- •Contents
- •1 Russian
- •1.1 The Russian language
- •1.1.1 Russian then and now
- •1.1.2 Levels of language
- •1.2 Describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.1 Conventions of notation
- •1.2.2 Abbreviations
- •1.2.3 Dictionaries and grammars
- •1.2.4 Statistics and corpora
- •1.2.5 Strategies of describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.6 Two fundamental concepts of (Russian) grammar
- •1.3 Writing Russian
- •1.3.1 The Russian Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.2 A brief history of the Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.3 Etymology of letters
- •1.3.4 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (basics)
- •1.3.5 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (refinements)
- •1.3.6 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (lexical idiosyncrasies)
- •1.3.7 Transliteration
- •2 Sounds
- •2.1 Sounds
- •2.2 Vowels
- •2.2.1 Stressed vowels
- •2.2.3 Vowel duration
- •2.2.4 Unstressed vowels
- •2.2.5 Unpaired consonants [ˇs ˇz c] and unstressed vocalism
- •2.2.6 Post-tonic soft vocalism
- •2.2.7 Unstressed vowels in sequence
- •2.2.8 Unstressed vowels in borrowings
- •2.3 Consonants
- •2.3.1 Classification of consonants
- •2.3.2 Palatalization of consonants
- •2.3.3 The distribution of palatalized consonants
- •2.3.4 Palatalization assimilation
- •2.3.5 The glide [j]
- •2.3.6 Affricates
- •2.3.7 Soft palatal fricatives
- •2.3.8 Geminate consonants
- •2.3.9 Voicing of consonants
- •2.4 Phonological variation
- •2.4.1 General
- •2.4.2 Phonological variation: idiomaticity
- •2.4.3 Phonological variation: systemic factors
- •2.4.4 Phonological variation: phonostylistics and Old Muscovite pronunciation
- •2.5 Morpholexical alternations
- •2.5.1 Preliminaries
- •2.5.2 Consonant grades
- •2.5.3 Types of softness
- •2.5.4 Vowel grades
- •2.5.5 Morphophonemic {o}
- •3 Inflectional morphology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Conjugation of verbs
- •3.2.1 Verbal categories
- •3.2.2 Conjugation classes
- •3.2.3 Stress patterns
- •3.2.4 Conjugation classes: I-Conjugation
- •3.2.5 Conjugation classes: suffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.6 Conjugation classes: quasisuffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.7 Stress in verbs: retrospective
- •3.2.8 Irregularities in conjugation
- •3.2.9 Secondary imperfectivization
- •3.3 Declension of pronouns
- •3.3.1 Personal pronouns
- •3.3.2 Third-person pronouns
- •3.3.3 Determiners (demonstrative, possessive, adjectival pronouns)
- •3.4 Quantifiers
- •3.5 Adjectives
- •3.5.1 Adjectives
- •3.5.2 Predicative (‘‘short”) adjectives
- •3.5.3 Mixed adjectives and surnames
- •3.5.4 Comparatives and superlatives
- •3.6 Declension of nouns
- •3.6.1 Categories and declension classes of nouns
- •3.6.2 Hard, soft, and unpaired declensions
- •3.6.3 Accentual patterns
- •3.6.8 Declension and gender of gradation
- •3.6.9 Accentual paradigms
- •3.7 Complications in declension
- •3.7.1 Indeclinable common nouns
- •3.7.2 Acronyms
- •3.7.3 Compounds
- •3.7.4 Appositives
- •3.7.5 Names
- •4 Arguments
- •4.1 Argument phrases
- •4.1.1 Basics
- •4.1.2 Reference of arguments
- •4.1.3 Morphological categories of nouns: gender
- •4.1.4 Gender: unpaired ‘‘masculine” nouns
- •4.1.5 Gender: common gender
- •4.1.6 Morphological categories of nouns: animacy
- •4.1.7 Morphological categories of nouns: number
- •4.1.8 Number: pluralia tantum, singularia tantum
- •4.1.9 Number: figurative uses of number
- •4.1.10 Morphological categories of nouns: case
- •4.2 Prepositions
- •4.2.1 Preliminaries
- •4.2.2 Ligature {o}
