- •Contents
- •Authors
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgments
- •Introduction
- •Selection of frameworks
- •Description and evaluation of individual frameworks
- •How to use this handbook
- •Overview of what follows
- •Chapter 1 The nature of thinking and thinking skills
- •Chapter 2 Lists, inventories, groups, taxonomies and frameworks
- •Chapter 3 Frameworks dealing with instructional design
- •Chapter 4 Frameworks dealing with productive thinking
- •Chapter 5 Frameworks dealing with cognitive structure and/or development
- •Chapter 6 Seven ‘all-embracing’ frameworks
- •Chapter 7 Moving from understanding to productive thinking: implications for practice
- •Perspectives on thinking
- •What is thinking?
- •Metacognition and self-regulation
- •Psychological perspectives
- •Sociological perspectives
- •Philosophical perspectives
- •Descriptive or normative?
- •Thinking skills and critical thinking
- •Thinking skills in education
- •Teaching thinking: programmes and approaches
- •Developments in instructional design
- •Bringing order to chaos
- •Objects of study
- •Frameworks
- •Lists
- •Groups
- •Taxonomies
- •Utility
- •Taxonomies and models
- •Maps, charts and diagrams
- •Examples
- •Bloom’s taxonomy
- •Guilford’s structure of intellect model
- •Gerlach and Sullivan’s taxonomy
- •Conclusion
- •Introduction
- •Time sequence of the instructional design frameworks
- •Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (cognitive domain) (1956)
- •Feuerstein’s theory of mediated learning through Instrumental Enrichment (1957)
- •Ausubel and Robinson’s six hierarchically-ordered categories (1969)
- •Williams’ model for developing thinking and feeling processes (1970)
- •Hannah and Michaelis’ comprehensive framework for instructional objectives (1977)
- •Stahl and Murphy’s domain of cognition taxonomic system (1981)
- •Biggs and Collis’ SOLO taxonomy (1982)
- •Quellmalz’s framework of thinking skills (1987)
- •Presseisen’s models of essential, complex and metacognitive thinking skills (1991)
- •Merrill’s instructional transaction theory (1992)
- •Anderson and Krathwohl’s revision of Bloom’s taxonomy (2001)
- •Gouge and Yates’ Arts Project taxonomies of arts reasoning and thinking skills (2002)
- •Description and evaluation of the instructional design frameworks
- •Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: cognitive domain
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Description and intended use
- •Intellectual skills
- •Cognitive strategies
- •Motor skills
- •Attitudes
- •Evaluation
- •Ausubel and Robinson’s six hierarchically-ordered categories
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Williams’ model for developing thinking and feeling processes
- •Description and intended use
- •Cognitive behaviours
- •Affective behaviours
- •Evaluation
- •Hannah and Michaelis’ comprehensive framework for instructional objectives
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Stahl and Murphy’s domain of cognition taxonomic system
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Biggs and Collis’ SOLO taxonomy: Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Quellmalz’s framework of thinking skills
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Presseisen’s models of essential, complex and metacognitive thinking skills
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Merrill’s instructional transaction theory
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Anderson and Krathwohl’s revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives
- •Description and intended use
- •Changes in emphasis
- •Changes in terminology
- •Changes in structure
- •Evaluation
- •Gouge and Yates’ ARTS Project taxonomies of arts reasoning and thinking skills
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Some issues for further investigation
- •Introduction
- •Time sequence of the productive-thinking frameworks
- •Altshuller’s TRIZ Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (1956)
- •Allen, Feezel and Kauffie’s taxonomy of critical abilities related to the evaluation of verbal arguments (1967)
- •De Bono’s lateral and parallel thinking tools (1976 / 85)
- •Halpern’s reviews of critical thinking skills and dispositions (1984)
- •Baron’s model of the good thinker (1985)
- •Ennis’ taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities (1987)
- •Lipman’s modes of thinking and four main varieties of cognitive skill (1991/95)
- •Paul’s model of critical thinking (1993)
- •Jewell’s reasoning taxonomy for gifted children (1996)
- •Petty’s six-phase model of the creative process (1997)
- •Bailin’s intellectual resources for critical thinking (1999b)
- •Description and evaluation of productive-thinking frameworks
- •Description and intended use
- •Problem Definition: in which the would-be solver comes to an understanding of the problem
- •Selecting a Problem-Solving Tool
- •Generating solutions: using the tools
- •Solution evaluation
- •Evaluation
- •Allen, Feezel and Kauffie’s taxonomy of concepts and critical abilities related to the evaluation of verbal arguments
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •De Bono’s lateral and parallel thinking tools
