- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1.1 Fundamentals of the semiclassical laser theory
- •1.1.1 The laser oscillator
- •1.1.2.2 Homogeneous, isotropic, linear dielectrics
- •1.1.2.2.1 The plane wave
- •1.1.2.2.2 The spherical wave
- •1.1.2.2.3 The slowly varying envelope (SVE) approximation
- •1.1.2.3 Propagation in doped media
- •1.1.3 Interaction with two-level systems
- •1.1.3.1 The two-level system
- •1.1.3.2 The dipole approximation
- •1.1.3.2.1 Inversion density and polarization
- •1.1.3.3.1 Decay time T1 of the upper level (energy relaxation)
- •1.1.3.3.1.1 Spontaneous emission
- •1.1.3.3.1.2 Interaction with the host material
- •1.1.3.3.1.3 Pumping process
- •1.1.3.3.2 Decay time T2 of the polarization (entropy relaxation)
- •1.1.4 Steady-state solutions
- •1.1.4.1 Inversion density and polarization
- •1.1.4.2 Small-signal solutions
- •1.1.4.3 Strong-signal solutions
- •1.1.5 Adiabatic equations
- •1.1.5.1 Rate equations
- •1.1.5.2 Thermodynamic considerations
- •1.1.5.3 Pumping schemes and complete rate equations
- •1.1.5.3.1 The three-level system
- •1.1.5.3.2 The four-level system
- •1.1.5.5 Rate equations for steady-state laser oscillators
- •1.1.6 Line shape and line broadening
- •1.1.6.1 Normalized shape functions
- •1.1.6.1.1 Lorentzian line shape
- •1.1.6.1.2 Gaussian line shape
- •1.1.6.1.3 Normalization of line shapes
- •1.1.6.2 Mechanisms of line broadening
- •1.1.6.2.1 Spontaneous emission
- •1.1.6.2.2 Doppler broadening
- •1.1.6.2.3 Collision or pressure broadening
- •1.1.6.2.4 Saturation broadening
- •1.1.6.3 Types of broadening
- •1.1.6.3.1 Homogeneous broadening
- •1.1.6.3.2 Inhomogeneous broadening
- •1.1.6.4 Time constants
- •1.1.7 Coherent interaction
- •1.1.7.1 The Feynman representation of interaction
- •1.1.7.3 Propagation of resonant coherent pulses
- •1.1.7.3.2 Superradiance
- •1.1.8 Notations
- •References for 1.1
- •2.1.1 Introduction
- •2.1.3 Radiometric standards
- •2.1.3.1 Primary standards
- •2.1.3.2 Secondary standards
- •References for 2.1
- •2.2 Beam characterization
- •2.2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.2 The Wigner distribution
- •2.2.3 The second-order moments of the Wigner distribution
- •2.2.4 The second-order moments and related physical properties
- •2.2.4.3 Phase paraboloid and twist
- •2.2.4.4 Invariants
- •2.2.4.5 Propagation of beam widths and beam propagation ratios
- •2.2.5.1 Stigmatic beams
- •2.2.5.2 Simple astigmatic beams
- •2.2.5.3 General astigmatic beams
- •2.2.5.4 Pseudo-symmetric beams
- •2.2.5.5 Intrinsic astigmatism and beam conversion
- •2.2.6 Measurement procedures
- •2.2.7 Beam positional stability
- •References for 2.2
- •3 Linear optics
- •3.1 Linear optics
- •3.1.1 Wave equations
- •3.1.2 Polarization
- •3.1.3 Solutions of the wave equation in free space
- •3.1.3.1 Wave equation
- •3.1.3.1.1 Monochromatic plane wave
- •3.1.3.1.2 Cylindrical vector wave
- •3.1.3.1.3 Spherical vector wave
- •3.1.3.2 Helmholtz equation
- •3.1.3.2.1 Plane wave
- •3.1.3.2.2 Cylindrical wave
- •3.1.3.2.3 Spherical wave
- •3.1.3.2.4.2 Real Bessel beams
- •3.1.3.2.4.3 Vectorial Bessel beams
- •3.1.3.3 Solutions of the slowly varying envelope equation
