- •Contents
- •1 Russian
- •1.1 The Russian language
- •1.1.1 Russian then and now
- •1.1.2 Levels of language
- •1.2 Describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.1 Conventions of notation
- •1.2.2 Abbreviations
- •1.2.3 Dictionaries and grammars
- •1.2.4 Statistics and corpora
- •1.2.5 Strategies of describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.6 Two fundamental concepts of (Russian) grammar
- •1.3 Writing Russian
- •1.3.1 The Russian Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.2 A brief history of the Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.3 Etymology of letters
- •1.3.4 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (basics)
- •1.3.5 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (refinements)
- •1.3.6 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (lexical idiosyncrasies)
- •1.3.7 Transliteration
- •2 Sounds
- •2.1 Sounds
- •2.2 Vowels
- •2.2.1 Stressed vowels
- •2.2.3 Vowel duration
- •2.2.4 Unstressed vowels
- •2.2.5 Unpaired consonants [ˇs ˇz c] and unstressed vocalism
- •2.2.6 Post-tonic soft vocalism
- •2.2.7 Unstressed vowels in sequence
- •2.2.8 Unstressed vowels in borrowings
- •2.3 Consonants
- •2.3.1 Classification of consonants
- •2.3.2 Palatalization of consonants
- •2.3.3 The distribution of palatalized consonants
- •2.3.4 Palatalization assimilation
- •2.3.5 The glide [j]
- •2.3.6 Affricates
- •2.3.7 Soft palatal fricatives
- •2.3.8 Geminate consonants
- •2.3.9 Voicing of consonants
- •2.4 Phonological variation
- •2.4.1 General
- •2.4.2 Phonological variation: idiomaticity
- •2.4.3 Phonological variation: systemic factors
- •2.4.4 Phonological variation: phonostylistics and Old Muscovite pronunciation
- •2.5 Morpholexical alternations
- •2.5.1 Preliminaries
- •2.5.2 Consonant grades
- •2.5.3 Types of softness
- •2.5.4 Vowel grades
- •2.5.5 Morphophonemic {o}
- •3 Inflectional morphology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Conjugation of verbs
- •3.2.1 Verbal categories
- •3.2.2 Conjugation classes
- •3.2.3 Stress patterns
- •3.2.4 Conjugation classes: I-Conjugation
- •3.2.5 Conjugation classes: suffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.6 Conjugation classes: quasisuffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.7 Stress in verbs: retrospective
- •3.2.8 Irregularities in conjugation
- •3.2.9 Secondary imperfectivization
- •3.3 Declension of pronouns
- •3.3.1 Personal pronouns
- •3.3.2 Third-person pronouns
- •3.3.3 Determiners (demonstrative, possessive, adjectival pronouns)
- •3.4 Quantifiers
- •3.5 Adjectives
- •3.5.1 Adjectives
- •3.5.2 Predicative (‘‘short”) adjectives
- •3.5.3 Mixed adjectives and surnames
- •3.5.4 Comparatives and superlatives
- •3.6 Declension of nouns
- •3.6.1 Categories and declension classes of nouns
- •3.6.2 Hard, soft, and unpaired declensions
- •3.6.3 Accentual patterns
- •3.6.8 Declension and gender of gradation
- •3.6.9 Accentual paradigms
- •3.7 Complications in declension
- •3.7.1 Indeclinable common nouns
- •3.7.2 Acronyms
- •3.7.3 Compounds
- •3.7.4 Appositives
- •3.7.5 Names
- •4 Arguments
- •4.1 Argument phrases
- •4.1.1 Basics
- •4.1.2 Reference of arguments
- •4.1.3 Morphological categories of nouns: gender
- •4.1.4 Gender: unpaired ‘‘masculine” nouns
- •4.1.5 Gender: common gender
- •4.1.6 Morphological categories of nouns: animacy
- •4.1.7 Morphological categories of nouns: number
- •4.1.8 Number: pluralia tantum, singularia tantum
- •4.1.9 Number: figurative uses of number
- •4.1.10 Morphological categories of nouns: case
- •4.2 Prepositions
- •4.2.1 Preliminaries
- •4.2.2 Ligature {o}
