- •Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering
- •Medical Image Processing
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Medical Image Processing
- •1.2 Techniques
- •1.3 Applications
- •1.4 The Contribution of This Book
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 MATLAB and DIPimage
- •2.2.1 The Basics
- •2.2.2 Interactive Examination of an Image
- •2.2.3 Filtering and Measuring
- •2.2.4 Scripting
- •2.3 Cervical Cancer and the Pap Smear
- •2.4 An Interactive, Partial History of Automated Cervical Cytology
- •2.5 The Future of Automated Cytology
- •2.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •3.1 The Need for Seed-Driven Segmentation
- •3.1.1 Image Analysis and Computer Vision
- •3.1.2 Objects Are Semantically Consistent
- •3.1.3 A Separation of Powers
- •3.1.4 Desirable Properties of Seeded Segmentation Methods
- •3.2 A Review of Segmentation Techniques
- •3.2.1 Pixel Selection
- •3.2.2 Contour Tracking
- •3.2.3 Statistical Methods
- •3.2.4 Continuous Optimization Methods
- •3.2.4.1 Active Contours
- •3.2.4.2 Level Sets
- •3.2.4.3 Geodesic Active Contours
- •3.2.5 Graph-Based Methods
- •3.2.5.1 Graph Cuts
- •3.2.5.2 Random Walkers
- •3.2.5.3 Watershed
- •3.2.6 Generic Models for Segmentation
- •3.2.6.1 Continuous Models
- •3.2.6.2 Hierarchical Models
- •3.2.6.3 Combinations
- •3.3 A Unifying Framework for Discrete Seeded Segmentation
- •3.3.1 Discrete Optimization
- •3.3.2 A Unifying Framework
- •3.3.3 Power Watershed
- •3.4 Globally Optimum Continuous Segmentation Methods
- •3.4.1 Dealing with Noise and Artifacts
- •3.4.2 Globally Optimal Geodesic Active Contour
- •3.4.3 Maximal Continuous Flows and Total Variation
- •3.5 Comparison and Discussion
- •3.6 Conclusion and Future Work
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Deformable Models
- •4.2.1 Point-Based Snake
- •4.2.1.1 User Constraint Energy
- •4.2.1.2 Snake Optimization Method
- •4.2.2 Parametric Deformable Models
- •4.2.3 Geometric Deformable Models (Active Contours)
- •4.2.3.1 Curve Evolution
- •4.2.3.2 Level Set Concept
- •4.2.3.3 Geodesic Active Contour
- •4.2.3.4 Chan–Vese Deformable Model
- •4.3 Comparison of Deformable Models
- •4.4 Applications
- •4.4.1 Bone Surface Extraction from Ultrasound
- •4.4.2 Spinal Cord Segmentation
- •4.4.2.1 Spinal Cord Measurements
- •4.4.2.2 Segmentation Using Geodesic Active Contour
- •4.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Imaging Body Fat
- •5.3 Image Artifacts and Their Impact on Segmentation
- •5.3.1 Partial Volume Effect
- •5.3.2 Intensity Inhomogeneities
- •5.4 Overview of Segmentation Techniques Used to Isolate Fat
- •5.4.1 Thresholding
- •5.4.2 Selecting the Optimum Threshold
- •5.4.3 Gaussian Mixture Model
- •5.4.4 Region Growing
- •5.4.5 Adaptive Thresholding
- •5.4.6 Segmentation Using Overlapping Mosaics
- •5.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Clinical Context
- •6.3 Vessel Segmentation
- •6.3.1 Survey of Vessel Segmentation Methods
- •6.3.1.1 General Overview
- •6.3.1.2 Region-Growing Methods
- •6.3.1.3 Differential Analysis
- •6.3.1.4 Model-Based Filtering
- •6.3.1.5 Deformable Models
- •6.3.1.6 Statistical Approaches
- •6.3.1.7 Path Finding
- •6.3.1.8 Tracking Methods
- •6.3.1.9 Mathematical Morphology Methods
- •6.3.1.10 Hybrid Methods
- •6.4 Vessel Modeling
- •6.4.1 Motivation
- •6.4.1.1 Context
- •6.4.1.2 Usefulness
- •6.4.2 Deterministic Atlases
- •6.4.2.1 Pioneering Works
- •6.4.2.2 Graph-Based and Geometric Atlases
- •6.4.3 Statistical Atlases
- •6.4.3.1 Anatomical Variability Handling
- •6.4.3.2 Recent Works
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Linear Structure Detection Methods
- •7.3.1 CCM for Imaging Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
- •7.3.2 CCM Image Characteristics and Noise Artifacts
- •7.4.1 Foreground and Background Adaptive Models