- •3.1.3.3.1 Gauss-Hermite beams (rectangular symmetry)
- •3.1.3.3.2 Gauss-Laguerre beams (circular symmetry)
- •3.1.3.3.3 Cross-sectional shapes of the Gaussian modes
- •3.1.4.4.2 Circular aperture with radius a
- •3.1.4.4.2.1 Applications
- •3.1.4.4.3 Gratings
- •3.1.5 Optical materials
- •3.1.5.1 Dielectric media
- •3.1.5.2 Optical glasses
- •3.1.5.3 Dispersion characteristics for short-pulse propagation
- •3.1.5.4 Optics of metals and semiconductors
- •3.1.5.6 Special cases of refraction
- •3.1.5.6.2 Variation of the angle of incidence
- •3.1.5.7 Crystal optics
- •3.1.5.7.2 Birefringence (example: uniaxial crystals)
- •3.1.5.8 Photonic crystals
- •3.1.5.9 Negative-refractive-index materials
- •3.1.5.10 References to data of linear optics
- •3.1.6 Geometrical optics
- •3.1.6.1 Gaussian imaging (paraxial range)
- •3.1.6.1.1 Single spherical interface
- •3.1.6.1.2 Imaging with a thick lens
- •3.1.6.2.1 Simple interfaces and optical elements with rotational symmetry
- •3.1.6.2.2 Non-symmetrical optical systems
- •3.1.6.2.3 Properties of a system
- •3.1.6.2.4 General parabolic systems without rotational symmetry
- •3.1.6.2.5 General astigmatic system
- •3.1.6.2.6 Symplectic optical system
- •3.1.6.2.7 Misalignments
- •3.1.6.3 Lens aberrations
- •3.1.7 Beam propagation in optical systems
- •3.1.7.2.1 Stigmatic and simple astigmatic beams
- •3.1.7.2.1.1 Fundamental Mode
- •3.1.7.2.1.2 Higher-order Hermite-Gaussian beams in simple astigmatic beams
- •3.1.7.2.2 General astigmatic beam
- •3.1.7.3 Waist transformation
- •3.1.7.3.1 General system (fundamental mode)
- •3.1.7.3.2 Thin lens (fundamental mode)
- •3.1.7.4 Collins integral
- •3.1.7.4.1 Two-dimensional propagation
- •3.1.7.4.2 Three-dimensional propagation
- •3.1.7.5 Gaussian beams in optical systems with stops, aberrations, and waveguide coupling
- •3.1.7.5.1 Field distributions in the waist region of Gaussian beams including stops and wave aberrations by optical system
- •3.1.7.5.2 Mode matching for beam coupling into waveguides
- •3.1.7.5.3 Free-space coupling of Gaussian modes
- •References for 3.1
- •4.1 Frequency conversion in crystals
- •4.1.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1.1 Symbols and abbreviations
- •4.1.1.1.1 Symbols
- •4.1.1.1.2 Abbreviations
- •4.1.1.1.3 Crystals
- •4.1.1.2 Historical layout
- •4.1.2 Fundamentals
- •4.1.2.1 Three-wave interactions
- •4.1.2.2 Uniaxial crystals
- •4.1.2.3 Biaxial crystals
- •4.1.2.5.1 General approach
- •4.1.3 Selection of data
- •4.1.5 Sum frequency generation
- •4.1.7 Optical parametric oscillation
- •4.1.8 Picosecond continuum generation
- •References for 4.1
- •4.2 Frequency conversion in gases and liquids
- •4.2.1 Fundamentals of nonlinear optics in gases and liquids
- •4.2.1.1 Linear and nonlinear susceptibilities
- •4.2.1.2 Third-order nonlinear susceptibilities
- •4.2.1.3 Fundamental equations of nonlinear optics
- •4.2.1.4 Small-signal limit
- •4.2.1.5 Phase-matching condition
- •4.2.2 Frequency conversion in gases
- •4.2.2.1 Metal-vapor inert gas mixtures
- •4.2.2.3 Mixtures of gaseous media
- •References for 4.2
- •4.3 Stimulated scattering
- •4.3.1 Introduction
- •4.3.1.1 Spontaneous scattering processes
