )

 

2

 

G(j f )

 

2

MSV Hz

(9.42)

 

 

 

 

or

Sy (f ) = Sx (f )

 

H(j f )G(j f )

 

2

MSV Hz

(9.43)

 

 

If white noise with a PDS, Sx(f ) = η MSV/Hz is the input to a linear system, then the output PDS is simply:

 

 

Sy (f ) = η

 

H(j f )

 

2

MSV Hz

(9.44)

 

 

The total mean-squared output noise of this system is given by:

 

 

 

= Sy (f )df = η

 

H(j f )

 

2 df MSV

 

 

von2

(9.45)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For transfer functions with one more finite poles than zeros, the right-hand integral of Equation 9.45 may be shown to be the product of the transfer function’s low-frequency or mid-band gain squared times the filter’s equivalent

© 2004 by CRC Press LLC

Noise and the Design of Low-Noise Amplifiers for Biomedical Applications

347

 

TABLE 9.1

 

 

 

 

 

Gain2-Bandwidth Products for Some Common Filter Transfer Functions

 

 

 

Transfer Functiona

Gain2 Bandwidthb

Filter Type

 

 

1.

 

Kv

 

 

 

 

 

 

sτ + 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.

 

 

 

 

Kv

 

 

 

(

1

+ 1

2

+ 1

 

 

 

)(

 

)

 

3.

 

 

 

 

Kv

 

 

 

s2

ωn2 + s2ξ ωn + 1

 

4.

 

 

sKv (2ξ ωn )

s2

ωn2 + s2ξ ωn + 1

 

2

 

1 ˆ

 

 

Kv

 

 

˜

 

Low pass; one real-pole

 

 

4τ ↓

 

 

2

 

 

1

ˆ

Low pass; two real poles

Kv

4(τ1 + τ2 )

˜

2

 

ωn

ˆ

 

Low pass; underdamped quadratic

Kv

 

8ξ

˜

 

 

 

 

 

Kv2 (ξωn )

 

Underdamped quadratic band pass

5.

 

 

 

1Kv

 

 

2

 

1

 

ˆ

Overdamped quadratic band pass

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kv

 

 

 

˜

(

 

+ 1

 

+ 1

 

 

1

2

 

4τ2 (1+ τ2

τ1 )

 

 

 

)(

 

)

 

 

aH(s)

bHz

Hertz noise bandwidth. Thus, the filter’s gain-squared bandwidth product is given by:

GAIN2BW =

 

H(2π fj)

 

2 df

(9.46)

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

Gain2-bandwidth integrals have been evaluated for a number of transfer functions using complex variable theory (James et al., 1947). Table 9.1 gives the gain2-bandwidth integrals for five common transfer functions. Note that the equivalent noise bandwidths (in brackets in each case) are in Hertz, not radians/second. Also note the absence of any 2π factors in these expressions. Gain2-bandwidth integrals are used to estimate the total MS output noise from amplifiers with (approximate) white noise input sources and are thus useful in calculating output signal-to-noise ratios.

9.4Noise Factor and Figure of Amplifiers

9.4.1Broadband Noise Factor and Noise Figure of Amplifiers

An amplifier’s noise factor, F, is defined as the ratio of the mean-squared signal-to-noise ratio at the amplifier’s input to the MS signal-to-noise ratio at the amplifier’s output. Because a real amplifier is noisy and adds noise to the signal as well as amplifying it, the output signal-to-noise ratio (SNRo)

© 2004 by CRC Press LLC

348

Analysis and Application of Analog Electronic Circuits

 

ena

Vi

 

Rs @ T

 

 

Vo

 

 

+

Vs

ina

Vi H(jf)

Amplifier

FIGURE 9.9

The simple two-noise source model for a noisy VCVS.

is always less than the input signal-to-noise ratio (SNRi); thus, the noise factor is always greater than one for a noisy amplifier. F is a figure of merit for an amplifier — the closer to unity the better.

F

SNRi

> 1

(9.47)

 

 

SNRo

 

The noise figure is defined as:

 

NF ∫ 10 log10 (F) (decibels dB)

(9.48)

when the SNRs are in terms of mean squared quantities. The closer NF is to zero, the quieter the amplifier is.

Figure 9.9 illustrates a simple two-noise source model for a noisy amplifier. Here it is assumed the spectrums of ena and ina are white and that R1 Rs.