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Halpern’s reviews of critical thinking skills and dispositions
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Baron’s model of the good thinker
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Ennis’ taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities
- •Description and intended use
- •Dispositions
- •Abilities
- •Clarify
- •Judge the basis for a decision
- •Infer
- •Make suppositions and integrate abilities
- •Use auxiliary critical thinking abilities
- •Evaluation
- •Lipman’s three modes of thinking and four main varieties of cognitive skill
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Paul’s model of critical thinking
- •Description and intended use
- •Elements of reasoning
- •Standards of critical thinking
- •Intellectual abilities
- •Intellectual traits
- •Evaluation
- •Jewell’s reasoning taxonomy for gifted children
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Petty’s six-phase model of the creative process
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Bailin’s intellectual resources for critical thinking
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Some issues for further investigation
- •Introduction
- •Time sequence of theoretical frameworks of cognitive structure and/or development
- •Piaget’s stage model of cognitive development (1950)
- •Guilford’s Structure of Intellect model (1956)
- •Perry’s developmental scheme (1968)
- •Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences (1983)
- •Koplowitz’s theory of adult cognitive development (1984)
- •Belenky’s ‘Women’s Ways of Knowing’ developmental model (1986)
- •Carroll’s three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities (1993)
- •Demetriou’s integrated developmental model of the mind (1993)
- •King and Kitchener’s model of reflective judgment (1994)
- •Pintrich’s general framework for self-regulated learning (2000)
- •Theories of executive function
- •Description and evaluation of theoretical frameworks of cognitive structure and/or development
- •Piaget’s stage model of cognitive development
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Guilford’s Structure of Intellect model
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Perry’s developmental scheme
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Koplowitz’s theory of adult cognitive development
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Belenky’s ‘Women’s Ways of Knowing’ developmental model
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Carroll’s three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Demetriou’s integrated developmental model of the mind
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •King and Kitchener’s model of reflective judgment
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Pintrich’s general framework for self-regulated learning
- •Description and intended use
- •Regulation of cognition
- •Cognitive planning and activation
- •Cognitive monitoring
- •Cognitive control and regulation
- •Cognitive reaction and reflection
- •Regulation of motivation and affect
- •Motivational planning and activation
- •Motivational monitoring
- •Motivational control and regulation
- •Motivational reaction and reflection
- •Regulation of behaviour
- •Behavioural forethought, planning and action
- •Behavioural monitoring and awareness
- •Behavioural control and regulation
- •Behavioural reaction and reflection
- •Regulation of context
- •Contextual forethought, planning and activation
- •Contextual monitoring
- •Contextual control and regulation
- •Contextual reaction and reflection
- •Evaluation
- •Theories of executive function
- •Description and potential relevance for education
- •Evaluation
- •Some issues for further investigation
- •6 Seven ‘all-embracing’ frameworks
- •Introduction
- •Time sequence of the all-embracing frameworks
- •Romiszowski’s analysis of knowledge and skills (1981)
- •Wallace and Adams’‘ Thinking Actively in a Social Context’ model (1990)
- •Jonassen and Tessmer’s taxonomy of learning outcomes (1996/7)
- •Hauenstein’s conceptual framework for educational objectives (1998)
- •Vermunt and Verloop’s categorisation of learning activities (1999)
- •Marzano’s new taxonomy of educational objectives (2001a; 2001b)
- •Sternberg’s model of abilities as developing expertise (2001)
- •Description and evaluation of seven all-embracing frameworks
- •Romiszowski’s analysis of knowledge and skills
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Jonassen and Tessmer’s taxonomy of learning outcomes
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Hauenstein’s conceptual framework for educational objectives
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Vermunt and Verloop’s categorisation of learning activities
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Marzano’s new taxonomy of educational objectives
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Sternberg’s model of abilities as developing expertise
- •Description and intended use
- •Evaluation
- •Some issues for further investigation
- •Overview
- •How are thinking skills classified?