- •4.3.1.2 Relationship between stimulated Stokes scattering and spontaneous scattering
- •4.3.2 General properties of stimulated scattering
- •4.3.2.1 Exponential gain by stimulated Stokes scattering
- •4.3.2.2 Experimental observation
- •4.3.2.2.1 Generator setup
- •4.3.2.2.2 Oscillator setup
- •4.3.2.3 Four-wave interactions
- •4.3.2.3.1 Third-order nonlinear susceptibility
- •4.3.2.3.3 Higher-order Stokes and anti-Stokes emission
- •4.3.2.4 Transient stimulated scattering
- •4.3.3 Individual scattering processes
- •4.3.3.1 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS)
- •4.3.3.2 Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) and stimulated thermal Brillouin scattering (STBS)
- •4.3.3.3 Stimulated Rayleigh scattering processes, SRLS, STRS, and SRWS
- •References for 4.3
- •4.4 Phase conjugation
- •4.4.1 Introduction
- •4.4.2 Basic mathematical description
- •4.4.3 Phase conjugation by degenerate four-wave mixing
- •4.4.4 Self-pumped phase conjugation
- •4.4.5 Applications of SBS phase conjugation
- •4.4.6 Photorefraction
- •References for 4.4
80 |
3.1.3 Solutions of the wave equation in free space |
[Ref. p. 131 |
|
|
|
3.1.3.2.4.2 Real Bessel beams
Real Bessel beams are limited by a finite aperture D of the optical elements needed or Gaussian beam illumination (Gaussian Bessel beams [87Gor]).
Methods of generation: axicons [85Bic] (Fig. 3.1.2), annular aperture in the focus of a lens [87Dur, 91Nie], holographic [91Lee] or di ractive [96Don] elements. Because of finite aperture di raction the latter display approximately the shape of (3.1.26) with cuto at a geometric determined radius rN , which includes N maxima (Fig. 3.1.3) and di erent amplitude patterns in dependence on z.
B
w
P1
P2 z z 0B
A
Fig. 3.1.2. Generation of a Bessel beam with help of an axicon A by a conus of plane-waves propagation directions.
maximum) |
|
to |
|
(normalized |
|
Intensity |
0.2 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
|
|
|
Radius r |
|
|
|
Fig. 3.1.3. Transversal intensity structure of a Bessel beam ( J02(r)).
Advantage of Bessel beams: Large depth of focus 2 z0B between P 1 and P 2 in Fig. 3.1.2 (thin “needle of light”) for measurement purposes.
Disadvantage: Every maximum in Fig. 3.1.3 contains in the corresponding circular ring nearly the same power as the central peak. High power loss occurs if the central part is used only [05Hod].
3.1.3.2.4.3 Vectorial Bessel beams
Vectorial Bessel beams are discussed in [96Hal].
3.1.3.3 Solutions of the slowly varying envelope equation
Gaussian beams are solutions of the SVE-equation (3.1.7) [91Sal, 96Ped, 86Sie, 78Gra], which is equivalent to paraxial approximation or Fresnel’s approximation, see Sect. 3.1.4.
The transition from SVE-approximated Gaussian beams towards an exact solution of the wave equation in the non-paraxial range is given in a Lax-W¨unsche series [75Lax, 79Agr, 92Wue]. For contour plots of the relative errors in the Gaussian beam volume see [97For, 97Zen].
The vectorial field of Gaussian beams is discussed in [79Dav, 95Gou], containing a Lax-W¨unsche series; Gaussian beam in elliptical cylinder coordinates are given in [94Soi, 00Gou].