- •4.2.3 Case government
- •4.3 Quantifiers
- •4.3.1 Preliminaries
- •4.3.2 General numerals
- •4.3.3 Paucal numerals
- •4.3.5 Preposed quantified noun
- •4.3.6 Complex numerals
- •4.3.7 Fractions
- •4.3.8 Collectives
- •4.3.9 Approximates
- •4.3.10 Numerative (counting) forms of selected nouns
- •4.3.12 Quantifier (numeral) cline
- •4.4 Internal arguments and modifiers
- •4.4.1 General
- •4.4.2 Possessors
- •4.4.3 Possessive adjectives of unique nouns
- •4.4.4 Agreement of adjectives and participles
- •4.4.5 Relative clauses
- •4.4.6 Participles
- •4.4.7 Comparatives
- •4.4.8 Event nouns: introduction
- •4.4.9 Semantics of event nouns
- •4.4.10 Arguments of event nouns
- •4.5 Reference in text: nouns, pronouns, and ellipsis
- •4.5.1 Basics
- •4.5.2 Common nouns in text
- •4.5.3 Third-person pronouns
- •4.5.4 Ellipsis (‘‘zero” pronouns)
- •4.5.5 Second-person pronouns and address
- •4.5.6 Names
- •4.6 Demonstrative pronouns
- •4.7 Reflexive pronouns
- •4.7.1 Basics
- •4.7.2 Autonomous arguments
- •4.7.3 Non-immediate sites
- •4.7.4 Special predicate--argument relations: existential, quantifying, modal, experiential predicates
- •4.7.5 Unattached reflexives
- •4.7.6 Special predicate--argument relations: direct objects
- •4.7.7 Special predicate--argument relations: passives
- •4.7.8 Autonomous domains: event argument phrases
- •4.7.9 Autonomous domains: non-finite verbs
- •4.7.12 Retrospective on reflexives
- •4.8 Quantifying pronouns and adjectives
- •4.8.1 Preliminaries: interrogatives as indefinite pronouns
- •4.8.7 Summary
- •4.8.9 Universal adjectives
- •5 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1.1 Predicates and arguments, in general
- •5.1.2 Predicate aspectuality and modality
- •5.1.3 Aspectuality and modality in context
- •5.1.4 Predicate information structure
- •5.1.5 Information structure in context
- •5.1.6 The concept of subject and the concept of object
- •5.1.7 Typology of predicates
- •5.2 Predicative adjectives and nouns
- •5.2.1 General
- •5.2.2 Modal co-predicates
- •5.2.3 Aspectual co-predicates
- •5.2.4 Aspectual and modal copular predicatives
- •5.2.5 Copular constructions: instrumental
- •5.2.6 Copular adjectives: predicative (short) form vs. nominative (long) form
- •5.2.9 Predicatives in non-finite clauses
- •5.2.10 Summary: case usage in predicatives
- •5.3 Quantifying predicates and genitive subjects
- •5.3.1 Basics
- •5.3.2 Clausal quantifiers and subject quantifying genitive
- •5.3.3 Subject quantifying genitive without quantifiers
- •5.3.4 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: basic paradigm
- •5.3.5 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates
- •5.3.6 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: reference
- •5.3.8 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates and reference
- •5.3.9 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: context
- •5.3.10 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: summary
- •5.4 Quantified (genitive) objects
- •5.4.1 Basics
- •5.4.2 Governed genitive
- •5.4.3 Partitive and metric genitive
- •5.4.4 Object genitive of negation
- •5.4.5 Genitive objects: summary
- •5.5 Secondary genitives and secondary locatives
- •5.5.1 Basics
- •5.5.2 Secondary genitive
- •5.5.3 Secondary locative
- •5.6 Instrumental case
- •5.6.1 Basics
- •5.6.2 Modal instrumentals
- •5.6.3 Aspectual instrumentals
- •5.6.4 Agentive instrumentals
- •5.6.5 Summary
- •5.7 Case: context and variants
- •5.7.1 Jakobson’s case system: general
- •5.7.2 Jakobson’s case system: the analysis
- •5.7.3 Syncretism
- •5.7.4 Secondary genitive and secondary locative as cases?