- •7.4.2 Local Orientation and Parameter Estimation
- •7.4.3 Separation of Nerve Fiber and Background Responses
- •7.4.4 Postprocessing the Enhanced-Contrast Image
- •7.5 Quantitative Analysis and Evaluation of Linear Structure Detection Methods
- •7.5.1 Methodology of Evaluation
- •7.5.2 Database and Experiment Setup
- •7.5.3 Nerve Fiber Detection Comparison Results
- •7.5.4 Evaluation of Clinical Utility
- •7.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Methods
- •8.2.1 Linear Feature Detection by MDNMS
- •8.2.2 Check Intensities Within 1D Window
- •8.2.3 Finding Features Next to Each Other
- •8.2.4 Gap Linking for Linear Features
- •8.2.5 Quantifying Branching Structures
- •8.3 Linear Feature Detection on GPUs
- •8.3.1 Overview of GPUs and Execution Models
- •8.3.2 Linear Feature Detection Performance Analysis
- •8.3.3 Parallel MDNMS on GPUs
- •8.3.5 Results for GPU Linear Feature Detection
- •8.4.1 Architecture and Implementation
- •8.4.2 HCA-Vision Features
- •8.4.3 Linear Feature Detection and Analysis Results
- •8.5 Selected Applications
- •8.5.1 Neurite Tracing for Drug Discovery and Functional Genomics
- •8.5.2 Using Linear Features to Quantify Astrocyte Morphology
- •8.5.3 Separating Adjacent Bacteria Under Phase Contrast Microscopy
- •8.6 Perspectives and Conclusions
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Bone Imaging Modalities
- •9.2.1 X-Ray Projection Imaging
- •9.2.2 Computed Tomography
- •9.2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •9.2.4 Ultrasound Imaging
- •9.3 Quantifying the Microarchitecture of Trabecular Bone
- •9.3.1 Bone Morphometric Quantities
- •9.3.2 Texture Analysis
- •9.3.3 Frequency-Domain Methods
- •9.3.4 Use of Fractal Dimension Estimators for Texture Analysis
- •9.3.4.1 Frequency-Domain Estimation of the Fractal Dimension
- •9.3.4.2 Lacunarity
- •9.3.4.3 Lacunarity Parameters
- •9.3.5 Computer Modeling of Biomechanical Properties
- •9.4 Trends in Imaging of Bone
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
- •10.2 Imaging Modalities Used for Spinal Deformity Assessment
- •10.2.1 Current Clinical Practice: The Cobb Angle
- •10.2.2 An Alternative: The Ferguson Angle
- •10.3 Image Processing Methods
- •10.3.1 Previous Studies
- •10.3.2 Discrete and Continuum Functions for Spinal Curvature
- •10.3.3 Tortuosity
- •10.4 Assessment of Image Processing Methods
- •10.4.1 Patient Dataset and Image Processing
- •10.4.2 Results and Discussion
- •10.5 Summary
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Retinal Imaging
- •11.2.1 Features of a Retinal Image
- •11.2.2 The Reason for Automated Retinal Analysis
- •11.2.3 Acquisition of Retinal Images
- •11.3 Preprocessing of Retinal Images
- •11.4 Lesion Based Detection
- •11.4.1 Matched Filtering for Blood Vessel Segmentation
- •11.4.2 Morphological Operators in Retinal Imaging
- •11.5 Global Analysis of Retinal Vessel Patterns
- •11.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.1.1 The Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy
- •12.2 Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy
- •12.2.1 Automated Detection of Microaneurysms
- •12.3 Image Databases
- •12.4 Tortuosity
- •12.4.1 Tortuosity Metrics
- •12.5 Tracing Retinal Vessels
- •12.5.1 NeuronJ
- •12.5.2 Other Software Packages
- •12.6 Experimental Results and Discussion
- •12.7 Summary and Future Work
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Volumetric Image Visualization Methods
- •13.2.1 Multiplanar Reformation (2D slicing)
- •13.2.2 Surface-Based Rendering
- •13.2.3 Volumetric Rendering
- •13.3 Volume Rendering Principles
- •13.3.1 Optical Models
- •13.3.2 Color and Opacity Mapping
- •13.3.2.2 Transfer Function
- •13.3.3 Composition
- •13.3.4 Volume Illumination and Illustration
- •13.4 Software-Based Raycasting
- •13.4.1 Applications and Improvements