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
Ref. p. 131] |
3.1 Linear optics |
81 |
|
|
|
3.1.3.3.1 Gauss-Hermite beams (rectangular symmetry)
Elliptical higher-order Gauss-Hermite beam:
Emn(x, y, z) = E0 Um(x, z) Un(y, z) exp {−i k0z} , |
2 Rx(z) exp {i ϕm(z)} , |
(3.1.27) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Um(x, z) = wx(z) |
|
Hm wx(z) exp |
− wx2 (z) − i |
(3.1.28) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w0x |
|
|
|
|
√ |
2 |
x |
|
|
x2 |
|
k0 x2 |
|
|
||||
Un(y, z) = Um n(x y, z) |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1.29) |
|||||||||||||||||||
with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
w0x : the 1/e2-intensity waist radius, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
z0x = |
π w02x |
|
|
: the Rayleigh distance (half depth of focus), |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
λ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
wx(z) = w0x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: the E00-beam 1/e2-intensity radius, |
|
||||||||||||||||
1 + z02 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
z2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rx(z) = z 1 + |
z2 |
: the radius of curvature of the wavefront at position z, |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
z02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ϕm(z) = |
2 |
+ m arctan |
|
: Gouy’s phase, changing sign for the transition through z = 0, |
|||||||||||||||
z0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Hm |
|
√ |
|
|
|
: the Hermite polynomial of order m [70Abr], |
|||||||||||||
|
2 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
wx(z) |
|||||||||||||||||||
H0(ξ) = 1 , H1(ξ) = 2 ξ , H2(ξ) = 4 ξ2 − 2 , H3(ξ) = 8 ξ3 − 12 ξ , H4(ξ) = 16 ξ4 − 48 ξ2 + 12 , . . . , |
|||||||||||||||||||
∞ |
|
exp −ξ2/2 |
|
|
|
|
exp −ξ2/2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
d ξ |
|
|
√π m! 2m Hm(ξ) |
√π n! 2n Hn(ξ) = δmn , |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−∞
δmn = |
1 |
for m = n |
(orthogonality relation) . |
|
0 |
for m = n |
|||
|
|
Example 3.1.4. Rotational symmetrical Gaussian fundamental mode (Gaussian beam):
Specialization of (3.1.27): m = n = 0 , w0x = w0y = w0 , r = |
x2 + y2 |
. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
E00(r, z) = E0 |
w0 |
exp − |
r2 |
|
kr2 |
exp |
i |
1 |
arctan |
|
z |
exp {−i kz} , |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
w(z) |
w2(z) |
2R(z) |
2 |
z0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
w(z) = w0 |
|
|
|
|
, R(z) = z 1 + z02 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
1 + z02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
z2 |
|
|
|
|
|
z2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1.30)
(3.1.31)
Properties of E00 (fundamental mode): The shape of the Gaussian E00-beam is depicted in Fig. 3.1.4. Parameters of E00 in Fig. 3.1.4 are:
C : curves with constant amplitude decrease as E(r, z) = E(0, z)/e or constant intensity decrease as I(r, z) = I(0, z)/e2 ,
P : phase fronts with radius of curvature R(z) ,
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
82 |
3.1.3 Solutions of the wave equation in free space |
[Ref. p. 131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wR |
|
w0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
z = 0 |
P |
|
|
z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P |
P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
z 0 |
C |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
z 0 |
|
Fig. 3.1.4. Shape of the Gaussian E00-beam. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
total |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P2 |
P3 |
|
P4 |
|
r/w)/l(0) |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
P(r/w)/P |
0.8 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
( |
|
|
|
|
|
Relativeencircledpower |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relativeintensityl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
P1 |
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
|
|
|
||
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
0.2 |
|
P2 |
P3 |
|
P4 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
|
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
||
a |
0 |
b |
0 |
||||||||||
|
Relative radial coordinate r /w |
|
|
|
|
Relative radial coordinate r /w |
|
|
Fig. 3.1.5. (a) Cross section of a Gaussian beam perpendicular to the z-axis. (b) Power transmitted by a circular aperture with the relative radius r/w in a cross section.
Table 3.1.3. Characteristic points in Fig. 3.1.5.
Point in |
Relative abscissa |
Relative intensity, |
Relative transmission, |
Characterization |
Fig. 3.1.5a, b |
r/w |
Fig. 3.1.5a |
Fig. 3.1.5b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
0.588 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
FWHM a |
P2 |
1 |
0.135 |
0.865 |
1/e2-int. b |
P3 |
1.57 |
0.01 |
0.99 |
trunc. c |
P4 |
2.3 |
0.001 |
0.999 |
trunc. d |
a Full width half maximum/2.
b 1/e2-intensity or 1/e-amplitude.
c Di raction of E00-beam by circular aperture 17 % intensity ripple [86Sie, p. 667].
dDi raction of E00-beam by circular aperture 1 % intensity ripple [86Sie, p. 667] (no essential e ect of truncation).
w0 : beam waist,
z0 : Rayleigh distance, half of the confocal parameter b = 2z0 (similarly to depth of focus in usual optics), that z-value, where the cross section π wR2 = 2π w02 of the Gaussian beam has doubled in comparison with the waist,
Θ0 = λ/(πw0) : 1/e2-intensity divergence angle toward the asymptotes A.