- •4.2.3 Case government
- •4.3 Quantifiers
- •4.3.1 Preliminaries
- •4.3.2 General numerals
- •4.3.3 Paucal numerals
- •4.3.5 Preposed quantified noun
- •4.3.6 Complex numerals
- •4.3.7 Fractions
- •4.3.8 Collectives
- •4.3.9 Approximates
- •4.3.10 Numerative (counting) forms of selected nouns
- •4.3.12 Quantifier (numeral) cline
- •4.4 Internal arguments and modifiers
- •4.4.1 General
- •4.4.2 Possessors
- •4.4.3 Possessive adjectives of unique nouns
- •4.4.4 Agreement of adjectives and participles
- •4.4.5 Relative clauses
- •4.4.6 Participles
- •4.4.7 Comparatives
- •4.4.8 Event nouns: introduction
- •4.4.9 Semantics of event nouns
- •4.4.10 Arguments of event nouns
- •4.5 Reference in text: nouns, pronouns, and ellipsis
- •4.5.1 Basics
- •4.5.2 Common nouns in text
- •4.5.3 Third-person pronouns
- •4.5.4 Ellipsis (‘‘zero” pronouns)
- •4.5.5 Second-person pronouns and address
- •4.5.6 Names
- •4.6 Demonstrative pronouns
- •4.7 Reflexive pronouns
- •4.7.1 Basics
- •4.7.2 Autonomous arguments
- •4.7.3 Non-immediate sites
- •4.7.4 Special predicate--argument relations: existential, quantifying, modal, experiential predicates
- •4.7.5 Unattached reflexives
- •4.7.6 Special predicate--argument relations: direct objects
- •4.7.7 Special predicate--argument relations: passives
- •4.7.8 Autonomous domains: event argument phrases
- •4.7.9 Autonomous domains: non-finite verbs
- •4.7.12 Retrospective on reflexives
- •4.8 Quantifying pronouns and adjectives
- •4.8.1 Preliminaries: interrogatives as indefinite pronouns
- •4.8.7 Summary
- •4.8.9 Universal adjectives
- •5 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1.1 Predicates and arguments, in general
- •5.1.2 Predicate aspectuality and modality
- •5.1.3 Aspectuality and modality in context
- •5.1.4 Predicate information structure
- •5.1.5 Information structure in context
- •5.1.6 The concept of subject and the concept of object
- •5.1.7 Typology of predicates
- •5.2 Predicative adjectives and nouns
- •5.2.1 General
- •5.2.2 Modal co-predicates
- •5.2.3 Aspectual co-predicates
- •5.2.4 Aspectual and modal copular predicatives
- •5.2.5 Copular constructions: instrumental
- •5.2.6 Copular adjectives: predicative (short) form vs. nominative (long) form
- •5.2.9 Predicatives in non-finite clauses
- •5.2.10 Summary: case usage in predicatives
- •5.3 Quantifying predicates and genitive subjects
- •5.3.1 Basics
- •5.3.2 Clausal quantifiers and subject quantifying genitive
- •5.3.3 Subject quantifying genitive without quantifiers
- •5.3.4 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: basic paradigm
- •5.3.5 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates
- •5.3.6 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: reference
- •5.3.8 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates and reference
- •5.3.9 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: context
- •5.3.10 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: summary
- •5.4 Quantified (genitive) objects
- •5.4.1 Basics
- •5.4.2 Governed genitive
- •5.4.3 Partitive and metric genitive
- •5.4.4 Object genitive of negation
- •5.4.5 Genitive objects: summary
- •5.5 Secondary genitives and secondary locatives
- •5.5.1 Basics
- •5.5.2 Secondary genitive
- •5.5.3 Secondary locative
- •5.6 Instrumental case
- •5.6.1 Basics
- •5.6.2 Modal instrumentals
- •5.6.3 Aspectual instrumentals
- •5.6.4 Agentive instrumentals
- •5.6.5 Summary
- •5.7 Case: context and variants
- •5.7.1 Jakobson’s case system: general
- •5.7.2 Jakobson’s case system: the analysis
- •5.7.3 Syncretism
- •5.7.4 Secondary genitive and secondary locative as cases?