- •Domain
- •Content
- •Process
- •Psychological aspects
- •Using thinking skills frameworks
- •Which frameworks are best suited to specific applications?
- •Developing appropriate pedagogies
- •Other applications of the frameworks and models
- •In which areas is there extensive or widely accepted knowledge?
- •In which areas is knowledge very limited or highly contested?
- •Constructing an integrated framework
- •Summary
- •References
- •Index
140 |
Frameworks for Thinking |
|
|
Classification by: |
Values: |
Practical illustrations |
||
• type of thinking |
• |
originality |
for teachers: |
|
|
• |
novelty |
• |
provides exemplars |
|
• |
individuality |
|
of use of the tools |
|
• |
opposed to dialectical |
|
and suggestions for a |
|
|
reasoning |
|
range of applications |
|
|
|
• |
extensive support |
|
|
|
|
through website, |
|
|
|
|
additional training |
|
|
|
|
materials, courses |
|
|
|
|
and seminars |
|
|
|
|
|
Halpern’s reviews of critical thinking skills and dispositions
Description and intended use
Much of the material presented here first appeared in Halpern’s influential book on critical thinking (Halpern, 1984), and was later developed into ‘a taxonomy of critical thinking skills’ (Halpern, 1994, p. 31). The taxonomy was intended to provide a basis for the national assessment of critical thinking skills in adults in the USA. At a govern- ment-sponsored workshop held in 1992, Halpern referred to the thinking skills needed to compete in a global economy and in the exercise of citizenship (1994, p. 29), but chose to focus on what is often referred to as ‘higher-order thinking’, i.e. thinking that is reflective, sensitive to context and monitored. She used the following category headings:
•verbal reasoning skills
•argument analysis skills
•skills in thinking as hypothesis testing
•using likelihood and uncertainty
•decision-making and problem-solving skills.
The 1992 workshop was set up in response to the following U.S. national objective:
The proportion of college graduates who demonstrate an advanced ability to think critically, communicate effectively, and solve problems will increase
substantially. (National Education Goals Panel, 1991, p. 237)
Productive thinking |
141 |
|
|
However, the workshop participants failed to agree on a single theoretical framework on which to base the proposed national assessment and the idea was eventually abandoned. Halpern subsequently revised her lists, and presented them, not as a taxonomy, but as a set of chapter reviews in her book, Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum
(Halpern, 1997). This book, which closely follows the chapter structure of her 1984 volume on critical thinking, includes material on memory skills and on creative thinking as well as on the types of thinking included in her 1992 taxonomy.
Halpern (1997) employs the following working definition of critical thinking as ‘the use of cognitive skills or strategies that increase the probability of a desirable outcome. . . thinking that is purposeful, reasoned, and goal-directed. . . and effective for the particular context and type of thinking task’ (1997, p. 4). This definition is so broad that it covers almost all thinking except basic arithmetical calculation and other automatised procedures. Halpern justifies her inclusion of memory skills by claiming that ‘All thinking skills are inextricably tied to the ability to remember’ (p. 19).
All the thinking skills described by Halpern in separate chapters of her book are listed in table 4.4, together with some category descriptors from Halpern (1994). What is omitted are more detailed descriptions and examples of use, all of which were written for a general readership and for ‘any course where critical thinking is valued’ (p. vii). Table 4.3 illustrates the level of detail provided throughout, using a single example, taken from Halpern’s review of decision-making skills (p. 217).