- •5.8 Voice: reflexive verbs, passive participles
- •5.8.1 Basics
- •5.8.2 Functional equivalents of passive
- •5.8.3 Reflexive verbs
- •5.8.4 Present passive participles
- •5.8.5 Past passive participles
- •5.8.6 Passives and near-passives
- •5.9 Agreement
- •5.9.1 Basics
- •5.9.2 Agreement with implicit arguments, complications
- •5.9.3 Agreement with overt arguments: special contexts
- •5.9.4 Agreement with conjoined nouns
- •5.9.5 Agreement with comitative phrases
- •5.9.6 Agreement with quantifier phrases
- •5.10 Subordinate clauses and infinitives
- •5.10.1 Basics
- •5.10.2 Finite clauses
- •5.10.4 The free infinitive construction (without overt modal)
- •5.10.5 The free infinitive construction (with negative existential pronouns)
- •5.10.6 The dative-with-infinitive construction (overt modal)
- •5.10.7 Infinitives with modal hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.8 Infinitives with hosts of intentional modality (nominative subject)
- •5.10.9 Infinitives with aspectual hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.10 Infinitives with hosts of imposed modality (accusative or dative object)
- •5.10.11 Final constructions
- •5.10.12 Summary of infinitive constructions
- •6 Mood, tense, and aspect
- •6.1 States and change, times, alternatives
- •6.2 Mood
- •6.2.1 Modality in general
- •6.2.2 Mands and the imperative
- •6.2.3 Conditional constructions
- •6.2.4 Dependent irrealis mood: possibility, volitive, optative
- •6.2.5 Dependent irrealis mood: epistemology
- •6.2.6 Dependent irrealis mood: reference
- •6.2.7 Independent irrealis moods
- •6.2.8 Syntax and semantics of modal predicates
- •6.3 Tense
- •6.3.1 Predicates and times, in general
- •6.3.2 Tense in finite adjectival and adverbial clauses
- •6.3.3 Tense in argument clauses
- •6.3.4 Shifts of perspective in tense: historical present
- •6.3.5 Shifts of perspective in tense: resultative
- •6.3.6 Tense in participles
- •6.3.7 Aspectual-temporal-modal particles
- •6.4 Aspect and lexicon
- •6.4.1 Aspect made simple
- •6.4.2 Tests for aspect membership
- •6.4.3 Aspect and morphology: the core strategy
- •6.4.4 Aspect and morphology: other strategies and groups
- •6.4.5 Aspect pairs
- •6.4.6 Intrinsic lexical aspect
- •6.4.7 Verbs of motion
- •6.5 Aspect and context
- •6.5.1 Preliminaries
- •6.5.2 Past ‘‘aoristic” narrative: perfective
- •6.5.3 Retrospective (‘‘perfect”) contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.4 The essentialist context: imperfective
- •6.5.5 Progressive context: imperfective
- •6.5.6 Durative context: imperfective
- •6.5.7 Iterative context: imperfective
- •6.5.8 The future context: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.9 Exemplary potential context: perfective
- •6.5.10 Infinitive contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.11 Retrospective on aspect
- •6.6 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.1 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.2 Measured intervals
- •6.6.3 Time units
- •6.6.4 Time units: variations on the basic patterns
- •6.6.14 Frequency
- •6.6.15 Some lexical adverbs
- •6.6.16 Conjunctions
- •6.6.17 Summary
- •7 The presentation of information
- •7.1 Basics
- •7.2 Intonation
- •7.2.1 Basics
- •7.2.2 Intonation contours
- •7.3 Word order
- •7.3.1 General
- •7.3.6 Word order without subjects
- •7.3.7 Summary of word-order patterns of predicates and arguments
- •7.3.8 Emphatic stress and word order
- •7.3.9 Word order within argument phrases
- •7.3.10 Word order in speech
- •7.4 Negation
- •7.4.1 Preliminaries
- •7.4.2 Distribution and scope of negation
- •7.4.3 Negation and other phenomena
- •7.5 Questions
- •7.5.1 Preliminaries
- •7.5.2 Content questions
- •7.5.3 Polarity questions and answers
- •7.6 Lexical information operators
- •7.6.1 Conjunctions
- •7.6.2 Contrastive conjunctions
- •Bibliography
- •Index
316A Reference Grammar of Russian
Écnm is used when the context deals with the state of the world, when the speaker paints a picture in which the possession of some entity is in some relation to other states of the world -- a relation of cause and effect, of principle and illustration, or of overlapping states.