- •5.8 Voice: reflexive verbs, passive participles
- •5.8.1 Basics
- •5.8.2 Functional equivalents of passive
- •5.8.3 Reflexive verbs
- •5.8.4 Present passive participles
- •5.8.5 Past passive participles
- •5.8.6 Passives and near-passives
- •5.9 Agreement
- •5.9.1 Basics
- •5.9.2 Agreement with implicit arguments, complications
- •5.9.3 Agreement with overt arguments: special contexts
- •5.9.4 Agreement with conjoined nouns
- •5.9.5 Agreement with comitative phrases
- •5.9.6 Agreement with quantifier phrases
- •5.10 Subordinate clauses and infinitives
- •5.10.1 Basics
- •5.10.2 Finite clauses
- •5.10.4 The free infinitive construction (without overt modal)
- •5.10.5 The free infinitive construction (with negative existential pronouns)
- •5.10.6 The dative-with-infinitive construction (overt modal)
- •5.10.7 Infinitives with modal hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.8 Infinitives with hosts of intentional modality (nominative subject)
- •5.10.9 Infinitives with aspectual hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.10 Infinitives with hosts of imposed modality (accusative or dative object)
- •5.10.11 Final constructions
- •5.10.12 Summary of infinitive constructions
- •6 Mood, tense, and aspect
- •6.1 States and change, times, alternatives
- •6.2 Mood
- •6.2.1 Modality in general
- •6.2.2 Mands and the imperative
- •6.2.3 Conditional constructions
- •6.2.4 Dependent irrealis mood: possibility, volitive, optative
- •6.2.5 Dependent irrealis mood: epistemology
- •6.2.6 Dependent irrealis mood: reference
- •6.2.7 Independent irrealis moods
- •6.2.8 Syntax and semantics of modal predicates
- •6.3 Tense
- •6.3.1 Predicates and times, in general
- •6.3.2 Tense in finite adjectival and adverbial clauses
- •6.3.3 Tense in argument clauses
- •6.3.4 Shifts of perspective in tense: historical present
- •6.3.5 Shifts of perspective in tense: resultative
- •6.3.6 Tense in participles
- •6.3.7 Aspectual-temporal-modal particles
- •6.4 Aspect and lexicon
- •6.4.1 Aspect made simple
- •6.4.2 Tests for aspect membership
- •6.4.3 Aspect and morphology: the core strategy
- •6.4.4 Aspect and morphology: other strategies and groups
- •6.4.5 Aspect pairs
- •6.4.6 Intrinsic lexical aspect
- •6.4.7 Verbs of motion
- •6.5 Aspect and context
- •6.5.1 Preliminaries
- •6.5.2 Past ‘‘aoristic” narrative: perfective
- •6.5.3 Retrospective (‘‘perfect”) contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.4 The essentialist context: imperfective
- •6.5.5 Progressive context: imperfective
- •6.5.6 Durative context: imperfective
- •6.5.7 Iterative context: imperfective
- •6.5.8 The future context: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.9 Exemplary potential context: perfective
- •6.5.10 Infinitive contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.11 Retrospective on aspect
- •6.6 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.1 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.2 Measured intervals
- •6.6.3 Time units
- •6.6.4 Time units: variations on the basic patterns
- •6.6.14 Frequency
- •6.6.15 Some lexical adverbs
- •6.6.16 Conjunctions
- •6.6.17 Summary
- •7 The presentation of information
- •7.1 Basics