In Fig. 3.1.5a the cross section of a Gaussian beam perpendicular to the z-axis is given, in Fig. 3.1.5b the power transmitted by a circular aperture with the relative radius r/w in a cross section. Characteristic points in Fig. 3.1.5 are listed in Table 3.1.3.
Astigmatic and general astigmatic generalizations of the elliptical Gaussian beam: see Sect. 3.1.7.
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
Ref. p. 131] |
3.1 Linear optics |
83 |
|
|
|
3.1.3.3.2 Gauss-Laguerre beams (circular symmetry)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
r |
|
l |
|
|
2 r2 |
|
Elp(r, ψ, z) = E0 exp {−i [kz − ϕlp(z)]} |
|
w0 |
2 |
Lpl |
|
|
|||||||||
w(z) |
w(z) |
|
w2(z) |
||||||||||||
× exp − |
r2 |
k x2 |
cos (lψ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
− i |
|
sin (lψ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
w2(z) |
2 R(z) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
z : propagation direction,
r, ϕ : polar coordinates in the plane z-axis,
z0 = |
πw02 |
|
: the Rayleigh distance (half depth of focus), |
||||||||||
λ |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 + |
|
z |
|
|
2 |
: the E00-beam 1/e2-intensity radius, |
||||
w(z) = w0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
z0 |
|
||||||||||||
R(z) = z 1 + |
z |
2 |
: the radius of curvature of the wavefront at position z, |
||||||||||
0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
z |
|
|
z
ϕlp = (2p + l + 1) arctan : Gouy’s phase, z0
Llp : Laguerre polynomial of degree p and order l [70Abr]:
l |
|
l |
|
|
|
l |
(l + 1)(l + 2) |
− (l + 2) ξ − |
1 |
|
2 |
|
|||||||||||||
L0 |
(ξ) = 1 , L1(ξ) = (l + 1) |
− |
ξ , L2(ξ) = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ξ |
|
, |
|||||||||||
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
l |
(ξ) = |
(l + 3)(l + 2)(l + 1) |
− |
(l + 3)(l + 2) |
ξ + |
(l + 3) |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
L3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ξ |
|
|
− |
|
ξ |
|
. . . , |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
6 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l + p)! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
0 |
d ξ ξl |
exp(−ξ) Lpl (ξ) Lql (ξ) = δpq |
(orthogonality relation) , |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
p! |
|
|
|
|
|
p! : the factorial p.
(3.1.32)
(3.1.33)
–Two degenerate mode patterns are formed by the cosand sin-terms in (3.1.32).
–l = p = 0 means the rotational symmetrical Gaussian beam E00.
–The symmetry determines what system of Gauss-Laguerre polynomials or Gauss-Hermite polynomials is more appropriate for a wave field development.
3.1.3.3.3 Cross-sectional shapes of the Gaussian modes
In Fig. 3.1.6 intensity distributions of Gauss-Hermite modes Emn are given (rectangular symmetry), in Fig. 3.1.7 intensity distributions of Gauss-Laguerre modes Epl (circular symmetry).
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
84 |
|
3.1.4 Di raction |
[Ref. p. 131 |
|
|
||
Rectangular symmetry (Gauss-Hermite modes) |
|
||
00 |
10 |
30 |
|
y |
x |
|
|
01 |
11 |
31 |
|
03 |
13 |
33 |
Fig. 3.1.6. Intensity distributions of Gauss-Hermite modes Emn. The two digits at each distribution are m and n.
Circular symmetry (Gauss-Laguerre modes)
00 |
10 |
30 |
01 |
11 |
31 |
03 |
13 |
33 |
Fig. 3.1.7. Intensity distributions of Gauss-Laguerre modes Epl. The two digits at each distribution are p and l. .
3.1.4 Di raction
Di raction of light by aperture rims or amplitude and phase modifications inside the aperture:
–Solutions of Maxwell’s equations taking into account the material properties of the aperture:
–special cases: exact solutions [99Bor, 86Sta],
–mostly: numerical solutions.
–Starting with a field near the aperture with reasonable assumptions for this field or its measurement: large variety of methods for di erent ranges of validity [99Bor, 86Sta, 61Hoe].