[206]<b,kbjntrfhib dcnhtnbkb vtyz c djcnjhujv. Rybub vjb e yb[ tcnm, ht,znf xbnf/n b[.
The librarians greeted me ecstatically. They have my books, children read them.
In [206], the relation is causal: the provincial library has the books, therefore children read them. In [207], having a notebook with a French title is a de rigueur consequence of taking music lessons:
[207]Yj [jlbnm yf ehjrb gjkfuftncz, b e vtyz, rjytxyj, tcnm yjnyfz gfgrf, ult gj-ahfywepcrb yfgbcfyj ≤v/pbr≥.
But it’s expected that I go to music lessons, and of course, I have a folder for sheet music, on which is written in French, “musique.”
Thus in context, †cnm establishes the existence of something, in the face of possible non-existence, where the existence of that entity affects other states of the world. In contrast, †cnm is omitted if the sentence is used to characterize the possessor rather than to establish the polarity of existence:
[208]<f,eirf rhfcfdbwf, yj cregfz. E ytt rk/xb jn rfccs.
Grandmother is a beauty, but she is stingy. She has the keys to the moneybox.
[209]E ytuj lheufz cgtwbfkmyjcnm: jy yfxbyftn ltrkfvbhjdfnm jxtym lkbyyst cnb[b, b exbntkm ujnjd gjcnfdbnm tve k/,e/ jnvtnre, kbim ,s jy pfvjkxfk. He has another specialty: he starts declaiming a long poem, and the teacher is ready to give him any grade if only he will shut up.
Thus [208] describes the possessor (her possession of keys goes along with her other character traits), while [209] explicates where the boy’s true talent lay.
5.4 Quantified (genitive) objects
5.4.1 Basics
The genitive can be used instead of the accusative for the object argument of transitive predicates under one of the following conditions: (a) individual verbs govern the genitive, now usually alongside the accusative; (b) the genitive can be used in place of the accusative in a partitive, or m e t r i c , meaning; and (c) the genitive is still frequently used in place of the accusative object of transitive verbs that are negated. These contexts are different enough from each other to merit separate discussion. Still, there are similarities. The genitive presents the
|
Predicates and arguments 317 |
|
Table 5.8 Semantic classes of predicates governing object genitive |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
predicates |
semantics |
|
|
|
|
bcrƒnm ‘seek, search for’, ;lƒnm ‘await’, |
potential: contact is potential, but |
|
nh†,jdfnm ‘demand’, (gj)ckéifnmcz ‘heed, |
unrealized |
|
listen to’, lj;lƒnmcz/lj;blƒnmcz ‘wait for’, |
|
|
;tkƒnm ‘desire’, [jn†nm ‘want’ |
|
|
ljcn∫xm/ljcnbuƒnm ‘reach’, lj,∫nmcz/lj,bdƒnmcz |
tenuous: actual contact in the face of |
|
‘achieve, acquire’, rfcƒnmcz ‘touch on’ |
possible non-contact |
|
,jz´nmcz ‘fear’, bp,t;ƒnm ‘avoid’, jgfcƒnmcz |
avoidance: possible contact is avoided |
|
‘be wary of’, ,th†xmcz ‘be wary of ’ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
situation more as a state of the world than as a property of a specific entity. At the level of the argument, the genitive is used for nouns that are essentialist rather than individuated in reference (‘this is a token of the kind of thing defined as . . .’).
5.4.2 Governed genitive
The genitive has long been used for the objects of certain verbs (Table 5.8).32 Verbs that can take the genitive at all present a scenario in which the object is potentially affected by the subject, but the potential effect (or the potential contact between the two entities) is less than complete: contact is only potential, not actual; or the contact is attenuated because non-contact was a real possibility; or contact is avoided.