- •7.2 Intonation
- •7.2.1 Basics
- •7.2.2 Intonation contours
- •7.3 Word order
- •7.3.1 General
- •7.3.6 Word order without subjects
- •7.3.7 Summary of word-order patterns of predicates and arguments
- •7.3.8 Emphatic stress and word order
- •7.3.9 Word order within argument phrases
- •7.3.10 Word order in speech
- •7.4 Negation
- •7.4.1 Preliminaries
- •7.4.2 Distribution and scope of negation
- •7.4.3 Negation and other phenomena
- •7.5 Questions
- •7.5.1 Preliminaries
- •7.5.2 Content questions
- •7.5.3 Polarity questions and answers
- •7.6 Lexical information operators
- •7.6.1 Conjunctions
- •7.6.2 Contrastive conjunctions
- •Bibliography
- •Index
Inf lectional morphology 153
If these proper names are used by themselves, not in apposition, they do decline, and animate names of books are treated as animate: Z, yfghbvth, yt dbltk <fqrfkf, hfpkbdf J,b d tt ecnmt ‘I, for one, have not seen Baikal, the bay of the Ob at its mouth’; Yfxfn hf,jnf yfl ≤Djqyjq<ins sg> b vbhjv<ins sg>≥ ‘Work was begun on War and Peace’; Ytcrjkmrj hfp jy lf;t wbnbhetn ≤<hfnmtd<acc=gen> Rfhfvfpjds[≥ b ≤Blbjnf≥<acc=gen> Ljcnjtdcrjuj ‘Several times he even cites
The Brothers Karamazov and The Idiot of Dostoevsky’.
3.7.5 Names
With names of people, the gender is determined by reference. A name has feminine syntactic gender if it is used in reference to a woman, masculine if used in reference to a man. Whether a name is declined depends largely on how well its phonological shape matches the declension appropriate to the referential gender and how familiar the name is.
Native names: Most native Russian surnames have an adjectival suffix, and distinguish masculine and feminine forms in the singular, and decline. Such are: suffixed names in {-ov}: msc <jh∫cjd, fem <jh∫cjdf; suffixed names in
{-in}: msc Géirby, fem Géirbyf; suffixed names in {-sk-}: msc Gtnhj´dcrbq, fem
Gtnhj´dcrfz, msc Rhégcrbq, fem Rhégcrfz. Names formed with the suffixes {-ov} and {-in} have a declension mixed between adjectives and nouns. Those in {-sk-} have a fully adjectival declension. Other names have a pure nominal declension: nom sg Vfyltkminƒv, ins sg Vfyltkminƒvjv, gen pl Vfyltkminƒvjd, ins pl
Vfyltkminƒvfvb. Surnames that are frozen genitive case forms do not decline:
Xthyß[, :bdƒuj.
Borrowed adjectival names: Names borrowed from other Slavic languages (Polish and Czech) that have an adjectival declension in the source language are treated like Russian adjectival names and decline, including in the feminine:
[25] nfr yfpdfk Vbwrtdbx |
that is how Mickiewicz dubbed Maria |
Vfhb/ Ibvfyjdcre/; |
Szymanowska; the life of Szymanowska; |
,bjuhfabz Ibvfyjdcrjq; c |
with Szymanowska |
Ibvfyjdcrjq |
|
[26]vfnx 33-ktnytq Эdthn b a match of the 33-year-old Evert and the
31-ktnytq Yfdhfnbkjdjq |
31-year-old Navratilova |
These names decline regardless of how the nominative is spelled, whether according to the Russian fashion (usual for the masculine, Kfgbwrbq ‘Lapicki’, possible for the feminine, Rfvbycrfz ‘Kaminska’)´ or the source language (possible
154A Reference Grammar of Russian
Djqybwrb ‘Wojnicki’, usual Dsibycrf ‘Wyszynska’)´ .33 Note also nom sg Yttlks, gen sg Yttlkjuj, from Czech Nejedlé, Nejedl†ho.