- •13.5 Splatting Algorithms
- •13.5.1 Performance Analysis
- •13.5.2 Applications and Improvements
- •13.6 Shell Rendering
- •13.6.1 Application and Improvements
- •13.7 Texture Mapping
- •13.7.1 Performance Analysis
- •13.7.2 Applications
- •13.7.3 Improvements
- •13.7.3.1 Shading Inclusion
- •13.7.3.2 Empty Space Skipping
- •13.8 Discussion and Outlook
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.1.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •14.1.2 Compressed Sensing
- •14.1.3 The Role of Prior Knowledge
- •14.2 Sparsity in MRI Images
- •14.2.1 Characteristics of MR Images (Prior Knowledge)
- •14.2.2 Choice of Transform
- •14.2.3 Use of Data Ordering
- •14.3 Theory of Compressed Sensing
- •14.3.1 Data Acquisition
- •14.3.2 Signal Recovery
- •14.4 Progress in Sparse Sampling for MRI
- •14.4.1 Review of Results from the Literature
- •14.4.2 Results from Our Work
- •14.4.2.1 PECS
- •14.4.2.2 SENSECS
- •14.4.2.3 PECS Applied to CE-MRA
- •14.5 Prospects for Future Developments
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Acquisition of DT Images
- •15.2.1 Fundamentals of DTI
- •15.2.2 The Pulsed Field Gradient Spin Echo (PFGSE) Method
- •15.2.3 Diffusion Imaging Sequences
- •15.2.4 Example: Anisotropic Diffusion of Water in the Eye Lens
- •15.2.5 Data Acquisition
- •15.3 Digital Processing of DT Images
- •15.3.2 Diagonalization of the DT
- •15.3.3 Gradient Calibration Factors
- •15.3.4 Sorting Bias
- •15.3.5 Fractional Anisotropy
- •15.3.6 Other Anisotropy Metrics
- •15.4 Applications of DTI to Articular Cartilage
- •15.4.1 Bovine AC
- •15.4.2 Human AC
- •References
- •Index
15 Digital Processing of Diffusion-Tensor Images of Avascular Tissues |
369 |
Fig. 15.18 Quiver plot showing the principal DT eigenvector for each voxel in the sample
References
1.Einstein, A.: Zur allgemeinen molekularen Theorie der W¨arme. Annalen der Physik 14(S1), 154–163 (2005)
2.Tanner, J.E.: Transient diffusion in a system partitioned by permeable barriers. Application to NMR measurements with a pulsed field gradient. J. Chem. Phys. 69(4), 1748–1754 (1978)
3.Stejskal, E.O., Tanner, J.E.: Spin diffusion measurements: Spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J. Chem. Phys. 42, 288–292 (1965)
4.Basser, P.J., Jones, D.K.: Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical review. NMR Biomed. 15(7–8), 456–467 (2002)
5.Jones, D.K.: The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study. Magn. Reson. Med. 51(4), 807–815 (2004)
370 |
K.I. Momot et al. |
6.Mukherjee, P., Chung, S.W., Berman, J.I., Hess, C.P., Henry, R.G.: Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: Technical considerations. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 29(5), 843–852 (2008)
7.Moffat, B.A., Pope, J.M.: Anisotropic water transport in the human eye lens studied by diffusion tensor NMR micro-imaging. Exp. Eye. Res. 74(6), 677–687 (2002)
8.Papadakis, N.G., Xing, D., Huang, C.L.H., Hall, L.D., Carpenter, T.A.: A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. J. Magn. Reson. 137(1), 67–82 (1999)
9.Jones, D.K., Horsfield, M.A., Simmons, A.: Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 42(3), 515–525 (1999)
10.Batchelor, P.G.: Optimisation of Direction Schemes for Diffusion Tensor Imaging. St Malo, France (2002)
11.Batchelor, P.G., Atkinson, D., Hill, D.L.G., Calamante, F., Connelly, A.: Anisotropic noise propagation in diffusion tensor MRI sampling schemes. Magn. Reson. Med. 49(6), 1143–1151 (2003)
12.Hasan, K.M., Parker, D.L., Alexander, A.L.: Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 13(5), 769–780 (2001)
13.Papadakis, N.G., Xing, D., Houston, G.C., Smith, J.M., Smith, M.I., James, M.F., Parsons, A.A., Huang, C.L.H., Hall, L.D., Carpenter, T.A.: A study of rotationally invariant and symmetric indices of diffusion anisotropy. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 17(6), 881–892 (1999)