Table 4.3. An example of one of the critical thinking skills specified by Halpern
Skill |
Description |
Example of use |
|
|
|
Avoiding the |
Entrapment occurs |
Shana decides to stick |
entrapment bias |
when a course of action |
with her boyfriend |
|
requires additional |
who treats her badly |
|
investments beyond those |
because she has already |
|
already made. |
invested several years in |
|
|
the relationship. |
|
|
|
142 Frameworks for Thinking
Table 4.4. Halpern’s categorisation of critical thinking skills
Memory skills
skills that are needed when learning, during retention and at retrieval
a.monitoring your attention
b.developing an awareness of the influence of stereotypes and other beliefs on what we remember
c.making abstract information meaningful as an aid to comprehension and recall
d.using advance organisers to anticipate new information
e.organising information so that it can be recalled more easily
f.generating retrieval cues at both acquisition and retrieval
g.monitoring how well you are learning
h.using external memory aids
i.employing keywords and images, rhymes, places, and first letters, as internal memory aids
j.applying the cognitive interview techniques (Geiselman and Fisher, 1985)
k.developing an awareness of biases in memory
Thought and language skills
skills that are needed to comprehend and defend against the persuasive techniques
that are embedded in everyday language
a.recognising and defending against the use of emotional and misleading language
b.detecting misuse of definitions and reification
c.understanding the use of framing with leading questions and negation to bias the reader
d.using analogies appropriately
e.employing questioning and paraphrase as a skill for the comprehension of text and oral language
f.producing and using a graphic representation of information provided in prose form
Deductive reasoning skills
skills used to determine if a conclusion is valid – i.e. it must be true if the premises
are true
Productive thinking |
143 |
|
|
a.discriminating between inductive and deductive reasoning
b.identifying premises and conclusions
c.reasoning with ‘if-then’ statements
d.using linear ordering principles
e.avoiding the fallacies of denying the antecedent and confirming the consequent
f.using tree diagrams with branches and nodes to represent information
Argument analysis skills
skills that are needed to judge how well reasons and evidence support a conclusion, including considering counter-evidence, stated and unstated assumptions, and the overall strength of the argument
a.identifying premises (reasons), counter-arguments and conclusions
b.making strong arguments that show good thinking and communication skills
c.judging the credibility of an information source and judging the difference between expertise in factual matters and in value matters
d.understanding the difference between opinion, reasoned judgment, and fact
e.recognising and avoiding common fallacies, such as straw person, appeals to ignorance, slippery slope, false dichotomy, guilt by association, and arguments against the person
f.identifying psychological effects on reasoning
g.remembering to consider what could be missing from an argument
Skills in thinking as hypothesis testing
the skills used in scientific reasoning – the accumulation of observations, formulation of beliefs or hypotheses, and then using the information collected to decide if it confirms or disconfirms the hypotheses
a.recognising the need for and using operational definitions
b.understanding the need to isolate and control variables in order to make strong causal claims
c.checking for adequate sample size and possible bias in sampling when a generalisation is made
d.being able to describe the relationship between any two variables as positive, negative, or unrelated
e.understanding the limits of correlational reasoning
144 Frameworks for Thinking
Table 4.4. (cont.)
Likelihood and uncertainty critical thinking skills
the correct use of objective and subjective estimates of probability
a.recognising regression to the mean
b.understanding and avoiding conjunction errors
c.utilising base rates to make predictions
d.understanding the limits of extrapolation
e.adjusting risk assessments to account for the cumulative nature of probabilistic events
f.thinking intelligently about unknown risks
Decision-making skills
the skills involved in the generation and selection of alternatives and in judging
among them
a.framing a decision in several ways to consider different sorts of alternatives
b.generating alternatives
c.evaluating the consequences of various alternatives
d.recognising the bias in hindsight analysis
e.using a decision-making worksheet
f.avoiding the entrapment bias
g.seeking disconfirming evidence
h.awareness of the effects of memory on decisions
Problem-solving skills
skills needed to identify and define a problem, state the goal and generate and
evaluate solution paths
a.restating the problem and the goal to consider different sorts of solution
b.recognising the critical role of persistence
c.using a quality representation of a problem (e.g. graphs, trees, matrices, and models)
d.understanding world-view constraints
e.selecting the best strategy for the type of problem
f.actively seeking analogies
Skills for creative thinking
a.redefine the problem and goal (in several different ways)
b.find analogies (across different domains of knowledge)