Foreign names ending in {-V}: Names of foreign origin that end in vowels other than {-a} do not decline, whether in reference to males or females:
[27] |
ghtrhfcyst hbceyrb bcgfycrjuj |
the wonderful sketches of the Spanish |
|
[elj;ybrf Cfkmdfljhf Lfkb |
artist Salvador Dali |
[28] |
e,bqcndj L;jyf Rtyytlb |
the murder of John Kennedy |
[29] abkmv c exfcnbtv <hbl;bn <fhlj |
a film starring Brigitte Bardot |
|
[30] c ;bdjq Bylbhjq Ufylb |
with the living Indira Gandhi |
The prohibition covers surnames ending in {-ko} and {-(en)ko}. Names of this type, though historically suffixed and historically of Slavic origin, generally do not decline in literary Russian, whether in reference to men ([31--33]) or women ([34]):
[31] |
rjkjybz F. C. Vfrfhtyrj |
the colony of A. S. Makarenko |
[32] |
gbcmvj {jlpmrj |
the letter of Chod´zko |
[33] |
lkz Uhjvsrj |
for Gromyko |
[34]ljcnb;tybt, ecnfyjdktyyjt ujl the triumph, accomplished a year ago by
yfpfl Kfhbcjq Cfdxtyrj b |
Larisa Savchenko and Svetlana |
Cdtnkfyjq Gfh[jvtyrj |
Parkhomenko |
Still, informally these names can decline ([35--36]), especially in the plural ([37-- 38]):
[35]E Yfevtyrb gjlkbyybr Naumenko has the original in her file. kt;bn.
[36] |
hfpdjl c Ibktqrjq |
divorce from Shileiko |
[37] |
Gj ldjhe ,tufkb b lheubt |
Around the yard ran other little |
|
vfktymrbt Rexthtyrb. |
Kucherenkos. |
[38]d jlyjv ljvt c Ujhtyrfvb in the same house with the Gorenkos
First names that end in {-o} decline according to Declension<Ia>, if the final vowel is stressed, as in Gtnhj´, Gtnhƒ, Gtnhé, Gtnhj´v, etc., though there is a tendency toward non-declension. In nouns like Lfy∫kj, Vb[ƒqkj, the unstressed final vowel is pronounced as [ə], the same as an unstressed {-a} in Declension<II>. In standard Russian, these nouns decline according to Declension<II> ([39]):
[39]Vb[fqke yt edbltk; jn [he] didn’t see Mikhailo; from Mikhailo; to
Vb[fqks; r Vb[fqkt; c |
Mikhailo; with Mikhailo |
Vb[fqkjq
33 Kalakutskaia 1970.
Inf lectional morphology 155
Foreign names ending in {-C}: Names that end in consonants fit the expected shape of Declension<Ia>, which contains only masculine nouns. In reference to males (or mixed groups), such names, including foreign names, generally decline.
[40] |
j ghbtplt {tvbyueэz |
about the arrival of Hemingway |
[41] |
gjhnhtns </y/эkz |
portraits of Bunuel˜ |
[42]cnfhjt dshf;tybt utythfkf an old expression of General De Gaulle lt Ujkkz
[43] hfdyj rfr b c Rjyljkbpjq |
similarly with Condaleezza Rice |
Hfqc b c <eifvb |
and the Bushes |
Included are stems which end in a palatalized consonant (lt Ujkkm) or [j] ({tvbyueэq). An exception is monosyllabic Korean names such as Gfr, Rbv, not declined by a majority of speakers a quarter of a century ago.34
Names that end in a consonant do not have a feminine nominative singular form and cannot decline when used in reference to females:
[44] |
htxm V. Nэnxth |
the speech of M. Thatcher |
[45] |
cvthnm :jh; Cfyl |
the death of George Sand |
[46]ujl yfpfl pf vtcnf d abyfkt a year ago places in the finals were
,jhjkbcm, rfr b ctqxfc, contested, as now, by Navratilova with Chris
Yfdhfnbkjdf c Rhbc Эdthn, f Evert, and Graf with Pam Shriver.
Uhfa -- c Gfv Ihfqdth.