The verbs of Table 5.8 all used to take the genitive regularly, but over the course of the twentieth century it became increasingly possible to use the accusative. Among the common verbs, the genitive is still usual with the highly modal nh†,jdfnm (over 90%), but now infrequent with bcrƒnm (less than 30% genitive), with ;lƒnm ‘wait’ intermediate. The accusative has made such progress with these verbs that RG 1980 recognized the accusative as a stylistically neutral option in two contexts: with nouns referring to persons (in the singular of Declension<II> or Declension<III> -- otherwise the animate accusative would be invoked), as in [210], and with nouns referring to known entities, as in [211]:
[210]Z gjitk bcrfnm cdj/ vfnm<acc> . I set off to look for my mother.
[211]Tve ye;yf jlyf rybuf, rjnjhfz e yfc tcnm. Z gjitk bcrfnm rybue<acc> . He needed a certain book that we had. I went to look for the book.
32 Matthews 1997.
318A Reference Grammar of Russian
In fact, the accusative is used more broadly with bcrƒnm and ;lƒnm. The accusative can be used for non-individuated objects if the eventual result is envisioned ([212--13]):
[212]Jntw t;tlytdyj e[jlbk bcrfnm rdfhnbhe<acc> .
Every day father would go out to search for an apartment.
[213]Jyf gjckfkf ntktuhfvve, cnfkf ;lfnm jndtnyjt gbcmvj<acc> . She sent a telegram and began to wait for the letter of reply.
The accusative is used for repeated activities, each of which is successful,
[214]Rf;lsq ltym z jnghfdkzkcz yf ks;f[ nj d jlye cnjhjye, nj d lheue/, bcrfk ltkzyrb<acc> , ult uecnj hjckb cjcys b gb[ns, gjnjv dtk nelf ktcjhe,jd b yfvtxfk ljhjub lkz dsdjprb ,htdty.
Every day I set out on skis in one direction or another, and located dense stands of pine and fir, then I brought the lumberjacks there and marked out roads for taking out the logs.
Or for an activity that is confined to a delimited interval of time:
[215]J,scr ghjljk;fkcz lj hfccdtnf. Gjlybvfkb gjkjdbws, bcrfkb jhe;bt<acc> , xbnfkb gbcmvf, jgznm bcrfkb, ybxtuj yt yf[jlbkb.
The search lasted until dawn. They lifted up the floorboards, they searched for guns, they read letters, they searched some more, they found nothing.
The generalization is that the accusative is used when the event is bounded. In contrast, the genitive is used when the event is not limited. In [216], the
speaker engages in the activity of waiting while, concurrently, observing another activity; [217] reports an open-ended process.
[216]Z ;lfk yf djrpfkt gjtplf<gen> c ,bktnjv d rfhvfyt b yf,k/lfk, rfr ldf yjcbkmobrf dskfdkbdfkb d njkgt gjljphbntkmys[ b dtkb b[ pf ne vfktymre/ ldthre.
I waited at the station for a train with a ticket in my pocket and observed how two porters would pick out suspicious types from the crowd and lead them behind that small door.
[217]Jy gjlfk fgtkkzwb/ d WRR b nthgtkbdj ;lfk htitybz<gen> cdjtq celm,s. He had put in an appeal to the Central Committee and was waiting patiently for the resolution of his fate.
In both [216--17], the object is defined in essentialist terms: ‘that which would be a train’, ‘that which would be the resolution of his fate’. This context -- openended activity, essentialist reference of the argument -- is the last refuge of the governed genitive.
Predicates and arguments 319
Unpaired reflexive verbs (,jz´nmcz ‘fear’, etc.) still take the genitive, but have begun to allow the accusative in the colloquial register with objects naming unique individuals:33
[218]Nfhfrfys yt ,jzkbcm lzl/ Dfc/<acc> . The roaches did not fear Uncle Vasia.
5.4.3 Partitive and metric genitive
The genitive case can be used for the object in what is often termed a pa r t i t i v e sense. The partitive sense presupposes a mass that is homogeneous (any portion is equivalent to any other), the total quantity of which is open-ended (there is always more where that came from). In the partitive usage, this formless mass is given shape: as a result of a bounded event, an unspecified but delimited quantity is created. In [219],
[219]-- Gjcnjq, cjecf<gen> djpmvb, -- crfpfk jy, elth;bdfz here Ktdbyf, rjnjhsq jnnfkrbdfk jn ct,z cjec<acc> .
Ktdby gjrjhyj gjkj;bk ct,t cjecf<gen> , yj yt lfk tcnm Cntgfye Fhrflmbxe. -- Hold on, take some sauce, -- he said, restraining Levin’s hand, who had been pushing the sauce away.