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
Ref. p. 131] |
3.1 Linear optics |
85 |
|
|
|
3.1.4.1 Vector theory of di raction
–Vectorial generalization of Kirchho ’s theory: Given E and H in an aperture E and H in the volume by Stratton-Chu Green’s function representation [23Kot, 41Str, 86Sol, 91Ish].
–Two-dimensional problem and meridional incidence of light [61Hoe]: Separation of the polarizations E parallel and E perpendicular to the plane of incidence for half plane [99Bor], slit [99Bor], gratings [80Pet], and volume gratings [69Kog, 81Sol, 81Rus].
3.1.4.2 Scalar di raction theory
Two sources of scalar di raction theory are:
–Transition from vectorial theory to scalar theory: [99Bor, 86Sol]. The information about the polarization is lost.
–Mathematical formulation and generalization of Huygens’ principle: Each point on a wavefront may be regarded as a source of secondary waves, and the position of the wavefront at a later time is determined by the envelope of these secondary waves.
In Table 3.1.4 di raction formulae with fields given near the di raction aperture are listed. Figures 3.1.8 and 3.1.9 are related to Table 3.1.4.
Remarks on the formulae of Table 3.1.4:
(3.1.37): Approximation of (3.1.34): Huygens’ principle with an additional directional factor (Fresnel).
(3.1.38): Approximation of (3.1.36): Huygens’ principle with a modified directional factor.
(3.1.39): Fresnel’s approximation (= paraxial approximation). The approximation conditions from (3.1.34) to (3.1.39) resp. (3.1.40) are explained in [96For, 86Sta, 87Ree].
Fresnel’s approximation: The condition NF(a/d)2/4 1 [91Sal] is valid for sharp-edged apertures A, but it is weakened for the transmission of Gaussian-beam-like fields [86Sie, p. 635] or Gaussian-like soft apertures. Fresnel’s approximation describes the propagation of the field from plane z = 0 to plane z = z. This transformation can be cascaded to describe complex systems and is an often used tool in paraxial propagation of radiation (Sect. 3.1.4.5.2).
x’ |
Opaque screen |
||
S (x’, y’, 0 ) |
|||
|
x |
||
|
|
||
|
y ’ |
Normal |
|
|
|
vector n |
|
dx ’dy ’ |
r0 |
rSP P (x, y, z ) |
|
|
z = 0 |
|
|
a |
|
z |
|
|
|
pi |
|
|
A |
|
b y
Diffracted field
E (x,y,z)
Fig. 3.1.8. Di raction at an aperture A with source
terms E(x , y , 0) and/or ∂z∂ E(x , y , z) z=0, respectively, and a or b the maximum radial distances
of source S or image point P , respectively. pi symbolizes di erent plane waves for (3.1.41)–(3.1.43).
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
B¨ornstein-Landolt
VIII/1A1 Series New
Table 3.1.4. Di raction formulae with fields given near the di raction aperture (rSP : see Fig. 3.1.8).
Integrals |
Formula |
Restrictions |
Ref. |
Rayleigh-
Sommerfeld of 1st kind
Rayleigh-
Sommerfeld of 2nd kind
Fresnel-Kirchho
RayleighSommerfeld
1st kind approx.
Fresnel-Kirchho approximation, refers to
Fig. 3.1.8
|
− 4π A |
|
|
|
|
|
∂ z |
rSP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
ERS1(x, y, z) = |
|
1 |
|
E(x |
, y , 0) |
∂ |
|
|
exp(−i krSP) |
d x d y |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
ERS2(x, y, z) = |
|
|
1 |
A |
|
∂ E(x , y , z |
) |
z =0 |
exp(−ikrSP) |
d x d y |
|
|
||||||||||||
− 2π |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
∂ z |
|
|
|
|
rSP |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
EFK(x, y, z) = |
1 |
|
[ERS1(x, y, z) + ERS2(x, y, z)] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
i λ A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rSP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
ERS1a(x, y, z) = |
1 |
|
|
E(x , y , 0) |
exp(−i krSP) |
cos (n, rSP) d x d y |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
i λ A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rSP |
|
· |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
EFKa(x, y, z) = |
|
1 |
|
|
E(x , y , 0) |
exp(−i krSP) |
|
1 + cos (n, rSP) |
d x |
d y |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1.34) |
rSP > λ0 , |
[99Bor] |
plane aperture |
[86Sta] |
|
(3.1.35) |
rSP > λ0 , |
|
plane aperture |
|
|
(3.1.36) |
rSP > λ0 , |
|
curved aperture |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1.37) |
rSP λ0 |
|
(3.1.38) |
rSP λ0 |
|
Fresnel’s |
|
i exp (−ikz) |
|
A |
|
|
|
(x − x )2 + (y |
− |
y )2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[99Bor] |
EFre(x, y, z) = |
|
E(x , y |
, 0) exp |
i π |
d x |
d y |
(3.1.39) z |
|
λ |
|
[96For] |
||||||
approximation, |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
λd |
|
− |
|
λ z |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
[97For] |
|||||
refers to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[87Ree] |
Fig. 3.1.8 |
[86Sta] |
|
|
|
|
|
(continued) |
86
ractionDi 4.1.3
131 .p .[Ref
B¨ornstein-Landolt
VIII/1A1 Series New
Table 3.1.4 continued.