The MS input signal is Si = vs2 , so the MS output signal is So = KV2 vs2 , where KV2 is the amplifier’s mid-band gain squared. The MS input noise is simply that associated with vs (here set to zero) plus the Johnson noise from the source resistance, Rs, in a specified Hertz noise bandwidth, B. It is:

Ni = 4kTRs B MSV

(9.49)

The mean-squared noise at the amplifier’s output, No, is composed of three components: one from the Rs Johnson noise and two from the equivalent noise sources. No can be written as the sum of MS voltages:

No = (4kTRs + ena2

+ ina2

Rs2 )

 

H(j f )

 

2 df

 

 

 

 

(9.50)

 

 

0

= (4kTRs + ena2

+ ina2

Rs2 )Kv2 B MSV

Using the definition for F, the noise factor for the simple noisy amplifier model can be written as:

© 2004 by CRC Press LLC

Noise and the Design of Low-Noise Amplifiers for Biomedical Applications

349

F = 1+

e 2

+ i 2

R 2

(9.51)

na

na

s

 

 

 

 

4kTRs

Note that this expression for F contains no bandwidth terms; they cancel out. When the NF is given for an amplifier, Rs must be specified, as well as the Hertz bandwidth, B, over which the noise is measured. The temperature should also be specified, although common practice usually sets T at 298 K (25C).

For practical amplifiers, NF and F are functions of frequency because ena and ina are functions of frequency (see Figure 9.6). For a given Rs, F tends to rise at low frequencies due to the 1/f components in the equivalent input noise sources. F also increases at high frequencies — again, due to the high-fre- quency increases in ena and ina. Often, one is interested in the noise performance of an amplifier in low or high frequencies in which the NF and F are not minimum. To examine the detailed noise performance of an amplifier at low and high frequencies, use the spot noise figure (described next).

9.4.2Spot Noise Factor and Figure

Spot noise measurements are made through a narrow band-pass filter in order to evaluate an amplifier’s noise performance in a certain narrow frequency range, particularly where ena(f ) and ina(f ) are not constant, such as the 1/f range. Figure 9.10 illustrates a set of spot noise figure (SNF) contours for a commercial low-noise preamplifier with applications at audio frequencies. Note the area in {Rs, f } space at which the spot noise figure is a minimum. For best noise performance, the Thevenin resistance of the source, Rs, should lie in the range of minimum SNF and the input signal’s PDS should contain most of its energy in the range of frequencies at which the SNF is minimum.

A system for determining an amplifier’s spot noise figure is shown in Figure 9.11. An adjustable white noise voltage source is used at the amplifier’s input. Note that the output resistance of the white noise source plus some external resistance must add up to Rs, the specified Thevenin equivalent input resistance. The system is used as follows: first, the band-pass filter (BPF) is set to the desired center frequency, fc, around which the amplifier’s noise performance is to be characterized. Then the white noise generator is set to eN = 0. Assume that the total mean squared noise at the system output under these conditions can be written as:

No (fc ) = [4kTRs + ena2 (fc )+ ina2 (fc )Rs2 ] KV2 BF MSV

(9.52)

where ena(fc) is the value of ena at the center frequency; fc, BF is the equivalent noise bandwidth of the BPF; and KV is the combined gain of the amplifier under measurement at fc, the BPF at fc, and the postamplifier. KV can be written:

© 2004 by CRC Press LLC

350

 

 

 

 

Analysis and Application of Analog Electronic Circuits

RS (ohms)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 dB

 

 

 

 

 

20 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

< 0.05 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

 

 

20 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40 dB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

101

1

10

102

103

104

105

106

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

f

(Hz)

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIGURE 9.10

Curves of constant spot noise figure (SNF) for a typical commercial low-noise amplifier. Note the region in RS-f space at which the SNF is minimum (optimum).

Rs @ T

ena

Vi

Von

 

 

 

 

+

eN

ina

 

Vi H(j2πf)

 

 

 

Ideal BPF

 

 

 

Vof

KF

 

 

 

BF

0

 

 

0

fc

f

KAVof

KA

True rms

Differential

voltmeter

amplifier

FIGURE 9.11

A test circuit for measuring an amplifier’s SNF.