In reference to men, these names decline: ;tyf ujcgjlbyf Nэnxthf ‘Mr. Thatcher’s wife’.
The prohibition against declining women’s surnames ending in a consonant holds also for names that have long been used in a Russian-language context. There is no distinct nominative singular feminine form for Ubyp,ehu or Abuyth, and these names do not decline in reference to women:
[47]rybuf Tdutybb Ubyp,ehu the book of Evgeniia Ginzburg Into the
≤Rhenjq vfhihen≥. |
Whirlwind |
[48] d Jltcce r Dtht Abuyth |
to Odessa to Vera Figner |
There is no feminine form, and hence no declension, of names made with the et-
ymologically Slavic suffixes {-ic} or {-uk} used in reference to women: Trfnthbyf
‹
Ybrjkftdyf {fhrtdbx, j Pjt Ybrjkftdyjq Ufkbx, r Cjyt Ufyxer.
Foreign names ending in {-a}: Names ending in {-a} are complicated. Some native roots and assimilated non-native roots are used as names, and they decline in reference to males: gjhnhtn yb ,jktt yb vtytt rfr cfvjuj Zujls -- ukfdyjuj
34 Kim 1970.
156 A Reference Grammar of Russian
gfkfxf yfitq cnhfys ‘a portrait of no one less than Iagoda himself -- the main hangman of our country’.
Names ending in {-a} borrowed from other Slavic languages and assimilated names in {-a} decline in reference to men:
[49] |
abkmv Dfqls |
a film of Wajda |
[50] |
pf Cvtnfyjq |
after Smetana |
[51] |
j Zyt :b;rt |
ˇ |
about Jan Zizkaˇ |
||
[52] |
dvtifntkmcndj <thbb; |
the interference of Beria; murder by Beria; |
|
e,bqcndj <thbtq; <thb/ |
Zhukov arrested Beria |
|
fhtcnjdfk :erjd |
|
[53] |
gtcyb Jrel;fds |
the songs of Okudzhava |
[54]bcnjhbz Relbhrb; Relbhre the story of Kudirkas; they called Kudirkas
gjpdfkb r yfxfkmybre |
in to see the head of the prison |
n/hmvs
With less assimilated foreign surnames used in reference to males, there is variation. Certainly many names decline:
[55] gjhnhtns Kjhrb |
portraits of Lorca |
[56]ghfdbntkmcndj Gfnhbcf the government of Patrice Lumumba
Kevev,s
[57] |
gthtl gjkjnyfvb Ujqb |
before the canvases of Goya |
[58] |
≤Ghjwtcc≥ Rfarb |
Kafka’s Trial |
[59] |
;fkb here Nheэ,s; |
they shook the hand of Trueba; agreement |
|
cjukfitybt c Nheэ,jq |
with Trueba |
[60] |
hf,jnf Bjibvehs; |
the work of Yoshimura; unknown to |
|
ytbpdtcnyj Bjibveht |
Yoshimura |
but declension is not automatic for unfamilar names. |
||
[61] |
d hf,jnf[ {bltwevb |
in the works of Hidezumi Terazawa |
|
Nthfpfdf |
|
Occasionally, there is variation for a given name, within one text:
[62]Lt-Gthhtue jcdj,jlbkb De Perregaux was freed before the end of
ljchjxyj. |
his sentence. |
[63] yjvth Lt-Gthhtuf |
the hotel room of de Perregaux |
Stress on the {-ƒ} makes declension impossible, even in widely used nouns:
[64]≤Nhb veirtnthf≥ L/vƒ
[65]d bcreccndt Эlufhf Ltuƒ
[66]ndjhxtcndj Pjkz´
[67]ljxm V.B. Gtnbgƒ
The Three Musketeers of Dumas in the art of Edgar Degas the creative work of Zola
the daughter of M. I. Petipa
Inf lectional morphology 157
The trend is evidently towards non-agreement. A work from the turn of the previous century declined Lope de Vega ([68]) but contemporary speakers do not:
[68]dkbzybt yf Kjgt lt Dtue; influence on Lope de Vega; activity of Lope
ltzntkmyjcnm Kjgt lt Dtub; de Vega; interest in Lope de Vega; written
bynthtc r Kjgt lt Dtut; |
about Lope de Vega |
yfgbcfyj j Kjgt lt Dtut
In reference to women, only highly assimilated names in {-a} decline ([69] vs. [70--71]).