Integrals |
Formula |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions |
Ref. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fraunhofer |
EFra(x, y, z) = |
i exp (−i kz) p |
A |
E(x , y , 0) exp |
|
i 2π |
xx + yy |
d x |
d y |
(3.1.40) |
a2 |
1 |
[99Bor] |
|||||||||
far-field |
λ z |
λd |
[68Goo] |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
λz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
approximation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[96For] |
|
refers to |
with the additional phase term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[97For] |
|||||||||
Fig. 3.1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[86Sta] |
||||||||||
p = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
λ z |
2 |
|
for |
|
λz |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
i π x |
|
+ y |
|
otherwise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
exp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plane-wave representation (also: angular-spectrum representation), refers to
Figs. 3.1.8 and 3.1.9
2-D Fourier transform (see remark on (3.1.40)) of the source distribution Es in plane z = 0: |
rSP > λ0 |
[91Sal] |
|||||||||||||||||||||
A0(fx, fy ) = |
|
∞ ∞ |
Es(x , y , 0) exp |
i 2 π (fxx |
+ fy y |
) |
d x d y |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1.41) |
[78Loh] |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[97For] |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[86Sta] |
|
|
|
−∞ −∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[99Bor] |
|||||
propagation of plane waves with the spatial frequencies fx and fy along the z-direction by distance z: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
exp {−i 2 π (fxx + fy y} exp −i 2 π (fxx + fy y + |
|
1/λ2 − fx2 − fy2 z) , |
|
|
|
(3.1.42) |
|
||||||||||||||||
addition of plane waves at distance z: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
2 |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
E(x, y, z) 2 |
2 |
0 x y |
x |
|
y |
|
|
− |
x − y |
x |
y |
|
|
||||||||||
fx |
+fy |
<1/λ |
A (f , f ) exp |
|
i 2 π |
f x + f y + |
|
f 2 f 2 z |
d f |
d f |
, |
(3.1.43) |
|
||||||||||
= |
|
|
|
|
|
1/λ2 |
|
|
equivalent to (3.1.34) [97For]
Far field in the focal plane of a lens, refers to
Fig. 3.1.9
EP(x, y) = λf |
|
∞ ∞ |
ES(x , y ) exp |
i 2 π λf |
x |
+ λf y dx |
dy |
, |
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
i p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
y |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
−∞ −∞ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(x |
2 |
+ |
y2) (d |
|
f ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
p = exp i π |
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
λ f 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d, f λ |
[91Sal] |
(3.1.44)
(3.1.45)
131] .p .Ref
optics Linear 1.3
87
88 |
|
|
3.1.4 Di raction |
|
|
[Ref. p. 131 |
x |
Plane wave |
|
x ’ |
Field ES (x’,y’) |
Lens |
x |
|
|
|
|
Plane wave |
|
Convergent wave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
z |
|
x |
= sin |
1 |
|
|
Field EP (x,y) |
|
x |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
d |
|
f |
|
x = 1/fx |
|
|
z |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
a |
|
|
b |
|
|
|
Fig. 3.1.9. (a) Spatial frequencies of a plane wave with propagation direction Θx with respect to the |
||||||
plane x = 0 (and Θy analogously) are fx and fy with Θx = sin−1(λfx) ≈ λfx and Θy = sin−1(λfy ) ≈ λfy |
||||||
(≈: paraxial approximation). (b) Generation of the far field in the focal plane of a lens: The Fourier |
||||||
transformation (d = f ) is changed by an additional phase term for d = f with d: distance, f : focal length. |
(3.1.40): Fraunhofer’s approximation
– Fresnel number :
NF = a2/λz . |
(3.1.46) |
–Validity of Fraunhofer’s approximation: NF 1 .
p = 1 (parabolic phase): the intensity of di racted light is the square of the modulus of the Fourier transform of E(x, y, 0) only.