14.Chang, L.C., Koay, C.G., Pierpaoli, C., Basser, P.J.: Variance of estimated DTI-derived parameters via first-order perturbation methods. Magn. Reson. Med. 57(1), 141–149 (2007)
15.Skare, S., Hedehus, M., Moseley, M.E., Li, T.Q.: Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI. J. Magn. Reson. 147(2), 340–352 (2000)
16.Poupon, C., Mangin, J.F., Clark, C.A., Frouin, V., Regis, J., Le Bihan, D., Bloch, I.: Towards inference of human brain connectivity from MR diffusion tensor data. Med. Image. Anal. 5(1), 1–15 (2001)
17.Basser, P.J., Pajevic, S., Pierpaoli, C., Duda, J., Aldroubi, A.: In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 44(4), 625–632 (2000)
18.Conturo, T.E., Lori, N.F., Cull, T.S., Akbudak, E., Snyder, A.Z., Shimony, J.S., McKinstry, R.C., Burton, H., Raichle, M.E.: Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96(18), 10422–10427 (1999)
19.Mori, S., van Zijl, P.C.M.: Fiber tracking: principles and strategies - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 15(7–8), 468–480 (2002)
20.Behrens, T.E.J., Berg, H.J., Jbabdi, S., Rushworth, M.F.S., Woolrich, M.W.: Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? Neuroimage 34(1), 144–155 (2007)
21.Tuch, D.S.: Q-Ball imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 52(6), 1358–1372 (2004)
22.Tournier, J.D., Calamante, F., Connelly, A.: Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 35(4), 1459–1472 (2007)
23.Tournier, J.D., Yeh, C.H., Calamante, F., Cho, K.H., Connelly, A., Lin, C.P.: Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: Validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data. Neuroimage 42(2), 617–625 (2008)
24.Basser, P.J., Mattiello, J., LeBihan, D.: Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin-echo. J. Magn. Reson. B 103(3), 247–254 (1994)
25.Momot, K.I., Kuchel, P.W.: PFG NMR diffusion experiments for complex systems. Concepts Magn. Reson. 28A, 249–269 (2006)
26.Momot, K.I., Kuchel, P.W.: Convection-compensating diffusion experiments with phasesensitive double-quantum filtering. J. Magn. Reson. 174(2), 229–236 (2005)
15 Digital Processing of Diffusion-Tensor Images of Avascular Tissues |
371 |
27.Coremans, J., Luypaert, R., Verhelle, F., Stadnik, T., Osteaux, M.: A method for myelin fiber orientation mapping using diffusion-weighted MR-images. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12(3), 443–454 (1994)
28.Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: Numerical Recipes in Fortran. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992)
29.Lenglet, C., Campbell, J.S.W., Descoteaux, M., Haro, G., Savadjiev, P., Wassermann, D., Anwander, A., Deriche, R., Pike, G.B., Sapiro, G., Siddiqi, K., Thompson, P.M.: Mathematical methods for diffusion MRI processing. Neuroimage 45(1), S111–S122 (2009)
30.Basser, P.J., Pajevic, S.: Statistical artifacts in diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI) caused by background noise. Magn. Reson. Med. 44(1), 41–50 (2000)
31.Meder, R., de Visser, S.K., Bowden, J.C., Bostrom, T., Pope, J.M.: Diffusion tensor imaging of articular cartilage as a measure of tissue microstructure. Osteoarthr. Cartilage. 14, 875–881 (2006)
32.de Visser, S.K., Crawford, R.W., Pope, J.M.: Structural adaptations in compressed articular cartilage measured by diffusion tensor imaging. Osteoarthr. Cartilage. 16(1), 83–89 (2008)
33.de Visser, S.K., Bowden, J.C., Wentrup-Byrne, E., Rintoul, L., Bostrom, T., Pope, J.M., Momot, K.I.: Anisotropy of collagen fibre alignment in bovine cartilage: Comparison of polarised light microscopy and spatially-resolved diffusion-tensor measurements. Osteoarthr. Cartilage. 16(6), 689–697 (2008)
34.Momot, K.I.: Diffusion tensor of water in model articular cartilage. Eur. Biophys. J. 40(1), 81–91 (2011)