[69] ,bjuhfabz K.Y. Cnjkbws |
the life of L. N. Stolitsa |
[70]e Vfkmds Kfylf; Vfkmde in the possession of Malva Landa; [they]
Kfylf dyjdm fhtcnjdfkb |
arrested Malva Landa again |
[71] d ndjhxtcndt V. {zhvf |
in the creative work of M. Harma |
[72]dvtcnj Rfhkjnns <hbfywf; in place of Carlotta Brianca; to replace
pfvtybnm Rfhkjnne |
Carlotta Brianca |
{?<hbfywe <hbfywf} |
|
The accusative was actually used in [72], from a memoir written by the paramour of Nicholas I, but for modern speakers the accusative is only <hbƒywf for this famous ballerina.
Russian is generous with respect to first names that refer to females, and declines any noun whose nominative can be construed as ending in {-a} in Russian:
[73]F hfpdt Geirby yt gbcfk j Did not Pushkin write about Cleopatra?
Rktjgfnht?
[74] |
c Bylbhjq Ufylb |
with Indira Gandhi |
[75] |
c Cbvjyjq Cbymjht |
with Simone Signoret |
Summaries of soap operas in the new Russian-American press decline the names of heroines <trrf, Эhbrf, <tkbylf, Ahfyxtcrf, because the nominative ends in {-a}, but they do not decline first names referring to women that end in consonants or vowels other than {-a}: Hfrtkm, Jgfk, {эqkb.
The usage of surnames discussed above can be summarized in tabular form (see Table 3.37).
Overall, names decline to the extent they are understood to fit the Russian pattern of gender and declension. The different forms of gender need to line up: it must be possible to assign the noun to a recognizable declension class (formal gender), and the referential gender (male vs. female) must be appropriate for the declension class. Names ending in vowels other than {-a} cannot decline at all,
158 A Reference Grammar of Russian
Table 3.37 Declension of surnames
|
referring to a man |
referring to a woman |
|
|
|
Russian surnames |
yes |
yes |
in {-in}, {-ov} |
yes: Dfqlf, Ukbyrf, Dtxthrf |
yes: Yfdhfnbkjdf |
Slavic surnames in {-a} |
||
assimilated surnames in {-a} |
yes: Jrel;fdf |
rarely yes: Cnjkbwf // |
|
|
usually no: <hbfywf |
assimilated surnames in {-C} |
yes: Ubyp,ehu |
no: [Tdutybz] Ubyp,ehu |
Slavic surnames in |
yes: Ufkbx |
no: [Cjyz] Ufyxer |
{-iˇc}, {-uk} |
yes: Htqufy, L;trcjy, |
no: [Rhbc] Эdthn |
foreign surnames in {-C} |
||
|
Эqyintqy, </y/эkm |
|
foreign surnames in {-a} |
often yes: Bjibvehf, Ujqz, |
no: [Vbyf] {fhvf |
|
Kjhrf // no: L/vf |
|
Slavic surnames in {-o} |
no: Vfrfhtyrj but pl yes: |
no: [Kfhbcf] Cfdxtyrj |
|
Rexthtyrb |
|
foreign surnames in {-V} |
no: Rtyytlb, Lfkb |
no: [Bylbhf] Ufylb, Ctymjht |
|
|
|
because they fit no declension class; nouns ending in consonants cannot decline in reference to women, there being no feminine gender nouns in Declension<Ia>. Perhaps paradoxically, foreign names in {-a} often decline in reference to men, but not in reference to women -- even though a noun in {-a} would seem to be a perfect candidate for membership as a feminine of Declension<II>.