– Additional condition with second Fresnel number NF = b2/λz 1 :
E(x, y, z) is the Fourier transform of E(x, y, 0) in dependence on the spatial frequencies fx ≈ (x/z)/λ ≈ Θx/λ and fy ≈ (y/z)/λ ≈ Θy /λ .
– Di erent conventions on the spatial Fourier transform F (fx) of a spatial distribution f (x) :
–The convention of the plane-wave structure exp(i kx − i ω t) is connected with the determination of F (fx) by
∞
F (fx) = d x f (x) e−i 2π fxx
−∞
[68Goo, 68Pap, 78Loh, 78Gas, 93Sto, 05Hod].
– The plane-wave structure exp(i ω t − i kx) can be combined with
∞
F (fx) = d x f (x) ei 2π fxx
−∞
[71Col, 73Men, 92Lug], but
∞
F (fx) = d x f (x) e−i 2π fxx
−∞
is defined also in [88Kle, 91Sal, 95Wil, 96Ped].
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
Ref. p. 131] |
3.1 Linear optics |
89 |
|
|
|
– Di erent approximations in (3.1.37) and (3.1.38):
rSP ≈ r0 + 2xξ − ξ2 + 2yη − η2
2r0
[99Bor, 68Pap, 78Gra] with r0 from Fig. 3.1.8 versus
rSP ≈ z + 2xx − x 2 + 2yy − y 2
2z
(references on lasers: [86Sie, 05Hod], optoelectronics: [68Goo, 72Mar, 91Sal]) for grating di raction: The sine of the di raction angle sin Θx = x/r0 is derived from principle and not by a postpositive reasoning of the paraxial range x/z = tan Θx ≈ sin Θx. x/z should be “translated” into sin Θx for better approximation.
(3.1.41)–(3.1.43): Plane-wave spectrum or angular-spectrum representation (also Rayleigh- Sommerfeld-Debye di raction theory) [78Loh, 99Pau] is the plane-wave formulation of (3.1.34) [78Loh, 97For]. Application: see Fourier optics [68Goo, 83Ste, 93Sto].
(3.1.44), (3.1.45): Generation of the far field in the focal plane of a lens: d = f (object is outside the object-side focal plane) additional phase term p to the pure (inverse) Fourier transform (d = f ), similarly to (3.1.40).
Applications: generation of the spectrum of a function, possibility of mathematical operations in the Fourier-space with complex filtering masks, correlation and convolution.
Another important di raction theory
Di raction theory after Young, Maggi, Rubinowicz [66Rub, 99Pau]: The light in point P of Fig. 3.1.8 results from the unperturbed light and local waves, which are emitted by the edge of the aperture A. Therefore, a line integral is to be calculated [99Pau]. There is an equivalence with Fresnel-Kirchho ’s theory.
3.1.4.3 Time-dependent di raction theory
Two formulations of the time-dependent treatment of di raction are possible:
1.A general Fresnel-Kirchho ’s integral formula exists for time-dependent source functions in the aperture A, see [99Bor, 99Pau].
2.Used more often now [96Die, 99Pau]: The time-dependent source functions are decomposed into a superposition of monochromatic fields. The di racted field is calculated for every monochromatic component by the stationary di raction given above. The superposition of all di racted monochromatic components yields the time-dependent di racted field.
3.1.4.4 Fraunhofer di raction patterns
3.1.4.4.1 Rectangular aperture with dimensions 2a × 2b
In Fig. 3.1.10 the geometry of the di raction from a rectangular aperture 2a × 2b is shown. The x-part of the di raction pattern in Fig. 3.1.10 is given in Fig. 3.1.11. In Table 3.1.5 the zeros and maxima of the intensity distribution are listed.
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1