Levin obediently took some sauce, but wouldn’t let Stepan Arkadich eat.
Levin responds to a request to create some delimited quantity of sauce (twice genitive), but manipulates the whole quantity of sauce (accusative).
The possibility of using a partitive genitive depends on the noun, on the verb, and on the context. The partitive genitive is most likely with nouns that refer to undifferentiated masses, especially comestibles. It is less frequent, but possible, with plural nouns ([220]).
[220]Jy regbk gfgbhjc<gen> b gjitk yfpfl r vjcnrfv. He bought cigarettes and went back to the platform.
The partitive is most natural with those predicates that report a situation in which the act itself creates a quantity, as happens with interpersonal, domestic acts of transfer (purchasing, serving, or giving), consumption, or accumulation (Table 5.9).
Using the genitive in its partitive sense depends in part on the aspectualmodal quality of the situation. Because the quantity is created by the event, the partitive sense is most natural in contexts in which completion of an action has occurred or is anticipated -- a perfective imperative (recall [219]), a past perfective ([221]), or a purpose clause or infinitive ([222]):
33 Butorin 1966.
320 A Reference Grammar of Russian
Table 5.9 Predicates taking partitive and metric genitive
verbs of |
examples |
typical objects |
|
|
|
t r a n s f e r : quantity defined |
lƒnm/lfdƒnm ‘give’, |
domestic products, money |
by moving some quantity |
reg∫nm/gjregƒnm ‘buy’, |
|
away from source location |
ghbckƒnm/ghbcskƒnm ‘send’, |
|
to new location |
dpz´nm/,hƒnm ‘take’ [rare], |
|
|
pfyz´nm/pfybvƒnm ‘borrow’ |
|
|
[rare] |
|
c o n s u m p t i o n : quantity |
c(†cnm/c(tlƒnm ‘eat up’, |
liquids, foodstuffs |
defined by act of |
ukjnyénm/ukjnƒnm ‘swallow’, |
|
consumption |
ds´ gbnm/dsgbdƒnm ‘drink up’ |
|
a c c u m u l a t i o n : quantity |
yf,hƒnm/yf,bhƒnm ‘gather’, |
liquids; particulate mass; |
defined by act of |
yfk∫nm/yfkbdƒnm ‘pour’, |
abstracts (in idioms) |
accumulation, especially |
ghb,ƒdbnm/ghb,fdkΩnm ‘add |
|
increase over prior amount |
to’, lj,ƒdbnm/lj,fdkΩnm ‘add’ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[221]Uhtiybwf, z lfkf<pf pst> tq cdjt gfkmnj b ltytu<gen> yf ljhjue lj Vjcrds, relf jyf gjt[fkf [kjgjnfnm j djccnfyjdktybb.
Sinner that I am, I gave her my coat and money for the trip to Moscow, where she was going to see about her rehabilitation.
[222]Yb jlyjuj lyz yt ghjdtk jy d ghfplyjcnb, cjdctv pf,sk vepsre, hfccskfz gj dctv ue,thybzv gbcmvf c ghjcm,jq ghbckfnm<pf inf> ctvzy<gen> b cf;tywtd<gen> , tot rfvyz<gen> , tot ktce<gen2> , heufzcm c gjlhzlxbrjv.
He didn’t spend a single day in idleness, completely forgot music, sending out letters to every province asking them to send additional seeds and seedlings, stone, and lumber, cursing at the contractor.
The genitive is not used as partitive for imperfective actions in progress, as in jyf rfr hfp yfkbdfkf vyt {xfq<acc> / xfz<gen>} ‘she was just pouring out some tea’, inasmuch as the quantity becomes defined only as a result of a finished action.34 The partitive is not used with imperfectives reporting generalized activities:
[223]Veptq cnfk cjplfdfnmcz ktn nhbyflwfnm yfpfl, rjulf nehbpv yfxfk lfdfnm ltymub<acc> .
The museum was founded about thirteen years ago, when tourism began to produce money.
The partitive genitive can be used with imperfectives that report a series of separate events, each of which is completed; in [224], he was given a quantity of money on each visit:
34 Russell 1986.