© 2004 by CRC Press LLC

Noise and the Design of Low-Noise Amplifiers for Biomedical Applications

351

KV = H(j 2π fc) KF KA

(9.53)

In the second step, the white noise source is made nonzero and adjusted so that the true RMS meter reads 2 higher than in the first case with eN = 0. The MS output voltage can now be written:

No(fc ) = 2No (fc ) = 2[4kTRs + ena2 (fc )+ ina2 (fc )Rs2 ]Kv2BF

= [

 

 

+ 4kTRs + ena2 (fc )+ ina2 (fc )Rs2 ]Kv2 BF

(9.54)

eN2

 

Under this condition, it is evident that

 

 

 

 

= 4kTRs + ena2 (fc )+ ina2 (fc )Rs2

 

 

eN2

(9.55)

so:

 

[ena2 (fc )+ ina2 (fc )Rs2 ]= [

 

4kTRs ]

 

eN2

(9.56)

If the left-hand side of this equation is substituted into Equation 9.51 for the noise factor, F,

Fspot =

 

(4kTRs )

 

eN2

(9.57)

Note that this simple expression for the SNF does not contain specific terms for the band-pass filter’s center frequency, fc, or its Hertz noise band-

width, BF. Note that these parameters must be specified when giving Fspot for an amplifier. Fspot is actually calculated by setting fc and Rs, then determining

the eN2 value that doubles the mean squared output noise. This value of eN2 is then divided by the calculated white noise spectrum from the resistor Rs.

It is also possible to measure Fspot using a sinusoidal source of frequency fc, instead of the calibrated white noise source, eN. See the home problems at the end of this chapter for a detailed treatment of this method.

9.4.3Transformer Optimization of Amplifier NF and Output SNR

Figure 9.10 illustrates that, for a given set of internal biasing conditions, a given amplifier will have an optimum operating region in which NFspot is a minimum in Rs,fc-space. In some practical instances, the input transducer to which the amplifier is connected has an Rs far smaller than the Rs giving the lowest NFspot on the amplifier’s spot NF contours. Consequently, the signal conditioning system (i.e., transducer and amplifier) is not operating to give the lowest NF or the highest output SNR.

© 2004 by CRC Press LLC

352

Analysis and Application of Analog Electronic Circuits

RS @ T

1 : n

 

ena

Vo

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vi

+

R1

ina

 

+

VS

 

Vi H(jω)

 

 

 

Ideal Xfmr.

FIGURE 9.12

Use of an ideal transformer in an amplifier’s input circuit to maximize the output MS signal- to-noise ratio, as well as minimize the SNF, given the optimum turns ratio.

One way of improving the output SNR is to couple the input transducer to the amplifier through a low-noise, low-loss transformer, as shown in Figure 9.12. Such coupling, of course, presumes that the signal coming from the transducer is ac and not dc, for obvious reasons. (A practical transformer is a band-pass device that loses efficiency at low and high frequencies, thus limiting the range of frequencies over which output SNR can be maximized.)

The output MS SNR can be calculated for the circuit of Figure 9.12 as follows: the MS input signal is simply vs2 . In the case of a sinusoidal input, it is well known that vs2 = Vs2/2 MSV, where Vs is the peak value of the sinusoid. The MS signal at the output is:

 

 

 

 

 

S = v 2 n2

K 2

(9.58)

o s

v

 

where n is the transformer’s secondary-to-primary turns ratio and KV is the amplifier’s mid-band gain.

The transformer is assumed to be ideal (and noiseless). In practice, transformer windings have finite resistance and thus make Johnson noise; their magnetic cores contribute Barkhausen noise to their outputs. (Barkhausen noise arises from the small transient voltages induced on the transformer winding when magnetic domains in the transformer’s ferromagnetic core flip direction as the magnetizing field, H, varies in time. Domain flipping is effectively random at low H values.)

The ideal transformer, besides having infinite frequency response, is also lossless and noiseless. From this latter assumption, it is easy to show that the amplifier “sees” a transformed Thevenin equivalent circuit of the input transducer with an open-circuit voltage of n vs(t) and a Thevenin resistance of n2 Rs (Northrop, 1990). Thus, the mean squared output noise of the trans- former-input amplifier can be written

No

 

2

2

2 2

2

˘

2

B MSV

(9.59)

= n

 

4kTRs + ena

+ ina (n

Rs )

˙ Kv

 

 

 

 

 

 

˚

 

 

 

© 2004 by CRC Press LLC